[001]
Perentie
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
As confused as I still am as to why they would make bisexual characters that only one Byleth can get with (even with Petra\'s case supposedly confirmed), I do think Ziodyne has a point that in some way it should be mentioned, especially in the case of Catherine/Shamir (while still noting that outside of such a paired ending Shamir\'s supports show zero same-sex interest). On the other hand, I still personally disagree that her love for Rhea is implied to be romantic, or at least conventionally romantic. One doesn\'t usually state they \
to:
As confused as I still am as to why they would make bisexual characters that only one Byleth can get with (even with Petra\\\'s case supposedly confirmed), I do think Ziodyne has a point that in some way the ambiguity should be mentioned, especially in the case of Catherine/Shamir (while still noting that outside of such a paired ending Shamir\\\'s supports show zero same-sex interest). On the other hand, I still personally disagree that her love for Rhea is implied to be romantic, or at least conventionally romantic. One doesn\\\'t usually state they \\\"revere\\\" the object of their romantic interest or treat them as the voice for communicating ultimate moral authority.
Perhaps MaybeEverAfter could even fit for Catherine/Shamir, given it\\\'s already used for a number of female/male paired endings where it\\\'s ambiguous if the relationship was romantic or not?
Perhaps MaybeEverAfter could even fit for Catherine/Shamir, given it\\\'s already used for a number of female/male paired endings where it\\\'s ambiguous if the relationship was romantic or not?
