[003]
Ninja857142
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they're not as important as Cinder, they're still significant and pivotal. I'm not even sure if the term
to:
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they\'re not as important as Cinder, they\'re still significant and pivotal. I\'m not even sure if the term \"Warm-Up Boss\" applies outside of video games. Thoughts?
Edit: I\'d also like to note that the [[Laconic/AnticlimaxBoss laconic description]] for AntiClimaxBoss is simply \"A boss that ends up much easier than expected, despite anything the plot may imply.\" Roman and Adam would definitely apply. From the way both the laconic and main pages describe it, the AnticlimaxBoss doesn\'t even have to be a ClimaxBoss; it simply has to be a boss with buildup who turns out to be a breeze.
Edit: I\'d also like to note that the [[Laconic/AnticlimaxBoss laconic description]] for AntiClimaxBoss is simply \"A boss that ends up much easier than expected, despite anything the plot may imply.\" Roman and Adam would definitely apply. From the way both the laconic and main pages describe it, the AnticlimaxBoss doesn\'t even have to be a ClimaxBoss; it simply has to be a boss with buildup who turns out to be a breeze.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they're not as important as Cinder, they're still significant and pivotal. I'm not even sure if the term
to:
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they\'re not as important as Cinder, they\'re still significant and pivotal. I\'m not even sure if the term \"Warm-Up Boss\" applies outside of video games. Thoughts?
Edit: I\'d also like to note that the [[Laconic/AnticlimaxBoss laconic description]] for AntiClimaxBoss is simply \"A boss that ends up much easier than expected, despite anything the plot may imply.\" Roman and Adam would definitely apply.
Edit: I\'d also like to note that the [[Laconic/AnticlimaxBoss laconic description]] for AntiClimaxBoss is simply \"A boss that ends up much easier than expected, despite anything the plot may imply.\" Roman and Adam would definitely apply.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they're not as important as Cinder, they're still significant and pivotal. I'm not even sure if the term
to:
Okay, I moved to add AntiClimaxBoss for Roman and Adam, and it was cut on the grounds that neither is a ClimaxBoss, and both are a WarmupBoss. I have to disagree; both are very important, pivotal characters who were built up for quite a while, and were shown to be quite dangerous in combat. Even if they\'re not as important as Cinder, they\'re still significant and pivotal. I\'m not even sure if the term \"Warm-Up Boss\" applies outside of video games. Thoughts?
