[003]
Hawkatana
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[https://www.reddit.com/r/TNOmod/comments/lcm8kb/followup_on_the_previous_announcement/ Something semi-important]] just came up.
to:
[[https://www.reddit.com/r/TNOmod/comments/lcm8kb/followup_on_the_previous_announcement/ Something semi-important]] just came up regarding the devs being doxxed by Russian nazis.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
4. I don\'t see anything in ConflictBall that says it can only be applied when the conflict contradictions previous characterization. The very first line is \
to:
4. I don\\\'t see anything in ConflictBall that says it can only be applied when the conflict contradictions previous characterization. The very first line is \\\"A character introduces or provokes conflict for reasons which are weak \\\'\\\'\\\'or\\\'\\\'\\\' which contradict previous characterization.\\\"
5. Even with your definition of ConflictBall, I don\\\'t see why this example shouldn\\\'t apply. The player character and the player themselves can easily have a history of taking moral actions and making moral choices, and yet this scenario forces the player to abandon that characterization and either kill House or kill the Brotherhood, when there\\\'s no real reason why the moral conflict couldn\\\'t be, if not completely avoided, at minimum significantly mitigated.
5. Even with your definition of ConflictBall, I don\\\'t see why this example shouldn\\\'t apply. The player character and the player themselves can easily have a history of taking moral actions and making moral choices, and yet this scenario forces the player to abandon that characterization and either kill House or kill the Brotherhood, when there\\\'s no real reason why the moral conflict couldn\\\'t be, if not completely avoided, at minimum significantly mitigated.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
4. I don\'t see anything in ConflictBall that says it can only be applied when the conflict contradictions previous characterization. The very first line is \
to:
4. I don\\\'t see anything in ConflictBall that says it can only be applied when the conflict contradictions previous characterization. The very first line is \\\"A character introduces or provokes conflict for reasons which are weak \\\'\\\'\\\'or\\\'\\\'\\\' which contradict previous characterization.\\\"
5. Even with your definition of ConflictBall, I don\\\'t see why this example shouldn\\\'t apply. The player character and the player themselves can easily have a history of taking moral actions and making moral choices, and yet this scenario forces the player to abandon that characterization and either kill House or kill the Brotherhood, when there\\\'s no real reason why the moral conflict couldn\\\'t be, if not completely avoided, at minimum significantly mitigated.
5. Even with your definition of ConflictBall, I don\\\'t see why this example shouldn\\\'t apply. The player character and the player themselves can easily have a history of taking moral actions and making moral choices, and yet this scenario forces the player to abandon that characterization and either kill House or kill the Brotherhood, when there\\\'s no real reason why the moral conflict couldn\\\'t be, if not completely avoided, at minimum significantly mitigated.
