Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / HouseOfCardsUS

Go To

OR

Added: 526

Changed: 211

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* I admit, I don't have anything to back this up, but It came to me in a dream and I believe it.

to:

* I admit, I don't have anything to back this up, but It came to me in a dream and I believe it.
* Frank is [[spoiler: basically in hell and is doomed to repeat his life cycle until he's willing to accept defeat and let go, trapping everyone else along with him]]?



* Because Frank Underwood is just that powerful.

to:

* Because Frank Underwood is just that powerful.



* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania during Walker's presidential campaign, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in real life. The party as a whole seems much further to the right in the show universe than it is in reality, with Frank Underwood, a conservative (for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as House Majority Whip, and Garrett Walker, an apparent centrist, as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education that a real life Democrat wouldn't dare to touch. If the Democrats have had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in real life.
** Pennsylvania isn't a guaranteed Democratic state in RealLife either, though. Even though it's consistently gone to the Democrats since 1992, it's been fought for each time and could be swayed by a strong challenger. A bit like North Carolina for the other side.

to:

* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania during Walker's presidential campaign, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in real life. The party as a whole seems much further to the right in the show universe than it is in reality, with Frank Underwood, a conservative (for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as House Majority Whip, and Garrett Walker, an apparent centrist, as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education that a real life Democrat wouldn't dare to touch. If the Democrats have had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in real life.
** * Pennsylvania isn't a guaranteed Democratic state in RealLife either, though. Even though it's consistently gone to the Democrats since 1992, it's been fought for each time and could be swayed by a strong challenger. A bit like North Carolina for the other side.



* Frank's bisexuality is touched upon in exactly one episode per season thus far, not enough to make it a prominent character trait, but enough to remind us that it is there. I can imagine that a revelation that he has had relationships with men will cause a media frenzy and a backlash against him. After all, [[SarcasmMode being ruthless and Machiavellian is fine, making out with guys?]] ''[[SarcasmMode Unacceptable!!!]]''.

to:

* Frank's bisexuality is touched upon in exactly one episode per season thus far, not enough to make it a prominent character trait, but enough to remind us that it is there. I can imagine that a revelation that he has had relationships with men will cause a media frenzy and a backlash against him. After all, [[SarcasmMode being ruthless and Machiavellian is fine, making out with guys?]] ''[[SarcasmMode Unacceptable!!!]]''.



* Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.
** Apropos? Most definitely! (Especially if there are two "between season" ''comedy'' episodes, in addition. In a word: Jokers!)
** Also appropriate in that each season takes approximately one year, and if the Underwoods lose in 2016, it would coincide with the end of the fourth season.

to:

* Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.
** * Apropos? Most definitely! (Especially if there are two "between season" ''comedy'' episodes, in addition. In a word: Jokers!)
** * Also appropriate in that each season takes approximately one year, and if the Underwoods lose in 2016, it would coincide with the end of the fourth season.



* After a long, sad and troubled life on the road, Jenny Curran abandons her infant son to the care of her first love and resolves to make something of herself. Drifting to South Carolina and meeting Francis, a man who is the polar opposite of Forrest, she changes her name to Claire and plots a move to the highest office in the land.
** Unlikely. Claire is a wealthy Texas socialite, and it is even occasionally hinted that Frank married her for her family's money.

to:

* After a long, sad and troubled life on the road, Jenny Curran abandons her infant son to the care of her first love and resolves to make something of herself. Drifting to South Carolina and meeting Francis, a man who is the polar opposite of Forrest, she changes her name to Claire and plots a move to the highest office in the land.
** * Unlikely. Claire is a wealthy Texas socialite, and it is even occasionally hinted that Frank married her for her family's money.



* Basically, there's the shot of the former in his "office", as the camera pulls back. It's possible he and Frank's new chief of staff (who will take the position officially when [[spoiler: Doug's body is found]]) will face off. As for Rachel--well, assuming she won't just hide somewhere and never be seen again in the show (She Knows Too Much, after all), we could well see her teaming up with the hacktivist (and, what the heck, the remaining member of Zoe's team--who'd panicked after [[spoiler: Zoe's death]]) to seek to expose the truth. Of course, Frank--being Frank--will destroy them by the end of the Season. Cue Season 4.
** [[spoiler: Semi-Jossed for them both. Neither of them are really antagonistic, the hacktivist just trying to stay free and Rachel just trying to not get killed to protect a secret she has no interest in revealing.]]

to:

* Basically, there's the shot of the former in his "office", as the camera pulls back. It's possible he and Frank's new chief of staff (who will take the position officially when [[spoiler: Doug's body is found]]) will face off. As for Rachel--well, assuming she won't just hide somewhere and never be seen again in the show (She Knows Too Much, after all), we could well see her teaming up with the hacktivist (and, what the heck, the remaining member of Zoe's team--who'd panicked after [[spoiler: Zoe's death]]) to seek to expose the truth. Of course, Frank--being Frank--will destroy them by the end of the Season. Cue Season 4.
** * [[spoiler: Semi-Jossed for them both. Neither of them are really antagonistic, the hacktivist just trying to stay free and Rachel just trying to not get killed to protect a secret she has no interest in revealing.]]



