Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / FindingDory

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Too much fluff that dosen't even fit removed


** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate.

to:

** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film or even superior is a point of serious debate.



* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right. And there are many who feel it's an EvenBetterSequel for it’s deeper story, faster pace, and Hank.

to:

* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right. And there are many who feel it's an EvenBetterSequel for it’s the deeper story, faster pace, superior humor, and Hank.



* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having fan favorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (''WesternAnimation/Cars2'' and ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'') and decidedly poor original films (''WesternAnimation/{{Brave}}'' and ''WesternAnimation/TheGoodDinosaur''). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having high with some. Not quite as bad as some examples though as having fan favorite Dory as the main character here helped did help a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are were very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (''WesternAnimation/Cars2'' and ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'') and decidedly poor original films (''WesternAnimation/{{Brave}}'' and ''WesternAnimation/TheGoodDinosaur''). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.positive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exceptions of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].

to:

** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exceptions of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].



* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right. And there are even some who feel it's an EvenBetterSequel.

to:

* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right. And there are even some many who feel it's an EvenBetterSequel. EvenBetterSequel for it’s deeper story, faster pace, and Hank.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeMusic:

to:

* AwesomeMusic:SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic:



* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Hank the Octopus has been said to be the most complex CGI rig Pixar has ever done. It took two years for the studio to finish even ''one'' of his scenes! They explain it in detail [[https://youtu.be/Nn0S2vmSCU0 here]].

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Hank the Octopus has been said to be the most complex CGI rig Pixar has ever done. It took two years for the studio to finish even ''one'' of his scenes! They explain it in detail [[https://youtu.be/Nn0S2vmSCU0 here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: After the first film made such a big deal about just getting to Australia, it can seem pretty weird that this film treats crossing ''the entire Pacific Ocean'' so casually. Though many fans are willing to forgive it as it lets most of the film take place in a new location that stops it from [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks feeling like a complete retread.]]

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: After the first film made such a big deal about just getting to Australia, it can seem pretty weird that this film treats crossing ''the entire Pacific Ocean'' so casually. Though many fans are willing to forgive it as it both lets most of the film take place in a new location that stops it from [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks feeling like a complete retread.]]retread]], and leaves open the possibility of a more epic-scale third film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Pretty much everyone wanted to see the sharks again, and for Crush to have a bigger part. Chances are that they're all being SavedForTheSequel, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
How on earth is it not Pixar-quality?


** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exceptions of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].

to:

** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exceptions of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].

Added: 13

Changed: 107

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase:



* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite fan favorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) (''WesternAnimation/Cars2'' and ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'') and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur).(''WesternAnimation/{{Brave}}'' and ''WesternAnimation/TheGoodDinosaur''). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/Coco'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/Inside Out'' non-''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/Coco'', ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I originally wrote that comment before Coco was released. I restored it but updated it with info on the reception of Coco.


* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur).

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''WesternAnimation/Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one seemed for a time to have by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory. Since then, ''WesternAnimation/Coco'', another decidedly strong original film, has managed to be as well recieved as ''Inside Out'', which isn't a good sign as to how ''Finding Dory'' will be looked back on in the future. However, time will tell whether ''Coco'' is even part of the aforementioned DorkAge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Hank is the only sea creature of the franchise who's from the ocean but actually ''wants'' to live in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]]. Of course, this could all be an idea for a future film.

to:

** Hank is the only sea creature of the franchise who's from the ocean but actually ''wants'' to live in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or way, why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]].climax]], or even what happened to his eighth tentacle. Of course, this could all be an idea for a future film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Coco fans might disagree


* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].

to:

** Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception exceptions of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Coco}}'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nemo this time around. Does having him be sarcastic either make him surprisingly funny or bizarrely out of character? Despite this, many feel Hayden Royce was just as good a replacement (if not better) for Alexander Gould.

to:

** Nemo this time around. Does having him be sarcastic either make him surprisingly funny or bizarrely out of character? Despite this, That being said, however, many feel Hayden Royce Rolence was just as good a replacement (if not better) for Alexander Gould.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase:

to:

* BrokenBase:** Hank. On one hand, he's a beautifully animated septopus who has a potentially interesting backstory, given his missing tentacle and his preference to being alone and living in captivity. On another hand, he's a GrumpyBear who serves as a foil to Dory (perhaps the most beloved character of the franchise); one of the only positive traits he has in contrast to her is his tendency to make plans, which, as Dory points out, isn't even always the best idea.



