Discussion History YMMV / TheAdventuresOfRobinHood

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood, and also, how would him being the first sound and color version even matter for him to be so iconic? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized).

Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it.
Hell, the Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the WhatGoesWhereontheWiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the What Goes Where on the Wiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.

I don\\\'t wanna seem like a sore loser, but I don\\\'t think Errol Flynn should be put as a Vanilla Protagonist, I really don\\\'t know a lot of people that considers him anything but one of, (if not the) best version of Robin Hood (and also how would him being the first sound and color version even matter with him being the considered the best version? This is a movie from 1938, the novelty of color and sound has been dead for longer than my parents have been alive. I think if Errol Flynn\\\'s popularity as Robin Hood depended solely on it more people by now would\\\'ve realized). Now yes, I know the whole point of YMMV is to collect subjective opinions regarding a work, but I think that it\\\'s pretty much agreed that at the very least a good deal of people should agree with it. Hell, the What Goes Whereon the Wiki page outright says \\\"In theory, Your Mileage May Vary on nearly all tropes. Who says that a Happy Ending is happy, for example? In practice, what we mean by a significant judgment call is exactly the duck test outlined above- an item falls under YMMV if people often disagree about it.\\\" and plenty of tropers and even mods seem to agree with this definition.