[001]
jameygamer
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* CriticalBacklash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it's predecessor has. Getting accused of having this opinion because of nostalgia is very likely. Though pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits is fine for most.
to:
* CriticalBacklash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it\'s predecessor has. Getting accused of having this opinion because of nostalgia is very likely. Though pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits is fine for most.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it's predecessor has. Though pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some
to:
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it\'s predecessor has. Though pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some \"fixes\" made the new style\'s problems worse is fine for most.
And the third version:
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it\'s predecessor has; quite a lot of people are getting fed up with this criticism simply because it is not judging the game on it\'s own merits and often used in connection with nostalgia. Pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some \"fixes\" made the new style\'s problems worse is fine for most.
And the last:
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems its predecessor has. Pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some \"fixes\" made the new style\'s problems worse is fine for most.
What should we word this as? Or should we get rid of this?
And the third version:
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems it\'s predecessor has; quite a lot of people are getting fed up with this criticism simply because it is not judging the game on it\'s own merits and often used in connection with nostalgia. Pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some \"fixes\" made the new style\'s problems worse is fine for most.
And the last:
* Critical Backlash: Criticising the game for not being like the first two Paper Mario games is a good way to cause this given the game fixes most of the problems its predecessor has. Pointing out the flaws the game has on its own merits or expressing when you feel some \"fixes\" made the new style\'s problems worse is fine for most.
What should we word this as? Or should we get rid of this?
