Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ScienceMarchesOn / WalkingWith

Go To

OR

Added: 1329

Changed: 166

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The episode depicts ''Anatotitan/Edmontosaurus'' as being considerably smaller than ''Tyrannosaurus'', but newer fossils indicate it was actually much larger, with specimens such as MOR 1142 and MOR 1609 suggesting lengths of over fifteen metres and possibly up to fifteen tonnes for some adults, far out-weighing the biggest ''T. rex''.

to:

* The episode depicts ''Anatotitan/Edmontosaurus'' as being considerably smaller than ''Tyrannosaurus'', but newer fossils indicate it was actually much larger, with specimens such as MOR 1142 and MOR 1609 suggesting lengths of over close to fifteen metres and possibly up to fifteen fourteen tonnes for some adults, far out-weighing the biggest ''T. rex''. This is partly because the most well-known fossils of the species were of 8-9 metre long individuals, but these were later determined to be adolescents.
* The ''Anatotitan'' lacks the frill of skin along its back that hadrosaurs are known to have had. An exceptionally well preserved "mummy" of the closely related ''Brachylophosaurus'' described in 2006 shows that this frill was separated into individual segments, and this has become widely known, but of course it was several years too late for ''Walking with Dinosaurs'' and ''Chased By Dinosaurs'', although the movie does include this feature on ''Edmontosaurus''.


Added DiffLines:

* The book mentions the existence of Ornithocheiridae, but the validity of this grouping is controversial and many species formerly assigned to it have since been moved to new groupings. Even the species featured in the show, ''Tropeognathus mesembrinus'', has been reclassified as part of Anhangueridae.


Added DiffLines:

* The ''Torosaurus'' entry states that the only land animals known with bigger skulls are some other horned dinosaur species. This probably refers to a ''Pentaceratops'' skull that was reported by Thomas Lehman to have a 2.9 metre long skull in 1998 (it was later renamed ''Titanoceratops'', but this reclassification is controversial), but this was downsized in 2011 to being "merely" 2.65 metres long, while even larger ''Torosaurus'' skulls have been found since, including one 3 metres long, making it still the land animal with the largest known skull.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The generic dromaeosaur goes unnamed in the episode because, at the time, there wasn't a named dromaeosaur taxon that was sympatric with T. rex, though supplementary material calls it ''Dromaeosaurus'', as isolated teeth known from Hell Creek and adjacent sites had previously been tentatively attributed to it and ''Saurornitholestes'', but both are only known from the previous Campanian age. Post-2013, there are now three named dromaeosaurs that coexisted with T. rex (the giant ''Dakotaraptor'', the small ''Acheroraptor'', and the midsized ''Dineobellator'', with the last one being from New Mexico). Furthermore, we now know that ''Dromaeosaurus'' had a rather deep, robust skull armed with strong jaws, and the same is true for ''Saurornitholestes '' ([[https://twitter.com/DavidEvans_ROM/status/1405155294540357637/photo/1 though it wasn't known until a well-preserved skull was found in 2014]]), in contrast to the ''Deinonychhus''-like skull shown here (on account of it being a PaletteSwap of the ''Utahraptor'', itself based entirely on ''Deinonychus''). It has even been suggested that the former two were more reliant on their heads for killing than the contemporary Asian velociraptorines (though they would have still used their feet and talons).

to:

* The generic featured dromaeosaur goes unnamed in the episode because, at the time, there wasn't a named dromaeosaur taxon that was sympatric with T. rex, though supplementary material calls it ''Dromaeosaurus'', as isolated teeth known from Hell Creek and adjacent sites had previously been tentatively attributed to it and ''Saurornitholestes'', but both are only known from the previous Campanian age. Post-2013, there are now three named dromaeosaurs that coexisted with T. rex (the giant ''Dakotaraptor'', the small ''Acheroraptor'', and the midsized ''Dineobellator'', with the last one being hailing from New Mexico). Furthermore, we now know that ''Dromaeosaurus'' had a rather deep, robust skull armed with strong jaws, and the same is true for ''Saurornitholestes '' ([[https://twitter.com/DavidEvans_ROM/status/1405155294540357637/photo/1 though it wasn't known until a well-preserved skull was found in 2014]]), in contrast to the ''Deinonychhus''-like ''Deinonychus''-like skull shown here (on account of it being a PaletteSwap of the ''Utahraptor'', itself based entirely on ''Deinonychus''). It has even been suggested that the former two were more reliant on their heads for killing than the contemporary Asian velociraptorines (though they would have still used their feet and talons).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Additional info


* The generic raptor is simply identified as a "dromaeosaur", because at the time, there wasn't a named dromaeosaur species that was known to have existed alongside ''Tyrannosaurus''; now there are known to be at least three (''Dakotaraptor'', ''Acheroraptor'', and ''Dineobellator'', with the last one being from New Mexico).

