Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be more active, but the site suffering from Website/{{Youtube}} Update Syndrome has diminished my desire to trope. Though I still edit every once in a while.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be more active, but the site suffering from Website/{{Youtube}} Update Syndrome Syndrome[[note]]getting worse with each update instead of better[[/note]] has diminished my desire to trope. Though I still edit every once in a while.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be more active, but the site suffering from Website/{{Youtube}} Update Syndrome has diminished my desire to trope. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily still edit every once in a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.while.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really. Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really. really.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really. Or maybe there is more to say, but I just don't feel like saying it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 4,21 (click to see context) :
----
[[folder:Troper habits that annoy me]]
As previously stated, I specialize in mistake-fixing. However, there are a few particular kinds of mistakes that really draw me toward the "Edit Page" button whenever I see them. Really, I made this list just because I felt like it - people who are actually looking to improve their wiki contributions will be reading {{Administrivia}} articles, not some random troper's contributor page, but whatever.
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope; the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
* '''Trope slashing:''' The act of "combining" two tropes into one entry by slashing them together. It screws with the alphabetizing, causes duplicates to pop up, and it's just an eyesore in general.
* '''Shoehorned YMMV cruft:''' For whatever reason, some tropers apparently think that stuff they think is [[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome awesome]], SugarWiki/{{heartwarming|Moments}}, [[TearJerker tear-jerking]], [[WhatAnIdiot stupid]], [[ThatOneIndex frustrating]], etc. is relevant enough to include in their objective trope examples, and will Administrivia/{{sinkhole}} them accordingly. Sometimes they don't even use sinkholes; they just outright add mini-reviews to their examples despite the fact that they add nothing of value to them.
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of an examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' Doesn't really count as a "mistake;" they just suck in general.
* '''See [X]:''' I see this too much. Telling the reader what essentially amounts to "in order to understand this trope entry, you have to go read some other trope entry" is bad example writing. It treats the reader like a fuckin' dog: "Go fetch the example context!" Even when there is actual context in the example, it just highlights how useless the "see [X]" WordCruft is. The sub-variants that include the word "above" or "below" are even worse, since this is a wiki and content can be moved or removed at any given time for numerous reasons.
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' A few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
** Shoehorned {{fanservice}}[=/=]attractiveness tropes. Using [[MrFanservice Mr.]][=/=]MsFanservice just to describe why a guy/girl is hot, using BuxomIsBetter to point out that a woman has big tits, etc.
** "Examples" saying that a work/character [[Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable could sort of arguably kind of MAYBE qualify, but YMMV]]. Similarly, examples that claim that a character "has their moments." No, they don't. They're either an example or not an example.
** Confusing SceneryPorn with SugarWiki/AwesomeArt. 99.9% of SceneryPorn examples I see are "OMFG THIS MOVIE/SHOW/GAME IS SO GORGEOUS!!!!111!!11one"
** {{Narm}} misuse. No, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
!!Last, but definitely not least:
* '''Unpunctuated sentences:''' This is something I see WAY more often than I should, and something that I will never, ever, in [[WesternAnimation/DuckDodgers six wazillion]] years, understand. According to TroperDemographics, roughly 86% of tropers are 18 or older. With that in mind, what possible justification could these editors have for making a mistake that a kindergarten kid could point out and is easily avoided by simply pressing one or two extra keys on your keyboard? You're editing a wiki, not sending a text message. So whenever I see an example like this, I end up clicking "Edit Page" and scrolling down to the example just to add a period. This should not even be a thing. There's no excuse for it. Absolutely none.
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Troper habits that annoy me]]
As previously stated, I specialize in mistake-fixing. However, there are a few particular kinds of mistakes that really draw me toward the "Edit Page" button whenever I see them. Really, I made this list just because I felt like it - people who are actually looking to improve their wiki contributions will be reading {{Administrivia}} articles, not some random troper's contributor page, but whatever.
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope; the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
* '''Trope slashing:''' The act of "combining" two tropes into one entry by slashing them together. It screws with the alphabetizing, causes duplicates to pop up, and it's just an eyesore in general.
