Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a [[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[TooBleakStoppedCaring making it hard to be entertaining]].
to:
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a
* OlderThanTheyThink: Many people hated Film/DayOfTheDead1985 for it's bleak tone. Ironically, the bleak and hopeless tone originated in the ''[[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 original]] film''. In fact, one could argue the tone was '''more''' bleak in the original, as everyone dies, whereas at least a small amount of characters made it out alive in Day of the Dead.
[[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[TooBleakStoppedCaring making it hard to be entertaining]].
* OlderThanTheyThink: Many people hated Film/DayOfTheDead1985 for it's bleak tone. Ironically, the bleak and hopeless tone originated in the ''[[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 original]] film''. In fact, one could argue the tone was '''more''' bleak in the original, as everyone dies, whereas at least a small amount of characters made it out alive in Day of the Dead.
[[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[TooBleakStoppedCaring making it hard to be entertaining]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Film/DiaryOfTheDead is often the point where people started loosing interest in the series. Mainly due to Jason [[SkewedPriorities prioritizing filming rather than]] [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic actually help his friends]]. It also doesn't help that the mere existance of the movie [[ContinuitySnarl causes the timeline to become... Questionable]], [[{{Understatement}} to say the least]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a [[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[DarknessInducedAudienceApathy making it hard to be entertaining]].
to:
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a [[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[DarknessInducedAudienceApathy [[TooBleakStoppedCaring making it hard to be entertaining]].
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.3.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* CommonKnowledge: Thanks to PopCultureOsmosis, a lot of people usually consider ''Living Dead'' zombies to be unintelligent shamblers. Funnily enough, one of the main constants in the series was that the zombies were [[ItCanThink smarter than they appeared]]. In the original ''Film/{{Night Of The Living Dead|1968}}'', zombies were using tools to kill their victims and to damage their victims' escape vehicles. ''Film/DawnOfTheDead1978'' established that zombies had some recollection of their old lives and could form memories that would help them hunt. Finally, certain zombies, such as [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 Bub]] and [[Film/LandOfTheDead Big Daddy]], were intelligent enough to properly wield firearms and single-handedly outmaneuver humans.
to:
* CommonKnowledge: Thanks to PopCultureOsmosis, a lot of people usually consider ''Living Dead'' zombies to be unintelligent mindless shamblers. Funnily enough, one of the main constants in the series was that the zombies were [[ItCanThink smarter than they appeared]]. In the original ''Film/{{Night Of The Living Dead|1968}}'', zombies were using tools to kill their victims and to damage their victims' escape vehicles. cars. ''Film/DawnOfTheDead1978'' established that zombies had some recollection of their old lives and could form memories that would help them hunt.diverge from the usual mob mentality if necessary. Finally, certain zombies, such as [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 Bub]] and [[Film/LandOfTheDead Big Daddy]], were intelligent enough to properly wield firearms and single-handedly outmaneuver humans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CommonKnowledge: Thanks to PopCultureOsmosis, a lot of people usually consider ''Living Dead'' zombies to be unintelligent shamblers. Funnily enough, one of the main constants in the series was that the zombies were [[ItCanThink smarter than they appeared]]. In the original ''Film/{{Night Of The Living Dead|1968}}'', zombies were using tools to kill their victims and to damage their victims' escape vehicles. ''Film/DawnOfTheDead1978'' established that zombies had some recollection of their old lives and could form memories that would help them hunt. Finally, certain zombies, such as [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 Bub]] and [[Film/LandOfTheDead Big Daddy]], were intelligent enough to properly wield firearms and single-handedly outmaneuver humans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: The political messages behind the films are not exactly subtle and, particularly in the post-2000s entries to the official sextet, often attract criticism.
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with ''Night of the Living Dead'', however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with ''Night of the Living Dead'', however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: The political messages behind the films are not exactly subtle and, particularly in the post-2000s entries to the official sextet, often attract criticism.
