[001]
EmeraldSky
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m leaning towards \
to:
I\\\'m leaning towards \\\"no\\\". There was a discussion in ATT about this [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=79630&type=att here]] (If the link doesn\\\'t work type Designated Hero in the ATT search and it\\\'ll show up) and they decided a few instances of \\\"moral grayness/villain-like actions\\\" did not count as Designated Hero. For reference, a couple of the instances discussed and nixed were Hermione jinxing the DA sign-up sheet (which caused a girl to be permanently disfigured) and Harry using Unforgivable Curses.
From my understanding, DesignatedHero is supposed to be repeated villainous actions made by heroes that we are supposed to see as good, correct, or justified. Unless I\\\'m forgetting something, RWBY\\\'s only \\\"villainous\\\" actions are yelling at/being cruel to Ozpin when he\\\'s pretty much the victim and stealing an airship (I\\\'m pretty sure Cordovin attracted the Grimm that threatened the town, not them). So I don\\\'t think that\\\'s enough.
From my understanding, DesignatedHero is supposed to be repeated villainous actions made by heroes that we are supposed to see as good, correct, or justified. Unless I\\\'m forgetting something, RWBY\\\'s only \\\"villainous\\\" actions are yelling at/being cruel to Ozpin when he\\\'s pretty much the victim and stealing an airship (I\\\'m pretty sure Cordovin attracted the Grimm that threatened the town, not them). So I don\\\'t think that\\\'s enough.