* The body count is rising - season one opened with the death of [[EstablishingCharacterMoment a dog]] and built up to the death of [[spoiler: Peter Russo]]; season two opened with the death of [[spoiler: Zoe Barnes]] and ended with [[spoiler: Doug Stamper's apparent death]]. Each death leaves Frank more and more vulnerable, and if this trend continues then, once he loses the few people he has left on his side, Frank'll probably end up biting it.
** Turns out [[spoiler: Doug isn't dead after all]].
* Given the ending of the original version of ''House of Cards'', I'd say that Frank's end will be [[spoiler: getting shot by a sniper during the unveiling of a memorial.]]

to:

* The body count is rising - season one opened with the death of [[EstablishingCharacterMoment a dog]] and built up to the death of [[spoiler: Peter Russo]]; season two opened with the death of [[spoiler: Zoe Barnes]] and ended with [[spoiler: Doug Stamper's apparent death]]. Each death leaves Frank more and more vulnerable, and if this trend continues then, once he loses the few people he has left on his side, Frank'll probably end up biting it.
** * Turns out [[spoiler: Doug isn't dead after all]].
* ** Given the ending of the original version of ''House of Cards'', I'd say that Frank's end will be [[spoiler: getting shot by a sniper during the unveiling of a memorial.]]



* Frank Underwood is finally at the top. There is only one direction for him to go. He will be disgraced, just like his predecessor, and will be forced to swallow his just desserts. Season 4 will be all about Frank making amends and returning to power.
** [[spoiler: Jossed for season 3, which has a major theme of him trying to secure re-election, and ends with him winning the Iowa Caucus.]]

to:

* Frank Underwood is finally at the top. There is only one direction for him to go. He will be disgraced, just like his predecessor, and will be forced to swallow his just desserts. Season 4 will be all about Frank making amends and returning to power.
** * [[spoiler: Jossed for season 3, which has a major theme of him trying to secure re-election, and ends with him winning the Iowa Caucus.]]



* [[spoiler: The letter he thought he was burning, that contains his confession, is still with Walker and will be key in Frank's downfall.]]

to:

* [[spoiler: The letter he thought he was burning, that contains his confession, is still with Walker and will be key in Frank's downfall.]]



* He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.

to:

* He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.



* Season 3 and/or 4 will be all about Walker finally realizing that Frank played him like a fiddle and attempting to expose what he's done. The climax will be the 2016 primaries where Walker will once again run and become Frank's main rival for the nomination.
** [[spoiler: Jossed for Season 3, Walker does not appear and is barely mentioned throughout the season.]]
** More likey for season four, in fitting with the fact that that's the next major election cycle (2016), and at thirteen episodes per season, we get 52- the same as a set of cards

to:

* Season 3 and/or 4 will be all about Walker finally realizing that Frank played him like a fiddle and attempting to expose what he's done. The climax will be the 2016 primaries where Walker will once again run and become Frank's main rival for the nomination.
** * [[spoiler: Jossed for Season 3, Walker does not appear and is barely mentioned throughout the season.]]
** More likey likely for season four, in fitting with the fact that that's the next major election cycle (2016), and at thirteen episodes per season, we get 52- the same as a set of cards



* Frank loves to manipulate people, make plays, and he wants more than anything to keep his power strong. If he's losing the presidential or primary election in Season 4, he might just try a Film/WagTheDog, incite tensions with Russia in order to give the voting public a strong reason to keep him around... and then it backfires.

to:

* Frank loves to manipulate people, make plays, and he wants more than anything to keep his power strong. If he's losing the presidential or primary election in Season 4, he might just try a Film/WagTheDog, incite tensions with Russia in order to give the voting public a strong reason to keep him around... and then it backfires.



* Frank Underwood's constant OOC behavior throughout the season ''really'' give the impression that something's "off". Considering how part of the implication of the last several episodes is that it's up to Doug to clean up the mess--and that he's more than up to the challenge--it's interesting to speculate that Doug's dreaming about how desperately Frank "really" needs him, telling himself that without his help, Frank's nothing.

to:

* Frank Underwood's constant OOC behavior throughout the season ''really'' give the impression that something's "off". Considering how part of the implication of the last several episodes is that it's up to Doug to clean up the mess--and that he's more than up to the challenge--it's interesting to speculate that Doug's dreaming about how desperately Frank "really" needs him, telling himself that without his help, Frank's nothing.