to:

* The generic raptor is simply identified as a "dromaeosaur", because dromaeosaur goes unnamed in the episode because, at the time, there wasn't a named dromaeosaur species taxon that was sympatric with T. rex, though supplementary material calls it ''Dromaeosaurus'', as isolated teeth known from Hell Creek and adjacent sites had previously been tentatively attributed to have existed alongside ''Tyrannosaurus''; now it and ''Saurornitholestes'', but both are only known from the previous Campanian age. Post-2013, there are known to be at least now three (''Dakotaraptor'', named dromaeosaurs that coexisted with T. rex (the giant ''Dakotaraptor'', the small ''Acheroraptor'', and the midsized ''Dineobellator'', with the last one being from New Mexico).Mexico). Furthermore, we now know that ''Dromaeosaurus'' had a rather deep, robust skull armed with strong jaws, and the same is true for ''Saurornitholestes '' ([[https://twitter.com/DavidEvans_ROM/status/1405155294540357637/photo/1 though it wasn't known until a well-preserved skull was found in 2014]]), in contrast to the ''Deinonychhus''-like skull shown here (on account of it being a PaletteSwap of the ''Utahraptor'', itself based entirely on ''Deinonychus''). It has even been suggested that the former two were more reliant on their heads for killing than the contemporary Asian velociraptorines (though they would have still used their feet and talons).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Walking with Beasts'' features many Asian mammals from the Paleogene, but extensive research during the 2000s pushed back the land mammal ages in Asia during the Eocene-Oligocene, so the Hsanda Gol Formation (where "Land of Giants" is nominally set in) went from Late Oligocene to Early Oligocene, and the Irdin Manha Formation (where the ''Andrewsarchus'' holotype comes from) went from Late Eocene to Mid Eocene.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
WWD's Muttaburrasaurus DOES walk bipedally and only occasionally drops on four legs, mostly when standing still.


* The ''Muttaburrasaurus'' are shown as facultative bipeds similar to ''Iguanodon'', but later research indicates that they were obligate bipeds and much more primitive in form. They're also depicted with thumb spikes, but shortly before the show premiered, the description of ''Muttaburrasaurus'' was revised after no evidence was found for any.

to:

* The ''Muttaburrasaurus'' are shown as facultative bipeds similar to ''Iguanodon'', but later research indicates that they were obligate bipeds and much more primitive in form. They're also is depicted with thumb spikes, but shortly before the show premiered, the description of ''Muttaburrasaurus'' was revised after no evidence was found for any.

Added: 411

Changed: -3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The introduction for ''Coelophysis'' states that dinosaurs were unique among reptiles for being able to stand balanced on two legs. However, it's since been found that crocodilian-line archosaurs independently developed bipedalism at about the same time (specifically, the poposauroids); they in fact coexisted with ''Coelophysis'' and were so dinosaur-like, they were thought to ''be'' dinosaurs at the time.



* ''Postosuchus'' and ''Placerias'' are both depicted as sluggish and ungainly relics from a bygone age that are destined to be supplanted by the "superior" dinosaurs (not unlike how we used to view [[DumbDinos dinosaurs]] themselves back in the early to mid-20th century in relation to mammals), who are framed as being more versatile, fleet-footed and have the unique gift of bipedalism. Suffice to say, none of that is true, as all terrestrial Triassic tetrapods were just as agile, sophisticated, and well-adapted to their enviroment as early dinosaurs and most of them likely died out as a result of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction]], which also allowed dinosaurs to take over ([[HistoryRepeats in the same way mammals took over thanks to the K-T mass extinction]])[[note]]The narration by Creator/KennethBranagh does mention the Triassic-Jurassic extinction during the credits, mostly glossing over it by stating how the dinosaurs have continued to evolve[[/note]], and bipedalism wasn’t unique to dinosaurs, as several other contemporary archosaurs, such as rauisuchids (including ''Postosuchus''), proposaurids, and shuvosaurids were also bipedal and shared many other morphological similarities to true dinosaurs (the last of which looked [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effigia#/media/File:Effigia_BW.jpg nigh-identical to dinosaur]] [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuvosaurus#/media/File:Shuvosaurus_BW.jpg to the untrained eye]]).

to:

* ''Postosuchus'' and ''Placerias'' are both depicted as sluggish and ungainly relics from a bygone age that are destined to be supplanted by the "superior" dinosaurs (not unlike how we used to view [[DumbDinos dinosaurs]] themselves back in the early to mid-20th century in relation to mammals), who are framed as being more versatile, fleet-footed and have the unique gift of bipedalism. Suffice to say, none of that is true, as all terrestrial Triassic tetrapods were just as agile, sophisticated, and well-adapted to their enviroment environment as early dinosaurs and most of them likely died out as a result of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction]], which also allowed dinosaurs to take over ([[HistoryRepeats in the same way mammals took over thanks to the K-T mass extinction]])[[note]]The narration by Creator/KennethBranagh does mention the Triassic-Jurassic extinction during the credits, mostly glossing over it by stating how the dinosaurs have continued to evolve[[/note]], and bipedalism wasn’t unique to dinosaurs, as several other contemporary archosaurs, such as rauisuchids (including ''Postosuchus''), proposaurids, and shuvosaurids were also bipedal and shared many other morphological similarities to true dinosaurs (the last of which looked [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effigia#/media/File:Effigia_BW.jpg nigh-identical to dinosaur]] [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuvosaurus#/media/File:Shuvosaurus_BW.jpg to the untrained eye]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Allosaurus'' was generally not as huge as depicted here, as most adult specimens are around 8-9 meters in length, not 12 meters. This may have resulted from confusion with a close relative called ''Saurophaganax maximus'' which actually did grow to 10.5-12 meters and 4-5 tons. However, some scientists do consider the two to be the same animal (although still as a separate species, ''Allosaurus maximus'', as opposed to the species most are familiar with, ''Allosaurus fragilis''). That said, fossils of giant allosaurs (including the giant ''Allosaurus amplexus'' as well as ''Saurophaganax'') are incredibly rare at Morrison and usually very fragmentary while the mid-sized ''Allosaurus fragilis'' is much more common, to the point of being the best documented of all macropredatory theropods. This also implies that the giant variety was a rare sight, which would make sense, as the large apex predator in any given ecosystem is bound to be rarer compared to the smaller mesocarnivores. So [[BiggerIsBetter showcasing the larger species in favor of the smaller one]] is more RuleOfCool rather than an accurate reflection of reality. ''The Ballad of Big Al'' does somewhat fix this issue, by emphasizing that gigantic specimens of ''Allosaurus'' are indeed a rare sight, but presents it as being due to most ''Allosaurus'' not living long enough to reach their adult size instead of being a case of species diversity and/or size variation within a species, as relatively few specimens in any given species reach their maximum potential size even if they live long lives.

to:

* ''Allosaurus'' was generally not as huge large as depicted shown here, as most adult specimens are around 8-9 meters in length, not 12 meters. This may have resulted from confusion with a close relative called The larger size is mostly based on fellow Morrison allosaurids ''Saurophaganax maximus'' and ''Epanterias amplexus'', which actually did grow to reach 10.5-12 meters and 4-5 tons. However, have been classed within the genus ''Allosaurus'' by some scientists do consider the two to be the same animal (although still (though as a separate species, ''Allosaurus maximus'', as opposed to species), but both are very fragmentary, especially ''amplexus'' (to the species most are familiar with, ''Allosaurus fragilis''). That said, point of being considered a ''nomen dubium''). Furthermore, fossils of giant allosaurs (including the giant ''Allosaurus amplexus'' as well as ''Saurophaganax'') allosaurids are incredibly rare at Morrison and usually very fragmentary Morrison, while the mid-sized ''Allosaurus fragilis'' is a common find and much more common, to the point of being the best documented of all macropredatory theropods. complete. This also implies that the giant variety was a rare sight, which would make makes sense, as the large apex predator in any given ecosystem is bound to be rarer compared to than the smaller mesocarnivores. So [[BiggerIsBetter showcasing the larger species in favor of the smaller one]] is more RuleOfCool rather than an accurate reflection of reality. ''The Ballad of Big Al'' does somewhat fix this issue, issue somewhat, by emphasizing that gigantic specimens of ''Allosaurus'' are indeed a rare sight, but presents it as being due to most ''Allosaurus'' not living long enough to reach their adult size instead of being a case of species diversity and/or size variation within a species, as relatively few specimens in any given species reach their maximum potential size even if they live long lives. species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not an example of this trope.


* The episode depicts the European ''Anurognathus'' in North America and interacting with otherwise North American animals. This is probably because the actual pterosaur fossils of the Morrison Formation are pretty terrible. However, the genus ''Mesadactylus'' was tentatively classified as an anurognathid in 2007, so they could have used that instead of ''Anurognathus'' nowadays.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Cynodictis'' is said to have lived in Asia and North America, but as explained before, evidence of ''Cynodictis'' in Asia is fragmentary and of dubious affinity, while its alleged existence in North America refers to the famous dawn canid ''Hesperocyon'', which some workers treated as a synonym of ''Cynodictis'' (which they consider a basal canid instead of an amphicyonid), but later research has generally identified ''Cynodictis'' as a bear-dog while ''Hesperocyon'' is seen as a valid canid. Likewise, a jaw fragment from America has been used to erect the species "''Cynodictis angustidens''" but it's considered a ''nomen dubium'' for obvious reasons. Strangely, the entry omits Europe, despite the majority of ''Cynodictis'' fossils coming from Europe, especially France.

