[004]
Severen
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To be honest, I\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\'s saying something. Just what is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\'t be victims in the same way women can? It\'s very disheartening to read an {{Anvilicious}} (though not necessarily bad) story like {{Bitter Virgin}}, then find out the author thinks the same situation, when gender-reversed, is nothing more than a big joke.
to:
To be honest, I\\\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\\\'s saying something. Just what is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\\\'t be victims in the same way women can? It\\\'s very disheartening to read an {{Anvilicious}} (though not necessarily bad) story like {{Bitter Virgin}}, then find out that the author thinks the same situation, when gender-reversed, is nothing more than a big joke.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To be honest, I\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\'s saying something. Just what is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\'t be victims in the same way women can? It\'s very disheartening to read an {{Anvilicious}} (though not necessarily bad) story like {{Bitter Virgin}}, then find out the author thinks the same situation, only gender-reversed, is nothing more than a big joke.
to:
To be honest, I\\\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\\\'s saying something. Just what is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\\\'t be victims in the same way women can? It\\\'s very disheartening to read an {{Anvilicious}} (though not necessarily bad) story like {{Bitter Virgin}}, then find out the author thinks the same situation, when gender-reversed, is nothing more than a big joke.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Was anyone else frighteningly disturbed by the fact that Kusunoki did both this manga and {{Bitter Virgin}}?
to:
Was anyone else disturbed by the fact that Kusunoki did both this manga and {{Bitter Virgin}}?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\'s saying something. Just what the hell is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\'t be victims in the same way women can?
to:
To be honest, I\\\'ve never seen a more blatant {{Double Standard}} from a particular mangaka in my life; {{Rumiko Takahashi}} has nothing on this woman, and that\\\'s saying something. Just what is she trying to prove with this? Does she really think men can\\\'t be victims in the same way women can? It\\\'s very disheartening to read an {{Anvilicious}} (though not necessarily bad) story like {{Bitter Virgin}}, then find out the author thinks the same situation, only gender-reversed, is nothing more than a big joke.
