Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / TheFlash

Go To
[005] Acomicfan1 Current Version
17th Feb '18 at 03:17:45 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To be fair, I misread the end of your quote. But there is nothing really fair about this solution. You suggested a compromise, but what you suggested is not a compromise as it does not eliminate the issue of the inclusion being the problem.
to:
To be fair, I misread the end of your quote. But there is nothing really fair about this solution. You say that you suggested a compromise, but what you suggested is not a compromise as it does not eliminate the issue of the inclusion being the problem.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, you shouldn't have added it again without talking about it first.
to:
Also, you shouldn\'t have added it again without talking about it first.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Those two statements don't mean the same thing. 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights' can be a part of 'stopping a flame war' but 'stopping a flame war' is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights'. Also, I am not going to look through the wiki to find examples of this one thing. It is in the text that it is to stop flame wars and that is what I am trying to do.
to:
Those two statements don\'t mean the same thing. \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\' can be a part of \'stopping a flame war\' but \'stopping a flame war\' is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\'. Also, I am not going to look through the wiki to find examples of this one thing. It is in the text that it is to stop flame wars and that is what I am trying to do.
[004] Acomicfan1
17th Feb '18 at 03:13:56 PM
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, you shouldn't have added it again without talking about it first.
to:
Also, you shouldn\'t have added it again without talking about it first.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Those two statements don't mean the same thing. 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights' can be a part of 'stopping a flame war' but 'stopping a flame war'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights'. Also, I am not going to look through the wiki to find examples of this one thing. It is in the text that it is to stop flame wars and that is what I am trying to do.
to:
Those two statements don\'t mean the same thing. \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\' can be a part of \'stopping a flame war\' but \'stopping a flame war\' is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\'. Also, I am not going to look through the wiki to find examples of this one thing. It is in the text that it is to stop flame wars and that is what I am trying to do.
[003] Acomicfan1
17th Feb '18 at 03:13:04 PM
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, you shouldn't have added it again without talking about it first.
to:
Also, you shouldn\'t have added it again without talking about it first.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Those two statements don't mean the same thing. 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights' can be a part of 'stopping a flame war' but 'stopping a flame war'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights'.
to:
Those two statements don\'t mean the same thing. \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\' can be a part of \'stopping a flame war\' but \'stopping a flame war\'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\'. Also, I am not going to look through the wiki to find examples of this one thing. It is in the text that it is to stop flame wars and that is what I am trying to do.
[002] Acomicfan1
17th Feb '18 at 03:11:27 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To be fair, I misread the end of your quote. But there is nothing really fair about this solution. You suggested a compromise, but what you suggest is not a compromise as it does not eliminate the issue of the inclusion being the problem.
to:
To be fair, I misread the end of your quote. But there is nothing really fair about this solution. You suggested a compromise, but what you suggested is not a compromise as it does not eliminate the issue of the inclusion being the problem.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Adding a Broken Base but removing the Dork Age would be a fair compromise that would cause fewer issues and that is what we should do. So unless you have anymore objections, I am going to remove it again.
to:
Adding a Broken Base but removing the Dork Age would be a fair compromise that would cause fewer issues and that is what we should do. So unless you have any more objections, I am going to remove it again.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, you shouldn't have added it again without talking about it first.
to:
Also, you shouldn\'t have added it again without talking about it first.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Those two statements don't mean the same thing. 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights' can be a part of 'stopping a flame war' but 'stopping a flame war'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights'.
to:
Those two statements don\'t mean the same thing. \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\' can be a part of \'stopping a flame war\' but \'stopping a flame war\'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\'.
[001] Acomicfan1
17th Feb '18 at 03:10:42 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No, the suggestion was to remove the Dork Age and put in the Broken Base instead that is the compromise that would stop flame wars and that is what we should do. You should not have added another Dork Age entry without consulting the thread, you asked if it would be ok to add it with changed wording, and I said that it isn't the wording that is the issue it is the fact that it was added.
to:
To be fair, I misread the end of your quote. But there is nothing really fair about this solution. You suggested a compromise, but what you suggest is not a compromise as it does not eliminate the issue of the inclusion being the problem.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, you shouldn't have added it again without talking about it first.
to:
Also, you shouldn\'t have added it again without talking about it first.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Those two statements don't mean the same thing. 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights' can be a part of 'stopping a flame war' but 'stopping a flame war'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from 'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights'.
to:
Those two statements don\'t mean the same thing. \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\' can be a part of \'stopping a flame war\' but \'stopping a flame war\'is a lot broader than that and includes a lot of other things aside from \'Stopping people from intentionally starting fights\'.

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top