Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ScienceMarchesOn / WalkingWith

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subsequent revisions of ''Tyrannosaurus'' anatomy indicate it was far more rotund than often depicted and its chest would've been much closer to the ground (as seen in a [[https://preview.redd.it/7ztfy21eg2e51.jpg?auto=webp&s=8524a994b0120effe630ca95a3873061bdffb7af a more modern reconstruction]], compared to [=WWD's=] [[https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JYF24vDemEo/hqdefault.jpg version]]). ''Tyrannosaurus'' is stated as weighing up to five tonnes, but most modern weight estimates suggest higher boundaries around seven to nine tonnes.

to:

* Subsequent revisions of ''Tyrannosaurus'' anatomy indicate it was far more rotund than often depicted and its chest would've been much closer to the ground (as seen in a [[https://preview.redd.it/7ztfy21eg2e51.jpg?auto=webp&s=8524a994b0120effe630ca95a3873061bdffb7af a more modern reconstruction]], compared to [=WWD's=] [[https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JYF24vDemEo/hqdefault.jpg version]]). ''Tyrannosaurus'' is stated as weighing up to five tonnes, but most modern weight estimates suggest higher boundaries around seven to nine tonnes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There were no [[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeNonDinosaurianReptiles cynodonts]] of the size depicted in the program in the late Triassic[[note]]other than traversodonts. Given that some Mesozoic mammals reached similar sizes (such as the infamous ''Repenomamus''), cynodonts that big in that time period aren't strictly unlikely, but unknown from the area the episode took place[[/note]]. This is an example of ScienceMarchesOn rather than ArtisticLicensePaleontology because at the time the series was produced it was assumed that cynodonts of that size did live in Late Triassic in North America. This assumption was based on the discovery of [[http://chinleana.blogspot.com/2009/09/enigmatic-triassic-taxa.html two teeth]] from [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinle_Formation Chinle Formation]][[note]]though these teeth were assumed to belong to [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traversodontidae traversodont]] cynodonts, very different from ''Thrinaxodon'' that WWD-cynodonts were based on[[/note]]. However, [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228488767_Unusual_tetrapod_teeth_from_the_Upper_Triassic_Chinle_Formation_Arizona_USA post-WWD study]] indicates that these teeth can't be confidently referred to Cynodontia (or any other known group of Triassic amniotes, for that matter).

to:

* There were no [[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeNonDinosaurianReptiles cynodonts]] of the size depicted in the program in the late Triassic[[note]]other than traversodonts. Given that some Mesozoic mammals reached similar sizes (such as the infamous ''Repenomamus''), cynodonts that big in that time period aren't strictly unlikely, but unknown Though uncommon, there have been fossils from the area the episode took place[[/note]]. This is an example of ScienceMarchesOn rather than ArtisticLicensePaleontology because at the time the series was produced it was assumed that cynodonts of that size did live Chinle Formation and adjacent sites in Late Triassic in western North America. This assumption was based on the discovery of [[http://chinleana.blogspot.com/2009/09/enigmatic-triassic-taxa.html two teeth]] from [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinle_Formation Chinle Formation]][[note]]though these teeth were assumed America that have historically been attributed to belong to [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traversodontidae traversodont]] cynodonts, very different from ''Thrinaxodon'' that WWD-cynodonts were based on[[/note]]. However, [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228488767_Unusual_tetrapod_teeth_from_the_Upper_Triassic_Chinle_Formation_Arizona_USA post-WWD study]] indicates that these though most of those are only isolated teeth can't be confidently referred to Cynodontia (or any (which share characteristics with other known group of Triassic amniotes, for amniotes), and one particular find, several teeth and two ischia found in the ''Placerias'' Quarry, have even been attributed to a ''Thrinaxodon''-like cynodont in a 1994 paper, while two other (and rather large) isolated teeth (named ''Kraterokheirodon'' in 2005) have been attributed to “huge traversodont cynodonts” in a 1995 review of the vertebrate fauna of Chinle. But later studies deemed most of these fossils undiagnostic and potentially not even representing synapsids. In 2020, we finally named a proper (albeit tiny) cynodont from Chinle called ''Kataigidodon'', with supplementary material to that matter).paper re-examining the previous, alleged cynodont material from the region and once more deeming it undiagnostic and dubious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The entry on ''Deinosuchus'' brings up how the giant croc might have hunted tyrannosaurs, citing a specimen of ''Albertosaurus'' that bears tooth marks attributed to a ''Deinosuchus''. This is referencing a tyrannosaur specimen from the Demopolis Chalk Formation in the Eastern United States first found in 1982, which was tentatively attributed to ''Albertosaurus'' due to having a similar gracile build, but in 2005, it was properly described as a distinct taxon, ''Appalachiosaurus montgomeriensis'' (and a juvenile one at that), and later cladistic analyses found it to not even be a proper tyrannosaurid and that it might represent a different lineage of tyrannosaurs unique to Appalachia (which was cut off from Laramidia for tens of millions of years due to the Western Interior Seaway).

