Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / TheLastJedi

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I had given thought to replacing the current page images with [[https://img.purch.com/h/1400/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uZXdzYXJhbWEuY29tL2ltYWdlcy9pLzAwMC8yMzkvMzAzL29yaWdpbmFsL0NBUE1BUlYyMDE5MDAxX1Jvc3NfY3ZyLmpwZz8xNTM5NzE1OTU1 this one]], since it shows all of Carol\'s outfits and identities through the years in a single picture rather than three or four.
to:
I had given thought to replacing the current page images with [[https://twitter.com/thealexrossart/status/1052278141136310273 this one]], since it shows all of Carol\\\'s outfits and identities through the years in a single picture rather than three or four.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I had given thought to replacing the current page images with this once, since it shows all of Carol\'s outfits and identities through the years in a single picture rather than three or four.
to:
I had given thought to replacing the current page images with [[https://img.purch.com/h/1400/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uZXdzYXJhbWEuY29tL2ltYWdlcy9pLzAwMC8yMzkvMzAzL29yaWdpbmFsL0NBUE1BUlYyMDE5MDAxX1Jvc3NfY3ZyLmpwZz8xNTM5NzE1OTU1 this one]], since it shows all of Carol\\\'s outfits and identities through the years in a single picture rather than three or four.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
https://img.purch.com/h/1400/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uZXdzYXJhbWEuY29tL2ltYWdlcy9pLzAwMC8yMzkvMzAzL29yaWdpbmFsL0NBUE1BUlYyMDE5MDAxX1Jvc3NfY3ZyLmpwZz8xNTM5NzE1OTU1
to:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we're going into some advanced form of
to:
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we\'re going into some advanced form of \"legal\" debate about conditionality of the tropes themselves. ShockingSwerve explicitly mentions CharacterDerailment as a valid argument, right on the main page. In addition, the notion that CharacterDerailment argument may be dismissed simply because there is \'\'any\'\' explanation, including broken logic or HandWave, is really sketchy and not immediately obvious. As such both tropes should be analyzed. Maybe take this to the forums?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we're going into some advanced form of
to:
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we\'re going into some advanced form of \"legal\" debate about \"laws\" themselves. ShockingSwerve explicitly mentions CharacterDerailment as a valid argument, right on the main page. In addition, the notion that CharacterDerailment argument may be dismissed simply because there is \'\'any\'\' explanation, including broken logic or HandWave, is really sketchy and not immediately obvious. As such both tropes should be analyzed. Maybe take this to the forums?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we're going into some advanced form of
to:
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we\'re going into some advanced form of \"legal\" debate. ShockingSwerve explicitly mentions CharacterDerailment as a valid argument, right on the main page. In addition, the notion that CharacterDerailment argument may be dismissed simply because there is \'\'any\'\' explanation, including broken logic or HandWave, is really sketchy and not immediately obvious. As such both tropes should be analyzed. Maybe take this to the forums?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we're going into some advanced form of
to:
Guess we really need an expert opinion on this matter because now we\'re going into some advanced form of \"legal\" debate. ShockingSwerve explicitly mentions CharacterDerailment as a valid argument, right on the main page. In addition, the presumption that CharacterDerailment may be dismissed simply because there is \'\'any\'\' explanation, including broken logic or HandWave, is really sketchy and not immediately obvious. As such both tropes should be analyzed. Maybe take this to the forums?
Top