[008]
WashTheLaundryHero
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Uraraka\'s page isn\'t that much longer than others like Kirishima or Momo right now. I say just split down the middle by seat order for now. Or however it\'s more balanced. I think right now that would be Aoyama to Kaminari in one page, Kirishima to Yaoyorozu in another.
to:
Uraraka\\\'s page isn\\\'t that much longer than others like Kirishima or Momo right now. I say just split down the middle by seat order for now. Or however it\\\'s more balanced in terms of page lenght. I think right now that would be Aoyama to Kaminari in one page, Kirishima to Yaoyorozu in another.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie doesn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but then it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie doesn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but then it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie doesn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie doesn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"AssPull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"Ass Pull: Ellie decides to spare Abby\\\'s life, despite the fact that none of the previous scenes hinted that Ellie even considered forgiving Joel\\\'s killer or at least renouncing to get revenge for his death; at best, she does the latter only reluctantly.\\\"\\\'\\\'
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
This one is kind of faulty worded as before the theater fight, both Ellie and Tommy agreed they were going back to Jackson and letting Abby live. It comes after Ellie was shaken from killing Owen and especially Mel, a pregnant woman, and before this again, she was traumatized from torturing Nora. It all implies Ellie was ready to let go of her quest and focus on getting Dina back to Jackson instead, realizing it was more important. But then Abby shows up and hell breaks loose again with Jesse killed and Tommy left handicapped. Approximately a year passes and Ellie didn\\\'t go after Abby that entire time, trying to live a peaceful life on the farm. It\\\'s not until Tommy shows up and guilt trips Ellie that she decides to try again, thinking it\\\'ll make her PTSD and nightmares end more than strictly get revenge at that point.
Bottom line: there \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' foreshadowing that Ellie was ready to abandon her quest, again, she and Tommy were even \\\'\\\'going to let Abby live and go back to Jackson\\\'\\\' before Abby showed up in the theater, so claiming Ellie \\\"showed no signs of wanting to renounce revenge\\\" is just untrue. I\\\'m not saying the trope itself should necessarily be removed, but it should be changed to different reasoning, for example ludonarrative dissonance i.e. \\\"Ellie kills hundreds of people but Abby is the only one she doesn\\\'t kill\\\" or along those lines, but the current reasoning just shows a direct misunderstanding of some of the more important story beats.
