Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / RaptorRed

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScienceMarchesOn:
** The book came out ''just'' before dromaeosaurids like Raptor Red and her kin were confirmed to have feathers. The same turned out to be true for troodonts and ostrich dinos. To be fair, it's just about the only birdlike trait the ''Utahraptors'' in this book ''don't'' have. That still doesn't stop other artists from drawing Red and the other dromaeosaurids with feathers, though.

to:

* ScienceMarchesOn:
ScienceMarchesOn: In short, this novel was cutting-edge science fiction in 1995, but paleontology is an incredibly fast-moving science.
** The book came out ''just'' before dromaeosaurids like Raptor Red and her kin were confirmed to have feathers. The same turned out to be true for troodonts and ostrich dinos. To be fair, it's just about the only birdlike trait the ''Utahraptors'' in this book ''don't'' have. That still doesn't stop other artists from drawing Red and the other dromaeosaurids with feathers, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Iguanodon'' is an exclusively European genus. At the time, it was thought to have also lived in North America, with ''Iguanodon lakotaensis'' being known from a partial skull from the Lakota Formation and ''Iguanodon ottingeri'', known only from teeth and jaw fragments, being found alongside ''Utahraptor'' at the Yellow Cat Memember of the Cedar Mountain Formation. However, the latter is now considered a ''nomen dubium'', and the former was reclasfied as ''Dakotadon lakotaensis'' in 2008. The giant dromaeosaur did coexist with the very similar ''Iguanacolossus'' though.

to:

** ''Iguanodon'' is an exclusively European genus. At the time, it was thought to have also lived in North America, with ''Iguanodon lakotaensis'' being known from a partial skull from the Lakota Formation and ''Iguanodon ottingeri'', known only from teeth and jaw fragments, being found alongside ''Utahraptor'' at the Yellow Cat Memember Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation. However, the latter is now considered a ''nomen dubium'', and the former was reclasfied reclassified as ''Dakotadon lakotaensis'' in 2008. The giant dromaeosaur did coexist with the very similar ''Iguanacolossus'' though.



** The story notably fudges the coexisting fauna, most obviously that ''Utahraptor'' (late Valanginian-Hauterivian) is known from significantly older deposits than ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus'' (late Aptian-early Ablbian). This was more plausible at the time, when ''Utahraptor'' and sympatric genera from the Yellow Cat Member were thought to have lived during the late Barremian-early Aptian, leaving only a gap of circa 5-7 million years, but now it's much harder to HandWave the anachronism.

to:

** The story notably fudges the coexisting fauna, most obviously that ''Utahraptor'' (late Valanginian-Hauterivian) is known from significantly older deposits than ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus'' (late Aptian-early Ablbian). This was more plausible at the time, when ''Utahraptor'' and sympatric genera from the Yellow Cat Member were thought to have lived during the late Barremian-early Aptian, leaving only a gap of circa 5-7 million years, but now it's much harder to HandWave the anachronism. That said, Yellow Cat did house the smaller dromaeosaur ''Yurgovuchia'' and isolated teeth point towards the presence of a large allosaur of some kind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Iguanodon'' didn't live in North America. The partial skull formerly classified as this genus has been reassigned to ''Dakotadon''.

to:

** ''Iguanodon'' didn't live is an exclusively European genus. At the time, it was thought to have also lived in North America. The America, with ''Iguanodon lakotaensis'' being known from a partial skull formerly classified from the Lakota Formation and ''Iguanodon ottingeri'', known only from teeth and jaw fragments, being found alongside ''Utahraptor'' at the Yellow Cat Memember of the Cedar Mountain Formation. However, the latter is now considered a ''nomen dubium'', and the former was reclasfied as this genus has been reassigned to ''Dakotadon''.''Dakotadon lakotaensis'' in 2008. The giant dromaeosaur did coexist with the very similar ''Iguanacolossus'' though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The story fudges a bit of the coexisting fauna, most obviously that ''Utahraptor'' is only known from slightly older deposits than ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus''. This was more plausible at the time, as the time difference was "only" about five to seven million years apart. Later geometric dating determined ''Utahraptor'' actually lived significantly earlier than initially thought, now making the time difference fifteen or more million years, a much harder gap to HandWave anachronisms.

to:

** The story notably fudges a bit of the coexisting fauna, most obviously that ''Utahraptor'' (late Valanginian-Hauterivian) is only known from slightly significantly older deposits than ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus''. ''Acrocanthosaurus'' (late Aptian-early Ablbian). This was more plausible at the time, as the time difference was "only" about five to seven million years apart. Later geometric dating determined when ''Utahraptor'' actually and sympatric genera from the Yellow Cat Member were thought to have lived significantly earlier than initially thought, now making during the time difference fifteen or more late Barremian-early Aptian, leaving only a gap of circa 5-7 million years, a but now it's much harder gap to HandWave anachronisms.the anachronism.