**criticism. [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with ''Night of the Living Dead'', however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
**
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage style filming was a unique approach to the genre, or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place.
to:
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage style filming was a unique approach to the genre, or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place. There’s also debate on whether the found footage aspect was executed properly or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesResonance: Many of the recurring themes seen throughout these films [[note]] [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ordinary people fighting against each]] [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 other over their differences]], [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 over-reliance on material belongings over human life]], [[Film/LandOfTheDead the struggles between the lower, middle & higher social classes]] and [[Film/DiaryOfTheDead fake news]] [[/note]] have become shockingly just as relevant, if not more relevant today than when the films were made.
to:
* ValuesResonance: Many of the recurring themes seen throughout these films [[note]] [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ordinary people fighting against each]] [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 other over their differences]], [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 over-reliance on material belongings over human life]], [[Film/LandOfTheDead the struggles between the lower, middle & higher social classes]] and [[Film/DiaryOfTheDead fake news]] mistrust of reliable sources]] [[/note]] have become shockingly just as relevant, if not more relevant today than when the films were made.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ValuesResonance: Many of the recurring themes seen throughout these films [[note]] [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ordinary people fighting against each]] [[Film/DayOfTheDead1985 other over their differences]], [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 over-reliance on material belongings over human life]], [[Film/LandOfTheDead the struggles between the lower, middle & higher social classes]] and [[Film/DiaryOfTheDead fake news]] [[/note]] have become shockingly just as relevant, if not more relevant today than when the films were made.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985 was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985 ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* {{Squick}}: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.
to:
* {{Squick}}: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.inevitable.
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985 was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.
* VindicatedByHistory: At the time, ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985 was seen as the weakest of the Romero zombie series overall, with many criticizing the bleak and hopeless tone as a turn away and was seen as a ToughActToFollow compared to ''Night'' and ''Dawn''. Nowadays it’s not uncommon to see many sites rank it on par with the first 2 movies, some even going as far as saying it’s the best of the original 3.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** ''Children of the Living Dead'' by John Russo [[note]] One of the original creators of Night of the Living Dead[[/note]] is also frequently mocked for its poor, murky cinematography and lack of connections to any of the established lore of the past films. The fact that it’s also a direct sequel to the universally despised ''[[GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion 30th Anniversary Edition]]'' only adds to its bad reputation.
to:
** ''Children of the Living Dead'' by John Russo [[note]] One of the original creators of Night of the Living Dead[[/note]] is also frequently mocked for its poor, murky cinematography and lack of connections to any of the established lore of the past films. The fact that it’s also a direct sequel to the universally despised ''[[GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion 30th Anniversary Edition]]'' of ''Night of the Living Dead'' only adds to its bad reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
** ''Day of the Dead 2: Contagium'' was made without Romero’s involvement and features [[{{Narm}} Unbelievably poor acting and effects]] and it shows.
to:
** ''Day of the Dead 2: Contagium'' was made without Romero’s involvement and features [[{{Narm}} Unbelievably unbelievably poor acting and effects]] and it shows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have ''Dawn'' in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy to the past films.
to:
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have ''Dawn'' in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy successors to the past films.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage approach was a unique approach to the genre or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place.
to:
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage approach style filming was a unique approach to the genre genre, or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place.
Added DiffLines:
* {{Sequelitis}}:
** ''Film/SurvivalOfTheDead'' is often ridiculed as the lowest point of the series, and the worst film in Romero’s filmography in general. Points of criticism go towards its [[EightDeadlyWords lack of any interesting or likable characters to root for]] and the HumansAreTheRealMonsters message [[{{Anvilicious}} being even more blatantly ham-fisted to the audience than ever before]].
** ''Day of the Dead 2: Contagium'' was made without Romero’s involvement and features [[{{Narm}} Unbelievably poor acting and effects]] and it shows.
** ''Children of the Living Dead'' by John Russo [[note]] One of the original creators of Night of the Living Dead[[/note]] is also frequently mocked for its poor, murky cinematography and lack of connections to any of the established lore of the past films. The fact that it’s also a direct sequel to the universally despised ''[[GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion 30th Anniversary Edition]]'' only adds to its bad reputation.
** ''Film/SurvivalOfTheDead'' is often ridiculed as the lowest point of the series, and the worst film in Romero’s filmography in general. Points of criticism go towards its [[EightDeadlyWords lack of any interesting or likable characters to root for]] and the HumansAreTheRealMonsters message [[{{Anvilicious}} being even more blatantly ham-fisted to the audience than ever before]].