* '''Shoehorned YMMV cruft:''' For whatever reason, some tropers apparently think that stuff they think is [[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome awesome]], SugarWiki/{{heartwarming|Moments}}, [[TearJerker tear-jerking]], [[WhatAnIdiot stupid]], [[ThatOneIndex frustrating]], etc. is relevant enough to include in their objective trope examples, and will Administrivia/{{sinkhole}} them accordingly. Sometimes they don't even use sinkholes; they just outright add mini-reviews to their examples despite the fact that they add nothing of value to them.
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of an examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' Doesn't really count as a "mistake;" they just suck in general.
* '''See [X]:''' I see this too much. Telling the reader what essentially amounts to "in order to understand this trope entry, you have to go read some other trope entry" is bad example writing. It treats the reader like a fuckin' dog: "Go fetch the example context!" Even when there is actual context in the example, it just highlights how useless the "see [X]" WordCruft is. The sub-variants that include the word "above" or "below" are even worse, since this is a wiki and content can be moved or removed at any given time for numerous reasons.
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' A few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
** Shoehorned {{fanservice}}[=/=]attractiveness tropes. Using [[MrFanservice Mr.]][=/=]MsFanservice just to describe why a guy/girl is hot, using BuxomIsBetter to point out that a woman has big tits, etc.
** "Examples" saying that a work/character [[Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable could sort of arguably kind of MAYBE qualify, but YMMV]]. Similarly, examples that claim that a character "has their moments." No, they don't. They're either an example or not an example.
** Confusing SceneryPorn with SugarWiki/AwesomeArt. 99.9% of SceneryPorn examples I see are "OMFG THIS MOVIE/SHOW/GAME IS SO GORGEOUS!!!!111!!11one"
** {{Narm}} misuse. No, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
!!Last, but definitely not least:
* '''Unpunctuated sentences:''' This is something I see WAY more often than I should, and something that I will never, ever, in [[WesternAnimation/DuckDodgers six wazillion]] years, understand. According to TroperDemographics, roughly 86% of tropers are 18 or older. With that in mind, what possible justification could these editors have for making a mistake that a kindergarten kid could point out and is easily avoided by simply pressing one or two extra keys on your keyboard? You're editing a wiki, not sending a text message. So whenever I see an example like this, I end up clicking "Edit Page" and scrolling down to the example just to add a period. This should not even be a thing. There's no excuse for it. Absolutely none.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/ZeroContextExamples, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/ZeroContextExamples, Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
As previously stated, I specialize in mistake-fixing. However, there are a few particular kinds of mistakes that really draw me toward the "Edit Page" button whenever I see them. Really, I made this list just because I felt like it - people who are actually looking to improve their wiki contributions will be reading {{Administrivia}} articles, not some random troper's contributor page, but whatever.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' They suck. End of story.
to:
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' They suck. End of story.Doesn't really count as a "mistake;" they just suck in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
to:
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of an examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' In general, but a few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
to:
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' In general, but a A few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/ZeroContextExamples, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm primarily a cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/ZeroContextExamples, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc. Not much else to say here, really.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope, the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
to:
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope, SubTrope; the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** {{Narm}} misuse. No people, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
to:
** {{Narm}} misuse. No people, No, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I'm mostly a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], or at least I used to be. Nowadays, I'm more of a Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Though I do add examples sometimes, I'm mostly primarily a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], cleanup-type editor who focuses on fixing Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}, commenting out Administrivia/ZeroContextExamples, correcting spelling/grammar/formatting errors, removing instances of SquarePegRoundTrope, etc.
----
[[folder:Troper habits that annoy me]]
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope, the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
* '''Trope slashing:''' The act of "combining" two tropes into one entry by slashing them together. It screws with the alphabetizing, causes duplicates to pop up, and it's just an eyesore in general.
* '''Shoehorned YMMV cruft:''' For whatever reason, some tropers apparently think that stuff they think is [[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome awesome]], SugarWiki/{{heartwarming|Moments}}, [[TearJerker tear-jerking]], [[WhatAnIdiot stupid]], [[ThatOneIndex frustrating]], etc. is relevant enough to include in their objective trope examples, and will Administrivia/{{sinkhole}} them accordingly. Sometimes they don't even use sinkholes; they just outright add mini-reviews to their examples despite the fact that they add nothing of value to them.
