[002]
GriffinPilgrim
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My argument was that Triss was not fostering a misconception. She didn't tell Geralt or imply to him that they were in a relationship (the sex remains casual until halfway through Act 3, maybe, depending on player choice).
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don't think she's a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn't. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt's relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don't think she's a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn't. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt's relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him
to:
My argument was that Triss was not fostering a misconception. She didn\'t tell Geralt or imply to him that they were in a relationship (the sex remains casual until halfway through Act 3, maybe, depending on player choice).
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don\'t think she\'s a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn\'t. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt\'s relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over now. Telling him \"you had a girlfriend called Yennefer and she died\" would have been the decent thing to do given that Yennefer was her friend but, since she was apparently dead, his previous relationship was no more relevant to him sleeping with her now than his past relationship with Fringilla Vigo did. If she\'s going to tell Geralt about every woman he\'s slept with they\'re gonna be there a while. Her behaviour is FAR from free from reproach but it is not rape.
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don\'t think she\'s a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn\'t. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt\'s relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over now. Telling him \"you had a girlfriend called Yennefer and she died\" would have been the decent thing to do given that Yennefer was her friend but, since she was apparently dead, his previous relationship was no more relevant to him sleeping with her now than his past relationship with Fringilla Vigo did. If she\'s going to tell Geralt about every woman he\'s slept with they\'re gonna be there a while. Her behaviour is FAR from free from reproach but it is not rape.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My argument was that Triss was not fostering a misconception. She didn't tell Geralt or imply to him that they were in a relationship (the sex remains casual until halfway through Act 3, maybe, depending on player choice).
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don't think she's a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn't. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt's relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don't think she's a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn't. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt's relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him
to:
My argument was that Triss was not fostering a misconception. She didn\'t tell Geralt or imply to him that they were in a relationship (the sex remains casual until halfway through Act 3, maybe, depending on player choice).
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don\'t think she\'s a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn\'t. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt\'s relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him \"you had a girlfriend called Yennefer and she died\" would have been the decent thing to do given that Yennefer washer friend but, since she was apparently dead, his previous relationship was no more relevant to him sleeping with her now than his past relationship with Fringilla Vigo did. If she\'s going to tell Geralt about every woman he\'s slept with they\'re gonna be there a while. Her behaviour is FAR from free from reproach but it is not rape.
That Triss was not wrong was never something I was arguing. I just don\'t think she\'s a rapist. Now if Triss thought Yennefer was alive maybe I could see it but she didn\'t. As far as she had any way of knowing Yennefer was dead and Geralt\'s relationship with her had as much relevance as, say, his relationship with Fringilla Vigo since it was over. Telling him \"you had a girlfriend called Yennefer and she died\" would have been the decent thing to do given that Yennefer washer friend but, since she was apparently dead, his previous relationship was no more relevant to him sleeping with her now than his past relationship with Fringilla Vigo did. If she\'s going to tell Geralt about every woman he\'s slept with they\'re gonna be there a while. Her behaviour is FAR from free from reproach but it is not rape.