** ''Day of the Dead 2: Contagium'' was made without Romero’s involvement and features [[{{Narm}} Unbelievably poor acting and effects]] and it shows.
** ''Children of the Living Dead'' by John Russo [[note]] One of the original creators of Night of the Living Dead[[/note]] is also frequently mocked for its poor, murky cinematography and lack of connections to any of the established lore of the past films. The fact that it’s also a direct sequel to the universally despised ''[[GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion 30th Anniversary Edition]]'' only adds to its bad reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ''Night of the Living Dead'']] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 ''Dawn of the Dead'']], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ''Night of the Living Dead'']] ''Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968'' is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 ''Dawn of the Dead'']], ''Film/DawnOfTheDead1978'', is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/''NightOfTheLivingDead1968'' Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/''DawnOfTheDead1978'' Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/''NightOfTheLivingDead1968'' Night [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 ''Night of the Living Dead]] Dead'']] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/''DawnOfTheDead1978'' Dawn [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 ''Dawn of the Dead]], Dead'']], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have Dawn in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy to the past films.
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have Dawn in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy to the past films.
to:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night ''Night of the Living Dead, Dead'', however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t haveDawn ''Dawn'' in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy to the past films.
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 [[Film/''NightOfTheLivingDead1968'' Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 [[Film/''DawnOfTheDead1978'' Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have Dawn in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form.
to:
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have Dawn in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form.form, though ''Film/LandOfTheDead'' and ''Film/DiaryOfTheDead'' tend to come up most as to whether or not they’re worthy to the past films.
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a [[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[DarknessInducedAudienceApathy making it hard to be entertaining]].
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage approach was a unique approach to the genre or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place.
** To be more specific, with ''Land'', fans either see it as a grand return for Romero’s directing career with great gore and suspense, a SoOkayItsAverage zombie flick that doesn’t do anything particularly new for the genre, or a [[{{Sequelitis}} bad follow up to]] ''Film/DayOfTheDead1985'' with [[{{Anvilicious}} a heavy handed message on the social classes]] and truly unlikable characters [[DarknessInducedAudienceApathy making it hard to be entertaining]].
** With ''Diary'', it’s whether or not the FoundFootage approach was a unique approach to the genre or a poorly executed way of incorporating a gimmick that took away from the what made the rest of the series beloved in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ContestedSequel: ''Every'' sequel that doesn’t have Dawn in the title is bound to suffer this in one way shape or form.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece for helping invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece for helping that helped invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, masterpiece for helping invent the modern horror and zombie genre we see today, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, the overall political message, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, the overall political message, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* Squick: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.
to:
* Squick: {{Squick}}: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, the overall political message, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, the overall political message, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.throughout.
* Squick: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.
* Squick: It’s a series about the living dead devouring human flesh in morbid and twisted ways. This was inevitable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
to:
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans and critics who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, the overall political message, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
to:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed confirmed]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, as Romero wasn’t going for any political message in that film.
to:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, [[WordOfGod as Romero himself confirmed that he wasn’t going for any political message in that film.film]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, as Romero wasn’t going for any political message in the film.
to:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, as Romero wasn’t going for any political message in the that film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[AvertedTrope Averted]] with Night of the Living Dead, however, as Romero wasn’t going for any political message in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: The political messages behind the films are not exactly subtle and, particularly in the post-2000s entries to the official sextet, often attract criticism.
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: The political messages behind the films are not exactly subtle and, particularly in the post-2000s entries to the official sextet, often attract criticism.criticism.
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
* EvenBetterSequel: [[Film/NightOfTheLivingDead1968 Night of the Living Dead]] is considered a groundbreaking masterpiece, but it’s sequel, [[Film/DawnOfTheDead1978 Dawn of the Dead]], is most beloved by fans who love it for its strong character development and interactions, impressive gore effects, and its overall fun feel while still maintaining a serious attitude throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved from the main page.
Added DiffLines:
* {{Anvilicious}}: The political messages behind the films are not exactly subtle and, particularly in the post-2000s entries to the official sextet, often attract criticism.
