Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
Obviously, Advance is planning world conquest...but if Disrupt doesn't control their actions, more harm than good will be done if the player doesn't remind them not to go all BombThrowingAnarchists on their goal.
to:
Obviously, Advance is planning world conquest...but if Disrupt doesn't control their actions, more harm than good will be done if the player doesn't remind them not to go all BombThrowingAnarchists on their goal.goal.
* '''Confirmed:''' [[spoiler:While most endings are of the Downer kind, the Bittersweet ones have both factions reining in their authoritarian impulses, and the GoldenEnding has you help expose how fundamentally corrupt ''both'' backers are.]]
* '''Confirmed:''' [[spoiler:While most endings are of the Downer kind, the Bittersweet ones have both factions reining in their authoritarian impulses, and the GoldenEnding has you help expose how fundamentally corrupt ''both'' backers are.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG:Siding with either faction will not end well if the player doesn't regulate their actions.]]
Obviously, Advance is planning world conquest...but if Disrupt doesn't control their actions, more harm than good will be done if the player doesn't remind them not to go all BombThrowingAnarchists on their goal.
Obviously, Advance is planning world conquest...but if Disrupt doesn't control their actions, more harm than good will be done if the player doesn't remind them not to go all BombThrowingAnarchists on their goal.