Added: 4719

Changed: 1081

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs coelurosaurs]] certainly had feathers. The several [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs dromaeosaurid species]] surely had them, but in the franchise they are all shown featherless: this, rather than ScienceMarchesOn, might be interpreted more as RuleOfCool, or rather, ArtisticLicensePaleontology, since feathered raptors would have appeared "too cute"? In RealLife dromeosaurids had WINGS just like their famous relative, the "ur-bird" ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Archaeopteryx]]''… This might be nothing compared to what is seeming to come: ''most small-sized dinosaurs'' may well have had some sort of covering. This theory was led by the discoveries of the primitive herbivore ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLife Tianyulong]]'' in China and ''Kulindadromeus'' in Russia, and further supported by [[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0728-7 the discovery]] of feathers or feather-like filaments in two anurognathid pterosaur specimens from China: the theory is that some kind of covering was present in the last common ancestor of ''all'' dinosaurs and pterosaurs, and then it was partially lost by its largest descendants, possibly because of the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-area-to-volume_ratio#Biology surface area to volume ratio]]. Some think the "spikes" on ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Diplodocus]]'' have the same common origin of feathers, as well as the quill of the small herbivore ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Psittacosaurus]]'' and even the horny bumps lined on the back of several [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs hadrosaur mummies]].

to:

* Most [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs coelurosaurs]] certainly had feathers. The several [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs dromaeosaurid species]] surely had them, but in the franchise they are all shown featherless: this, rather than ScienceMarchesOn, might be interpreted more as RuleOfCool, or rather, ArtisticLicensePaleontology, since feathered non-avian dinosaurs were already known at the time; perhaps fluffy raptors would have appeared "too cute"? In RealLife dromeosaurids had WINGS just like their famous relative, the "ur-bird" ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Archaeopteryx]]''… This might be nothing compared to what is seeming to come: ''most small-sized dinosaurs'' may well have had some sort of covering. This theory was led by the discoveries of the primitive herbivore ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLife Tianyulong]]'' in China and ''Kulindadromeus'' in Russia, and further supported by [[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0728-7 the discovery]] of feathers or feather-like filaments in two anurognathid pterosaur specimens from China: the theory is that some kind of covering was present in the last common ancestor of ''all'' dinosaurs and pterosaurs, and then it was partially lost by its largest descendants, possibly because of the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-area-to-volume_ratio#Biology surface area to volume ratio]]. Some think the "spikes" on ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Diplodocus]]'' have the same common origin of feathers, as well as the quill of the small herbivore ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Psittacosaurus]]'' and even the horny bumps lined on the back of several [[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs hadrosaur mummies]].



* ''Tropeognathus'' and ''Tupandactylus'', known from the Brazilian Santana Group, specifically the Romualdo and underlying Crato Formation respectively, are shown living 127 million years ago (middle Barremian), but the ages of Romualdo and Crato have subsequently been reinterpreted as early Albian (112-108 mya) and late Aptian (115-113 mya) respectively. The same AnachronismStew is present with the sympatric ''Anhanguera'' in ''Series/DinosaurRevolution''.

to:

* The episode uses the interpretation that crested and crestless ornithocheirids were respectively males and females (even suggesting the keel-like crest of "males" allowed them a different style of fishing from the crestless females). This was a pet hypothesis from the series' pterosaur consultant, David Unwin, but the idea does not have much weight behind it nowadays, primarily because there's no real evidence for it beyond speculation. The sexual dimorphism seen in ''Tropeognathus''/''Ornithcheirus'' in the episode is purely speculative anyway.
* ''Tropeognathus'' and ''Tupandactylus'', known from the Brazilian Santana Group, specifically the Romualdo and underlying Crato Formation respectively, are shown living 127 million years ago (middle Barremian), but the ages of Romualdo and Crato have subsequently been reinterpreted as early Albian (112-108 mya) and late Aptian (115-113 mya) respectively. The same AnachronismStew is present with the sympatric ''Anhanguera'' in ''Series/DinosaurRevolution''. Also, ''Tropeognathus'' is known only from the Romualdo Formation, while ''Tupandactylus'' is only known from the underlying Crato Formation, so it is probable the two animals did not actually coexist.



* The episode depicts female ''Tyrannosaurus'' as being larger and more vicious than males, based on then supposed evidence of "gracile" and "robust" morphs of ''T. rex'' fossils and a supposed egg canal gap in the tail vertebrae known in the "robust" morphs, as known in modern crocodilians, so the "robust" morph was considered the female (the 'making of' program has them identifying the very large and extremely robust "Sue" ''Tyrannosaurus'' specimen as female). However, shortly after the series was broadcast evidence for female's being larger was severely weakened by the fact the supposed egg canal anatomy found in crocodilians was in error, so it could not be used to accurately determine dinosaur sexes, and the extremely robust "Sue" specimen had a fully intact tail vertebrae anyway, contradicting the idea regardless. Although considering that this pattern of dimorphism is seen in most large carnivorous birds as well as the most primitive birds today, it isn't improbable, there's just no direct evidence of it.

to:

* The episode depicts female ''Tyrannosaurus'' as being larger and more vicious than males, based on then supposed evidence of "gracile" and "robust" morphs of ''T. rex'' fossils and a supposed egg canal gap in the tail vertebrae known in the "robust" morphs, as known in modern crocodilians, so the "robust" morph was considered the female (the 'making of' program has them identifying the very large and extremely robust "Sue" ''Tyrannosaurus'' specimen as female). However, shortly after the series was broadcast broadcast, evidence for female's being larger was severely weakened by the fact the supposed egg canal anatomy found in crocodilians was in error, so it could not be used to accurately determine dinosaur sexes, and the extremely robust "Sue" specimen had a fully intact tail vertebrae anyway, contradicting the idea regardless. Although considering that this pattern of dimorphism is seen in most large carnivorous birds as well as the most primitive birds today, it isn't improbable, there's just no direct evidence of it.



