Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts (and many of the reader posts).
to:
** the The text of some of Atropos' PHO posts (and many of the reader posts).
Added DiffLines:
** Someone wrote "Ravioli" instead of "Ravager" to refer to the villain. Ack promptly stated it was so hilarious that Atropos would use it as part of her plan to ruin Ravager's reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
to:
** Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity. Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fan suggestion. Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
to:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including (but not limited to):
** the text of some of Atropos' PHOposts, and sometimes posts (and many of the reader posts).
** Sometimes entirescenes, scenes have been adapted, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity. identity.
** Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fansuggestion. suggestion.
** Whirligig and Trainwreck applying to become rogues under Parian also happened in a canonized omake.
Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
** the text of some of Atropos' PHO
** Sometimes entire
** Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fan
** Whirligig and Trainwreck applying to become rogues under Parian also happened in a canonized omake.
Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Expand example
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity. Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fan suggestion.
to:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity. Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fan suggestion. Scenes marked "Side story" on Spacebattles and Sufficient Velocity are also considered canonical, without being specifically copied into the main story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** The main reason Taylor invokes YouDon'tWantToKnow with Danny regarding Mannequin's death is that it involved shoving the death of Mannequin's wife (and children) in his face, and she doesn't want to re-traumatise her own father that way, even second hand.
to:
** The main reason Taylor invokes YouDon'tWantToKnow YouDontWantToKnow with Danny regarding Mannequin's death is that it involved shoving the death of Mannequin's wife (and children) in his face, and she doesn't want to re-traumatise her own father that way, even second hand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The main reason Taylor invokes YouDon'tWantToKnow with Danny regarding Mannequin's death is that it involved shoving the death of Mannequin's wife (and children) in his face, and she doesn't want to re-traumatise her own father that way, even second hand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' '''[=StarCat=]:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
** There's even an Informational titled BEFORE YOU POST A QUERY: SOME MISCONCEPTIONS (ie, STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSES)
Added DiffLines:
** If you're confused about this or any other aspect, there's an Informational titled BEFORE YOU POST A QUERY: SOME MISCONCEPTIONS (ie, STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSES).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> ='''StarCat:'''= You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
to:
--> ='''StarCat:'''= '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> '''=StarCat=:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
to:
--> '''=StarCat=:''' ='''StarCat:'''= You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> '''StarCat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
to:
--> '''StarCat:''' '''=StarCat=:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.\\
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are [[SymbioticPossession getting along great]]. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
to:
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are [[SymbioticPossession getting along great]]. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.it.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** There's even an Informational titled BEFORE YOU POST A QUERY: SOME MISCONCEPTIONS (ie, STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSES)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
--> '''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
--> '''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' '''StarCat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
-->bullshit.\\
'''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
-->
'''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.
--> Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
--> Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.
-->synonymous. Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
-->
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.//
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.//
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.
Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.
synonymous.//
--> Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
--> Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.//
to:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.//
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
--> '''Starcat:''' You're forgetting that drug use, and drug addiction are not synonymous.//
Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
--> '''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
Banning people from anything "for their own good" is paternalistic bullshit.
--> '''Atropos:''' See, that's where you make your mistake. I'm not doing this for "your own good". The illegal hard drug trade is bad for the city, so I'm bringing it to an end. Other than that, I don't give a flying fuck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DearNegativeReader: After one reader wrote about not every drug user being an addict (and the ensuing discussion), the author brought in pretty much the same discussion into an InUniverse PHO thread, with Atropos pointing out to the InUniverse equivalent of said reader that she is stopping the drug trade in Brockton Bay because she knows it's horrible for people's health and the city.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add potholes
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
** Taylor can't just arbitrarily obtain things by trying to "end my lack of this thing." The shard is not about ''getting'' things, it's about destruction, and attempting to get around that will get her the equivalent of a raised eyebrow and an invitation to try again. However, she's not currently showing any signs of trying that.
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are getting along great. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are getting along great. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
to:
** Taylor can't just arbitrarily obtain things by trying to "end my lack of this thing." The shard is not about ''getting'' things, it's about destruction, and [[LoopholeAbuse attempting to get around that that]] will get her the equivalent of a raised eyebrow and an invitation to try again. However, she's not currently showing any signs of trying that.
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are [[SymbioticPossession getting alonggreat.great]]. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
** Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, she and her shard are [[SymbioticPossession getting along
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Expand example
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity.
to:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity. Even Atropos' signature bodice shears were originally a fan suggestion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add a trope
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
WordOfGod: Ack drops various bits of information about how Taylor's shard works from time to time in order to clear up any misunderstandings.
to:
* AscendedFanon: A number of reader contributions have been incorporated into the story, including the text of some of Atropos' PHO posts, and sometimes entire scenes, like breakfast with Danny after he learns her identity.
--> "This is going in the 'canon' pile. I like it a lot."
* WordOfGod: Ack drops various bits of information about how Taylor's shard works from time to time in order to clear up any misunderstandings.
--> "This is going in the 'canon' pile. I like it a lot."
* WordOfGod: Ack drops various bits of information about how Taylor's shard works from time to time in order to clear up any misunderstandings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Those aren't trivia entries so adjusting.
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* LoopholeAbuse: Defied according to WordOfGod; Taylor can't just arbitrarily obtain things by trying to "end my lack of this thing." The shard is not about ''getting'' things, it's about destruction, and attempting to get around that will get her the equivalent of a raised eyebrow and an invitation to try again. However, she's not currently showing any signs of trying that.
* SymbioticPossession: Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, WordOfGod is that she and her shard are getting along great. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
* SymbioticPossession: Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, WordOfGod is that she and her shard are getting along great. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
to:
** Taylor can't just arbitrarily obtain things by trying to "end my lack of this thing." The shard is not about ''getting'' things, it's about destruction, and attempting to get around that will get her the equivalent of a raised eyebrow and an invitation to try again. However, she's not currently showing any signs of trying that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add a trope
Added DiffLines:
* LoopholeAbuse: Defied according to WordOfGod; Taylor can't just arbitrarily obtain things by trying to "end my lack of this thing." The shard is not about ''getting'' things, it's about destruction, and attempting to get around that will get her the equivalent of a raised eyebrow and an invitation to try again. However, she's not currently showing any signs of trying that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add draft
Added DiffLines:
* SymbioticPossession: Taylor's CombatClairvoyance relies on letting her shard essentially puppet her body for a time. However, WordOfGod is that she and her shard are getting along great. It loves how she is destroying her enemies with flair, and she's having the time of her life doing it.
