Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: Holly and her father were... [[HarryPotter Time Turners?]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: Holly and her father were... [[HarryPotter [[Literature/HarryPotter Time Turners?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Holly and her father were... [[HarryPotter Time Turners?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalBacklash: It's known for being the GenreKiller of British Sci-fi for a long time, but not everyone feels it was bad enough for that, believing it to be guilty of predictability and somewhat wooden acting, but not actually terrible. It's been kind of MisBlamed in this regard, since the mid-90s BBC didn't approach live-action sci-fi as their priority.
to:
* CriticalBacklash: It's known for being the GenreKiller of British Sci-fi for a long time, but not everyone feels it was bad enough for that, believing it to be guilty of predictability and somewhat wooden acting, but not actually terrible. It's been kind of MisBlamed in this regard, since the mid-90s BBC didn't approach live-action sci-fi as their priority.priority anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalBacklash: It's known for being the GenreKiller of British Sci-fi for a long time, but not everyone feels it was bad enough for that, believing it to be guilty of predictability and somewhat wooden acting, but not actually terrible.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description'' above sounds very intriguing. Many people found the actual show to be a disappointment.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description'' above sounds very intriguing. Many people found the actual show to be a disappointment.
to:
* CriticalBacklash: It's known for being the GenreKiller of British Sci-fi for a long time, but not everyone feels it was bad enough for that, believing it to be guilty of predictability and somewhat wooden acting, but not actually terrible.
terrible. It's been kind of MisBlamed in this regard, since the mid-90s BBC didn't approach live-action sci-fi as their priority.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description''above of the show sounds very intriguing. Many people found the actual show to [[SoOkayItsAverage be a disappointment.disappointment]].
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description'' above sounds very intriguing. Many people found the actual show to be a [[{{Understatement}} disappointment]].
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: The ''description'' above sounds very intriguing. Many people found the actual show to be a [[{{Understatement}} disappointment]].disappointment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
to:
* CriticalBacklash: It's known for being the GenreKiller of British Sci-fi for a long time, but not everyone feels it was bad enough for that, believing it to be guilty of predictability and somewhat wooden acting, but not actually terrible.
