Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Administrivia / WordCruft

Go To

[002] Terrie Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1) People are making the comparison based on those similarities. That the comparison could potentially be made to other items is irrelevant if people are not actually making those comparisons. That you disagree with the comparison is irrelevant because that it exists is factual.
to:
1) People are making the comparison based on those similarities. That the comparison could potentially be made to other items is irrelevant if people are not actually making those comparisons. That you disagree with the comparison is irrelevant because that it is being made is factual.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2) Your whole argument is based on the idea that Lind doesn\'t actually believe or support the stuff in the book, that\'s it\'s \
to:
2) Your whole argument is based on the idea that Lind doesn\\\'t actually believe or support the stuff in the book, that\\\'s it\\\'s \\\"just\\\" a story. When a guy who is one of the core proponents of the concepts of the evils of \\\"Cultural Marxism\\\" and Fourth Generation War writes a book about... evils of \\\"Cultural Marxism\\\" and Fourth Generation War, it\\\'s safe to say he agrees with the views in the book. I can\\\'t decide if I think you\\\'re naive or an apologist at this point.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2) Your whole argument is based on the idea that Lind doesn\'t actually believe or support the stuff in the book, that\'s it\'s \
to:
2) Your whole argument is based on the idea that Lind doesn\\\'t actually believe or support the stuff in the book, that\\\'s it\\\'s \\\"just\\\" a story. When a guy who is one of the core proponents of the concepts of the evils of \\\"Cultural Marxism\\\" and Fourth Generation War writes a book about... evils of \\\"Cultural Marxism\\\" and Fourth Generation War, it\\\'s safe to say he agrees with the views in the book. I can\\\'t decide if I think you\\\'re naive or an apologist at this point.
Top