* [[spoiler: Although there IS a terror attack in the last two episodes, where the Islamic Organization Caliphate kills an american citizen.]]

to:

* [[spoiler: Although there IS a terror attack in the last two episodes, where the Islamic Organization Caliphate kills an american American citizen.]]



* I think there've been articles and interviews with Constance Zimmer suggesting that Janine Skorsky, last seen hiding as a teacher in Ithaca trying to distance herself from Frank, will revive interest in Zoe's death and bring about Frank's downfall.

to:

* I think there've been articles and interviews with Constance Zimmer suggesting that Janine Skorsky, last seen hiding as a teacher in Ithaca trying to distance herself from Frank, will revive interest in Zoe's death and bring about Frank's downfall.



* Given that a major element of Season 3 is that Frank is getting played left and right by not!Putin, my hope is that the show will end with Frank and not!Putin forcing each other into a corner, and with Frank wanting to pull a "Wag the Dog" to improve his chances of reelection, he miscalculates his schemes and things go to hell in the end.

to:

* Given that a major element of Season 3 is that Frank is getting played left and right by not!Putin, my hope is that the show will end with Frank and not!Putin forcing each other into a corner, and with Frank wanting to pull a "Wag the Dog" to improve his chances of reelection, he miscalculates his schemes and things go to hell in the end.



#Hammerschmidt's reputation is only just on the mend, especially since he went freelance after he left the ''Herald'' and only returned to the ''Herald'' for backing when he knew he was on the verge of breaking the story. To go public on "Frank Underwood is a murderer" without credible sources to back him up would probably be career suicide.

to:

#Hammerschmidt's reputation is only just on the mend, especially since he went freelance after he left the ''Herald'' and only returned to the ''Herald'' for backing when he knew he was on the verge of breaking the story. To go public on "Frank Underwood is a murderer" without credible sources to back him up would probably be career suicide.suicide.

[[WMG: Frank's asides to the Fourth Wall are possible because this is Frank's autobiography and he's speaking to the readers]]
He can't die until he writes a rough draft at the very least, not that it [[KilledMidSentence guarantees his safety]] or even that anyone will actually read the book. Alternately, like ''Film/{{Goodfellas}}'' and ''Film/HeavenlyCreatures'' the asides are from court transcripts. [[spoiler: Claire can do it too because she's either a co-author or she's written her own book on the same time period.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, that's assuming that Hammerschmidt was being honest when he says he doesn't believe Frank could have killed anyone. Reporters are known to sometimes lie to get cooperation, and we see this later in season 4 when Hammerschmidt pays a visit to Garrett Walker. From the dialogue, it seems that Hammerschmidt was only able to secure an interview with Walker by claiming he wanted to interview Walker about his scholarship fund. Given that, part of me thinks Hammerschmidt very much suspects Frank killed Zoe and Russo (or at the very least hired assassins to kill them). He just can't go public with that for a few reasons:
#If debunked Clinton "death list" conspiracy theories have shown us anything, it's that the idea of the President of the United States being a murderer is tin foil hat material. And Hammerschmidt would know that. So he's choosing to not 'publicly' pursue that portion of the story. Instead he's wisely choosing to go after something more acceptable, and probably a lot easier for the public to buy: corruption in the White House.
#Hammerschmidt's reputation is only just on the mend. To go public on "Frank Underwood is a murderer" without sources to back him up would probably be career suicide.

to:

However, that's assuming that Hammerschmidt was being honest when he says he doesn't believe Frank could have killed anyone. Reporters are known to like police detectives - sometimes they'll lie to get cooperation, and we see someone to say things they wouldn't normally say. An example of this later is in season 4 Chapter 51 when Hammerschmidt pays a visit to Garrett Walker. From the dialogue, it The dialogue seems to imply that Hammerschmidt was only able had to lie to Walker on the phone about the purpose of his visit in order to secure an interview with Walker by claiming he wanted to interview Walker about his scholarship fund. time. Given that, part of me thinks Hammerschmidt very much suspects Frank killed Zoe and Russo (or at the very least hired assassins to kill them).them, if not just his part in the cover-up). He just can't go public with that for a few reasons:
#If debunked Clinton "death list" conspiracy theories have shown us anything, it's that the idea of the President of the United States being a murderer is tin foil hat material. And Hammerschmidt would know that. So he's choosing to not 'publicly' pursue that portion of the story. Instead he's wisely choosing to go after something the "corruption in the White House" angle, because that's more acceptable, and probably a lot easier for the public to buy: corruption in the White House.
believe.
#Hammerschmidt's reputation is only just on the mend. mend, especially since he went freelance after he left the ''Herald'' and only returned to the ''Herald'' for backing when he knew he was on the verge of breaking the story. To go public on "Frank Underwood is a murderer" without credible sources to back him up would probably be career suicide.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It'll be fitting, especially when you consider how he staged the murders he committed (Peter Russo's as a suicide, Zoe Barnes' as either suicide or a tragic accident), and his own views on people who do commit suicide. Plus, it'll give him a chance to make a truly Shakespearean villainous speech to the audience one last time.