* The series uses a design choice of fusing the bony hornlets above its eyes into one large, continuous ridge. Supplementary material states some experts at the time argued for them, but the idea, which was niche even at the time, has virtually no followers nowadays since there is no real evidence for it from any theropod; ''Walking with Dinosaurs'' is probably the ''only'' popular depiction that uses this design idea.



* At the time the show came out, ''Didelphodon'' was mostly known from teeth, which were exceptionally large and robust for a Cretaceous mammal, leading to badger-like depictions, as in this episode. A skeleton was later found, revealing that it was shorter-legged, leaner, and semiaquatic, like an otter. The robust teeth were probably to crush freshwater crabs and molluscs. This is ironic, because ''Didelphodon'' is used in the show as an argument for dinosaurs "oppressing" mammals and keeping them from diversifying during the Mesozoic, but in reality it was an example of higher mammalian diversity in the Mesozoic than commonly assumed.
** Interestingly, there is another mammal that lived alongside T. rex, called ''Nanocuris'',which might fit the profile of the WWD ''Didelphodon'' a lot better, as it was a member of the [[https://www.deviantart.com/midiaou/art/FC-Deltatheridium-654910222 deltatheridiids]], who were likely active predators and might have even ''preyed on baby dinosaurs'', as the skull remains of a juvenile troodontid from Mongolia sport bite marks made by a deltatheridiid.

to:

* At the time the show came out, ''Didelphodon'' was mostly known from teeth, which were exceptionally large and robust for a Cretaceous mammal, leading to badger-like depictions, as in this episode. A skeleton was later found, revealing that it was shorter-legged, leaner, and semiaquatic, like an otter. The robust teeth were probably used to crush freshwater crabs and molluscs. This is ironic, because ''Didelphodon'' is used in the show as an argument for dinosaurs "oppressing" mammals and keeping them from diversifying during the Mesozoic, but in reality it was an example of higher mammalian diversity in the Mesozoic than commonly assumed.
** Interestingly, there is another mammal that lived alongside T. rex, called ''Nanocuris'',which ''Nanocuris'', which might fit the profile of the WWD ''Didelphodon'' a lot better, as it was a member of the [[https://www.deviantart.com/midiaou/art/FC-Deltatheridium-654910222 deltatheridiids]], who were likely active predators and might have even ''preyed on baby dinosaurs'', as the skull remains of a juvenile troodontid from Mongolia sport bite marks made by a deltatheridiid.



* ''Tapejara'' (now known as ''Tupandactylus'') is described as being a carnivorous fish eater. ''Tapejara'' is now speculated to have been a hornbill or toucan-like fruit-eater or omnivore, while ''Tupandactylus'' is thought to have been a ground-dwelling raptorial predator.

to:

* ''Tapejara'' (now known as ''Tupandactylus'') is described as being a carnivorous fish eater. ''Tapejara'' is now speculated to have been a hornbill or toucan-like fruit-eater or omnivore, omnivore (so there's really no reason it should have been near the coast in "Giant of the Skies"), while ''Tupandactylus'' is thought to have been a ground-dwelling raptorial predator.


Added DiffLines:

!'''Walking with Dinosaurs: The Evidence'''
* The closing page for the "New Blood" section states that non-mammalian cynodonts became extinct in the Early Jurassic, although it does cite the dubious fossil ''Chronoperates'', from the Late Palaeocene, as a possible late-surviving cynodont. Both interpretations are now thought to be incorrect; non-mammalian cynodonts are now known to have persisted until at least the Early Cretaceous with ''Fossiomanus'', and possibly the haramiyids (and if gondwanatherians are haramiyids, this would suggest their survival until at least the end of the Mesozoic), while ''Chronoperates'' is now thought to possibly be a late-surviving symmetrodont mammal.
* The entry on sauropod size mentions the obscure taxon ''Amphicoelias fragillimus'', known only from a lost partial vertebrae, as possibly being the largest ever animal. This species was renamed ''Maraapunisaurus'' in 2018, classifying it as a potential rebbachisaurid instead, which have comparably very tall vertebrae. Its possible measurements of 60 metres and 150 tonnes have been reduced to 35 metres and 70-80 tonnes from this classification; still gigantic for any land animal, but within the upper limits known from other sauropod taxa.
* The book states that evidence of aggressive interactions between ''Allosaurus'' and ''Stegosaurus'' are lacking, but a 2005 study found evidence indicating gouges in bones of both species from attacks. A ''Stegosaurus'' plate with a chunk taken out of that fits the jaw of ''Allosaurus'', and a ''Allosaurus'' vertebrae with a puncture hole in it that perfectly fits a ''Stegosaurus'' tail spike (with an ensuing bone infection around the hole indicating the damage occurred when the animal was alive).
* The depiction of ''Torosaurus'' using their horns in intraspecific combat was partly based on a 1990 study by Thomas Lehman suggesting there was sexual dimorphism amongst ''Triceratops''. However this "sexual dimorphism" was largely discredited in a 2009 study which showed that the two different forms were in fact different species (''T. horridus'' and ''T. prosus'') that are chronologically separated in the fossil record (they did not coexist, one likely evolved into the other). That said, horns being used for fighting amongst themselves is still plausible, even if there's no conclusive evidence of sexual dimorphism in any ceratopsian.
* The section on the depictions of Australian pterosaurs in the episode "Spirits of the Ice Forest", it mentions an unnamed Brazilian pterosaur with ''Ornithocheirus''-like teeth and a ''Pteranodon''-like crest. This has since been named ''Ludodactylus'' ("toy finger", after the fact it strongly resembles the made-up pterosaur chimera of ''Pteranodon'' [[ToothyBird with teeth]] in pop culture) in 2003.
* The ''Didelphodon'' appearance and behaviour in the episode is heavily based on the Tasmanian devil, because, as a similar-sized carnivorous metatherian with powerful jaws, it was considered the closest living ecological equivalent. This includes ''Didelphodon'' being depicted as strictly solitary and violently territorial. Aside from the aforementioned fact a much more complete ''Didelphodon'' fossil has found it was not as robustly-built as previously believed, a 2009 study indicated that Tasmanian devils are far more social than previously believed, not defending territories, forming communities of unrelated adult individuals, and feeding communally. This doesn't necessarily preclude ''Didelphodon'' being solitary, but of course the fact it wasn't like a Tasmanian devil anatomically either makes it inaccurate either way.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The episode depicts numerous Mid Jurassic species near the end of the Late Jurassic in one of the series' most egregious examples of AnachronismStew. This likely stems from the fact that ''Liopleurodon'', ''Cryptoclidus'', and especially ''Ophthalmosaurus'' were used as wastebasket taxa in the past, with various pliosaurid, cryptoclidid and ichthyosaur fossils from the Late Jurassic being attributed to them respectively, and in the case of ''Ophthalmosaurus'', even some Early Cretaceous ichthyosaurs material, but those younger specimens have all since been placed in different genera, reclassified as new genera or have been deemed too fragmentary to be diagnostic, leaving the former three restricted to the Callovian-early Kimmeridgian (166-155 mya). There was, however, no excuse for ''Eustreptospondylus'', who is only known from its Oxfordian-aged holotype (circa 160 mya).

to:

* The episode depicts numerous Mid Jurassic species near the end of the Late Jurassic in one of the series' most egregious examples of AnachronismStew. This likely stems from the fact that ''Liopleurodon'', ''Cryptoclidus'', and especially ''Ophthalmosaurus'' were used as wastebasket taxa in the past, with various pliosaurid, cryptoclidid and ichthyosaur fossils from the Late Jurassic being attributed to them respectively, and in the case of ''Ophthalmosaurus'', even some Early Cretaceous ichthyosaurs ichthyosaur material, but those younger specimens have all since been placed in different genera, reclassified as new genera or have been deemed too fragmentary to be diagnostic, leaving the former three restricted to the Callovian-early Kimmeridgian (166-155 mya). There was, however, no excuse for ''Eustreptospondylus'', who is only known from its Oxfordian-aged holotype (circa 160 mya).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Plateosaurus'' entry states that prosauropods did not evolve into sauropods, but later studies have found the the traditional idea was correct that prosauropods really were the direct ancestors of sauropods and the group is paraphyletic.

to:

* The ''Plateosaurus'' entry states that prosauropods did not evolve into sauropods, but later studies have found the that the traditional idea was correct that prosauropods really were the direct ancestors of sauropods and the group is paraphyletic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
the study does NOT conclude on a late maastrichtian age for the nemegt, it states that 66.7 +/- 2.5 Ma is the uppermost possible limit and represents a post-burial dating for the fossils, so an early maastrichtian date is still probable


* While all of them stem from the Late Cretaceous Nemegt Basin group, the cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the Nemegt Formation, which overlies the Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, a 2023 study using radiometric dating on ''Tarbosaurus'' teeth from Nemegt pushed up the age of the formation from 70-68 mya to the very end of the Maastrichtian, circa 68-66 mya, making its fauna contemporaries of T. rex and the other Hell Creek dinosaurs in North America, and quite a bit younger than ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops'' (who lived during the late Campanian, 75-72 mya). Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the biome (their last known occurrence being at Barun Goyot).

to:

* While all of them stem from the Late Cretaceous Nemegt Basin group, the * The cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the mid Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation, Formation (which gets namedropped by Nigel, meaning it's the episode's setting), which overlies the early Maastrichtian Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the late Campanian Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, a 2023 study using radiometric dating on ''Tarbosaurus'' teeth velociraptorine and protoceratopsid fossils from Nemegt pushed up the intermediary Barun Goyot Formation have subsequently been reassigned to separate genera (''Kuru'' and ''Shri'', and ''Bagaceratops'' respectively), which widened the age of the formation from 70-68 mya to the very end of the Maastrichtian, circa 68-66 mya, making its fauna contemporaries of T. rex and the other Hell Creek dinosaurs in North America, and quite a bit younger than ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops'' (who lived during the late Campanian, 75-72 mya). gap. Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the biome (their last known occurrence site. Furthermore, Nemegt and Djadochta turned out to be quite different biomes, with the former being at Barun Goyot). an alluvial plain and thriving with large dinosaurs, while the latter was more arid and desert-like (complete with sand dunes), and mainly housed small dinosaurs.