Added: 789

Changed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The holotype hails from the Irdin Manha Formation, which turned out to be Mid Eocene in age (44-40 mya), not Late Eocene (39-34 mya), meaning it would not have been a contemporary of ''Embolotherium''. The apex predators of Late Eocene Asia would have been hyaenodonts and entelodonts (like the ones seen in "Land of Giants").

to:

** * The holotype of ''Andrewsarchus'' hails from the Irdin Manha Formation, which turned out to be Mid Eocene in age (44-40 mya), not Late Eocene (39-34 mya), meaning it would not have been a contemporary of ''Embolotherium''. The apex predators of Late Eocene Asia would have been hyaenodonts and entelodonts (like the ones seen in "Land of Giants").


Added DiffLines:

* The bear-dog, if indeed ''Cynodictis'', would count as an example of MisplacedWildlife. While known from extensive material in Western Europe, especially the Quercy Phosphorites Formation in France, fossils attributed to ''Cynodictis'' in Asia (like "''Cynodictis mongoliensis''") are scarce and fragmentary, and later researchers have dismissed their inclusion in ''Cynodictis'' and suggested that they represent other basal caniforms, such as amphicynodontids (not to be confused with ''amphicyonids'', actual bear-dogs), who are basal relatives of bears or possibly even stem-pinnipeds. Furthermore, due to its basal nature, there has been debate about whether ''Cynodictis'' is even an amphicyonid or possibly a basal canid (though later research favors the bear-dog classification).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Argentinosaurus'' would have looked different than the ''Saltasaurus''-like design in the show; giant titanosaurs are now known to have longer necks and upright-slanted postures similar to ''Brachiosaurus''.

to:

* ''Argentinosaurus'' would have looked different than the ''Saltasaurus''-like design in the show; giant titanosaurs are now known to have longer necks and upright-slanted postures similar to ''Brachiosaurus''. It's also portrayed with a ''Brachiosaurus''-like skull, but the few titanosaur skulls which have subsequently been found indicate ''Argentinosaurus'' probably had a more diplodocid-like skull (a longer snout, squared-off jaw, and no domed nares).

Added: 490

Changed: 183

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Any and all shots of pterosaurs taking off bipedally became inaccurate after it was discovered that they launched quadrupedally. The documentary also avoids showing the large pterosaurs taking off almost entirely, because at the time it was uncertain how such large flying animals could lift up from the ground. It's now known that they probably pushed off their front limbs to vault themselves into the air.

to:

* Any and all shots of pterosaurs taking off bipedally became inaccurate after it was discovered that they launched quadrupedally. The documentary also avoids showing the large pterosaurs taking off almost entirely, because at the time it was uncertain how such large flying animals could lift up from the ground.ground (''Chased by Dinosaur'' states they relied on winds blowing off steep cliffs to get themselves aloft). It's now known that they probably pushed off their front limbs to vault themselves into the air.



* ''Giganotosaurus'' is portrayed as briefly being able to chase a speeding car and suggested in supplementary material as being able to reach speeds of over thirty miles per hour. Later bio-mechanical studies on the running speeds of large theropods found it would have been impossible for them to run at high speeds, or possibly even run at all (that is, having a stride where both feet are off the ground at the same time for most of the stride) because they were so heavy their footfalls would have broken their legs, even if they had enough muscle mass to propel their massive bodies so quickly.

to:

* ''Giganotosaurus'' is portrayed as briefly being able to chase a speeding car and suggested in supplementary material as being able to reach speeds of over thirty miles per hour. Later bio-mechanical studies on the running speeds of large theropods found it would have been impossible for them to run at high speeds, or possibly even run at all (that is, having a stride where both feet are off the ground at the same time for most of the stride) because they were so heavy their footfalls would have broken shattered their legs, even if they had enough muscle mass to propel their massive bodies so quickly.



* The accompanying book identifies the unnamed theropod as being a coelurosaur. However, coelurosaurs did not evolve until the Jurassic Period (technically, [[AnachronismStew no dinosaurs would have existed Europe at the time]], they had only just evolved). This can be chalked up to the fact coelurosaur was once a more generic term that lumped together all small theropods, regardless of actual relation; it wasn't until mid-2000s that coelurosaurs as a true clade was concretely defined.



