Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hate to be a killjoy, but this technically counts as first-person writing.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie'' or ''No Man's Scam'', though some forgive the initial misleading due to the Foundations Update and several others being free updates rather than paid DLC.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie'' or ''No Man's Scam'', though some forgive the initial misleading due to the Foundations Update and several others being free updates rather than paid DLC.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie'' or ''No Man's Scam''.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie'' or ''No Man's Scam''.Scam'', though some forgive the initial misleading due to the Foundations Update and several others being free updates rather than paid DLC.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie''.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie''.Lie'' or ''No Man's Scam''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example. The game is known to its detractors as ''One Man's Lie''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicking
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* TheWikiRule: Currently two: [[https://nomanssky.gamepedia.com/No_Man%27s_Sky_Wiki Here on Gamepedia]] and [[http://nomanssky.wikia.com/wiki/No_Man%27s_Sky_Wiki here on]] Website/{{Wikia}}.
to:
* TheWikiRule: Currently two: [[https://nomanssky.gamepedia.com/No_Man%27s_Sky_Wiki Here on Gamepedia]] and [[http://nomanssky.wikia.com/wiki/No_Man%27s_Sky_Wiki here on]] Website/{{Wikia}}.Wikia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As much as I would like to agree, this trope is made for FAN Nicknames, not hatedom nicknames.
Deleted line(s) 5,7 (click to see context) :
* FanNickname: Negative examples:
** "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don't exist]]. WebVideo/HonestTrailers added its own variant during their trailer: "Big Fat Lie".
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
** "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don't exist]]. WebVideo/HonestTrailers added its own variant during their trailer: "Big Fat Lie".
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* FanNickname:
to:
* FanNickname:FanNickname: Negative examples:
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example.
* NotScreenedForCritics: Review copies of this game weren't given to PC users at all, and the No Man's Sky review embargo was lifted on August 9th, the same day as the game's release date. Hello Games didn't like that leaked copies footage got published on the internet, claiming that it "didn't represent in which the game would take on its release day". As it turned out to be, the leaked copies of the game were a perfect representation of what the game would look like on its release day, and many players were in for a bad surprise.
* NotScreenedForCritics: Review copies of this game weren't given to PC users at all, and the No Man's Sky review embargo was lifted on August 9th, the same day as the game's release date. Hello Games didn't like that leaked copies footage got published on the internet, claiming that it "didn't represent in which the game would take on its release day". As it turned out to be, the leaked copies of the game were a perfect representation of what the game would look like on its release day, and many players were in for a bad surprise.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Oh my.'' More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. game -- and only later did some parts show up in the later Foundations Update released ''four months'' later! See NotScreenedForCritics below for another example.
* NotScreenedForCritics: Review copies of this game weren't given to PC users at all, and the No Man's Sky review embargo was lifted on August 9th, the same day as the game's release date. Hello Games didn't like that leaked copies footage got published on the internet, claiming that it "didn't represent in which the game would take on its release day". As it turned out to be, the leaked copies of the game were in fact aperfect ''perfect'' representation of what the game would look like on its release day, and many players were in for a bad surprise.
* NotScreenedForCritics: Review copies of this game weren't given to PC users at all, and the No Man's Sky review embargo was lifted on August 9th, the same day as the game's release date. Hello Games didn't like that leaked copies footage got published on the internet, claiming that it "didn't represent in which the game would take on its release day". As it turned out to be, the leaked copies of the game were in fact a
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Justifying Edit, "To be fair" is also Word Cruft, and you really need to link a source for that kind of comment.
Deleted line(s) 12 (click to see context) :
** Though to be fair, it may not be their fault: [[ExecutiveMeddling Sony basically blackmailed them into releasing the game]] ''years'' earlier than they intended.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Though to be fair, it may not be their fault: [[ExecutiveMeddling Sony basically blackmailed them into releasing the game]] ''years'' earlier than they intended.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. See NotScreenForCritics below for another example.
to:
* LyingCreator: More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. See NotScreenForCritics NotScreenedForCritics below for another example.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game.
to:
* LyingCreator: More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. See NotScreenForCritics below for another example.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* LimitedSpecialCollectorsUltimateEdition: There are two special editions.
