[002]
Willy2537
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Okay, is there something even remotely morally right in caused a car to almost crash and kill its inhabitants? Freddy was pretty angry when he calls Shazam out on it, in addition to already being angry for his dickish behaviors earlier (which I coild understand does not qualify for an example). The point is, when the trope name says “What the Hell, Hero?”, you would expect any example in which someone calling out a hero for any action that caused harm would qualify, morally ambiguous or not, right? Can anyone explain why this is the case, and is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
to:
Okay, is there something even remotely morally right in caused a car to almost crash and kill its inhabitants? Freddy was pretty angry when he calls Shazam out on it, in addition to already being angry for his dickish behaviors earlier (which I coild understand does not qualify for an example). The point is, when the trope name says “What the Hell, Hero?”, you would expect any example in which someone calling out a hero for any action that caused harm would qualify, morally ambiguous or not, right? Why must an example be morally ambiguous or villainous actions only when even accidental actions or dickish behaviors can cause harm or distress to people around the hero as well and characters in-story do sometimes call them out on it.
Can anyone explain why? And is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
Can anyone explain why? And is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Okay, is there something even remotely morally right in caused a car to almost crash and kill its inhabitants? Freddy was pretty angry when he calls Shazam out on it, in addition to already being angry for his dickish behaviors earlier (which I coild understand does not qualify for an example). The point is, when the trope name says “What the Hell, Hero?”, you would expect any example in which someone calling out a hero for any action that caused harm would qualify, morally ambiguous or not, right? Can anyone explain why this is the case, and is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
to:
Okay, is there something even remotely morally right in caused a car to almost crash and kill its inhabitants? Freddy was pretty angry when he calls Shazam out on it, in addition to already being angry for his dickish behaviors earlier (which I coild understand does not qualify for an example). The point is, when the trope name says “What the Hell, Hero?”, you would expect any example in which someone calling out a hero for any action that caused harm would qualify, morally ambiguous or not, right? Why must an example be morally ambiguous or villainous actions only when even accidental actions or dickish behaviors can cause harm or distress to people around the hero as well and characters in-story do sometimes call them out on it.
Can anyone explain why? And is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
Can anyone explain why? And is there a need to word the trope name better so people don’t get confuse about what qualifies as an example or not?
