[001]
WanderingBrowser
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I definitely agree that more \
to:
I definitely agree that more \\\"universal\\\" races should be kept on this page - humans, dwarves, elves, gnomes, halflings, half-elves, half-orcs, along with anything that wasn\\\'t really designed as part of a specific setting, like many of the races from 3e, such as spellscales. Probably also races that have multiple interpretations in multiple settings, such as dragonborn, who have their 3e lore, Nentir Vale lore, Forgotten Realms lore, and Eberron lore, none of which are identical.
Currently, we have setting specific character pages for TabletopGame/ForgottenRealms, Literature/{{Dragonlance}} (which could probably use some splitting), TabletopGame/{{Greyhawk}}, TabletopGame/{{Eberron}}, TabletopGame/{{Planescape}} and TabletopGame/{{Ravenloft}}. I would argue that at the very least we should consider adding character pages for TabletopGame/NentirVale, TabletopGame/{{Mystara}}, TabletopGame/DarkSun and TabletopGame/{{Spelljammer}}, given that these are all fairly large settings with multiple associated unique races. Sound logical?
Currently, we have setting specific character pages for TabletopGame/ForgottenRealms, Literature/{{Dragonlance}} (which could probably use some splitting), TabletopGame/{{Greyhawk}}, TabletopGame/{{Eberron}}, TabletopGame/{{Planescape}} and TabletopGame/{{Ravenloft}}. I would argue that at the very least we should consider adding character pages for TabletopGame/NentirVale, TabletopGame/{{Mystara}}, TabletopGame/DarkSun and TabletopGame/{{Spelljammer}}, given that these are all fairly large settings with multiple associated unique races. Sound logical?
