[003]
Emu0
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is
to:
How is \"lack of M/M options\" inherently petty, though? That sums it up; there were not sufficient options. It\'s a perfectly legitimate reason to be bothered.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about achievements. Hell, a lot of people don\'t care about the romances at all. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about achievements. Hell, a lot of people don\'t care about the romances at all. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is
to:
How is \"lack of M/M options\" inherently petty, though? That sums it up; there were not sufficient options. It\'s a perfectly legitimate reason to be bothered.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about romances, especially romance-related ones. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about romances, especially romance-related ones. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is
to:
How is \"lack of M/M options\" inherently petty, though? That sums it up, and it\'s a perfectly legitimate reason to be bothered.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about romances, especially romance-related ones. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
The significance of \"squadmate\" romances is going to sound petty anyway to people not already part of the discussion, and not everyone cares about romances, especially romance-related ones. If someone fundamentally doesn\'t get that there are people who identify with the characters/are very invested in the romances and thus feel slighted when they\'re limited to a few side characters, that\'s on them, and they won\'t change their mind with a longer explanation.
The issue is that TV Tropes is made to catalogue tropes, not sell specific viewpoints, and whatever reasons you outline are going to sound petty to people who disagree with you anyway.
The point of the edit was to make the entry concise as possible and cut down on extended explanations of *why* something went over badly. That\'s what\'s going on with all the entries right now. I agree with what you\'re saying, but that just isn\'t the point of trope entries, YMMV or not.