* ''Liopleurodon'' is identified as the largest carnivorous reptile to have ever lived. Aside from the aforementioned revisions about pliosaur size, just one year after the series premiered a gigantic Triassic ichthyosaur was described known as ''Shonisaurus sikanniensis'' (although it's sometimes considered a species of ''Shastasaurus'') which, at 21 metres in length, was far larger than any pliosaur or mosasaur. Fragmentary fossils of related animals suggest even larger sizes, possibly up to 26 metres in length, about the same size as the ''Liopleurodon'' is as depicted in the series. Although, since it was toothless and dolphin-like in shape, it wouldn't have been quite as fearsome-looking as a pliosaur or mosasaur.
* A number of mosasaur fossils have been found with shark like tail impressions (one long fin, one short fin). These fossils, and various other arguments, suggest that most or all mosasaurs would have looked more fishlike than the ones shown on the show. This, combined with the fact that it was warm-blooded, would have made it an even faster, more active hunter and give it access to polar regions.
* The largest mosasaurs probably didn't get as large in reality as they were portrayed because of this, as they would have had a more compact body shape. Lengths of between forty and fifty feet are considered more likely for the largest mosasaurs such as ''Mosasaurus'' or ''Tylosaurus''.

to:

* ''Liopleurodon'' is identified as the largest carnivorous reptile to have ever lived. Aside from the aforementioned revisions about pliosaur size, just one year after the series premiered a gigantic Triassic ichthyosaur was described known as ''Shonisaurus sikanniensis'' (although it's sometimes considered a species of ''Shastasaurus'') which, at 21 metres in length, was far larger than any pliosaur or mosasaur. Fragmentary fossils of related animals suggest even larger sizes, possibly up to 26 metres in length, about the same size as the ''Liopleurodon'' is as depicted in the series. Although, since it was toothless and toothless, dolphin-like in shape, with a proportionately small skull, it wouldn't have been quite as fearsome-looking as a pliosaur or mosasaur.
* A number of mosasaur fossils have been found with shark like shark-like tail impressions (one long fin, one short fin). These fossils, and various other arguments, suggest that most or all mosasaurs would have looked more fishlike than the ones shown on the show. This, combined with the fact that it was warm-blooded, would have made it an even faster, more active hunter and give it access to polar regions.
* The largest mosasaurs probably didn't get as large in reality as they were portrayed because of this, as they would have had a more compact body shape. Lengths of between forty and fifty feet are considered more likely for the largest mosasaurs such as ''Mosasaurus'' or ''Tylosaurus''.''Tylosaurus'' instead of over sixty feet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Cameroceras'' (the 'giant orthocone' in the Ordovician segment) is depicted as being a 10 metre long behemoth. However, the largest specimens known are considered about 6 metres in length and are now thought to belong to the genus ''Endoceras'', while the supposed +9 metre long specimen is considered highly dubious due to being purely anecdotal (the specimen was destroyed before it could be collected, photographed, or even illustrated).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Macrauchenia'' is said to have first emerged during the Late Miocene (7 mya). However, the only definitive ''Macrauchenia'' species currently recognized are the large, Upper Pleistocene M. ''patachonica'' (the type species) and the more basal, Upper Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene M. ''ullomensis'', while other purported species have either been deemed ''nomen dubia'' or transferred to their own genera (like ''Promacrauchenia'' and ''Huayqueriana''), thus making ''Macrauchenia'' not much more ancient than ''Smilodon''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Macrauchenia patachonica'' was actually a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrauchenia#/media/File:Macrauchenia_wiki.png very imposing animal]], [[https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/laelaps/what-in-the-world-was-macrauchenia/ similar in size to a moose but more stocky in build]], weighing up to a ton, in contrast to the rather dainty animal depicted in the episode.

to:

* ''Macrauchenia patachonica'' was actually a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrauchenia#/media/File:Macrauchenia_wiki.png very imposing animal]], [[https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/laelaps/what-in-the-world-was-macrauchenia/ similar in size to a moose but more stocky in build]], weighing up to a ton, in contrast to the rather dainty animal depicted in the episode. Its design and proportions might have actually been based on smaller, more basal species, which have since been reclassified as separate genera (like ''Promacrauchenia'' and ''Huayqueriana'').

Added: 2215

Removed: 28

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Hyneria'' is stated to reach up to 5 metres in length, but this was based on undescribed fossils which have since been evaluated to belong to animals only about 2.7 metres in length. Maximum known size for the species is now thought to be 3 metres in length, possibly up to 3.5 metres (in another undescribed specimen).
* ''Hynerpeton'' has also been found to only be about 70 centimetres in length rather than 1.5 metres as in the program, making him less than half the length of the animal presented.
!!'''Reptile's Beginnings'''



!!'''Reptile's Beginnings'''


Added DiffLines:

* A 2023 study found that the last ''Inostrancevia'' migrated to South Africa from Russia to replace the rubidgeine gorgonopsids of the region. Considering both ''Rhinesuchus'' and ''Diictodon'' are already known from South Africa and [[MisplacedWildlife absent in Russia]], they could just as well have just made the entire segment set in South Africa instead (replacing ''Scutosaurus'' with ''Lystrosaurus'', which, unlike ''Diictodon'', actually did survive the Permian into the Triassic).


