Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History VideoGame / AdventureQuest3D

Go To

Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? Does this mean Daenerys destroying the city gates is the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender before the surrender happens? Or am I missing what this example is saying? I\'m hesitant to remove or edit in case I\'m not understanding it right.
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? Does this mean Daenerys destroying the city gates is the signal to begin the attack even in spite of surrender? Or am I missing what this example is saying? I\\\'m hesitant to remove or edit in case I\\\'m not understanding it right.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? Does this mean Daenerys destroying the city gates is the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender? Or am I missing what this example is saying?
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? Does this mean Daenerys destroying the city gates is the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender before the surrender happens? Or am I missing what this example is saying? I\\\'m hesitant to remove or edit in case I\\\'m not understanding it right.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? How is Daenerys destroying the city gates the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender? Or am I missing what this example is saying?
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? Does this mean Daenerys destroying the city gates is the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender? Or am I missing what this example is saying?
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack \\\'\\\'after\\\'\\\' the bells rang. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something? Or what these examples are saying? If so, I apologize.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers, who they faced in a stand-off before a battle in the city occurred. Then the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official.

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany attacked. If there was a signal, I think that was it -- after the surrender.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? How is Daenerys destroying the city gates the signal to begin the attack when the bells hadn\'t been rung yet? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? How is Daenerys destroying the city gates the signal to begin the attack in spite of surrender? Or am I missing what this example is saying?

Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering, it\\\'s not a signal to attack. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers. After a stand-off, the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official -- Grey Worm knew this, Dany knew this. Why would this be a case of \\\"In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege\\\"?

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany flew overhead. It wasn\\\'t triggered by the bells.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? How is the signal Daenerys destroying the city gates? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? How is Daenerys destroying the city gates the signal to begin the attack when the bells hadn\\\'t been rung yet? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering, it\\\'s not a signal to attack. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers. After a stand-off, the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official -- Grey Worm knew this, Dany knew this. Why would this be a case of \\\"In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege\\\"?

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany flew overhead. It wasn\\\'t triggered by the bells.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'m not sure what this means? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
I\\\'m not sure what this means? How is the signal Daenerys destroying the city gates? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering, it\\\'s not a signal to attack. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers. After a stand-off, the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official -- Grey Worm knew this, Dany knew this. Why would this be a case of \\\"In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege\\\"?

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany flew overhead. It wasn\\\'t triggered by the bells.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
-->Tyrion tells Daenerys that the sign for surrender is the city ringing the bells and opening the gates, to which she seemingly assents before Daenerys tells Grey Worm to wait for her signal and he\'ll know what to do. \'\'\'In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege. As is clear, the signal is Daenerys destroying the city gates all by herself well before anyone in King\'s Landing would be able to meet the second part of Tyrion\'s criteria.\'\'\'\\\\\\
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
-->Tyrion tells Daenerys that the sign for surrender is the city ringing the bells and opening the gates, to which she seemingly assents before Daenerys tells Grey Worm to wait for her signal and he\\\'ll know what to do. \\\'\\\'\\\'In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege. As is clear, the signal is Daenerys destroying the city gates all by herself well before anyone in King\\\'s Landing would be able to meet the second part of Tyrion\\\'s criteria.\\\'\\\'\\\'

I\\\'m not sure what this means? Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"

From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering, it\\\'s not a signal to attack. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers. After a stand-off, the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official -- Grey Worm knew this, Dany knew this. Why would this be a case of \\\"In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege\\\"?

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany flew overhead. It wasn\\\'t triggered by the bells.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
to:
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \\\"Cersei\\\'s followers will abandon her if they know the war is lost. Give them that chance. If the city surrenders, they will ring the bells and raise the gates. Please, if you hear them ringing the bells, call off the attack.\\\"
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Greyworm was present at the discussion between Daenerys and Tyrion when Tyrion said, \
to:
From this, Greyworm knew the bells meant surrender, regardless of Dany burning down the gate and not KL raising the gate themselves. In this situation, I think it\\\'s pretty clear what the bells ringing mean -- that the city is surrendering, it\\\'s not a signal to attack. The forces entered the city and met the Lannister soldiers. After a stand-off, the Lannister soldiers drop their weapons in clear defeat and the bells rang, making the surrender official -- Grey Worm knew this, Dany knew this. Why would this be a case of \\\"In context the signal is a sign to begin the attack or siege\\\"?

Likewise, Grey Worm didn\\\'t lead the attack until Dany flew overhead. It wasn\\\'t triggered by the bells.

-->AmbiguousSituation: Who ordered the bells to be rung? Cersei who is shown staring at the city skyline and making no orders. \\\'\\\'\\\'Random soldiers reacting in panic and acting on their own. None of that is made clear.\\\'\\\'\\\'

Panic among the soldiers didn\\\'t begin until Greyworm lead the attack. While it\\\'s not certain who rang the bells, I think it\\\'s clear what the bells meant.

Am I misunderstanding something?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
THe Great Fire war happened in AQ DF and AQWorlds, in all three games Galanoth had the hero to help him deal with the loss of his long time friend. It took the intervention of the hero and a lot of character development for Galanoth to yield to the request of the Avatar of the fire lord. I think prior to this game Galanoth had hit a moral event horion and a dispair event horizon. One of the things you find out in the first cut scene is that he is not only willing to kill good dragons he refuses to belive they exist. That said if (this may count as a minor spoiler) if you buy the gurdian dragon package and open the right chest you find a note that indicates Galanoth used to be a guadian. That\'s right. Guarudans to serve the Guardian Dragon. the chest contains the broken hilt of Galanoth\'s old guaridan blade. So you have an ex Guaridan dragon slayer who wants to erriadicate ALL dragons (does that include the Guardian Dragon?)
to:
THe Great Fire war happened in AQ DF and AQWorlds, in all three games Galanoth had the hero to help him deal with the loss of his long time friend. It took the intervention of the hero and a lot of character development for Galanoth to yield to the request of the Avatar of the fire lord. I think prior to this game Galanoth had hit a moral event horion and a dispair event horizon. One of the things you find out in the first cut scene is that he is not only willing to kill good dragons he refuses to belive they exist. That said if (this may count as a minor spoiler) if you buy the gurdian dragon package and open the right chest you find a note that indicates Galanoth used to be a guadian. That\\\'s right. Guarudans to serve the Guardian Dragon. the chest contains the broken hilt of Galanoth\\\'s old guaridan blade. So you have an ex Guaridan dragon slayer who wants to erriadicate ALL dragons (does that include the Guardian Dragon?) Wouldn\\\'t that make him and oathbreaker as well. Shame they didn\\\'t include an guardian only cut scene where a guaridan could call him out on this
Top