Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / HouseOfCardsUS

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.

to:

* He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.reappearance.

[[WMG: Walker will play the role that the King did in the original UK series]]

Season 3 and/or 4 will be all about Walker finally realizing that Frank played him like a fiddle and attempting to expose what he's done. The climax will be the 2016 primaries where Walker will once again run and become Frank's main rival for the nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.

to:

* He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[spoiler: The letter he thought he was burning, that contains his confession, is still with President Walker and will be key in Frank's downfall.]]

to:

* [[spoiler: The letter he thought he was burning, that contains his confession, is still with President Walker and will be key in Frank's downfall.]]]]

[[WMG:Stamper isn't dead.]]
He was LeftForDead by Rachel, but she's just an average young woman who doesn't seem to make a habit of exercising or murdering people, she might not even have really wanted him dead specifically as much as she just wanted to get away from him, and bashing with a rock isn't necessarily the world's most effective murder method, so I doubt his injuries are too severe. Since we didn't even see him lying on the ground or anything, it seems like a pretty strong setup for him to have a surprise reappearance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just going to call this now so I can look smart later.


* Frank Underwood is finally at the top. There is only one direction for him to go. He will be disgraced, just like his predecessor, and will be forced to swallow his just desserts. Season 4 will be all about Frank making amends and returning to power.

to:

* Frank Underwood is finally at the top. There is only one direction for him to go. He will be disgraced, just like his predecessor, and will be forced to swallow his just desserts. Season 4 will be all about Frank making amends and returning to power.power.

[[WMG: The envelope Frank burned at the end of Season 2 was empty.]]
* [[spoiler: The letter he thought he was burning, that contains his confession, is still with President Walker and will be key in Frank's downfall.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where AlGore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with a '''new Democratic president''' having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. Therefore, the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush. Gore then either serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.

to:

[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where AlGore UsefulNotes/AlGore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of BillClinton UsefulNotes/BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of GeorgeWBush UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with a '''new Democratic president''' having been elected in '''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. Therefore, the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is AlGore UsefulNotes/AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush. Gore then either serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.



**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to succeed Gore later.

to:

**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be GeorgeWBush UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to succeed Gore later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ousted during season 3


* The body count is rising - season one opened with the death of [[EstablishingCharacterMoment a dog]] and built up to the death of [[spoiler: Peter Russo]]; season two opened with the death of [[spoiler: Zoe Barnes]] and ended with [[spoiler: Doug Stamper's apparent death]]. Each death leaves Frank more and more vulnerable, and if this trend continues then, once he loses the few people he has left on his side, Frank'll probably end up biting it.

to:

* The body count is rising - season one opened with the death of [[EstablishingCharacterMoment a dog]] and built up to the death of [[spoiler: Peter Russo]]; season two opened with the death of [[spoiler: Zoe Barnes]] and ended with [[spoiler: Doug Stamper's apparent death]]. Each death leaves Frank more and more vulnerable, and if this trend continues then, once he loses the few people he has left on his side, Frank'll probably end up biting it.it.

[[WMG: Frank will be ousted as President at the end of season 3]]
* Frank Underwood is finally at the top. There is only one direction for him to go. He will be disgraced, just like his predecessor, and will be forced to swallow his just desserts. Season 4 will be all about Frank making amends and returning to power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Basically, there's the shot of the former in his "office", as the camera pulls back. It's possible he and Frank's new chief of staff (who will take the position officially when [[spoiler: Doug's body is found]]) will face off. As for Rachel--well, assuming she won't just hide somewhere and never be seen again in the show (She Knows Too Much, after all), we could well see her teaming up with the hacktivist (and, what the heck, the remaining member of Zoe's team--who'd panicked after [[spoiler: Zoe's death]]) to seek to expose the truth. Of course, Frank--being Frank--will destroy them by the end of the Season. Cue Season 4.

to:

* Basically, there's the shot of the former in his "office", as the camera pulls back. It's possible he and Frank's new chief of staff (who will take the position officially when [[spoiler: Doug's body is found]]) will face off. As for Rachel--well, assuming she won't just hide somewhere and never be seen again in the show (She Knows Too Much, after all), we could well see her teaming up with the hacktivist (and, what the heck, the remaining member of Zoe's team--who'd panicked after [[spoiler: Zoe's death]]) to seek to expose the truth. Of course, Frank--being Frank--will destroy them by the end of the Season. Cue Season 4.4.

