Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TheTurnOfTheScrew

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LyingCreator: James stated that the novel is a straightforward ghost story and not an example of UnreliableNarrator, but many critics argue that James was being intentionally deceptive when he made such statements. James is known for his use of UnreliableNarrator in other works.
* MoneyDearBoy: James intended this novella to bring him some much-needed cash, which it did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MoneyDearBoy: James intended this novella to bring him some much-needed cash, which it did.

to:

* MoneyDearBoy: James intended this novella to bring him some much-needed cash, which it did.did.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DeathOfTheAuthor: James claimed that the work is only a simple ghost story and ''not'' about an UnreliableNarrator. Most critics who don't assume that he was a LyingCreator just ignore the comments and appreciate the story for both possible interpretations.

to:

* DeathOfTheAuthor: James claimed that the work is only a simple ghost story and ''not'' about an UnreliableNarrator. Most critics who don't assume that he was a LyingCreator just ignore the comments and appreciate the story for both possible interpretations.interpretations.
* LyingCreator: James stated that the novel is a straightforward ghost story and not an example of UnreliableNarrator, but many critics argue that James was being intentionally deceptive when he made such statements. James is known for his use of UnreliableNarrator in other works.
* MoneyDearBoy: James intended this novella to bring him some much-needed cash, which it did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DeathOfTheAuthor: James claimed that the work is only a simple ghost story and ''not'' about an UnreliableNarrator. Most critics who don't assume that he was a LyingCreator just ignore the comments and appreciate the story for both possible interpretations.

Top