Remark History - TV Tropes

[003] KingZeal

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn't a good example of a trope. I'm not going to take a personal chainsaw to an entire trope just because ''YOU'' have an issue with my example.

to:

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn\'t a good example of a trope. I\'m not going to take a personal chainsaw to an entire trope just because \'\'YOU\'\' have an issue with my example.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

Also, I know that the laconic isn't the sole arbiter. Which is why I ''also'' included the description in my original argument and also mentioned the examples. You're the person who used ''ONLY'' the PlayingWith page as evidence for your viewpoint.

to:

Also, I know that the laconic isn\'t the sole arbiter. Which is why I \'\'also\'\' included the description in my original argument and also mentioned the examples. You\'re the person who used \'\'ONLY\'\' the PlayingWith page as evidence for your viewpoint.

[002] KingZeal

5th Aug '16 at 07:27:13 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn't a good example of a trope. I'm not going to take a personal chainsaw to an entire trope just because ''YOU'' have an issue with my example.

to:

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn\'t a good example of a trope. I\'m not going to take a personal chainsaw to an entire trope just because \'\'YOU\'\' have an issue with my example.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

Also, I know that the laconic isn't the sole arbiter. Which is why I ''also'' included the description in my original argument. However, to the point, the trope description and the examples below do NOT give any criteria on what it means for something to be

to:

Also, I know that the laconic isn\'t the sole arbiter. Which is why I \'\'also\'\' included the description in my original argument and also mentioned the examples. You\'re the person who used \'\'ONLY\'\' the PlayingWith page as evidence for your viewpoint.

However, to the point, the trope description and the examples below do NOT give any criteria on what it means for something to be \"a loss\" to the heroes. Going strictly by the description, the laconic, \'\'AND\'\' the examples provided in the trope, everything points towards the Thousand Year War being an example of the trope, only for it \'\'not\'\' to be during the penultimate chapter.

And no, I don\'t agree with waiting until the next chapter. Another part of the description of the trope is that it creates a BittersweetEnding or a DownerEnding when the situation occurs at the finale of a story. The name of this chapter is \'\'literally\'\' a happy end, and we\'re flat out told that nothing bad of consequence happened during the 10 years following the war.

[001] KingZeal

5th Aug '16 at 07:26:14 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn't a good example of a trope.

to:

Wyldchyld, I have no desire to appoint myself the sole arbiter of what is or isn\'t a good example of a trope. I\'m not going to take a personal chainsaw to an entire trope just because \'\'YOU\'\' have an issue with my example.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

Also, I know that the laconic isn't the sole arbiter. Which is why I ''also'' included the description in my original argument. However, to the point, the trope description and the examples below do NOT give any criteria on what it means for something to be

to:

Also, I know that the laconic isn\'t the sole arbiter. Which is why I \'\'also\'\' included the description in my original argument. However, to the point, the trope description and the examples below do NOT give any criteria on what it means for something to be \"a loss\" to the heroes. Going strictly by the description, the laconic, \'\'AND\'\' the examples provided in the trope, everything points towards the Thousand Year War being an example of the trope, only for it \'\'not\'\' to be during the penultimate chapter.

And no, I don\'t agree with waiting until the next chapter. Another part of the description of the trope is that it creates a BittersweetEnding or a DownerEnding when the situation occurs at the finale of a story. The name of this chapter is \'\'literally\'\' a happy end, and we\'re flat out told that nothing bad of consequence happened during the 10 years following the war.

Discussion History Main / BloodKnight