to:

It'll be fitting, especially when you consider how he staged the murders he committed (Peter Russo's as a suicide, Zoe Barnes' as either suicide or a tragic accident), and his own views on people who do commit suicide. Plus, it'll give him a chance to make a truly Shakespearean villainous speech to the audience one last time.time.

[[WMG:Tom Hammerschmidt actually does believe Frank is a murderer]]

Watching Tom Hammerschmidt's plotline in the second half of season 4, part of me wondered, why is Hammerschmidt focused on exposing Frank's corruption as opposed to linking him to Russo and Zoe Barnes' deaths? In Chapter 49, when Heather Dunbar visits Hammerschmidt at his house, and he lets her in on what he's been doing. As they are talking it over, she says "I don't think Frank's a murderer," and Hammerschmidt agrees.

However, that's assuming that Hammerschmidt was being honest when he says he doesn't believe Frank could have killed anyone. Reporters are known to sometimes lie to get cooperation, and we see this later in season 4 when Hammerschmidt pays a visit to Garrett Walker. From the dialogue, it seems that Hammerschmidt was only able to secure an interview with Walker by claiming he wanted to interview Walker about his scholarship fund. Given that, part of me thinks Hammerschmidt very much suspects Frank killed Zoe and Russo (or at the very least hired assassins to kill them). He just can't go public with that for a few reasons:
#If debunked Clinton "death list" conspiracy theories have shown us anything, it's that the idea of the President of the United States being a murderer is tin foil hat material. And Hammerschmidt would know that. So he's choosing to not 'publicly' pursue that portion of the story. Instead he's wisely choosing to go after something more acceptable, and probably a lot easier for the public to buy: corruption in the White House.
#Hammerschmidt's reputation is only just on the mend. To go public on "Frank Underwood is a murderer" without sources to back him up would probably be career suicide.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, in season 2, Frank will get a PS4.

to:

* Similarly, in season 2, Frank will get a PS4.[=PS4=].

Added: 49

Changed: 209

Removed: 232

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In fact, we know 9/11 DID happen in this timeline since Will Conway brings it up at one of his rallies.

to:

*** In fact, we know 9/11 DID happen in this timeline since the ''House of Cards'' timeline. In season 4, Will Conway brings it up at one of his rallies.mentioned that he enlisted with the Air Force literally the day after 9/11 happened.



** It's Seth Grayson, and Doug is attacking him for leaking a photo of Frank's father posing with KKK members.
#There's a shot of Doug in the hospital. It's either a flashback of something new not seen in Season 2 during his recovery from the ordeal with Rachel, or Doug finds himself hospitalized again. Maybe he somehow loses the Kern fight.

to:

** It's Seth Grayson, and Doug is attacking him for leaking a photo of Frank's father posing with KKK members.
#There's a shot
members and another one of Doug in the hospital. It's either a flashback of something new not seen in Season 2 during his recovery from the ordeal him with Rachel, or Doug finds himself hospitalized again. Maybe he somehow loses the Kern fight. Civil War reenactor.



**That's Lucas talking with the Armenian cellmate



Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the events of Season 4, Episode 4.

to:

Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the events of Season 4, Episode 4.
getting shot
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
marked a spoiler like the person who posted it did not


* Given the ending of the original version of ''House of Cards'', I'd say that Frank's end will be getting shot by a sniper during the unveiling of a memorial.

to:

* Given the ending of the original version of ''House of Cards'', I'd say that Frank's end will be [[spoiler: getting shot by a sniper during the unveiling of a memorial.
memorial.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's Frank hallucinating being attacked by the ghosts of Zoe Barnes and Peter Russo in the Oval Office while he's undergoing surgery
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* [[spoiler: Although there IS a terror attack in the last two episodes, where the Islamic Organization Caliphate kills an american citizen.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the events of Season 4, Episode 4.

to:

Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the events of Season 4, Episode 4.4.

