Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
to:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity {{Retcon}} of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and contradictions the episode causes simply by existing.
to:
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and contradictions the episode causes creates simply by existing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and [[RetroactiveContinuity contradictions]] the episode causes by virtue of existing.
to:
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and [[RetroactiveContinuity contradictions]] contradictions the episode causes simply by virtue of existing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
to:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.episode.
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and [[RetroactiveContinuity contradictions]] the episode causes by virtue of existing.
* FanonDiscontinuity: Many fans of the original episode are perfectly happy to pretend this episode never happened, due to the HappyEndingOverride and many, many {{Retcon}}s and [[RetroactiveContinuity contradictions]] the episode causes by virtue of existing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cut trope
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, it is obvious the creators were recalling the original episode from memory, and assumed the episode was only, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, it is obvious the creators were recalling the original episode from memory, and assumed the episode was only, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
to:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, it is obvious the creators were recalling the original episode from memory, and assumed the episode was only, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.episode.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, it is obvious the creators were recalling the original episode from memory, and assumed the episode was only, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, is obvious the creators were making the episode from memory, and just assumed the episode was, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
to:
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, it is obvious the creators were making recalling the original episode from memory, and just assumed the episode was, was only, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: Many longtime fans find the episode an unnecessary and insulting RetroactiveContinuity of the original episode, and doing absolutely nothing interesting with the continuation regardless. Others, especially newer fans, find the episode enjoyable as a stand-alone episode.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, is obvious the creators were making the episode from memory, and just assumed the episode was, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
* TheyJustDidntCare: Despite the heavy hype of a sequel to one of the series's most iconic episodes, is obvious the creators were making the episode from memory, and just assumed the episode was, "Bart and Lisa go to a camp run by Krusty, and it sucked, so they rebelled." The episode would have made more sense had it not been a sequel, but an episode with a setup where the kids go ''back'' to Kamp Krusty.