** A Limited Edition of the game for the [=PS4=]. It includes a steelbook case, a comic book, an art book, a [=PS4=] theme, and codes for in-game content.
** An Explorer's Edition is availble for the PC. It includes your choice of a {{Steam}} or Website/GOGDotCom game code, a cast metal replica fighter ship, an enamel pin, a backdrop to show off the ship, and a [[UnknownItemIdentification mystery item]], the nature of which to be revealed at launch.
** A Limited Edition of the game for the [=PS4=]. It includes a steelbook case, a comic book, an art book, a [=PS4=] theme, and codes for in-game content.
** An Explorer's Edition is availble for the PC. It includes your choice of a {{Steam}} or Website/GOGDotCom game code, a cast metal replica fighter ship, an enamel pin, a backdrop to show off the ship, and a [[UnknownItemIdentification mystery item]], the nature of which to be revealed at launch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 40%).
to:
* StreisandEffect: It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 40%).'''''[[EpicFail 12%]]''''').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 40%).
to:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 40%).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* DummiedOut: A large amount of the content that had been promised - and which was present in the build shown a few months before release - was removed from the final version of the game.
to:
* DummiedOut: DummiedOut:
** A large amount of the content that had been promised - and which was present in the build shown a few months before release - was removed from the final version of the game.
** A large amount of the content that had been promised - and which was present in the build shown a few months before release - was removed from the final version of the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Made the example more concise.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Very'' infamously. If you just take a look at some of the promotional material for this game, you'll find that more than half of what the developers promised to be in the game is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game.
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Very'' infamously. If you just take a look at some of the promotional material for this game, you'll find that more More than half of what the developers promised to be in the game game, per the promotional material, is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Controversy is not relevant to the tropes. They are not audience reaction tropes.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* LyingCreator: ''Very'' infamously. If you just take a look at some of the promotional material for this game, you'll find that more than half of what the developers promised to be in the game is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. Understandably, [[BrokenBase the fandom hasn't taken this very well]].
to:
* LyingCreator: ''Very'' infamously. If you just take a look at some of the promotional material for this game, you'll find that more than half of what the developers promised to be in the game is either nerfed to hell and back, or ''flat out doesn't exist'' in the final game. Understandably, [[BrokenBase the fandom hasn't taken this very well]].
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks vastly different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[{{Understatement}} the least]].
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks vastly different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[{{Understatement}} the least]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks *vastly* different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[{{Understatement}} the least]].
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks *vastly* vastly different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[{{Understatement}} the least]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not trivia]
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* BrokenBase: To a nearly unprecedented degree. Some gamers adore it for the chill exploration and deeper sci-fi themes, but many despise it for not living up to the hype.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) :
* FanDumb: So many of the features that were "cut" are actually in the game. A faction/reputation system, large space battles, huge mountain ranges, tall trees and rainforests, large brontosaurus type dinosaurs, animals attacking other animals and creatures moving in herds were all present in version 1.00, but not found by early twitch streamers, giving rise to the reputation that Sean Murray was a LyingCreator.
** It certainly didn't help that certain internet communities used their own information repositories for pre-release information, and then populated those repositories with "well sourced" information from speculation articles and ''YouTube fan videos'' talking about features they hoped for. Many fans turned on Hello Games when some of the features that had ''been entirely made-up by fans'' weren't actually in the game.
** It certainly didn't help that certain internet communities used their own information repositories for pre-release information, and then populated those repositories with "well sourced" information from speculation articles and ''YouTube fan videos'' talking about features they hoped for. Many fans turned on Hello Games when some of the features that had ''been entirely made-up by fans'' weren't actually in the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: To a nearly unprecedented degree. Some gamers adore it for the chill exploration and deeper sci-fi themes, but many despise it for not living up to the hype.
