Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: [[spoiler: Was Jane an actual witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of? As such, was she EvilAllAlong or a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds who became evil due to what was done to her?]]
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: [[spoiler: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
** Was Jane an actual [[spoiler: witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of? As such, was she EvilAllAlong or a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds who became evil due to what was done toher?]]her? Tommy thinks the latter, but that's predicated on his assumption that there was no such thing as a witch - something that's an unfounded assumption in-universe]].
**Tommy offers himself [[spoiler: as a human sacrifice to Jane, asking that she torture him as she was tortured so that his son would be spared. She seems to take Tommy up on his offer, but then obviously reneges by also killing Austin. Did Jane kill Austin because she had no intention of honoring Tommy's "deal", or did Jane only do so because she thought Tommy didn't pay his dues - i.e. Austin put Tommy out of his misery with a MercyKill, thus not allowing him to experience the same ordeal that she did]].
** Was Jane an actual [[spoiler: witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of? As such, was she EvilAllAlong or a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds who became evil due to what was done to
**Tommy offers himself [[spoiler: as a human sacrifice to Jane, asking that she torture him as she was tortured so that his son would be spared. She seems to take Tommy up on his offer, but then obviously reneges by also killing Austin. Did Jane kill Austin because she had no intention of honoring Tommy's "deal", or did Jane only do so because she thought Tommy didn't pay his dues - i.e. Austin put Tommy out of his misery with a MercyKill, thus not allowing him to experience the same ordeal that she did]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope is about when a significant amount of the audience is outside the intended demographic. It is not "Watched it for the Fanservice"
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* PeripheryDemographic: Naked, good looking woman being present on the table for almost entire duration of the movie? [[PoorMansPorn Go figure!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* {{Narm}}: Austin's wailings of "Ooooooh noooooooo!" when [[spoiler: he cradles Emma's body in his arms after Tommy accidentally kills her. It should be sad, but poor acting combined with the contrivance of the situation makes it come off as hilarious.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Remember not to trope your own writing.
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* JustHereForGodzilla: Whoever did marketing for the movie, made sure people will pay to see [[PoorMansPorn some]] [[IncrediblyLamePun body]].
to:
* JustHereForGodzilla: Whoever did marketing for the movie, made sure people will pay to see [[PoorMansPorn some]] [[IncrediblyLamePun some body]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: [[spoiler: Was Jane an actual witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of?]]
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: [[spoiler: Was Jane an actual witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of?]]of? As such, was she EvilAllAlong or a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds who became evil due to what was done to her?]]
Added DiffLines:
* {{Narm}}: Austin's wailings of "Ooooooh noooooooo!" when [[spoiler: he cradles Emma's body in his arms after Tommy accidentally kills her. It should be sad, but poor acting combined with the contrivance of the situation makes it come off as hilarious.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds: [[spoiler: Jane, if the in-universe theory that she was an innocent girl punished for witchcraft is true.]]
to:
* WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds: [[spoiler: Jane, if the in-universe theory that she was an innocent girl punished for witchcraft is true.]]]]
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* PeripheryDemographic: Naked, good looking woman being present on the table for almost entire duration of the movie? [[PoorMansPorn Go figure!]]
to:
* PeripheryDemographic: Naked, good looking woman being present on the table for almost entire duration of the movie? [[PoorMansPorn Go figure!]]figure!]]
* WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds: [[spoiler: Jane, if the in-universe theory that she was an innocent girl punished for witchcraft is true.]]
* WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds: [[spoiler: Jane, if the in-universe theory that she was an innocent girl punished for witchcraft is true.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: [[spoiler: Was Jane an actual witch caught in Salem or was she an innocent girl who, through the brutal ritual and torture, became what the people accused her of?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JustHereForGodzilla: Whoever did marketing for the movie, made sure people will pay to see [[PoorMansPorn some]] [[IncrediblyLamePun body]].
* PeripheryDemographic: Naked, good looking woman being present on the table for almost entire duration of the movie? [[PoorMansPorn Go figure!]]
* PeripheryDemographic: Naked, good looking woman being present on the table for almost entire duration of the movie? [[PoorMansPorn Go figure!]]