* The cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the mid Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation (which gets namedropped by Nigel, meaning it's the episode's setting), which overlies the early Maastrichtian Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the late Campanian Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, velociraptorine and protoceratopsid fossils from the intermediary Barun Goyot Formation have subsequently been reassigned to separate genera (''Kuru'' and ''Shri'', and ''Bagaceratops'' respectively), which widened the age gap. Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the site. Furthermore, Nemegt and Djadochta turned out to be quite different biomes, with the former being an alluvial plain and thriving with large dinosaurs, while the latter was more arid and desert-like (complete with sand dunes), and mainly housed small dinosaurs.

to:

* The While all of them stem from the Late Cretaceous Nemegt Basin group, the cast of the episode wouldn't have all been contemporaries in real life. ''Therizinosaurus'', ''Tarbosaurus'', ''Mononykus'', and ''Saurolophus'' all come from the mid Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation (which gets namedropped by Nigel, meaning it's the episode's setting), Formation, which overlies the early Maastrichtian Barun Goyot Formation, and it, in turn, overlies the late Campanian Djadochta Formation (which houses ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops''). To complicate matters, velociraptorine and protoceratopsid fossils a 2023 study using radiometric dating on ''Tarbosaurus'' teeth from the intermediary Barun Goyot Formation have subsequently been reassigned to separate genera (''Kuru'' and ''Shri'', and ''Bagaceratops'' respectively), which widened Nemegt pushed up the age gap. of the formation from 70-68 mya to the very end of the Maastrichtian, circa 68-66 mya, making its fauna contemporaries of T. rex and the other Hell Creek dinosaurs in North America, and quite a bit younger than ''Velociraptor'' and ''Protoceratops'' (who lived during the late Campanian, 75-72 mya). Nemegt did house a medium-sized dromaeosaur (and possible velociraptorine) called ''Adasaurus'', but no protoceratopsid fossils are known from the site. Furthermore, Nemegt and Djadochta turned out to be quite different biomes, with the former biome (their last known occurrence being an alluvial plain and thriving with large dinosaurs, while the latter was more arid and desert-like (complete with sand dunes), and mainly housed small dinosaurs.at Barun Goyot).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The idea that the Hell Creek ecosystem was a barren wasteland with only patches of forest scattered across it is entirely incorrect, volcanism or not. We know from both the fossil flora and the abundance of small animals like mammals, birds, fish, turtles, and crocodiles that Hell Creek was a lush, alluvial flood plain environment much more akin to today’s Everglades, but with araucaria conifers and ferns in place of grass rather than the ash fields of Chile.

to:

* The idea that the Hell Creek ecosystem was is shown as a barren wasteland with only patches of forest scattered across it is entirely incorrect, volcanism or not. We know from both (due to the alleged volcanism), but most of the available evidence paints a very different picture. Based on the fossil flora and the abundance of small animals like mammals, (mammals, birds, fish, turtles, and crocodiles crocodiles), we know that Hell Creek was a lush, alluvial flood plain environment much more akin to today’s Everglades, but floodplain environment, with araucaria conifers and ferns in place of grass rather than the ash fields of Chile. grass, much more similar to today’s Everglades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown are identified by supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', the first azhdarchid ever described. But ''Azhdarcho'' hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous.

to:

* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown in this episode are identified by in supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', but the first azhdarchid ever described. But ''Azhdarcho'' genus hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Nemegt (basal tyrannosaurs, hadrosaurs, ankylosaurs, etc.). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as since workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous. ''Azhdarcho''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The group includes "insectivores", "creodonts", and "lepticids", groups with have since been found to be wastebasket taxa, the latter two being probably paraphyletic. Lepticids are also shown as placental mammals, but some studies find them as non-placental eutherians.

to:

** The group includes "insectivores", "creodonts", and "lepticids", "leptictids", groups with have since been found to be wastebasket taxa, the latter two being probably paraphyletic. Lepticids Leptictids are also shown as placental mammals, but some studies find them as non-placental eutherians.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Tapejara'' (now known as ''Tupandactylus'') is described as being a carnivorous fish eaters. ''Tapejara'' is now speculated to have been a hornbill or toucan-like fruit-eater or omnivore, while ''Tupandactylus'' is thought to have been a ground-dwelling raptorial predator.

to:

* ''Tapejara'' (now known as ''Tupandactylus'') is described as being a carnivorous fish eaters.eater. ''Tapejara'' is now speculated to have been a hornbill or toucan-like fruit-eater or omnivore, while ''Tupandactylus'' is thought to have been a ground-dwelling raptorial predator.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Ambulocetus'' most likely [[https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160725105228.htm couldn't support itself on land]], and was fully aquatic despite still having limbs.

to:

* ''Ambulocetus'' is portrayed as very awkwardly being able to walk on land, while still being a graceful swimmer, when the modern consensus is that it most likely [[https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160725105228.htm couldn't support itself on land]], and was fully aquatic despite still having limbs.land]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crude cave art such as this isn’t slam-dunk evidence, so it should be treated with caution.