[[WMG: Frank will commit suicide rather than go to jail for his crimes]]
It'll be fitting, especially when you consider how he staged the murders he committed (Peter Russo's as a suicide, Zoe Barnes' as either suicide or a tragic accident), and his own views on people who do commit suicide. Plus, it'll give him a chance to make a truly Shakespearean villainous speech to the audience one last time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
spoilers


Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the shooting.

to:

Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the shooting.events of Season 4, Episode 4.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Her staff are being questioned about a meeting she had with Lucas Goodwin.

to:

** Her staff are being questioned about a meeting she had with Lucas Goodwin.Goodwin.

[[WMG:Frank will die in season 5]]
Its already been foreshadowed in season 4 that FU won't make it past season 5. There's his liver problems, and then there's the fact that you get a hint Frank seems to be fighting for his health ever since the shooting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* [[spoiler: Jossed. It's not a terror attack, but an assassination attempt on Frank's life.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***In fact, we know 9/11 DID happen in this timeline since Will Conway brings it up at one of his rallies.

Added: 278

Changed: 76

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**It's Frank having a hallucination.



**It's the crowd scattering after Lucas Goodwin attempts to assassinate Frank, only succeeding in wounding Frank and killing Meechum.



**It's Seth Grayson, and Doug is attacking him for leaking a photo of Frank's father posing with KKK members.




to:

**Her staff are being questioned about a meeting she had with Lucas Goodwin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




Added DiffLines:

* Except Frank ''didn't'' lose the nomination to Dunbar -- in fact, he won the Iowa caucus, meaning that right now he's ahead of her. While it's not out of the question that he'll end up lagging behind later in the race and then resort to extreme methods, right now it's not necessary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Given that a major element of Season 3 is that Frank is getting played left and right by not!Putin, my hope is that the show will end with Frank and not!Putin forcing each other into a corner, and with Frank wanting to pull a "Wag the Dog" to improve his chances of reelection, he miscalculates his schemes and things go to hell in the end.

to:

* Given that a major element of Season 3 is that Frank is getting played left and right by not!Putin, my hope is that the show will end with Frank and not!Putin forcing each other into a corner, and with Frank wanting to pull a "Wag the Dog" to improve his chances of reelection, he miscalculates his schemes and things go to hell in the end.end.

[[WMG:Off the Season 4 trailer, these things might happen]]
#There's a shot of Claire facing off with Petrov. They're big rivals, so.
#There's a shot of a woman sitting on Frank. Many think it's Zoe Barnes because of her height, body, and the clothes she wears resembles something of Zoe. Possibly a vision or another woman who reminds him of her.
#A shot of the actor who played Augustus Underwood in that Civil War reenactment scene in season 2. So he either comes back for another reenactment or he's either joined the Anti-Frank and will attempt an assassination on him or is joining Team Frank.
#There's a shot of a crowd panicking and taking cover. It looks like it could be an assassination attempt, since the only people standing appear to be Secret Service agents.
#There's a shot in which we see Claire's reflection while someone else attacks Frank. Assuming this could be either Meechum or someone else within the Secret Service detail because that would be impossible to happen with a regular person since he's the President.
#Doug attacks someone and throws them to the floor. I think most have said the person Doug is attacking is the Underwoods' former PR guy Connor Ellis, but it looks more like the guy being attacked is Michael Kern. Kern would be another loop from the old days. He was the first person Frank tore down, and of course with the Walker stuff. He could have information or be suspecting something and Doug acts quickly.
#There's a shot of Doug in the hospital. It's either a flashback of something new not seen in Season 2 during his recovery from the ordeal with Rachel, or Doug finds himself hospitalized again. Maybe he somehow loses the Kern fight.
#There's a shot of Lucas Goodwin in prison, so he's back in the picture. Perhaps he's conspiring with a cellmate who's about to be released, or maybe it's someone undercover to stop Lucas or maybe against Frank. Or possibly someone hired by Frank through Doug to kill Lucas in prison.
#In one shot, we see Heather Dunbar looking out a window with her staff appearing to be questioned by police or Secret Service. Maybe a scheme to end her campaign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Jossed. [[http://deadline.com/2016/01/house-of-cards-renewed-season-5-netflix-beau-willimon-departs-1201692370/ The show has been renewed for a fifth season]].