** Hank is the only sea creature shown in the movie who's born in the ocean to actually ''want'' to be in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]]. Of course, this could all be an idea for a future film.

to:

** Hank is the only sea creature shown in of the movie franchise who's born in from the ocean to but actually ''want'' ''wants'' to be live in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]]. Of course, this could all be an idea for a future film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nemo this time around. Did having him as sarcastic either make him surprisingly funny or bizarrely out of character? Nonetheless, many feel Hayden Royce was just as good a replacement (if not better) for Alexander Gould.

to:

** Nemo this time around. Did Does having him as be sarcastic either make him surprisingly funny or bizarrely out of character? Nonetheless, Despite this, many feel Hayden Royce was just as good a replacement (if not better) for Alexander Gould.

Added: 1043

Changed: 1041

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* BaseBreakingCharacter: The two female randos, one of whom sports a tomboyish haircut, who may or may not be [[LesYay a lesbian couple]].[[note]]They're often referred to as "the two women with the baby," only because they're seen looking into a baby carriage in the trailer. In the movie itself, they're actually putting the sippy cup containing Dory back into the carriage when they think that the baby inside (Hank in disguise) dropped it. They, themselves, are never actually seen with a baby.[[/note]] When they appeared in a trailer, it sparked a lot of hype from people who believe there should be more positive portrayals of homosexuality in family films, but also a lot of [[GayPanic animosity]] between them and [[MoralGuardians exactly the kind of people one would expect to have a problem with this]]. Even the filmmakers [[ShrugOfGod decidedly not taking a stand and leaving it up to the viewer]] [[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/11/finding-dory-s-lesbian-couple-and-how-disney-keeps-failing-its-lgbt-fans.html has been controversial]].

to:

* BaseBreakingCharacter: BaseBreakingCharacter:
**
The two female randos, one of whom sports a tomboyish haircut, who may or may not be [[LesYay a lesbian couple]].[[note]]They're often referred to as "the two women with the baby," only because they're seen looking into a baby carriage in the trailer. In the movie itself, they're actually putting the sippy cup containing Dory back into the carriage when they think that the baby inside (Hank in disguise) dropped it. They, themselves, are never actually seen with a baby.[[/note]] When they appeared in a trailer, it sparked a lot of hype from people who believe there should be more positive portrayals of homosexuality in family films, but also a lot of [[GayPanic animosity]] between them and [[MoralGuardians exactly the kind of people one would expect to have a problem with this]]. Even the filmmakers [[ShrugOfGod decidedly not taking a stand and leaving it up to the viewer]] [[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/11/finding-dory-s-lesbian-couple-and-how-disney-keeps-failing-its-lgbt-fans.html has been controversial]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Nemo this time around. Did having him as sarcastic either make him surprisingly funny or bizarrely out of character? Nonetheless, many feel Hayden Royce was just as good a replacement (if not better) for Alexander Gould.
** Also Marlin, as some feel his CharacterDevelopment from the first film didn't carry into this one well.
** Bailey. Is he funny or just obnoxious?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Tank Gang were actually going to be ''main characters in the film who helped Marlin and Nemo look for Dory''. Why in the world they were demoted to a brief scene after the credits (especially considering it involved bringing back all their voice actors) is a mystery that to this day remains unanswered, but it's highly speculated that it's because their storyline is being [[RefittedForTheSequel saved for the next film]].

to:

** The Tank Gang were actually going to be ''main characters in the film who helped Marlin and Nemo look for Dory''. Why in the world they were demoted to a brief scene after the credits (especially considering it involved bringing back all their voice actors) is a mystery that to this day remains unanswered, but it's highly speculated that it's because their storyline is being [[RefittedForTheSequel [[RefittedForSequel saved for the next film]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JerkassWoobie: Hank is a cranky octopus who is frequently rude towards Dory, and is seemingly only helping her to get her quarantine tag. But the fact that he's traumatized from being mishandled by people (in fact, the reason why he's so desperate to get Dory's quarantine tag is to be able to live a peaceful, secluded life without any contact with others) and was clearly terrified when he found himself in a touch tank makes him much more sympathetic. It's also highly implied that the loss of one of his tentacles due to a traumatizing experience is why he is so afraid of being released back into the wild.

to:

* JerkassWoobie: Hank is a cranky octopus septopus who is frequently rude towards Dory, and is seemingly only helping her to get her quarantine tag. But the fact that he's traumatized from being mishandled by people (in fact, the reason why he's so desperate to get Dory's quarantine tag is to be able to live a peaceful, secluded life without any contact with others) and was clearly terrified when he found himself in a touch tank makes him much more sympathetic. It's also highly implied that the loss of one of his tentacles due to a traumatizing experience is why he is so afraid of being released back into the wild.