Added: 503

Changed: 12

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

to:

** Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') roughly contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.



** ''Acrocanthosaurus'', while still an apex predator, is depicted as mid-sized, at just 3 tons. At the time the novel was written, only the holotype and paratype were properly described, neither of which are particularly large, but almost immediately after, workers described more and larger skeletons (such as "Fran"), which showed that ''Acrocanthosaurus'' reached much greater sizes, up to 38 feet and 6 tons, just marginally smaller than T. rex. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses also showed that carcharodontosaurs like ''Acrocanthosaurus'' were actually derived allosaurs, but the novel treats ''Acrocanthosaurus'' and the Jurassic allosaurs such as ''Allosaurus'' as entirely different types of theropods.

to:

** ''Acrocanthosaurus'', while still an apex predator, is depicted as mid-sized, at just 3 tons. At the time the novel was written, only the holotype and paratype were properly described, neither of which are particularly large, but almost immediately after, workers described more and larger skeletons (such as "Fran"), which showed that ''Acrocanthosaurus'' reached much greater sizes, up to 38 feet and 6 tons, just marginally smaller than T. rex.''T. rex''. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses also showed that carcharodontosaurs like ''Acrocanthosaurus'' were actually derived allosaurs, but the novel treats ''Acrocanthosaurus'' and the Jurassic allosaurs such as ''Allosaurus'' as entirely different types of theropods.



** The depiction of the dromaeosaurs' hunting techniques is now considered outdated with respect to how the hind claws were used. Based in large part on observation of how modern raptorial birds like hawks and eagles use their talons (which can be thought of as having "raptor claws" on ''all of their toes'' since they no longer need to use them for running), it's now thought the the giant curved claws on species such as ''Utahraptor'' were used for ''gripping'' prey, not slicing or tearing. You can look up "raptor prey restraint" theory if you want more of the gory details.

to:

** The depiction of the dromaeosaurs' hunting techniques is now considered outdated with respect to how the hind claws were used. Based in large part on observation of how modern raptorial birds like hawks and eagles use their talons (which can be thought of as having "raptor claws" on ''all of their toes'' since they no longer need to use them for running), it's now thought the the giant curved claws on species such as ''Utahraptor'' were used for ''gripping'' prey, not slicing or tearing. You can look up "raptor prey restraint" theory if you want more of the gory details.details.
** The story fudges a bit of the coexisting fauna, most obviously that ''Utahraptor'' is only known from slightly older deposits than ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus''. This was more plausible at the time, as the time difference was "only" about five to seven million years apart. Later geometric dating determined ''Utahraptor'' actually lived significantly earlier than initially thought, now making the time difference fifteen or more million years, a much harder gap to HandWave anachronisms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Acrocanthosaurus'', while still an apex predator, is depicted as mid-sized, at just 3 tons. At the time the novel was written, only the holotype and paratype were properly described, neither of which are particularly large, but almost immediately after, workers described more and larger skeletons (such as "Fran"), which showed that ''Acrocanthosaurus'' reached much greater sizes, up to 38 feet and 6 tons, just marginally smaller than T. rex. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses also showed that carcharodontosaurs like ''Acrocanthosaurus'' were actually derived allosaurs, but the novel treats ''Acrocanthosaurus'' and the Jurassic allosaurs such as ''Allosaurus'' as entirely different types of theropods.

to:

* ** ''Acrocanthosaurus'', while still an apex predator, is depicted as mid-sized, at just 3 tons. At the time the novel was written, only the holotype and paratype were properly described, neither of which are particularly large, but almost immediately after, workers described more and larger skeletons (such as "Fran"), which showed that ''Acrocanthosaurus'' reached much greater sizes, up to 38 feet and 6 tons, just marginally smaller than T. rex. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses also showed that carcharodontosaurs like ''Acrocanthosaurus'' were actually derived allosaurs, but the novel treats ''Acrocanthosaurus'' and the Jurassic allosaurs such as ''Allosaurus'' as entirely different types of theropods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Acrocanthosaurus'', while still an apex predator, is depicted as mid-sized, at just 3 tons. At the time the novel was written, only the holotype and paratype were properly described, neither of which are particularly large, but almost immediately after, workers described more and larger skeletons (such as "Fran"), which showed that ''Acrocanthosaurus'' reached much greater sizes, up to 38 feet and 6 tons, just marginally smaller than T. rex. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses also showed that carcharodontosaurs like ''Acrocanthosaurus'' were actually derived allosaurs, but the novel treats ''Acrocanthosaurus'' and the Jurassic allosaurs such as ''Allosaurus'' as entirely different types of theropods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The book repeatedly stresses that ''Utahraptor'' originated in Asia and migrated into North America via the Bering land bridge, and at the end mentions that the descendants of the American ''Utahraptor'' eventually traveled back into Asia, citing the then-recent discovery of another large dromaeosaur from Asia, likely referring to the animal that would be named ''Achillobator'' in 1999. While ''Utahraptor'' and ''Achillobator'' are quite similar and some studies recover them as fairly close relatives, the latter turned out to be tens of millions of years younger than ''Utahraptor'' and there is no evidence to suggest that ''Utahraptor'' originated in Asia. While it isn’t impossible that its ancestors came from the east, it could just as well have been born and bred in America.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyCorrectZoology:

to:

* AccidentallyCorrectZoology: Quite a few of Bakker's speculative ideas wound up being validated by future finds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Kronosaurus'' is described as 40 feet long, but that was based on an incorrect reconstruction that gave it too many vertebrae. It would have had a more compact body and it was actually 30-35 feet. It's also given a weight of 20 tons, but later estimates put it at half that weight.

to:

** ''Kronosaurus'' is described as 40 feet long, but that was based on an incorrect reconstruction that gave it too many vertebrae. It would have had a more compact body and it was actually body, at 30-35 feet. It's also given a weight of 20 tons, but later estimates put it at half that weight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Kronosaurus'' is described as 40 feet long, but that was based on an incorrect reconstruction that gave it too many vertebrae, and it was actually 30-35 feet.

to:

* ** ''Kronosaurus'' is described as 40 feet long, but that was based on an incorrect reconstruction that gave it too many vertebrae, vertebrae. It would have had a more compact body and it was actually 30-35 feet. It's also given a weight of 20 tons, but later estimates put it at half that weight.

Added: 163

Changed: 68

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The book came out ''just'' before dromaeosaurids like Raptor Red and her kin were confirmed to have feathers. To be fair, it's just about the only birdlike trait the Utahraptors in this book ''don't'' have. That still doesn't stop other artists from drawing Red and the other dromaeosaurids with feathers, though.

to:

** The book came out ''just'' before dromaeosaurids like Raptor Red and her kin were confirmed to have feathers. The same turned out to be true for troodonts and ostrich dinos. To be fair, it's just about the only birdlike trait the Utahraptors ''Utahraptors'' in this book ''don't'' have. That still doesn't stop other artists from drawing Red and the other dromaeosaurids with feathers, though.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Kronosaurus'' is described as 40 feet long, but that was based on an incorrect reconstruction that gave it too many vertebrae, and it was actually 30-35 feet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Raptor Red and her family briefly live in the mountains, one of the local animals is said to be a small iguanodont that is easily killed by the raptors. In 2010, we described a small iguanodont called ''Hippodraco'', which coexisted with ''Utahraptor''.

to:

* ** When Raptor Red and her family briefly live in the mountains, one of the local animals is said to be a small iguanodont that is easily killed by the raptors. In 2010, we described a small iguanodont called ''Hippodraco'', which coexisted with ''Utahraptor''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When Raptor Red and her family briefly live in the mountains, one of the local animals is said to be a small iguanodont that is easily killed by the raptors. In 2010, we described a small iguanodont called ''Hippodraco'', which coexisted with ''Utahraptor''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Raptor Red and her family are shown hunting a large-bodied ostrich dinosaur. In 2018, we discovered a large ornithomimosaur from the Early Cretaceous of North America, ''Arkansaurus''. Though it lived after ''Utahraptor'', it did coexist with ''Deinonychus'' and ''Acrocanthosaurus'' (who are likewise prominent in the book).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** With the 2010 description of ''Geminiraptor'', Bakker was likewise right about small troodontids having coexisted with ''Utahraptor''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Iguanodon'' didn't live in North America. The partial skull formerly classified as this genus has been reassigned to ''Dakotadon''.

to:

** ''Iguanodon'' didn't live in North America. The partial skull formerly classified as this genus has been reassigned to ''Dakotadon''.''Dakotadon''.
** The depiction of the dromaeosaurs' hunting techniques is now considered outdated with respect to how the hind claws were used. Based in large part on observation of how modern raptorial birds like hawks and eagles use their talons (which can be thought of as having "raptor claws" on ''all of their toes'' since they no longer need to use them for running), it's now thought the the giant curved claws on species such as ''Utahraptor'' were used for ''gripping'' prey, not slicing or tearing. You can look up "raptor prey restraint" theory if you want more of the gory details.

