Discussion History UsefulNotes / Europe

Go To

[002] MiinU Current Version

29th Jun '16 at 09:38:47 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

[[quoteblock]]Which makes it irrelevant. We don't know if it was innocent or flirtatious.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]Which makes it irrelevant. We don\'t know if it was innocent or flirtatious.[[/quoteblock]]

Changed line(s) 7 from:

...and so is Rook, since he's with BLADE.

to:

...and so is Rook, since he\'s with BLADE.

Changed line(s) 9 from:

[[quoteblock]]No she isn't.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]No she isn\'t.[[/quoteblock]]

Changed line(s) 11 from:

Yes she is. Regardless of their respective works/writers the two are still comparable. And drawing analogy between similar situations is how we identify if/when certain tropes are in play.

to:

Yes she is. Regardless of their respective works/writers the two are still comparable. And drawing comparisons between similar situations is how we identify if/when certain tropes are in play.

Changed line(s) 13 from:

[[quoteblock]]They don't prove jack.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]They don\'t prove jack.[[/quoteblock]]

[001] MiinU

29th Jun '16 at 09:37:44 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

[[quoteblock]]Which makes it irrelevant. We don't know if it was innocent or flirtatious.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]Which makes it irrelevant. We don\'t know if it was innocent or flirtatious.[[/quoteblock]]

Changed line(s) 3 from:

My point exactly, since the same an be said of her inviting Rook.

to:

My point exactly, since the same can be said of her inviting Rook.

Changed line(s) 7 from:

...and so is Rook, since he's with BLADE.

to:

...and so is Rook, since he\'s with BLADE.

Changed line(s) 9 from:

[[quoteblock]]No she isn't.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]No she isn\'t.[[/quoteblock]]

Changed line(s) 13 from:

[[quoteblock]]They don't prove jack.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]They don\'t prove jack.[[/quoteblock]]

Top