Added: 430

Changed: 161

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Tank Gang were actually going to be ''main characters in the film who helped Marlin and Nemo look for Dory''. Why in the world they were demoted to a brief scene after the credits (especially considering it involved bringing back all their voice actors) is a mystery that to this day remains unanswered, but it's highly speculated that it's because their storyline is being [[RefittedForTheSequel saved for the next film]].



* ToughActToFollow: ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered a modern day classic, so this was inevitable. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: Considering how well-loved ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered is, and the fact that it had ''13 years'' to be loved as just a modern day classic, so this was inevitable.stand-alone film, expectations for the sequel were a little too high. Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.

Added: 508

Changed: 1290

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].
** Also, on whether or not it should be the end for the ''Finding'' franchise. Some feel that Dory was the best and perhaps only thing left to truly be explored after the first film, and so a third film would feel [[SeasonalRot forced and bad]]. On the other hand, many also feel that sacrificing elements of the first film (like the sharks, the tank gang, Nigel the pelican, and the entire ocean) is a clear sign that the this is ''not'' the GrandFinale, and that there is still more unexplored greatness for the series.

to:

* BrokenBase: BrokenBase:
**
Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].
** Also, on whether Whether or not it should be the end for the ''Finding'' franchise. Some feel that Dory was the best and perhaps only thing left to truly be explored after the first film, and so a third film would feel [[SeasonalRot forced and bad]]. On the other hand, many also feel that sacrificing elements of the first film (like the sharks, the tank gang, Nigel the pelican, and the entire ocean) is a clear sign that the this is ''not'' the GrandFinale, and that there is still more unexplored greatness for the series.

Added: 522

Changed: 168

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's up to Pixar standards is a point of debate. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].

to:

* BrokenBase: Although most people agree that this film is good, whether or not it's up to Pixar standards as good as the first film is a point of debate. Some even debate whether it's up to ''Pixar standards'', despite the fact that it's a sequel to what's considered a classic Pixar film. Still, the fact that there's even debate is saying something, because every other Pixar movie after ''Toy Story 3'' (with the definite exception of ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'') [[DorkAge is widely agreed to be below their standards]].standards]].
** Also, on whether or not it should be the end for the ''Finding'' franchise. Some feel that Dory was the best and perhaps only thing left to truly be explored after the first film, and so a third film would feel [[SeasonalRot forced and bad]]. On the other hand, many also feel that sacrificing elements of the first film (like the sharks, the tank gang, Nigel the pelican, and the entire ocean) is a clear sign that the this is ''not'' the GrandFinale, and that there is still more unexplored greatness for the series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Hank the Octopus has been said to be the most complex CGI rig Pixar has ever done. It took two years for the studio to finish even ''one'' of his scenes! They explain it in detail [[https://youtu.be/Nn0S2vmSCU0 here]].

Added: 394

Changed: 286

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odDkji5biaE Shells]].

to:

** Like ''Finding Nemo'', the entire soundtrack is amazing, but special mention goes to [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odDkji5biaE Shells]]. It's too beautiful for words.



** While most of the previous movie's characters are relegated to minor roles, they still have memorable appearances. Special mention goes to the turtles and [[spoiler:the Tank Gang]].

to:

** While most of the previous movie's characters are relegated to minor roles, they still have memorable appearances. Special mention goes to the turtles turtles, the seagulls, and [[spoiler:the Tank Gang]].



* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Those who feel this movie is weaker than the first will often point out the fact that it's a smaller scale adventure than the first film (taking place in an aquarium instead of an ocean). Of course, making it large-scale [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks might not have made much of a difference]] to the reception, and it also opens the possibility of a large-scale third film.



** Hank is the only sea creature shown in the movie who's born in the ocean to actually ''want'' to be in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]].
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: After the first film made such a big deal about just getting to Australia, it can seem pretty weird that this film treats crossing ''the entire Pacific Ocean'' so casually. Though many fans are willing to forgive it as it lets most of the film take place in a new location that stops it from feeling like a complete retread.
* ToughActToFollow: ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered a modern day classic, so this was inevitable. The reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.

to:

** Hank is the only sea creature shown in the movie who's born in the ocean to actually ''want'' to be in human captivity. He shows signs of trauma thinking about living in the ocean and is incredibly pushy about getting his turn to go far inland. The movie never explains why Hank feels this way or why [[spoiler:he has a change of [[{{Pun}} hearts]] near the climax]]. Of course, this could all be an idea for a future film.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: After the first film made such a big deal about just getting to Australia, it can seem pretty weird that this film treats crossing ''the entire Pacific Ocean'' so casually. Though many fans are willing to forgive it as it lets most of the film take place in a new location that stops it from [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks feeling like a complete retread.
retread.]]
* ToughActToFollow: ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered a modern day classic, so this was inevitable. The Having FanFavorite Dory as the main character here helped a ''ton'', and the reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV


* SequelHook: Some fans consider the lack of appearances from most characters of the first film as a good sign that there is more to come.