Added: 404

Changed: 401

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyCorrectZoology: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

to:

* AccidentallyCorrectZoology: AccidentallyCorrectZoology:
**
Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I'm surprised the whiptail predicting Leinkupal's discovery to some extent was never mentioned!

Added DiffLines:

** When the book was written in 1995, no Early Cretaceous diplodocids were known. Then, in 2014, ''Leinkupal laticauda'' was found in Argentina. Granted, it lived in a different continent from ''Utahraptor'', but it still lived at exactly the same time.

Added: 274

Removed: 301

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyCorrectWriting: Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.


Added DiffLines:

** Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Therizinosaurs are depicted as featherless burrowers, and are referred to as "segnosaurs." They're now considered to have been feathered, although digging may be plausible. In addition, several of the illustrations depict them as quadrupeds (or at least crouching), but it is now known that therizinosaurs were bipedal, like other theropods[[note]]Indeed, it used to be uncertain that therizinosaurs were theropods at all.[[/note]].

to:

** Therizinosaurs are depicted as featherless burrowers, and are referred to as "segnosaurs." They're now considered to have been feathered, although digging may be plausible. In addition, several of the illustrations depict them as quadrupeds (or at least crouching), but it is now known that therizinosaurs were bipedal, like other theropods[[note]]Indeed, it used to be uncertain that therizinosaurs were theropods at all.[[/note]].[[/note]].
** ''Iguanodon'' didn't live in North America. The partial skull formerly classified as this genus has been reassigned to ''Dakotadon''.

Changed: 300

Removed: 274

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyCorrectWriting:
** Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.
** Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.

to:

* AccidentallyCorrectWriting:
**
AccidentallyCorrectWriting: Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.
* AccidentallyCorrectZoology:
Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.
** Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.
published.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Accidentally Accurate has been renamed per TRS thread.


* AccidentallyAccurate:

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: AccidentallyCorrectWriting:

Added: 678

Changed: 401

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: AccidentallyAccurate:
**
Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.published.
** Obscure pterosaur ''Ornithodesmus'' ([[ScienceMarchesOn now known as]] ''Istiodactylus'') is depicted as a scavenger, while at the time, it was thought of as a fish eater. In 2012, Mark Witton did some research and confirmed that ''Istiodactylus'' was indeed a scavenger.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Therizinosaurs are depicted as featherless burrowers, and are referred to as "segnosaurs." They're now considered to have been feathered, although digging may be plausible. In addition, several of the illustrations depict them as quadrupeds, but it is now known that therizinosaurs were bipedal, like other theropods[[note]]Indeed, it used to be uncertain that therizinosaurs were theropods at all.[[/note]].

to:

** Therizinosaurs are depicted as featherless burrowers, and are referred to as "segnosaurs." They're now considered to have been feathered, although digging may be plausible. In addition, several of the illustrations depict them as quadrupeds, quadrupeds (or at least crouching), but it is now known that therizinosaurs were bipedal, like other theropods[[note]]Indeed, it used to be uncertain that therizinosaurs were theropods at all.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.published.
* ScienceMarchesOn:
** The book came out ''just'' before dromaeosaurids like Raptor Red and her kin were confirmed to have feathers. To be fair, it's just about the only birdlike trait the Utahraptors in this book ''don't'' have. That still doesn't stop other artists from drawing Red and the other dromaeosaurids with feathers, though.
** The taxon ''Ornithodesmus'' shows up in the book as a pterosaur. Turns out that it was actually a misidentified dromaeosaurid, the first named. The pterosaur material with the fossil has been named ''Istiodactylus''. Bakker was right about ''Istiodactylus'' being scavengers though.
** Therizinosaurs are depicted as featherless burrowers, and are referred to as "segnosaurs." They're now considered to have been feathered, although digging may be plausible. In addition, several of the illustrations depict them as quadrupeds, but it is now known that therizinosaurs were bipedal, like other theropods[[note]]Indeed, it used to be uncertain that therizinosaurs were theropods at all.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]]) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]]) fossils]].) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AccidentallyAccurate: Bakker included a therizinosaur ("segnosaur") in the story even though none were known from the right time and place when the book was written. (Perhaps not coincidentally, it was depicted as a mountain dweller, therefore [[FridgeBrilliance living in an environment unlikely to preserve its fossils]]) A decade later, a therizinosaur (''Falcarius'') contemporaneous with ''Utahraptor'' was published.

Top