[[WMG: Frank will die at the end of the last season.]]
* The body count is rising - season one opened with the death of [[EstablishingCharacterMoment a dog]] and built up to the death of [[spoiler: Peter Russo]]; season two opened with the death of [[spoiler: Zoe Barnes]] and ended with [[spoiler: Doug Stamper's apparent death]]. Each death leaves Frank more and more vulnerable, and if this trend continues then, once he loses the few people he has left on his side, Frank'll probably end up biting it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This WMG actually fits quite well with the one below--well, the "Clinton--Bush--McCain" version, anyway.

to:

** This WMG actually fits quite well with the one below--well, the "Clinton--Bush--McCain" "Clinton--Bush--[=McCain=]" version, anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** This WMG actually fits quite well with the one below--well, the "Clinton--Bush--McCain" version, anyway.

Added: 711

Changed: 128

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Apropos? Most definitely! (Especially if there are two "between season" ''comedy'' episodes, in addition. In a word: Jokers!)



* After a long, sad and troubled life on the road, Jenny Curran abandons her infant son to the care of her first love and resolves to make something of herself. Drifting to South Carolina and meeting Francis, a man who is the polar opposite of Forrest, she changes her name to Claire and plots a move to the highest office in the land.

to:

* After a long, sad and troubled life on the road, Jenny Curran abandons her infant son to the care of her first love and resolves to make something of herself. Drifting to South Carolina and meeting Francis, a man who is the polar opposite of Forrest, she changes her name to Claire and plots a move to the highest office in the land.land.

[[WMG: Season 3 will have the hacktivist and Rachel as prominent antagonists.]]
* Basically, there's the shot of the former in his "office", as the camera pulls back. It's possible he and Frank's new chief of staff (who will take the position officially when [[spoiler: Doug's body is found]]) will face off. As for Rachel--well, assuming she won't just hide somewhere and never be seen again in the show (She Knows Too Much, after all), we could well see her teaming up with the hacktivist (and, what the heck, the remaining member of Zoe's team--who'd panicked after [[spoiler: Zoe's death]]) to seek to expose the truth. Of course, Frank--being Frank--will destroy them by the end of the Season. Cue Season 4.

Added: 335

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: Claire Underwood is hiding a secret past when she was known as "[[ForrestGump Jenny]]"".]]

to:

[[WMG: Claire Underwood is hiding a secret past when she was known as "[[ForrestGump Jenny]]"".]][[ForrestGump Jenny]].]]
* After a long, sad and troubled life on the road, Jenny Curran abandons her infant son to the care of her first love and resolves to make something of herself. Drifting to South Carolina and meeting Francis, a man who is the polar opposite of Forrest, she changes her name to Claire and plots a move to the highest office in the land.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.

to:

* Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.deck.

[[WMG: Claire Underwood is hiding a secret past when she was known as "[[ForrestGump Jenny]]"".]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: House of Cards takes place in the same universe as DarkSouls.]]
* I admit, I don't have anything to back this up, but I came to me in a dream and I believe it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.

to:

* Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: ''House of Cards'' will be four seasons total.]]
Four seasons of 13 episodes each equals 52 episodes total: the same number of cards in a standard deck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I think the safest point of departure would be the 2008 election. The electorate weren't confident that the Democrats could get them out of the economic slump and went with McCain and the Democrats lost the House. Things went very much similarly (or perhaps worst) as they did in our timeline. Then in 2012, we have Walker elected.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Francis' bisexuality is touched upon exactly once in each season, not enough to make it a prominent character trait, but enough to remind us that it is there. I can imagine that a revelation that he has had relationships with men will cause a media frenzy and a backlash against him. After all, [[SarcasmMode being ruthless and Machiavellian is fine, making out with guys?]] ''[[SarcasmMode Unacceptable!!!]]''.

to:

* Francis' bisexuality is touched upon in exactly once in each season, one episode per season thus far, not enough to make it a prominent character trait, but enough to remind us that it is there. I can imagine that a revelation that he has had relationships with men will cause a media frenzy and a backlash against him. After all, [[SarcasmMode being ruthless and Machiavellian is fine, making out with guys?]] ''[[SarcasmMode Unacceptable!!!]]''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Francis's sexuality will ultimately cause, or contribute to, his downfall]]
Francis' bisexuality is touched upon exactly once in each season, not enough to make it a prominent character trait, but enough to remind us that it is there. I can imagine that a revelation that he has had relationships with men will cause a media frenzy and a backlash against him. After all, [[SarcasmMode being ruthless and Machiavellian is fine, making out with guys?]] ''[[SarcasmMode Unacceptable!!!]]''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to beat Gore later.

to:

