[005]
MathsAngelicVersion
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From the description, this looks like it\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that you didn\'t care about them because the work didn\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing a story that goes out of its way to make the event even worse than it was in reality or portray the victims in an unflattering light.)
to:
It\\\'s listed on NoRealLife.NarrativeCharacterizationAndPlotTropes, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\\\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\\\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that you didn\\\'t care about them because the work didn\\\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing a story that goes out of its way to make the event even worse than it was in reality or portray the victims in an unflattering light.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From the description, this looks like it\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing a story that goes out of its way to make the event even worse than it was in reality.)
to:
From the description, this looks like it\\\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\\\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\\\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that you didn\\\'t care about them because the work didn\\\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing a story that goes out of its way to make the event even worse than it was in reality or portray the victims in an unflattering light.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From the description, this looks like it\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing something that goes out of its way to make the event seem even worse than it was in reality.)
to:
From the description, this looks like it\\\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\\\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\\\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\\\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing a story that goes out of its way to make the event even worse than it was in reality.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From the description, this looks like it\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\'t sanitize it enough).
to:
From the description, this looks like it\\\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\\\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\\\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\\\'t sanitize it enough. On the other hand, I would feel comfortable listing something that goes out of its way to make the event seem even worse than it was in reality.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From the description, this looks like it\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably safer. Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\'t sanitize it enough).
to:
From the description, this looks like it\\\'s restricted to fiction, which is probably the safer approach (especially when it comes to politically charged topics like this). Though media about fictional mass shootings could qualify. (I\\\'m not sure about media based on real tragedies -- as much as I wouldn\\\'t enjoy it, it seems tasteless to take a real event with real victims and complain that the work didn\\\'t sanitize it enough).
