Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Film / Shazam2019

Go To

[003] rva98014 Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
The tone is hardly a SugarBowl and the disparity between the lighter scenes and the \
to:
The tone is hardly a SugarBowl and the disparity between the lighter scenes and the \\\"boardroom scene\\\" while intense, isn\\\'t outside of the balance of light-hearted and scary scenes from films like \\\"Gremlins\\\" or \\\"The Goonies\\\" or \\\"Raiders of the Lost Ark\\\".

I presented this to Ask The Tropers. You can check it out here:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=75413&type=att

Unfortunately, the feedback wasn\\\'t especially definitive. But there was a comment made that there would be a benefit in having a trope that sits between KnightOfCerebus and VileVillainSaccharineShow to account for a \\\"villain who is significantly darker than the rest of the work.\\\"

So this is leaving me with the impression that because a new trope would be helpful to bridge these two tropes, then VileVillainSaccharineShow is truly focusing on the tone of the story being a SugarBowl world that has a villain that wildly clashes with that tone.

In other words, it\\\'s not just about the gap between villain and story tone but that the setting has to be in a predominately saccharine world as well.

Given that interpretation, the trope really doesn\\\'t apply to Shazam. The story balances light-hearted, goofy moments with darker themes and has a strong villain in Dr. Sivana. There is the \\\"boardroom scene\\\" which, while horrifying, isn\\\'t any worse than the \\\"face-melt\\\" or \\\"propeller scene\\\" in \\\"Raiders\\\".

As such I propose removing the trope example from the main page.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There isn’t really anything heartwarming about that, though. If they had a good, healthy relationship beforehand, then maybe it would’ve meant something, but they didn’t. Even if they did, the fact that she’s emulating Tex’s style is kind of undercut by the fact that she’s trying to kill a hundred Texes.
to:
There isn’t really anything heartwarming about that, though. If they had a good, healthy relationship beforehand, then maybe it would’ve meant something, but they didn’t. Even if they did, Carolina emulating Tex’s style is kind of undercut by the fact that she’s trying to kill a hundred Texes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There isn’t really anything heartwarming about that, though. If they had a good, healthy relationship beforehand, then maybe it would’ve meant something, but they didn’t. Even if they did, the fact that she’s emulating Tex’s style is kind of undercut by the fact that she’s trying to kill a hundred Texes.
to:
There isn’t really anything heartwarming about that, though. If they had a good, healthy relationship beforehand, then maybe it would’ve meant something, but they didn’t. Even if they did, Carolina emulating Tex’s style is kind of undercut by the fact that she’s trying to kill a hundred Texes.
Top