Added: 81

Changed: 75

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* jossed
[[WMG: {{Sony}} is winning the Console War in the House Of Cards verse.]]

to:

* jossed
Jossed

[[WMG: {{Sony}} Creator/{{Sony}} is winning the Console War in the House Of Cards verse.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*I personally thought that "Bush Jr." was George W. Bush and his presidency still happened (since George H.W. Bush is referred to as Bush Sr.), and another fictional Republican filled in the gap between the end of Bush's presidency and the start of Walker's presidency, as it is hinted that the Democrats finally get back into power when the show starts. I don't think [=McCain=], Hillary or Obama were that interim President from 2009-2013, as none of them are in Congress and aren't even mentioned or shown, so I think the government probably transitioned from reality to fiction (with the obvious exceptions of Frank, and other fictional characters in Congress for past years/decades like Jackie Sharp, Heather Dunbar, Doug Stamper, Bob Birch, Hector Mendoza and whatnot) around 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG:Season 4 will end with World War 3]]
* Given that a major element of Season 3 is that Frank is getting played left and right by not!Putin, my hope is that the show will end with Frank and not!Putin forcing each other into a corner, and with Frank wanting to pull a "Wag the Dog" to improve his chances of reelection, he miscalculates his schemes and things go to hell in the end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG:Janine Skorsky will reenter the show]]
* I think there've been articles and interviews with Constance Zimmer suggesting that Janine Skorsky, last seen hiding as a teacher in Ithaca trying to distance herself from Frank, will revive interest in Zoe's death and bring about Frank's downfall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Chapter 39, there's a scene where Claire lights a cigarette, but if you watch closely, she never actually smokes it.

to:

* In Chapter 39, there's a scene where Claire lights a cigarette, but if you watch closely, she never actually smokes it.it.

[[WMG:Rachel is still alive]]
And Doug never killed her. Look, they never actually showed Rachel getting hit. They showed him turning around in the van, but before he gets very close to her, the scene cuts away. And then we see less than five seconds of Doug burying with a shovel. Without showing what happened between those two points in time, it seems to point to the dead body possibly NOT being Rachel, even though that appears to be red hair, just like what Rachel has, sticking out of the grave. It points to a possible season 4 storyline twist of Doug killed someone else.

[[WMG:Doug didn't want to kill Rachel]]
He clearly had feelings for her. I don't think he wanted to have to kill her (this is assuming she is in fact six feet under), but he knew if he let her go and she reneged on her whole "I just want to live my life away from it all" deal, and went public with any of what she knows, it would mean his own death because Frank would most certainly kill him if he failed again. It was him or her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


I'd also bet that Claire was right, and Doug actually did make a backup copy of that journal as insurance, just in case his meeting with Frank didn't go as smoothly as he hoped. Doug may be blindly loyal when it comes to Frank, but the man isn't stupid and considering the role he played in Peter Russo's and Zoe Barnes's deaths, Doug has seen first hand the lengths Frank is willing to go to when someone presents themselves as a threat.

to:

I'd also bet that Claire was right, and Doug actually did make a backup copy of that journal as insurance, just in case his meeting with Frank didn't go as smoothly as he hoped. Doug may be blindly loyal when it comes to Frank, but the man isn't stupid and considering the role he played in Peter Russo's and Zoe Barnes's deaths, Doug has seen first hand the lengths Frank is willing to go to when someone presents themselves as a threat.threat.

[[WMG:Claire is pregnant at the end of season 3]]
Towards the end of season 3, Claire shows a range of strange emotions in regards to her usual personality that seemed a bit out-of-character. Perhaps these are mood swings related to a pregnancy. Evidence:
* Her sudden appetite. At the end of Chapter 28, she claims she is not hungry, and then almost throws up before making some not some great looking eggs in a hurry.
* Up and down emotions, and mood swings, a big change from her usual self.
* In later episodes, we mostly see her around kids reading to the group of young kids and the mother with the young child. The mother mentions to her having a husband cheating and being stuck to him due to having a child with him- which is referenced about Claire's marriage to Frank.
* In Chapter 39, there's a scene where Claire lights a cigarette, but if you watch closely, she never actually smokes it.

Added: 835

Changed: 40

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:Doug will be killed in the fourth season]]

to:

[[WMG:Doug [[WMG:Doug's loyalty to Frank will be killed tested in season 4]]
Frank knows Doug's one and only desire in life is to serve him. Doug's brother even pointed out that his life is all about Frank, while the brother has the nice home, wife, kids, "the American Dream", basically.

It wouldn't surprise me if at some point in Season 4, Doug finds out Frank has been having him closely monitored ever since their meeting
in the fourth season]]Oval Office when Doug burned the journal.

