Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / MassEffectAndromeda

Go To

[006] AntMan Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->
to:
-->\"\'\'PragmaticAdaptation: In the comics, Hela is Loki\'s daughter. Instead, in this film she\'s [[spoiler:conflated with [[Comicbook/AngelaMarvelComics Angela]], Thor and Loki\'s long-lost sister. No doubt this in part because it makes more sense for Odin to have a secret child, and]] partly because the audience subconsciously wouldn\'t be able to accept Loki[[note]] played by 36-year-old--\'\'and\'\' OlderThanHeLooks--Creator/TomHiddleston, even if Asgardians tend to be ReallySevenHundredYearsOld[[/note]] having a fully grown daughter[[note]]played by 48-year-old Creator/CateBlanchett[[/note]].\'\'\"

Am I the only one who thinks that if the audience has trouble accepting that \'\'a something-hundred year old adult\'\' could have a fully-grown daughter, then they\'re just being downright unreasonable?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->
to:
-->\"\'\'PragmaticAdaptation: In the comics, Hela is Loki\'s daughter. Instead, in this film she\'s [[spoiler:conflated with [[Comicbook/AngelaMarvelComics Angela]], Thor and Loki\'s long-lost sister. No doubt this in part because it makes more sense for Odin to have a secret child, and]] partly because the audience subconsciously wouldn\'t be able to accept Loki[[note]] played by 36-year-old--\'\'and\'\' OlderThanHeLooks--Creator/TomHiddleston, even if Asgardians tend to be ReallySevenHundredYearsOld[[/note]] having a fully grown daughter[[note]]played by 48-year-old Creator/CateBlanchett[[/note]].\'\'\"

Am I the only one who thinks that if the audience has trouble accepting that \'\'a something-hundred year old adult\'\' could have a fully-grown daughter, then they\'re just being downright unreasonable?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I'm not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I'm neutral on them until we learn more, and I found the Collectors genuinely menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it's rehashing a conversation that's already been had on the discussion page.
to:
I\'m not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I\'m neutral on them until we learn more, and I found the Collectors genuinely menacing), but, again, this is rehashing a conversation that\'s already been had on the discussion page, and, quite frankly, it feels a little bit like your main goal is to bash the kett and you\'re looking for tropes to bash the kett *with*.
I apologize if that\'s not your intention, but this is a thing that\'s happened on this page already, so it just kinda looks like more of the same.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
With the Applicability bit, I feel like it's not just a matter of differing opinion, but a potentially *very* inflammatory topic.
to:
With the Applicability bit, I feel like it\'s not just a matter of differing opinion, but a potentially *very* inflammatory topic.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I'm not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I'm neutral on them until we learn more, and I found the Collectors genuinely menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it's rehashing a conversation that's already been had on the discussion page.
to:
I\'m not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I\'m neutral on them until we learn more, and I found the Collectors genuinely menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it\'s rehashing a conversation that\'s already been had on the discussion page.

With the Applicability bit, I feel like it\'s not just a matter of differing opinion, but a potentially *very* inflammatory topic.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
You find the Collectors sympathetic because they used to be Protheans. The kett used to be angara, cannot go back to being angara, and they're 100% not sympathetic because of the specific mechanics?
I'm not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I'm neutral on them, and I found the Collectors a thousand times more menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it's rehashing a conversation that's already been had on the discussion page.
to:
You find the Collectors sympathetic because they used to be Protheans. The kett used to be angara, cannot go back to being angara, and the individual that they were before is gone.

I\'m not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I\'m neutral on them until we learn more, and I found the Collectors genuinely menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it\'s rehashing a conversation that\'s already been had on the discussion page.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
You find that the Collectors are sympathetic because they used to be Protheans. The kett used to be angara, cannot go back to being angara, and they're 100% not sympathetic because of the specific mechanics?
I'm not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I'm neutral on them, and I found the Collectors a thousand times more menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing.
to:
You find the Collectors sympathetic because they used to be Protheans. The kett used to be angara, cannot go back to being angara, and they\'re 100% not sympathetic because of the specific mechanics?
I\'m not saying I particularly *like* the kett (I\'m neutral on them, and I found the Collectors a thousand times more menacing), but, again, this is just kinda feeling like off-topic bashing and it\'s rehashing a conversation that\'s already been had on the discussion page.
Top