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' They suck. End of story.
* '''See [X]:''' I see this too much. Telling the reader what essentially amounts to "in order to understand this trope entry, you have to go read some other trope entry" is bad example writing. It treats the reader like a fuckin' dog: "Go fetch the example context!" Even when there is actual context in the example, it just highlights how useless the "see [X]" WordCruft is. The sub-variants that include the word "above" or "below" are even worse, since this is a wiki and content can be moved or removed atleast I used to be. Nowadays, I'm any given time for numerous reasons.
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' In general, but a few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
** Shoehorned {{fanservice}}[=/=]attractiveness tropes. Using [[MrFanservice Mr.]][=/=]MsFanservice just to describe why a guy/girl is hot, using BuxomIsBetter to point out that a woman has big tits, etc.
** "Examples" saying that a work/character [[Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable could sort of arguably kind of MAYBE qualify, but YMMV]]. Similarly, examples that claim that aTrope Editor character "has their moments." No, they don't. They're either an example or not an example.
** Confusing SceneryPorn with SugarWiki/AwesomeArt. 99.9% of SceneryPorn examples I see are "OMFG THIS MOVIE/SHOW/GAME IS SO GORGEOUS!!!!111!!11one"
** {{Narm}} misuse. No people, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
!!Last, but definitely not least:
* '''Unpunctuated sentences:''' This is something I see WAY more often than I should, andCasual Example Adder.something that I will never, ever, in [[WesternAnimation/DuckDodgers six wazillion]] years, understand. According to TroperDemographics, roughly 86% of tropers are 18 or older. With that in mind, what possible justification could these editors have for making a mistake that a kindergarten kid could point out and is easily avoided by simply pressing one or two extra keys on your keyboard? You're editing a wiki, not sending a text message. So whenever I see an example like this, I end up clicking "Edit Page" and scrolling down to the example just to add a period. This should not even be a thing. There's no excuse for it. Absolutely none.
[[/folder]]
----
[[folder:Troper habits that annoy me]]
* '''Tropes listed as sub-bullets under other tropes:''' A form of bad Administrivia/{{Example Indentation|InTropeLists}}. VideoGameSettings in particular get this annoyingly often. It's especially bad when the sub-bulleted trope isn't even a SubTrope, the editor is just trying to establish some vague connection between the two trope entries by clumsily latching them together like some kind of ugly parasite while giving alphabetical order the middle finger in the process.
* '''Trope slashing:''' The act of "combining" two tropes into one entry by slashing them together. It screws with the alphabetizing, causes duplicates to pop up, and it's just an eyesore in general.
* '''Shoehorned YMMV cruft:''' For whatever reason, some tropers apparently think that stuff they think is [[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome awesome]], SugarWiki/{{heartwarming|Moments}}, [[TearJerker tear-jerking]], [[WhatAnIdiot stupid]], [[ThatOneIndex frustrating]], etc. is relevant enough to include in their objective trope examples, and will Administrivia/{{sinkhole}} them accordingly. Sometimes they don't even use sinkholes; they just outright add mini-reviews to their examples despite the fact that they add nothing of value to them.
* '''Pointless aversions:''' Simply put, an AvertedTrope that just isn't notable. The point of examples list is to ''list examples''. "Aversions" are just clutter. Averted tropes are only notable when a trope is so omnipresent within a genre or series that one would expect its presence by default.
* '''CharacterizationTags:''' They suck. End of story.
* '''See [X]:''' I see this too much. Telling the reader what essentially amounts to "in order to understand this trope entry, you have to go read some other trope entry" is bad example writing. It treats the reader like a fuckin' dog: "Go fetch the example context!" Even when there is actual context in the example, it just highlights how useless the "see [X]" WordCruft is. The sub-variants that include the word "above" or "below" are even worse, since this is a wiki and content can be moved or removed at
* '''SquarePegRoundTrope:''' In general, but a few variants in particular annoy me more than others.