Added DiffLines:

* The therocephalian being depicted as venomous is based on fossils of ''Euchambersia'' with possible venom gland pits in its skull and venom grooves in its teeth. However, a exceptionally well-preserved skull described in 2022 failed to find evidence of the supposed venom glands, making it possible they were actually scent glands. The venom idea remains possible, however (the venom being as incredibly potent as depicted is purely speculative though).
* ''Proterosuchus'' is depicted as a semi-aquatic, crocodile-like swimmer. This was the traditionally held view, but more recent studies find evidence that conflict with this idea and suggest it was a land-based predator, such as having strong, well-developed limb bones, nostrils placed on the sides of the skull rather than the top, and its fossils being known from arid environments.


Added DiffLines:

* The supplementary book identifies the largest mosasaur as being ''Hainosaurus''. A number of studies since have considered ''Hainosaurus'' as being a probably synonym of ''Tylosaurus'' (on top of ''Hainosaurus'' being downsized from 17 metres to 12 metres in length, making it marginally smaller than the 13 metre long ''Mosasaurus hoffmannii'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Allosaurus'' is portrayed with an unusually short and blunt skull, but this is because the design is based on the ''Allosaurus'' neotype, USNM 4734, which had a rather poorly preserved skull that was distorted in the fossilization process, rendering it shorter and more rounded. It's now recognized that this was in error, but not before the error was repeated in ''The Ballad of Big Al'' (complete with the skull's smaller secondary crest ridges). Together, the shortened skull and the mistake of placing the horns over the eyes instead of in front almost make the ''Allosaurus'' look like a long-armed ''Carnotaurus''.

to:

* The ''Allosaurus'' is portrayed with an unusually short and blunt skull, but this is because the design is based on the ''Allosaurus'' neotype, USNM 4734, which had a rather poorly preserved skull that was distorted in the fossilization process, rendering it shorter and more rounded. It's now recognized that this was in error, but not before the error was repeated in ''The Ballad of Big Al'' (complete with the skull's smaller secondary crest ridges). Together, The longer-snouted skulls were attributed to another species; ''Allosaurus atrox'', but once the shortened skull and erroneous reconstruction of the mistake of placing former was recognized, A. ''atrox'' was sunk into A. ''fragilis'' (previously thought to have sported the horns over the eyes instead of in front almost make the ''Allosaurus'' look like a long-armed ''Carnotaurus''.short snout).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Additional info


* Geologists now place the end of the Oligocene at 23 million years ago, instead of 25.

to:

* Geologists now place the end of the Oligocene at 23 million years ago, instead of 25. Notably, the episode is nominally based on the Hsanda Gol Formation (known for fossils of the giant ''Paraceratherium transouralicum''), which at the time was thought to be late Oligocene in age, but researchers in the mid-late 2000s determined its age to actually be the very early Oligocene (the overlying Loh Formation represents the late Oligocene), which also had the domino effect of pushing back the ages of many underlying fossil beds in Central Asia, such as the Houldjin Gravels (previously considered the lowest unit of Hsanda Gol), which went from early Oligocene to late Eocene, and is the only part of the location to have fossils of entelodonts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" might have been alluding to the fact that that the former was at the time a minor wastebasket taxon, with several different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.

to:

* The North American ''Polacanthus'' (or ''Gastonia'') is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" might have been alluding to the fact that that the former was at the time a minor wastebasket taxon, with several different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Elasmosaurus'' is stated to have also inhabited Russia and Japan, but these species are now considered to be either indeterminate elasmosaurid species for the former and classified as ''Futabasaurus'' in 2006 for the latter.

to:

* ''Elasmosaurus'' is given a lengthy fossil range of 85-65 mya, and stated to have also inhabited Russia and Japan, but these along with the United States. However, subsequent research has deemed it a wastebasket taxon, with the only confirmed species (''Elasmosaurus platyurus'') being only known from a single partial skeleton from early Campanian rocks at Pierre Shale, while other specimens from the Western Interior Seaway are now considered attributed to be either related but different elasmosaurids, mainly the larger and slightly older ''Styxosaurus'' (who has been a major influence on our general image of ''Elasmosaurus''), along with the Maastrichtian ''Hydrotherosaurus.'' The alleged fossils from Russia and Japan, meanwhile, have been deemed indeterminate elasmosaurid species for the former fragmentary elasmosaurids and classified as placed in ''Futabasaurus'' in 2006 for the latter.respectively.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Mononykus'' being the only non-avian theropod with feathers (not just quills) in the franchise reflects a theory at the time that alvarezsaurs were either very close relatives of birds or flightless, basal avians themselves, based on several anatomical similarities (the 2005 tie-in book mentions the same thing) but the discovery of more basal alvarezsaurs like ''Haplocheirus'' has shown that this is more likely a case of convergent evolution and thus alvarezsaurs have subsequently been classed as basal maniraptorans, being more distant from birds than ''therizinosaurs''. On the other hand, deinonychosaurians [[note]] dromaeosaurs and troodonts, though some argue the latter are closer to avians [[/note]] like ''Velociraptor'' (who is here shown as entirely scaly) are considered the true sister group to avians (forming the Paraves).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Additional info


