[002]
ZenBlade
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How should a single folder refer to multiple archetypes/series? So far we\'ve been using slashes (/), but it seems we have differing ideas on how to use the slashes, leading to inconsistencies in the folders. Some use the slash without putting spaces between the names and the slash, others do put spaces. If we\'re going to continue using slashes, I think using spaces would be better. In my opinion, slashes without spaces on single-word archetypes/series makes them look a bit messy and more difficult to parse. There\'s also the issue of archetypes/series that already use slashes in their names, such as D/D. Right now, the folder for D/D, D/D/D, and Dark Contract uses spaces, so it looks like \
to:
How should a single folder refer to multiple archetypes/series? So far we\\\'ve been using slashes (/), but it seems we have differing ideas on how to use the slashes, leading to inconsistencies in the folders. Some use the slash without putting spaces between the names and the slash, others do put spaces. If we\\\'re going to continue using slashes, I think using spaces would be better. In my opinion, slashes without spaces on single-word archetypes/series makes them look a bit messy and more difficult to parse. There\\\'s also the issue of archetypes/series that already use slashes in their names, such as D/D. Right now, the folder for D/D, D/D/D, and Dark Contract uses spaces, so it looks like \\\"D/D / D/D/D / Dark Contract\\\". If we decide to get rid of spaces, it becomes \\\"D/D/D/D/D/Dark Contract\\\". That\\\'s six \\\"D\\\"s in a row, separated only by slashes, and it\\\'s nearly impossible to tell just what is being referred to just looking at the folder title unless you already had knowledge of the archetypes. A reader unfamiliar might think the name \\\"D/D/D/D/D/Dark Contract\\\" refers to a single archetype and not a collection of three different archetypes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How should a single folder refer to multiple archetypes/series? So far we\'ve been using slashes (/), but it seems we have differing ideas on how to use the slashes, leading to inconsistencies in the folders. Some use the slash without putting spaces between the names and the slash, others do put spaces. If we\'re going to continue using slashes, I think uses spaces would be better. In my opinion, slashes without spaces on single-word archetypes/series makes them look a bit messy and more difficult to parse. There\'s also the issue of archetypes/series that already use slashes in their names, such as D/D. Right now, the folder for D/D, D/D/D, and Dark Contract uses spaces, so it looks like \
to:
How should a single folder refer to multiple archetypes/series? So far we\\\'ve been using slashes (/), but it seems we have differing ideas on how to use the slashes, leading to inconsistencies in the folders. Some use the slash without putting spaces between the names and the slash, others do put spaces. If we\\\'re going to continue using slashes, I think using spaces would be better. In my opinion, slashes without spaces on single-word archetypes/series makes them look a bit messy and more difficult to parse. There\\\'s also the issue of archetypes/series that already use slashes in their names, such as D/D. Right now, the folder for D/D, D/D/D, and Dark Contract uses spaces, so it looks like \\\"D/D / D/D/D / Dark Contract\\\". If we decide to get rid of spaces, it becomes \\\"D/D/D/D/D/Dark Contract\\\". That\\\'s six \\\"D\\\"s in a row, separated only by slashes, and it\\\'s nearly impossible to tell just what is being referred to just looking at the folder title unless you already had knowledge of the archetypes. A reader unfamiliar might think the name \\\"D/D/D/D/D/Dark Contract\\\" refers to a single archetype and not a collection of three different archetypes.
