... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
\"... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...\"
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn't done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn\'t done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn't done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn\'t done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
Decline : Dead. Killed in Ltt P. Has been resurrected. Died again. Maybe has reincarnated by the point of the original games.
to:
Decline : Dead. Killed in Ltt P. Has been resurrected. Died again. Maybe has reincarnated by the time of the original games.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn't done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn\'t done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
Decline : Dead. Killed in Ltt P Maybe has reincarnated or been resurrected.
to:
Decline : Dead. Killed in Ltt P. Has been resurrected. Died again. Maybe has reincarnated by the point of the original games.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Why would Calamity Ganon giving up his power to reincarnate in the final battle be such a big deal if he hasn\'t done it before? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact then that takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact anymore that the game takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
... In a '''past more distant''' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
to:
... In a \'\'\'past more distant\'\'\' than even the Great Calamity or the creation of the Divine Beast Vah Ruta...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. But there is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon '''has''' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
to:
Understatement there. But it is just a reference. There is still not any evidence Calamity Ganon is the same from OOT other than you suppose he is. Does the very fact that Ganon \'\'\'has\'\'\' reincarnated debunk the theory that every Ganon are one and the same? Plus it falls apart under further scrutiny, like what branch of the timeline does it fall in.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact then that it took place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after a
to:
Just because there are references to OOT does not mean you can objectively state that it takes place 10,000 years after it. There are references to TP as well. Bot W could take place 10K years after TP and not change anything. But it would not be a fact then that takes place 10k years after OOT. So saying it takes place after \"a previous game\" is safer than saying it takes place after OOT.