Added: 195

Changed: 193

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* NarmCharm: "It's your destiny, Destiny." As silly as that line sounds on paper (and on-screen), the context ([[spoiler:Bailey getting Destiny to jump the wall of her enclosure]]) manages to make it work.

to:

* NarmCharm: NarmCharm:
**
"It's your destiny, Destiny." As silly as that line sounds on paper (and on-screen), the context ([[spoiler:Bailey getting Destiny to jump the wall of her enclosure]]) manages to make it work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SequelHook: Some fans consider the lack of appearances from most characters of the first film as a good sign that there is more to come.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The use of "What a Wonderful World" in the climax. Is it a cliched, overused song? Yes. Does it work just beautifully in the moment? ''Absolutely.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpoiledByTheFormat: The names of [[spoiler:the Tank Gang]] and their voice actors appear in the end credits before the characters themselves show up in TheStinger.
* TastesLikeDiabetes: The opening scene with Baby Dory.

to:

* SpoiledByTheFormat: The names of [[spoiler:the Tank Gang]] and their voice actors appear in the end credits before the characters themselves show up in TheStinger.
TheStinger. This likely helped to viewers to stay to see the stinger.
* TastesLikeDiabetes: The opening scene with Baby Dory. A beautiful case of TropesAreNotBad.



** The GiantSquid, which takes the role of the anglerfish from the original movie. Unlike the anglerfish, however, the squid doesn't get outwitted in any way (our heroes simply flee from it), and it disappears entirely until a scene during the credits. Considering that [[spoiler:the climax takes place outside the institute (and features nearly everyone coming BackForTheFinale)]], it could've easily made a reappearance.

to:

** The GiantSquid, which takes the role of the anglerfish from the original movie. Unlike the anglerfish, however, the squid doesn't get outwitted in any way (our heroes simply flee from it), and it disappears entirely until a scene during the credits. Considering that [[spoiler:the climax takes place outside the institute (and features nearly everyone coming BackForTheFinale)]], it could've easily made a reappearance. Although considering it's an antagonist to the main characters, it would more likely just get in the way of the main objective.



* ToughActToFollow: ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered a modern day classic, so this was inevitable. The reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one.

to:

* ToughActToFollow: ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'' is considered a modern day classic, so this was inevitable. The reviews for this film are very, very positive, but not quite as strong as the first one. This most likely has to do with the fact that Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise inferior sequels (Cars 2, Monsters University) and decidedly poor original films (Brave, The Good Dinosaur). Of the non-''Inside Out'' films of said DorkAge, this one has by ''far'' the best chance of becoming VindicatedByHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right.

to:

* ContestedSequel: ''Finding Dory'' is an odd case among Pixar movies. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is in the mid-90s, putting it nearly on par with ''Finding Nemo'' and Pixar's other acclaimed classics, but the reviews themselves frequently note that [[ToughActToFollow the movie isn't as good as its predecessor]], similar to reviews for ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'' (which had a significantly lower Tomatometer score). If one looks at Metacritic, its score is a respectable 77 (the exact same as ''WesternAnimation/ABugsLife''), whereas Pixar's [[Franchise/ToyStory other]] [[WesternAnimation/FindingNemo highly]] [[WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles acclaimed]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Ratatouille}} films]] [[WesternAnimation/WallE have]] [[WesternAnimation/{{Up}} scores]] [[WesternAnimation/InsideOut in]] the high 80s or low 90s. In any case, [[OverlyNarrowSuperlative it's the best-reviewed Pixar sequel that isn't a follow-up to]] ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'', and it's still seen as a worthy sequel and a good movie in its own right. And there are even some who feel it's an EvenBetterSequel.



** While technically the same character, Baby Dory is the undisputed beloved fan favorite of the film, who endeared ''every'' viewer who saw her.

to:

** While technically Unsurprisingly, given she's the same character, character as the fan favorite of the entire franchise, Baby Dory is the undisputed beloved fan favorite of the film, who endeared ''every'' viewer who saw her.

Top