[005]
Loremasta1
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put the shoe on the other foot, it's likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would (understandably) be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would be cancelled before it even reached cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don't call this movie misandrist is because I don't know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far, and it's unlikely they'd openly admit to misandry if that was their motivation). Either way, we can't edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that's for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
to:
To put the shoe on the other foot, it\'s likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would (understandably) be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would be cancelled before it even reached cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don\'t call this movie misandrist is because I don\'t know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far, and it\'s unlikely they\'d openly admit to misandry if that played a role). Either way, we can\'t edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that\'s for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put the shoe on the other foot, it's likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would be cancelled before it even reached cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don't call this movie misandrist is because I don't know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far, and it's unlikely they'd openly admit to misandry if that was their motivation). Either way, we can't edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that's for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
to:
To put the shoe on the other foot, it\'s likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would (understandably) be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would be cancelled before it even reached cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don\'t call this movie misandrist is because I don\'t know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far, and it\'s unlikely they\'d openly admit to misandry if that was their motivation). Either way, we can\'t edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that\'s for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put the shoe on the other foot, it's likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would never even make it to cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don't call this movie misandrist is because I don't know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far). Either way, we can't edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that's for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
to:
To put the shoe on the other foot, it\'s likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would be cancelled before it even reached cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don\'t call this movie misandrist is because I don\'t know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far, and it\'s unlikely they\'d openly admit to misandry if that was their motivation). Either way, we can\'t edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that\'s for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put the shoe on the other foot, it's likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would never even make it to cinemas. For me the only reason I don't call this movie misandrist is because I don't know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far). Either way, we can't edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that's for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
to:
To put the shoe on the other foot, it\'s likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil [[DoubleStandard it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would never even make it to cinemas]]. For me the only reason I don\'t call this movie misandrist is because I don\'t know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far). Either way, we can\'t edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that\'s for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
NubianSatyress; the accusation of misandry is because every man in the movie is portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil. It's like that if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would never even make it to cinemas. For me the only reason I don't call this movie misandrist is because I don't know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far). Either way, we can't edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that's for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
to:
NubianSatyress; you make a good point. The accusation of misandry is because every man in the movie is portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil (it happened to Mad Max: Fury Road, as I stated above, which had a more positive portrayal of men).
Changed line(s) 4 from:
to:
To put the shoe on the other foot, it\'s likely if there was a movie where the heroes were all men and every woman was portrayed as stupid, wrong and/or evil it would be lambasted so strongly as misogynist it would never even make it to cinemas. For me the only reason I don\'t call this movie misandrist is because I don\'t know whether that was the intent of the filmmakers (it certainly looks like this or feminist sentiment taken too far). Either way, we can\'t edit the YMMV page, so I suppose that\'s for a mod who sees our discussion to decide.
