I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, but it states facts that tangibly happened (a Facebook user is boasting about a feat that he may or may not have performed, and cites gender politics as a motivating factor). Just in case, I could also propose a similar entry without linking to the article:
to:
The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, but it states facts that tangibly happened (a Facebook user is boasting about a feat that he may or may not have performed, and cites gender politics as a motivating factor). Just in case, I could also propose a similar entry without linking to the article:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception, as well as whether it influenced its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception, as well as whether it influenced its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? It \'\'is\'\' a touchy issue.
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception, as well as whether it influenced its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, but it states facts that tangibly happened (a Facebook user is boasting about a feat that they may or may not have performed, and cites gender politics as a motivating factor). Just in case, I could also propose a similar entry without linking to the article:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, but it states facts that tangibly happened (a Facebook user is boasting about a feat that he may or may not have performed, and cites gender politics as a motivating factor). Just in case, I could also propose a similar entry without linking to the article:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, so I could also remove it and rewrite the entry as such:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, but it states facts that tangibly happened (a Facebook user is boasting about a feat that they may or may not have performed, and cites gender politics as a motivating factor). Just in case, I could also propose a similar entry without linking to the article:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article, so I could also remove it and rewrite the entry as such:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception, as well as its vocally mixed fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens''the importance and prominence of the movie's female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film's conception and fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and reception. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film's controversy as a whole:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have had some role in the movie's vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\'the importance and prominence of the movie\'s female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo has raised debates on the role of feminism in the film\'s conception and fan reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film's controversy as a whole:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film\'s controversy as a whole:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have had some role in the movie's vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have had some role in the movie\'s vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film's controversy as a whole:
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film\'s controversy as a whole:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have some role in the movie's vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have had some role in the movie\'s vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]].
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]]. So another possibility could be to merely briefly allude to how the politics have figured into the film\'s controversy as a whole:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be - to the point that some fans argue that gender politics have some role in the movie\'s vocally mixed reception. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it's basically its own thing. So:
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, bland may be preferable.
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment bland may be preferable]].
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead?
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead? I thought of rewriting the entry talking about the Holdo/Poe subplot to talk about the female leads in general, but it cites so many sources that it\'s basically its own thing. So:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral ''and'' very bland entry, but when you're dealing with heated political issues, bland may be preferable.
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, bland may be preferable.
In that case, may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead?
to:
I do think there could be a way to allude to the issue without getting too deep into controversy and instigating heavy bias or FlameBait, so may I propose adding another entry under WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical instead?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
**Like with ''Film/TheForceAwakens'', the movie's feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie's Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
to:
**Like with \'\'Film/TheForceAwakens\'\', the movie\'s feminism (via four of its female leads in Rey, Leia, Rose and Holdo) has raised debates on how politicized that aspect of the film is or was meant to be. Numerous websites have reported on a Website/{{Facebook}} {{troll}} [[https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-group-with-ridiculous-name-takes-credit-for-1821509821 taking credit]] (however falsely) for tanking the movie\'s Website/RottenTomatoes score due to gender politics. However, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment the issue is best discussed elsewhere]].
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all?
to:
Or is it better off not mentioning it at all? The mere mention of the AV Club article (or related articles) automatically adds some degree of feminist bias due to the derisive tone of the article; I feel that removing the middle sentence would make for a very neutral \'\'and\'\' very bland entry, but when you\'re dealing with heated political issues, bland may be preferable.
