Is the Furry Fandom page not sufficiently useful in its notage?
This is still a signature.^^Natter would probably occur, but why shouldn't this phenomenon deserve a Useful Notes page? And I'm saying that as someone who would probably never read it.
No such thing as notability, and all that.
Come to think of it, would it make more sense for our current page on the Furry Fandom to be moved to Useful Notes? It's not a trope.
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulIt would. Move Furry Fandom as we have it now to Useful Notes.
Maybe rewrite the current page to be more of a trope, or just delete it?
edited 1st Sep '10 9:43:51 PM by rallyfan9000
I am a proud member of the Western Federation's Anti-Japan Media Task Force. My work is very important.Well it's not a trope so really, it should belong in useful notes because that's all it is.
However, as a furry sympathizer, I agree with Shadowgirl's sentiment.
When All Else Fails, you have fun and flirt wit da ladies, dats da Drawings way!I support a Useful Notes page just because I've heard so many goddamn definitions of "furry" that it's ridiculous.
As someone who's a bit on the furry side himself, I support a move to useful notes. Not really a trope, and I can't really see it as a trope.
I thought this would be a good opportunity to add a Furry page to the Useful Notes page. It would help clear up many misconceptions on Furries, like the whole "furfag sex in costumes" thing
YOU! OBEY THE FIST!