**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to beat succeed Gore later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Perhaps the inferred "Bush Junior" is Walker's immediate predecessor as President. It doesn't necessarily have to be GeorgeWBush either -- it could be Jeb Bush, succeeding in 2004/2008 where his brother failed in 2000. Another possibility is that John [=McCain=] was the Republican candidate in 2000 in this timeline, who lost to Gore, freeing up either Bush brother to beat Gore later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** It can't be Prescott Bush. The reference to Bush Sr takes place in 1992. Prescott Bush died twenty years earlier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** At one point, the show refers to a "Bush Senior"(implying that there is a junior as well) and the Republicans control the Senate.
**** Alternatively, "Bush Senior" is PRESCOTT Bush(41's father) and the point of divergence from our own time is even further back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There is reference to Catherine Durant being "vocally anti-war" which would imply that the War on Terror exists in this universe as well, and in turn 9/11 happened too. Invading Afghanistan would have been a no-brainer for any president after 9/11, but it's hard to believe that Al Gore would invade Iraq after that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*Similarly, in season 2, Frank will get a PS4.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Pennsylvania isn't a guaranteed Democratic state in RealLife either, though. Even though it's consistently gone to the Democrats since 1992, it's been fought for each time and could be swayed by a strong challenger. A bit like North Carolina for the other side.



* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with a '''new Democratic president''' having been elected in '''2012'''. Therefore, the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush. Gore then either serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.

to:

* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the presidency of GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with it such as the Iraq War. Furthermore, the show begins with a '''new Democratic president''' having been elected in '''2012'''.'''2012''', and the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. Therefore, the point of divergence between the ''House of Cards'' timeline and ours is AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election instead of Bush. Gore then either serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of the Bush Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of Bill Clinton -- but there is never any reference to the Bush Administration or historical events directly associated with them such as the Iraq War, and the show begins with a new Democratic president having been elected in 2012. Therefore, the point of divergence between the House of Cards timeline and ours is Al Gore winning the 2000 presidential election -- and either he serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of President Bush jr. means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.

to:

[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where Al Gore AlGore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of Bill Clinton BillClinton -- but there is never any reference to the Bush Administration presidency of GeorgeWBush or historical events directly associated with them it such as the Iraq War, and War. Furthermore, the show begins with a new '''new Democratic president president''' having been elected in 2012. '''2012'''. Therefore, the point of divergence between the House ''House of Cards Cards'' timeline and ours is Al Gore AlGore winning the 2000 presidential election -- and instead of Bush. Gore then either he serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of President the Bush jr. Administration means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania in a presidential election, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in RL. The party as a whole seems much further to the right than it is in RL, with a conservative(for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as Majority Whip and an apparent centrist as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education and that a Democrat in RL wouldn't dare to touch. If they've had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in RL.

to:

* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania in a presidential election, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in RL. The party as a whole seems much further to the right than it is in RL, with a conservative(for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as Majority Whip and an apparent centrist as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education and that a Democrat in RL wouldn't dare to touch. If they've had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in RL.RL.

[[WMG: The series is set in an AlternateHistory where Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.]]
* We know from characters' dialogue and the episode of ''Jeopardy'' playing on TV that the show's political history matches up with real life at least up until the presidency of Bill Clinton -- but there is never any reference to the Bush Administration or historical events directly associated with them such as the Iraq War, and the show begins with a new Democratic president having been elected in 2012. Therefore, the point of divergence between the House of Cards timeline and ours is Al Gore winning the 2000 presidential election -- and either he serves one term and is followed by a two-term Republican, or serves two terms and is followed by a one-term Republican. This may also account for the Democrats' much more centrist stance in the show, as Gore's victory and the absence of President Bush jr. means that the DLC faction of the Democratic Party is still dominant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: The Democrats are in serious trouble.]]
* They fought tooth and nail to defend Pennsylvania in a presidential election, a state they haven't had serious trouble with for the past 20 years in RL. The party as a whole seems much further to the right than it is in RL, with a conservative(for a Democrat, anyway) southerner as Majority Whip and an apparent centrist as President who pushed through an education bill that incorporates a bunch of conservative policy proposals in education and that a Democrat in RL wouldn't dare to touch. If they've had to moderate their positions so much, it's a sign that the country is much more right-wing than in RL.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: Matthews will lose the governor's race, meaning Francis can't become VP.]]

to:

[[WMG: Matthews will lose the governor's race, meaning Francis can't become VP.]]]]

[[WMG: {{Sony}} is winning the Console War in the House Of Cards verse.]]
* Because Frank Underwood is just that powerful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Matthews will lose the governor's race, meaning Francis can't become VP.]]

Top