* Paleoartistic reconstruction have increasingly moved from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either. However, prehistoric rock art discovered in the Amazon in 2020 depicting trunked, long-necked animals has brought the possibility of ''Macrauchenia'' possessing a proboscis into the fray again.

to:

* Paleoartistic reconstruction reconstructions have increasingly moved away from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical tapir-like trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either. However, [[note]] Debatebly, prehistoric rock art discovered in the Amazon in 2020 depicting trunked, long-necked animals has brought the possibility of ''Macrauchenia'' possessing been interpreted as possibly representing a proboscis into the fray again.''Macrauchenia''. [[/note]]

Changed: 917

Removed: 818

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The "American ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Iguanodon]]''" would probably be placed in the genus ''[[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2007.04.009 Dakotadon]]'' today.
* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" probably also comes from the fact that it, just like ''Iguanodon'', was at the time a huge wastebasket taxon, with many different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.
* The narrator alludes to ''Iguanodon'' being a highly successful genus that was both widely distributed and lasted for tens of millions of years, but this was due to ''Iguanodon''’s former status as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]], when any mid to large-sized ornithopod fossils from the Early to Mid Cretaceous (even if they were very fragmentary) were lumped into it. Subsequent studies, however, found that the only fossils attributable to ''Iguanodon'' come from Western Europe (Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, and Iberia) during the Barremian and early Aptian (130-122 mya), and even then, many iguanodont fossils from the Early Cretaceous of Europe have been reassigned to different genera like ''Hypselospinus'', ''Barilium'', and the aforementioned ''Mantellisaurus''.

to:

* The "American ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursTrueDinosaurs Iguanodon]]''" would probably be placed in the genus ''[[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2007.04.009 Dakotadon]]'' today.
* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" probably also comes from
today. Likewise, the fact that it, just like ''Iguanodon'', was at the time a huge wastebasket taxon, with many different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.
* The
narrator alludes to ''Iguanodon'' being a highly successful genus that was both widely distributed and lasted for tens of millions of years, but this was due to ''Iguanodon''’s former status as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]], when any mid to large-sized ornithopod fossils from the Early to Mid Cretaceous (even if they were very fragmentary) were lumped into it. Subsequent studies, however, found that the only fossils attributable to ''Iguanodon'' come from Western Europe (Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, and Iberia) during the Barremian and early Aptian (130-122 mya), and even then, many iguanodont fossils from the Early Cretaceous of Europe have been reassigned to different genera like ''Hypselospinus'', ''Barilium'', and the aforementioned ''Mantellisaurus''.''Mantellisaurus''.
* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" might have been alluding to the fact that that the former was at the time a minor wastebasket taxon, with several different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* It's mentioned in the ''Tapejara'' entry that it is known from the Santana Formation, but this has since been split into the Romualdo, Ipubi and Crato Formations. The species of ''Tapejara''/''Tupandactylus'' depicted therefore did not actually coexist with ''Ornithocheirus''/''Tropeognathus'', as it is known from the Crato Formation, while the latter is known from the Romualdo Formation, which dates a few million years later (it's a moot point in the episode, as both lived several million years before the Barremian).


Added DiffLines:

* The ''Argentinosaurus'' entry notes that titanosaurs are known from every continent except Antarctica; however, a titanosaur vertebrae was described from the continent (or at least, the outlying James Ross Island) in 2012.

Added: 1337

Changed: 944

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The episode depicts plesiosaurs as having an alternating flipper stroke, but biomechanical tests done since has found this method of locomotion was pretty inefficient due to the vortexes created by the stroke of the front flippers resulting in significant turbulence that would hinder propulsion generated by the delayed stroke of the back flippers. A 2017 study with mechanical plesiosaur fins found that the most efficient gait for plesiosaurs was all four flippers moving almost in unison, with the back flippers stroking just after the front pair to ride in its immediate wake.

to:

* The episode depicts plesiosaurs as having an alternating flipper stroke, but biomechanical tests done since has have found this method of locomotion was pretty inefficient due to the vortexes created by the stroke of the front flippers resulting in significant turbulence that would hinder propulsion generated by the delayed stroke of the back flippers. A 2017 study with mechanical plesiosaur fins found that the most efficient gait for plesiosaurs was all four flippers moving almost in unison, with the back flippers stroking just after the front pair to ride in its immediate wake.



* The ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeNonDinosaurianReptiles Tapejara]]'' species featured has now been reassigned to ''Tupandactylus''. We also now know that the head is too small and the males had a flat crest rather than a ridged crest.

to:

* ''Ornithocheirus'' is seen as a seagoing animal feeding solely on fish, but [[https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2017AM/webprogram/Paper305496.html a 2017 study on ornithocheiroid carbon isotopes]] found that they probably fed substantially on terrestrial prey as well as aquatic prey, making them closer to gigantic seagulls than albatrosses.
* Similar to the ''Rhamphorhynchus'', the ''Ornithocheirus'' is shown fishing by simply flying low over the water and skimming its beak across the surface to catch prey, with the accompanying guidebook even suggesting its keel-like snout crests were used to keep its head straight while dipping its beak underwater. Few take the idea of such massive flying animals skim-feeding seriously anymore.
* The ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeNonDinosaurianReptiles Tapejara]]'' species featured has now been reassigned to ''Tupandactylus''. We also now know that the head is too small and the males had a flat crest rather than a ridged crest. Also, a nearly complete ''Tupandactylus navigans'' fossil (the species depicted in the episode) with crest impressions described in 2021 indicates the crest was more forward slung than depicted in the episode.
** The 2021 study on the ''Tupandactylus'' fossil cautiously suggested that ''T. navigans'' may actually represent the female form of the larger ''T. imperator''. This is unlike the episode's portrayal, which has ''T. navigans'' as the larger male form, while the smaller female is represented by a speculative and made-up morph with blunt crests. However, the authors stressed that this was just one possible interpretation (because sexual dimorphism is generally hard to prove from fossils).



* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''.

to:

* The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''. The line that ''Polacanthus'' are "often found around ''Iguanodon'' herds" probably also comes from the fact that it, just like ''Iguanodon'', was at the time a huge wastebasket taxon, with many different nodosaurid fossils from throughout the United Kingdom, Spain, and (in ''Hoplitosaurus''' case) North America attributed to it. However, a 2020 study found that only the holotype could be conclusively attributed to ''Polacanthus'', and all other European fossils were too scrappy to conclusively classify.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Paleoartistic reconstruction have increasingly moved from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either.

to:

* Paleoartistic reconstruction have increasingly moved from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either. However, prehistoric rock art discovered in the Amazon in 2020 depicting trunked, long-necked animals has brought the possibility of ''Macrauchenia'' possessing a proboscis into the fray again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The episode depicts plesiosaurs as having an alternating flipper stroke, but biomechanical tests done since has found this method of locomotion was pretty inefficient due to the vortexes created by the stroke of the front flippers resulting in significant turbulence that would hinder propulsion generated by the delayed stroke of the back flippers. A 2017 study with mechanical plesiosaur fins found that the most efficient gait for plesiosaurs was all four flippers moving almost in unison, with the back flippers stroking just after the front pair to ride in its immediate wake.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[PteroSoarer giant pterosaur]] ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursNonDinosaurs Quetzalcoatlus]]'' is shown as a fish eater hunting prey on the wing (the episode implies that it's normally a seagoing animal and happened to come in from the coast, seemingly ignoring that its remains are known entirely from semi-arid inland ecosystems that would've been hundreds of kilometres from the sea), while we now know it was actually stork-like in habits. In fact, it probably wouldn't have hesitated to eat juvenile tyrannosaurs, like the ones in the program! We now know ''Quetzalcoatlus'' actually had a much larger head and neck.

to:

* The [[PteroSoarer giant pterosaur]] pterosaur ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursNonDinosaurs Quetzalcoatlus]]'' is shown as a fish eater hunting prey on the wing (the episode implies that it's normally a seagoing animal and happened to come in from the coast, seemingly ignoring that its remains are known entirely from semi-arid inland ecosystems that would've been hundreds of kilometres from the sea), while we now know it was actually stork-like in habits. In fact, it probably wouldn't have hesitated to eat juvenile tyrannosaurs, like the ones in the program! We now know ''Quetzalcoatlus'' actually had a much larger head and neck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Andrewsarchus'' is classed as a member of Cetancodontamorpha, and is considered to possibly be a close relative of entelodonts, thus making it rather [[HilariousInHindsight humorous in hindsight]] how different the show’s models for these two ungulates are, as conventional wisdom nowadays is that ''Andrewsarchus'' paid a stronger resemblance to entelodonts (to what extent is unclear).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the summary, ''Smilodon'' and ''Doedicurus'' are ranked among the Pliocene animals, while the start of the following Pleistocene epoch is listed as 1.8 mya. But later studies have put the start of the Pleistocene at 2.5 mya, thus making ''Smilodon'' (2.5 million to 10,000 ya) and ''Doedicurus'' (2 million to 10,000 ya) strictly Pleistocene genera, or in the case of ''Doedicurus'', it might have even lasted into the early Holocene (with some fossils possibly being 8,000 to 7,000 years old).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Additional info/Elaboration


* Megalodon is identified as a ''Carcharodon'' species (the same genus that the modern great white belongs), but subsequent studies place it in the extinct genus ''Otodus''.

to:

* Megalodon is identified as a species of ''Carcharodon'' species (the same genus that the modern great white belongs), but subsequent studies place it in the have agreed that it's actually an otodontid (an entirely extinct lineage of sharks), placing it within either the genus ''Otodus''.''Carcharocles'' or in ''Otodus'' itself (in which case ''Carcharocles'' is treated as a synonym of the latter). Its extinction date is also listed as 1.6 mya (the Early Pleistocene) but later studies bumped it down to about 3.5 mya (the Mid Pliocene).

