The trope as-written is, "To solve overpopulation, a government limits heterosexual sex while encouraging homosexuality." My impression is that it's Too Rare To Trope...I'm not sure that there are going to be enough examples. (At least, I don't think I've ever seen any.) I'm also not sure whether all of that is part of the definition or if it's just an Example as a Thesis that never gets to the actual definition.
Rhymes with "Protracted."Damn, this is actually a pretty interesting trope idea, but it's way too rare for my liking. The three examples listed work well, but I haven't heard of anymore than that.
Fight. Struggle. Endure. Suffer. LIVE.Well, it does have our minimum number of examples, I'm just not certain if it's going to get more. It is a quandary.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickIt already has the required three examples, so it's not too rare.
edited 28th Mar '11 4:07:25 PM by EternalSeptember
Is there a trope about a ban on any kind of sex? When I first started reading the description I thought of the play Beirut. In that universe there is a ban on all sex because of an AIDS like plague. But it doesn't fit.
And in the play Once Upon A Mattress there is an implied ban on sex that causes Lady Larkin and Sirt Harry some problems but that doesn't really fit either.
If there is no YKTTW history, how about taking the trope to there?
Agreed, send it to YKTTW to gather more examples. Coz with 3 examples, forget about Wiki Magic ever hitting this page.
edited 29th Mar '11 12:52:27 AM by Ghilz
It's got six examples now. I just added this trope to the Sex Tropes and Gender and Sexuality Tropes indexes, so hopefully it'll get a bit more love. How about a lock?
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it. And even if it is broke, just ignore it and maybe it'll be sort of OK — like the environment."
This page has three examples and no YKTTW history. I think that it is a valid trope but maybe a little too narrowly defined.
Thoughts?