FastEddie
Since: Apr, 2004
#2: Apr 9th 2011 at 9:25:13 PM
I moved it to repair.
I agree that so much techy-techy is not needed.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
#3: Apr 9th 2011 at 9:26:47 PM
Now the title's a bit redundant. Anyone know how to deal with that?
FastEddie
Since: Apr, 2004
#4: Apr 9th 2011 at 9:29:59 PM
Title seems fine to me. I zapped a bunch of that wikipedia-esque text out of the article.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
#5: Apr 9th 2011 at 9:41:17 PM
I was referring to the title of this thread, but oh well.
You can probably lock this now. Outside of the description there was no real problem with it.
Total posts: 5
Specifically, we get one short paragraph about the trope and several long paragraphs explaining why it's nonsensical science and where the myth may have originally come from. I don't think all of that needs to be in the description, but I'm not quite sure what to do with it. I put this in here instead of the Trope Repair Shop because it's not really a problem that needs fixing - I just don't want to make a large change unilaterally.
Ideas? It almost seems like it could be split off for a Useful Notes page, but that seems unnecessary.
Link.
Edit: Looks like it's been moved to TRS anyway.
edited 9th Apr '11 9:25:36 PM by nrjxll