I'd also bet that Claire was right, and Doug actually did make a backup copy of that journal as insurance, just in case his meeting with Frank didn't go as smoothly as he hoped. Doug may be blindly loyal when it comes to Frank, but the man isn't stupid and considering the role he played in Peter Russo's and Zoe Barnes's deaths, Doug has seen first hand the lengths Frank is willing to go to when someone presents themselves as a threat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Frank loves to manipulate people, make plays, and he wants more than anything to keep his power strong. If he's losing the presidential or primary election in Season 4, he might just try a WagTheDog, incite tensions with Russia in order to give the voting public a strong reason to keep him around... and then it backfires.

to:

* Frank loves to manipulate people, make plays, and he wants more than anything to keep his power strong. If he's losing the presidential or primary election in Season 4, he might just try a WagTheDog, Film/WagTheDog, incite tensions with Russia in order to give the voting public a strong reason to keep him around... and then it backfires.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania during Walker's presidential campaign, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in RL. The party as a whole seems much further to the right than it is in reality, with Frank Underwood, a conservative (for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as House Majority Whip, and Garrett Walker, an apparent centrist, as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education that a real life Democrat wouldn't dare to touch. If the Democrats have had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in real life.

to:

* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania during Walker's presidential campaign, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in RL. real life. The party as a whole seems much further to the right in the show universe than it is in reality, with Frank Underwood, a conservative (for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as House Majority Whip, and Garrett Walker, an apparent centrist, as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education that a real life Democrat wouldn't dare to touch. If the Democrats have had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in real life.



Think about it. There are allegations that Bill Clinton had a "death list", which is a list of people allegedly ordered killed on orders of the Clinton administration. So, in the show universe, there might be conspiracy theorists who will say that Peter Russo and Zoe Barnes were on the Underwood death list. Now while Frank did take both of those people in ways that look like a suicide and accident respectively, that won't shut up the conspiracy theorists.

[[WMG:Doug will be killed in the fourth season]]

to:

Think about it. There are allegations that Bill Clinton had a "death list", which is a list of people allegedly ordered killed on orders of the Clinton administration. So, in the show universe, there might be conspiracy theorists who will say that Peter Russo and Zoe Barnes were on the Underwood death list. Now while Frank did take personally kill both of those people in ways that look like a suicide and accident respectively, that won't shut up the conspiracy theorists.

[[WMG:Doug will be killed in the fourth season]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Think about it. There are allegations that Bill Clinton had a "death list", which is a list of people allegedly ordered killed on orders of the Clinton administration. So, in the show universe, there might be conspiracy theorists who will say that Peter Russo and Zoe Barnes were on the Underwood death list. Now while Frank did take both of those people in ways that look like a suicide and accident respectively, that won't shut up the conspiracy theorists.

to:

Think about it. There are allegations that Bill Clinton had a "death list", which is a list of people allegedly ordered killed on orders of the Clinton administration. So, in the show universe, there might be conspiracy theorists who will say that Peter Russo and Zoe Barnes were on the Underwood death list. Now while Frank did take both of those people in ways that look like a suicide and accident respectively, that won't shut up the conspiracy theorists.theorists.

[[WMG:Doug will be killed in the fourth season]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Series/{{Jeopardy}}'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until January 20, 2001 and the end of the presidency of UsefulNotes/BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with Garrett Walker (D-CO) being a '''new Democratic president''', having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. It's also explicitly mentioned that Walker is the ''45th'' President of the United States, meaning one things: there were two Presidents between January 20, 2001 and January 21, 2013[[note]]January 20th, 2013 fell on a Sunday, so the official inauguration ceremony for Walker would be held on Monday, as is the tradition[[/note]], and given how the 22nd Amendment works, one of them was a two-term President and the other was a one-term President.

to:

We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Series/{{Jeopardy}}'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until January 20, 2001 and the end of the presidency of UsefulNotes/BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with Garrett Walker (D-CO) being a '''new Democratic president''', having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. It's also explicitly mentioned that Walker is the ''45th'' President of the United States, meaning one things: two things are for certain: there were two Presidents between January 20, 2001 and January 21, 2013[[note]]January 20th, 2013 fell on a Sunday, so the official inauguration ceremony for Walker would be held on Monday, as is the tradition[[/note]], and given how the 22nd Amendment works, one of them was a two-term President and the other was a one-term President.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where UsefulNotes/AlGore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Series/{{Jeopardy}}'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until January 20, 2001 and the end of the presidency of UsefulNotes/BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with Garrett Walker (D-CO) being a '''new Democratic president''', having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. Therefore, the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is UsefulNotes/AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush. Gore then either served one term and was followed by a two-term Republican, or served two terms and was followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.
** There is reference to Catherine Durant being "vocally anti-war" which means that 9/11 and the War on Terror still happened in the way they unfolded in real life. For the record, invading Afghanistan would have been a no-brainer after 9/11 regardless of who was President at the time, but it's hard to believe that Al Gore would invade Iraq after that.
*** At one point, the show refers to a "Bush Senior" (implying that there is a junior as well) and the Republicans control the Senate.
**** Alternatively, "Bush Senior" is PRESCOTT Bush (41's father) and the point of divergence from our own time is even further back.
**** It can't be Prescott Bush. The reference to Bush Sr takes place in 1992, meaning it's referring to UsefulNotes/GeorgeHWBush. Prescott Bush died in 1972, and there are references to the presidencies of UsefulNotes/JimmyCarter and UsefulNotes/BillClinton.
**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to succeed Gore later.
** I think the safest point of departure would be the 2008 election. The electorate weren't confident that the Democrats who were backing UsefulNotes/BarackObama could get them out of the economic slump and went with [=McCain=] and the Democrats lost the House. Things went very much similarly (or perhaps worst) as they did in our timeline until 2012, when Walker was elected.
** A major plot element in Season 3 is dealing with reducing tensions between Israel and Palestine, and no massive ongoing quagmires in Iraq or Afghanistan are mentioned. Maybe just trying to [[ConservationOfDetail keep things tidy]], but might also be a sign that there is no conflict in Afghanistan or Iraq.