Added DiffLines:
** Portals, as featured in the trailers, can be found in the game, but cannot be interacted with.
* FanDumb: So many of the features that were "cut" are actually in the game. A faction/reputation system, large space battles, huge mountain ranges, tall trees and rainforests, large brontosaurus type dinosaurs, animals attacking other animals and creatures moving in herds were all present in version 1.00, but not found by early twitch streamers, giving rise to the reputation that Sean Murray was a LyingCreator.
** It certainly didn't help that certain internet communities used their own information repositories for pre-release information, and then populated those repositories with "well sourced" information from speculation articles and ''YouTube fan videos'' talking about features they hoped for. Many fans turned on Hello Games when some of the features that had ''been entirely made-up by fans'' weren't actually in the game.
* FanDumb: So many of the features that were "cut" are actually in the game. A faction/reputation system, large space battles, huge mountain ranges, tall trees and rainforests, large brontosaurus type dinosaurs, animals attacking other animals and creatures moving in herds were all present in version 1.00, but not found by early twitch streamers, giving rise to the reputation that Sean Murray was a LyingCreator.
** It certainly didn't help that certain internet communities used their own information repositories for pre-release information, and then populated those repositories with "well sourced" information from speculation articles and ''YouTube fan videos'' talking about features they hoped for. Many fans turned on Hello Games when some of the features that had ''been entirely made-up by fans'' weren't actually in the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 50%).
to:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 50%).40%).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks *vastly* different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[Understatement the least]].
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks *vastly* different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say]] [[Understatement [[{{Understatement}} the least]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an abysmal user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 50%).
to:
* StreisandEffect: Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an abysmal ''abysmal'' user score (under 3.0) and subpar reviews on Steam (under 50%).
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks vastly different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say the least]].
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: [[https://youtube.com/watch?v=JYNriatnYkE The games prerelease material looks vastly *vastly* different from the finished product]], and a number of touted features were either reduced in scope or removed entirely. [[BrokenBase This was controversial]], [[HypeBacklash to say say]] [[Understatement the least]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an abysmal user score (under 3.0) and less than positive reviews on Steam (under 50%).
to:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit Perhaps one of the most tragic and ultimate examples. It began when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game sits at 64 on Metacritic, with an abysmal user score (under 3.0) and less than positive subpar reviews on Steam (under 50%).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Recent. Using "Now" and a footnote are unecessary.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering the game now sits at 64 on Metacritic and around 58% positive reviews on Steam[[note]]Now down to 47%[[/note]].
to:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering that a few weeks after its release the game now sits at 64 on Metacritic Metacritic, with an abysmal user score (under 3.0) and around 58% less than positive reviews on Steam[[note]]Now down to 47%[[/note]].Steam (under 50%).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding a number to Metacritic and updating the current Steam review count.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering the game now sits at the high 60's on Metacritic and around 58% positive reviews on Steam[[note]]Now down to 51%[[/note]].
to:
* StreisandEffect: The game suffered a good bit when a Reddit user was able to purchase an early copy of the game and posted his findings to the site. Many fans were upset over this, but the creators stated that fans should just ignore the findings, that this sort of thing isn't the real deal. Even more, Sony ended up forcing [=YouTube=] to take down a video from Creator/RoosterTeeth's "The Know" news channel talking about the findings, which two of the many hosts [[WhatTheHellHero called out the company for when they found out how they did it]]. This is a game that also did an embargo on early reviews, which sent up a lot of red flags for many consumers... which later proved to be true, considering the game now sits at the high 60's 64 on Metacritic and around 58% positive reviews on Steam[[note]]Now down to 51%[[/note]].47%[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* FanNickname: "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don't exist]].
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
to:
* FanNickname: FanNickname:
** "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don'texist]].
exist]]. WebVideo/HonestTrailers added its own variant during their trailer: "Big Fat Lie".
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
** "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don't
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Another derogatory nickname is "No Man's Buy", obviously warning potential buyers not to purchase the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FanNickname: "No Man's Lie", for [[LyingCreator the controversy surrounding]] [[WhatCouldHaveBeen all the things that were hyped up for the game that were reduced or don't exist]].