** Shoehorned {{fanservice}}[=/=]attractiveness tropes. Using [[MrFanservice Mr.]][=/=]MsFanservice just to describe why a guy/girl is hot, using BuxomIsBetter to point out that a woman has big tits, etc.
** "Examples" saying that a work/character [[Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable could sort of arguably kind of MAYBE qualify, but YMMV]]. Similarly, examples that claim that a
** Confusing SceneryPorn with SugarWiki/AwesomeArt. 99.9% of SceneryPorn examples I see are "OMFG THIS MOVIE/SHOW/GAME IS SO GORGEOUS!!!!111!!11one"
** {{Narm}} misuse. No people, Narm does not mean "anything in a work I find stupid/lame." It means "unintentionally funny dramatic moment."
!!Last, but definitely not least:
* '''Unpunctuated sentences:''' This is something I see WAY more often than I should, and
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I'm mostly a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], but I'm also part Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I'm mostly a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], but or at least I used to be. Nowadays, I'm also part more of a Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I'm mostly a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], but I also have shades of Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I'm mostly a [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], but I I'm also have shades of part Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I used to be a more active contributor, but I don't edit as much as I used to.
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 My thread for improving work descriptions]]
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 My thread for improving work descriptions]]
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I used to be I'm mostly a more active contributor, [[JustForFun/TroperTypes Trope Repairman]], but I don't edit as much as I used to.
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 My thread for improving work descriptions]]also have shades of Trope Editor and Casual Example Adder.
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 My thread for improving work descriptions]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I don't edit as much as I used to.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally.Wiki/TVTropes. I used to be a more active contributor, but I don't edit as much as I used to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I don't edit much anymore.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I don't edit as much anymore.
as I used to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I barely ever edit anymore.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I barely ever don't edit much anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend editing the wiki.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active contributor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend editing the wiki.
barely ever edit anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend here.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, contributor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend here.
editing the wiki.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend editing.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, but I've greatly reduced the amount of time I spend editing.
here.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, but I barely log on to the site anymore. I guess I just haven't been into wiki editing lately.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I used to be a more active editor, but I barely log on to I've greatly reduced the site anymore. amount of time I guess I just haven't been into wiki editing lately.
spend editing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I spend most of my troping time in TropeRepairShop discussions and cleaning up {{natter}}, {{sinkhole}}s, [[SquarePegRoundTrope trope misuse]], editorialism, and other stuff like that. I am a member of {{PEPPER}}.
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it can be found [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 here]].
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it can be found [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 here]].
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. Wiki/TVTropes... occasionally. I spend most of my troping time in TropeRepairShop discussions and cleaning up {{natter}}, {{sinkhole}}s, [[SquarePegRoundTrope trope misuse]], editorialism, and other stuff like that. I am a member of {{PEPPER}}.
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it canused to be found a more active editor, but I barely log on to the site anymore. I guess I just haven't been into wiki editing lately.
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100here]].My thread for improving work descriptions]]
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it can
[[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
[[quoteright:350:[[VisualPun http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/troperpageimage_3340.png]]]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:350:[[VisualPun http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/troperpageimage_3340.png]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I spend most of my troping time in TropeRepairShop discussions and cleaning up {{natter}}, {{sinkhole}}s, [[SquarePegRoundTrope trope misuse]], and other stuff like that. I am a member of {{PEPPER}}.
to:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I spend most of my troping time in TropeRepairShop discussions and cleaning up {{natter}}, {{sinkhole}}s, [[SquarePegRoundTrope trope misuse]], editorialism, and other stuff like that. I am a member of {{PEPPER}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Just some guy who edits Wiki/TVTropes. I spend most of my troping time in TropeRepairShop discussions and cleaning up {{natter}}, {{sinkhole}}s, [[SquarePegRoundTrope trope misuse]], and other stuff like that. I am a member of {{PEPPER}}.
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it can be found [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 here]].
----
I've started a campaign for improving works' descriptions. The thread for it can be found [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13245720310A36120100 here]].
----