Added: 618

Changed: 592

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Rhamphorhynchus''' specified range includes Tanzania, but these so-called remains, once dubbed "Rhamphorhynchus tendagurensis", has since been reevaluated as being too scrappy to concretely belong to the genus.

to:

* ''Rhamphorhynchus''' The books state that both ''Brachiosaurus'' and ''Allosaurus'' lived in Africa, but since 2009, the Tanzanian ''Brachiosaurus brancai'' has been classified as ''Giraffatitan brancai'' by most workers, with later phylogenetic studies even suggesting that it’s not particularly closely related to B. ''altithorax'' (though still a brachiosaurid), while the sympatric "''Allosaurus tendagurensis''” (known only from a large tibia) has been deemed a ''nomen dubium'' due to its fragmentary nature, with the same applying to other alleged ''Allosaurus'' fossils from Tanzania.
* ''Rhamphorhynchus''
specified range includes Tanzania, but these so-called remains, once dubbed "Rhamphorhynchus tendagurensis", "''Rhamphorhynchus tendagurensis''", has since been reevaluated as being too scrappy to concretely belong to the genus.genus. On that note, it's also given a rather broad fossil range of 170-145 mya, because in the past, many fragmentary rhamphorhynchoid fossils have been attributed to it (including finds from Oxford Clay like the likewise dubious "''Rhamphorhynchus jessoni''"), but later research clarified that the only conclusive ''Rhamphorhynchus'' fossils material all comes from the Tithonian of Europe (150-145 mya).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Rhamphorhynchus''' specified range includes Tanzania, but these so-called remains, once dubbed "Rhamphorhynchus tendagurensis", has since been reevaluated as being too scrappy to concretely belong to the genus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Iguanodon'' is said to have inhabited Eurasia and North America 140-112 mya (Valanginian-early Albian), which was actually a more ''conservative'' description of its alleged temporal/geographic range compared to what some other sources claimed at the time. Still, besides the aforementioned American ''Dakotadon'', fossils from the Aptian-Albian of Central Asia previously attributed to ''Iguanodon'' have either been deemed ''nomen dubia'' or reassigned to ''Altirhinus'', while in Western Europe, the Valanginian species have been reclassified as ''Barilium'' and ''Hypselospinus'', leaving ''Iguanodon'' restricted to the Barremian-earliest Aptian.

to:

* ''Iguanodon'' is said to have inhabited Eurasia and North America 140-112 mya (Valanginian-early Albian), which was actually a more ''conservative'' description of its alleged temporal/geographic range compared to what some other sources claimed at the time. [[note]] Which included fossils from the Late Jurassic-Mid Cretaceous of Eurasia and even some from Africa, some of which turned out to not belong to iguanodonts or even dinosaurs. [[/note]] Still, besides the aforementioned American ''Dakotadon'', fossils from the Aptian-Albian of Central Asia previously attributed to ''Iguanodon'' have either been deemed ''nomen dubia'' or reassigned to ''Altirhinus'', while in Western Europe, the Valanginian species have been reclassified as ''Barilium'' and ''Hypselospinus'', leaving ''Iguanodon'' restricted to the Barremian-earliest Aptian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Iguanodon'' is said to have inhabited Eurasia and North America 140-112 mya (Valanginian-early Albian), which was actually a more ''conservative'' description of its alleged temporal/geographic range compared to what some other sources claimed at the time. Still, besides the aforementioned American ''Dakotadon'', fossils from the Aptian-Albian of Central Asia previously attributed to ''Iguanodon'' have either been deemed ''nomen dubia'' or reassigned to ''Altirhinus'', while in Western Europe, the Valanginian species have been reclassified as ''Barilium'' and ''Hypselospinus'', leaving ''Iguanodon'' restricted to the Barremian-earliest Aptian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Ornithocheirus'' is said to have lasted pretty much the entirety of the Cretaceous (140-70 mya) and that it had an almost cosmopolitan distribution, both of which reflect its former status as a wastebasket taxon, with the type species, O. ''simus'', now being restricted to the Albian of Britain, while many other Mid Cretaceous species have been reassigned to various different genera. The very Early Cretaceous ones have been reclassified as ''Serrodraco'' and ''Targaryendraco'' respectively, and the claim that it lasted until the Late Cretaceous is based on the Campanian “''Ornithocheirus buenzeli''”, known only from a humerus and jaw fragment now thought to represent an azhdarchid.

to:

* ''Ornithocheirus'' is said to have lasted pretty much the entirety of the Cretaceous (140-70 mya) and that it had an almost cosmopolitan distribution, both of which reflect its former status as a wastebasket taxon, with the type species, O. ''simus'', now being restricted to the Albian of Britain, while many other Mid Cretaceous species have been reassigned to various different genera. The very Early Cretaceous ones have been reclassified as ''Serrodraco'' and ''Targaryendraco'' respectively, and the claim that it lasted until the Late Cretaceous is based on the Campanian “''Ornithocheirus buenzeli''”, known only from a humerus and jaw fragment now thought to represent an azhdarchid. Oddly enough, it also lists Australia as part of its geographic range, most likely referring to fragmentary pterosaur fossils from the Toolebuc Formation found in 1980 and 1991 respectively, which have since been described as ''Aussiedraco'' and ''Mythunga''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Ornithocheirus'' is said to have lasted pretty much the entirety of the Cretaceous (140-70 mya) and that it had an almost cosmopolitan distribution, both of which reflect its former status as a wastebasket taxon, with the type species, O. ''simus'', now being restricted to the Albian of Britain, while many other Mid Cretaceous species have been reassigned to various different genera. The very Early Cretaceous ones have been reclassified as ''Serrodraco'' and ''Targaryendraco'' respectively, and the claim that it lasted until the Late Cretaceous is based on the Campanian “''Ornithocheirus buenzeli''”, known only from a humerus and jaw fragment now thought to represent an azhdarchid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Unnecessary


* ''Placerias'':

Top