* * The cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the mid Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation (which gets namedropped by Nigel, meaning it's the episode's setting), which overlies the early Maastrichtian Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the late Campanian Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, velociraptorine and protoceratopsid fossils from the intermediary Barun Goyot Formation have subsequently been reassigned to separate genera (''Kuru'' and ''Shri'', and ''Bagaceratops'' respectively), which widened the age gap. Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the site. Furthermore, Nemegt and Djadochta turned out to be quite different biomes, with the former being an alluvial plain and thriving with large dinosaurs, while the latter was more arid and desert-like (complete with sand dunes), and mainly housed small dinosaurs.
* Feather issues aside, ''Velociraptor'' was likely nocturnal.

to:

* * The cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the mid Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation (which gets namedropped by Nigel, meaning it's the episode's setting), which overlies the early Maastrichtian Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the late Campanian Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, velociraptorine and protoceratopsid fossils from the intermediary Barun Goyot Formation have subsequently been reassigned to separate genera (''Kuru'' and ''Shri'', and ''Bagaceratops'' respectively), which widened the age gap. Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the site. Furthermore, Nemegt and Djadochta turned out to be quite different biomes, with the former being an alluvial plain and thriving with large dinosaurs, while the latter was more arid and desert-like (complete with sand dunes), and mainly housed small dinosaurs.
* Feather issues aside, ''Velociraptor'' was likely nocturnal.nocturnal, though it's not unusual for extant nocturnal hunters like leopards or foxes to also hunt during the daytime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The episode uses the interpretation that crested and crestless ornithocheirids were respectively males and females (even suggesting the keel-like crest of "males" allowed them a different style of fishing from the crestless females). This was a pet hypothesis from the series' pterosaur consultant, David Unwin, but the idea does not have much weight behind it nowadays, primarily because there's no real evidence for it beyond speculation. The sexual dimorphism seen in ''Tropeognathus''/''Ornithcheirus'' in the episode is purely speculative anyway.

to:

* The episode uses the interpretation that crested and crestless ornithocheirids were respectively males and females (even suggesting the keel-like crest of "males" allowed them a different style of fishing from the crestless females). This was a pet hypothesis from the series' pterosaur consultant, David Unwin, but the idea does not have much weight behind it nowadays, primarily because there's no real evidence for it beyond speculation. The sexual dimorphism seen in ''Tropeognathus''/''Ornithcheirus'' ''Tropeognathus''/''Ornithocheirus'' in the episode is purely speculative anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While ''Walking With Dinosaurs'' was generally accurate for when it was made, it is over two decades old now. New evidence regarding behavior, color and other details are always emerging. So, there are inaccuracies.

to:

While ''Walking With Dinosaurs'' was generally accurate for when it was made, it is over two decades old now. New evidence regarding behavior, color and other details are always emerging. [[ScienceMarchesOn So, there are inaccuracies. inaccuracies.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The ''Elasmosaurus'' model has aged rather poorly, suffering from severe shrinkwrapping, which gives it a very bulbous head and skinny neck, along with an overly rotund body, while later reconstructions show it as a much more streamlined and hydrodynamic animal. It's also given a length of 50 feet, but that is likely an overestimate, as the largest known elasmosaurids likely didn't grow longer than 40 feet and taxonomic shuffling later placed the largest Niobrara specimens in the genus ''Styxosaurus'' (previously treated as a synonym of ''Elasmosaurus'' by some), leaving ''Elasmosaurus'' at a more modest 35 feet (its incomplete holotype is the only specimen that can confidently be assigned to ''Elasmosaurus'').

to:

