[005]
Eagal
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Given: Sam is racist, confrontational and antagonistic.
Given: People consider these to be positive traits.
Conclusion: Yes, it is MisaimedFandom.
IF what you say is true then you're right that she isn't part of the satire. That doesn't make her actions or words acceptable.
Authorial intent is not otherwise relevant in this context.
And in fact, Sam is a pretty strong case for UnintentionallyUnsympathetic if she is supposed to be right.
Given: People consider these to be positive traits.
Conclusion: Yes, it is MisaimedFandom.
IF what you say is true then you're right that she isn't part of the satire. That doesn't make her actions or words acceptable.
Authorial intent is not otherwise relevant in this context.
And in fact, Sam is a pretty strong case for UnintentionallyUnsympathetic if she is supposed to be right.
to:
Edit: Seems like I\'m wrong. Still seems fishy to me.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
IF what you say is true then you're right that she isn't part of the satire. That doesn't make her actions or words acceptable.
to:
IF what you say is true then you\'re right that she isn\'t part of the satire. That doesn\'t make her actions or words acceptable.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
to:
And in fact, Sam is a pretty strong case for UnintentionallyUnsympathetic if she is supposed to be right.
