[007]
alnair20aug93
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes on why should the historical tidbit on men wearing heels, the agreement on there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is. Though to me summing it up, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=88634&type=att#comment-251237 it had been agreed upon]] that this should be taken to TRS and there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels.
to:
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes on why should the historical tidbit on men wearing heels, the agreement on there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels should be included or not, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\\\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is. Though to me summing it up, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=88634&type=att#comment-251237 it had been agreed upon]] that this should be taken to TRS and there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes on why should the historical tidbit on men wearing heels, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is.
to:
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes on why should the historical tidbit on men wearing heels, the agreement on there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\\\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is. Though to me summing it up, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=88634&type=att#comment-251237 it had been agreed upon]] that this should be taken to TRS and there should be a separate trope for men wearing heels.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
to:
A TLP draft on men wearing heels was attempted, yet it was discarded because it wasn\\\'t tropeworthy. It might need another try.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is.
to:
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes on why should the historical tidbit on men wearing heels, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\\\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the edit wars, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is.
to:
Come to think of it, even prior to 2020 update regarding stealth launching, this trope felt rushed and catching on the 3 day rule. Even with all the wonking, the edit disputes, and now adding an example linking high heels and the economy, this feels like it\\\'s still underbaked and confused on what this trope truly is.