** * The ''Elasmosaurus'' model has aged rather poorly, suffering from severe shrinkwrapping, shrinkwrapping (quite odd, since ''Cryptoclidus'' did not suffer the same issue), which gives it a very bulbous head and skinny neck, along with an overly rotund body, while later reconstructions show it as a much more streamlined and hydrodynamic animal. It's also given a length of 50 feet, but that is likely an overestimate, as the largest known elasmosaurids likely didn't grow longer than 40 feet and taxonomic shuffling later placed the largest Niobrara specimens in the genus ''Styxosaurus'' (previously treated as a synonym of ''Elasmosaurus'' by some), leaving ''Elasmosaurus'' at a more modest 35 feet (its incomplete holotype is the only specimen that can confidently be assigned to ''Elasmosaurus'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The ''Elasmosaurus'' model has aged rather poorly, suffering from severe shrinkwrapping, which gives it a very bulbous head and skinny neck, along with an overly rotund body, while later reconstructions show it as a much more streamlined and hydrodynamic animal. It's also given a length of 50 feet, but that is likely an overestimate, as the largest known elasmosaurids likely didn't grow longer than 40 feet and taxonomic shuffling later placed the largest Niobrara specimens in the genus ''Styxosaurus'' (previously treated as a synonym of ''Elasmosaurus'' by some), leaving ''Elasmosaurus'' at a more modest 35 feet (its incomplete holotype is the only specimen that can confidently be assigned to ''Elasmosaurus'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The distinct head of the ''Giganotosaurus'' is based on [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giganotosaurus#/media/File:Giganotosaurus.jpg older reconstructions of its skull]] (which is incompletely known and some elements aren't properly described), which made it very elongated with a tapering snout and with a very large temporal fenestra and long jaw hinge, leading workers to deem it the longest skull of any theropod, but the subsequent discovery of closely related giganotosaurines with better skull material, especially ''Meraxes'', shows that ''Giganotosaurus'' likely had a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meraxes#/media/File:Meraxes_gigas_skull_reconstruction.png much boxier skull shape]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Additional info


* The episode sets the tone that even before the asteroid arrives, dinosaurs are already doing poorly due to increased global volcanism poisoning the environment with toxic fumes, and the meteor is more like the straw that broke the camel's back. However, this stance on dinosaur mass extinction is highly contentious, and many newer studies indicate evidence for a drop in end-Cretaceous dinosaur diversity brought on by mass volcanism is inconclusive at best. Notably, few other dinosaur documentaries even mention it. The next prevailing view is that an impact event was indeed the primary reason for their extinction and they were doing very well beforehand, [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842625/ which is]] [[https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay5055 currently the]] [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382232/ majority held view]].

to:

* The episode sets the tone that even before the asteroid arrives, dinosaurs are already doing poorly due to increased global volcanism poisoning the environment with toxic fumes, and the meteor is more like the straw that broke the camel's back. However, this stance on dinosaur mass extinction is highly contentious, and many newer studies indicate evidence for a drop in end-Cretaceous dinosaur diversity brought on by mass volcanism is inconclusive at best. Notably, few other dinosaur documentaries even mention it.''Walking with Dinosaurs: The Evidence'' admits that evidence for excessive volcanism during the Late Cretaceous is lacking and controversial, instead citing the alleged drop in saurian diversity and the possibility that a meteor impact wasn't "enough" to wipe out the non-avian dinosaurs completely to beef up the former argument. The next prevailing view is that an impact event was indeed the primary reason for their extinction and they were doing very well beforehand, [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842625/ which is]] [[https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay5055 currently the]] [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382232/ majority held view]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Rhinesuchus'' showing up at the end of the Permian, despite only being known from substantially older strata, can be attributed to related and younger rhinesuchids being previously included in the genus, such as ''Rhineceps'' and ''Uranocentrodon'', the latter of which is known from the Permian-Triassic boundary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Hyaenodon'' is described as being “as big as a rhino”, but no known hyaenodont approached the size of even the smallest extant rhino (the Sumatran rhino, which can still reach a whopping 800 kg). The largest known hyeanodont is ''Megistotherium osteothlastes'', with an estimated weight of 500 kg, but it lived in Early-Mid Miocene Africa, not Late Oligocene Asia. The largest species of ''Hyaenodon'' proper, ''Hyeanodon gigas'' (only known from teeth and jaw fragments), is estimated to have weighed 250-378 kg, about the size of a tiger. The exaggerated size was likely based on outdated methods used for calculating the body weight of hyaenodonts, based on the proportions of modern carnivorans. This failed to take into account their unique proportions compared to modern carnivores (specifically their proportionally larger heads), leading to overestimates.

to:

* The ''Hyaenodon'' is described as being “as big as a rhino”, but no known hyaenodont approached the size of even the smallest extant rhino (the Sumatran rhino, which can still reach a whopping 800 kg). The largest known hyeanodont hyaenodont is ''Megistotherium osteothlastes'', with an estimated weight of 500 kg, but it lived in Early-Mid Miocene Africa, not Late Oligocene Asia. The largest species of ''Hyaenodon'' proper, ''Hyeanodon ''Hyaenodon gigas'' (only known from teeth and jaw fragments), is estimated to have weighed 250-378 kg, about the size of a tiger. The exaggerated size was likely based on outdated methods used for calculating the body weight of hyaenodonts, based on the proportions of modern carnivorans. This failed to take into account their unique proportions compared to modern carnivores (specifically their proportionally larger heads), leading to overestimates.

Top