to:

[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where UsefulNotes/AlGore won How the 2000 presidential election.]]
*
alternate history of the Oval Office in this show timeline works]]
We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Series/{{Jeopardy}}'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until January 20, 2001 and the end of the presidency of UsefulNotes/BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with Garrett Walker (D-CO) being a '''new Democratic president''', having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. Therefore, It's also explicitly mentioned that Walker is the ''45th'' President of the United States, meaning one things: there were two Presidents between January 20, 2001 and January 21, 2013[[note]]January 20th, 2013 fell on a Sunday, so the official inauguration ceremony for Walker would be held on Monday, as is the tradition[[/note]], and given how the 22nd Amendment works, one of them was a two-term President and the other was a one-term President.
*Here's one theory:
the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is that UsefulNotes/AlGore winning won the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush.Bush, due to the voting machine discrepancy never happening. Gore then either served one term and was followed by a two-term Republican, or served two terms and was followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.
** There is reference to Catherine Durant being "vocally anti-war" which means that while there may have been a different President than Bush in office, 9/11 still happened as it did in real life, and the War on Terror still happened in the way they unfolded similarly to how it did in real life. For the record, invading Afghanistan would have been a no-brainer after 9/11 regardless of who was President at the time, but it's hard to believe that Al Gore would invade Iraq after that.
*** At *At one point, the show refers to a "Bush Senior" (implying that there is a junior as well) and the Republicans control the Senate.
**** ** Alternatively, "Bush Senior" is PRESCOTT Prescott Bush (41's (H.W. Bush's father) and the point of divergence from our own time is even further back.
**** It ***It can't be Prescott Bush. The reference to Bush Bush, Sr takes place in 1992, meaning it's referring to UsefulNotes/GeorgeHWBush. Prescott Bush died in 1972, and there are references to the presidencies of UsefulNotes/JimmyCarter UsefulNotes/JimmyCarter, UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan and UsefulNotes/BillClinton.
**** Perhaps ***Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to succeed Gore later.
** I *I think the safest point of departure would be the 2008 election. The Perhaps in the ''House of Cards'' timeline, the electorate weren't confident that the Democrats who were backing UsefulNotes/BarackObama could would get them out of the economic slump and went with [=McCain=] John [=McCain=], and the Democrats lost the House. Things went were then very much similarly (or perhaps worst) as they did similar to what happened in our timeline until 2012, when Walker was elected.
** A *A major plot element in Season 3 is dealing with reducing tensions between Israel and Palestine, and no massive ongoing quagmires in Iraq or Afghanistan are mentioned. Maybe just trying to [[ConservationOfDetail keep things tidy]], but might also be a sign that there is no conflict in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:Donald Blythe is somehow related to UsefulNotes/BillClinton]]
My logic is the fact that Bill Clinton's birth name was 'William Jefferson Blythe III'. And like Clinton, Donald Blythe is a Democrat. He even may be a baby boomer, like Clinton is.

to:

[[WMG:Donald Blythe is somehow related to UsefulNotes/BillClinton]]
My logic is the fact that Bill Clinton's birth name BillClinton, in real life, was born 'William Jefferson Blythe III'. And like Clinton, III', and changed his last name to 'Clinton' at age 15 as a gesture toward his stepfather Roger Clinton. Donald Blythe is explicitly a Democrat, and his actor Reed Birney is about eight years younger than Clinton is. So my theory goes that in this alternate timeline, Donald Blythe is a Democrat. He even may be a baby boomer, like Clinton is.cousin on Clinton's father's side.

Top