Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FirstInstallmentWins: The book is frequently considered one of the "bibles" of animation and a frequent reference point for terms such as "The Twelve Principles of Animation". Many fans don't know that Frank and Ollie continued to expand on their work in subsequent books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] Disney]][[note]]Granted, this is a Disney animation book made by veteran Disney animators, so some bias is perhaps to be expected, but we digress.[[/note]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book ''is'' made by Disney and the full title is ''"Illusion of Life: '''Disney Animation'''"'', so some bias is perhaps to be expected.[[/note]]
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book ''is'' made by Disney and the full title is ''"Illusion of Life: '''Disney Animation'''"'', so some bias is perhaps to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book ''is'' made by Disney, so some bias is to be expected.[[/note]]
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book ''is'' made by Disney, Disney and the full title is ''"Illusion of Life: '''Disney Animation'''"'', so some bias is perhaps to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book was made within Disney by Disney animators and reprints of the book would later be published by Disney's publishing divisions, so some bias towards Disney is to be expected.[[/note]]
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book was ''is'' made within Disney by Disney animators and reprints of the book would later be published by Disney's publishing divisions, Disney, so some bias towards Disney is to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book was made within Disney by Disney animators and reprints of the book would later be published by Disney's publishing divisions, so some bias towards Disney is to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book's full title is ''"Disney Animation": The Illusion of Life'' and was made by Disney animators (the book would also be later reprinted by Disney), so the book having a bias towards Disney is probably to be expected.[[/note]]
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book's full title is ''"Disney Animation": The Illusion of Life'' and was made by Disney animators (the book would also be later reprinted by Disney), so the book having a bias towards Disney is probably to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book is a Disney-themed book done by Disney animators (with the book being later reprinted by Disney), so some bias is probably to be expected.[[/note]]
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.[[note]]Granted, the book book's full title is a Disney-themed book done ''"Disney Animation": The Illusion of Life'' and was made by Disney animators (with the (the book being would also be later reprinted by Disney), so some the book having a bias towards Disney is probably to be expected.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice.
to:
* HypeBacklash: Despite its praise, there are some animation fans, historians, and animators (such as Michael Barrier) who have criticized the book for claiming that only Disney could produce convincing character animation during UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation, and no other studio succeeded in doing so. These critics point out that many of the WesternAnimation/LooneyTunes, Creator/FleischerStudios, and WesternAnimation/TomAndJerry shorts from the time are just as critically-acclaimed as the Disney animated films, and go on to accuse the book of being [[BiasSteamroller biased toward Disney]] as opposed to helpful animation advice. [[note]]Granted, the book is a Disney-themed book done by Disney animators (with the book being later reprinted by Disney), so some bias is probably to be expected.[[/note]]
