Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ScienceMarchesOn / WalkingWith

Go To

OR

Changed: 886

Removed: 674

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Combining repeated entries


* Andrews originally restored "''Baluchitherium''" as a tremendously massive animal even by rhino standards, most likely as a way to make sure that ''he'' had found the largest land mammal of all time. The reconstructions lost weight through the 20th century, and this process continued after the show. Nowadays, some no longer believe it was the largest land mammal of all time but was surpassed by the elephant ''Palaeoloxodon namadicus'', although it is still the tallest (and the line about being the largest land animal ''since the dinosaurs'' is still true).

to:

* Andrews originally restored "''Baluchitherium''" as a tremendously massive animal even by rhino standards, most likely as a way to make sure The opening states that ''he'' had found indricotheres are the largest land mammal mammals of all time. The reconstructions lost weight through time, but [[https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app001362014.html a study in 2015]] found that the 20th century, and this process continued after the show. Nowadays, some no longer believe it was the largest land mammal of all time but was surpassed by the extinct elephant species ''Palaeoloxodon namadicus'', although namadicus'' may have gotten bigger by about five tonnes (17 tonnes for ''Paraceratherium'' vs 22 tonnes for ''Paleoloxodon''). However, the study based this on two partial bones discovered and measured in the early 19th century, not from direct examination of these fossils, so it is still requires further confirmation. Also the tallest (and study found the line about being largest ''Paraceratherium'' could have reached 17 tonnes rather than 15 as stated in the episode. In any case, the claim that indricotheres are the largest land animal animals ''since the dinosaurs'' is still true).true.



* The opening for the episode states the indricothere as being the largest land mammal of all time, but [[https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app001362014.html a study in 2015]] found that the extinct elephant species ''Palaeoloxodon namadicus'' may have gotten bigger by about five tonnes (17 tonnes for ''Paraceratherium'' vs 22 tonnes for ''Paleoloxodon''). However, the study based this on two partial bones discovered and measured in the early 19th century, not from direct examination of these fossils, so it still requires further confirmation. Also the study found the largest ''Paraceratherium'' could have reached 17 tonnes rather than 15 as stated in the episode.

Added: 269

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Brachiosaurus'' is no longer considered the largest land animal; the exact species of sauropod that was is not clear, one such candidate being ''Argentinosaurus'', but it wasn't ''Brachiosaurus''. The weight measurement given in the episode is also a bit higher than the maximum weight estimates considered plausible nowadays (over 70 tonnes versus less than 60 tonnes). This is likely due to weight calculation methods done on ''Giraffatitan'' (then considered a species a ''Brachiosaurus'', as noted in the companion book, which includes Africa as part of '''Brachiosaurus''' range) which are now considered to be flawed.

to:

* ''Brachiosaurus'' is no longer considered the largest land animal; the exact species of sauropod that was is not clear, one such candidate being ''Argentinosaurus'', but it wasn't ''Brachiosaurus''. The weight measurement given in the episode is also a bit higher than the maximum weight estimates considered plausible nowadays (over 70 tonnes versus less than 60 tonnes). This is likely due to weight calculation methods done on ''Giraffatitan'' (then considered a species a ''Brachiosaurus'', as noted in the companion book, which includes Africa as part of '''Brachiosaurus''' ''Brachiosaurus''' range) which are now considered to be flawed.


Added DiffLines:

* The adult ''Ophthalmosaurus'' are described as being toothless, but this actually turned out to be an error from a nearly complete fossil which had no teeth, but it's now known that it had teeth, but they dropped out and were lost during the process of decomposition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The ''Allosaurus'' is portrayed with an unusually short and blunt skull, but this is because the design is based on the ''Allosaurus'' neotype, USNM 4734, which had a rather poorly preserved skull that was distorted in the fossilization process, rendering it shorter and more rounded. It's now recognized that this was in error, but not before the error was repeated in ''The Ballad of Big Al'' (complete with the skull's smaller secondary crest ridges). Together, the shortened skull and the mistake of placing the horns over the eyes instead of in front almost make the ''Allosaurus'' look like a long-armed ''Carnotaurus''.

Added: 16

Changed: 471

Removed: 239

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing some indentation problems and recent phrasing


* ''Placerias'':



* Another error with the ''Placerias'' is depicting them with tusks. Unlike most dicynodonts, ''Placerias'' actually had horn-like protrusions of bone projecting straight from its skull rather than tusks (technically, it also had tusks, but they're very small and hidden underneath these protrusions).
* Another minor error is that ''Placerias'' is known from two morphotypes of equal ratio, one with longer tusks than the other, and usually believed to be the male and female forms (this was actually noted in scientific descriptions long before the production of [=WWD=], but the literature was rather obscure and would've been difficult to find, making this a borderline example), but the version here is depicted without this dimorphism.
* The most glaring example by far is how ''Postosuchus'' and ''Placerias'' are both depicted as sluggish and ungainly relics from a bygone age that are destined to be supplanted by the “superior” dinosaurs (not unlike how we used to view [[DumbDinos dinosaurs]] themselves back in the early to mid-20th century in relation to mammals), who are framed as being more versatile, fleet-footed and have the unique gift of bipedalism. Suffice to say, none of that is true, as all terrestrial Triassic tetrapods were just as agile, sophisticated, and well-adapted to their enviroment as early dinosaurs and most of them likely died out as a result of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction]], which also allowed dinosaurs to take over ([[HistoryRepeats in the same way mammals took over thanks to the K-T mass extinction]])[[note]]The narration by Creator/KennethBranagh does mention the Triassic-Jurassic extinction during the credits, mostly glossing over it by stating how the dinosaurs have continued to evolve[[/note]], and bipedalism wasn’t unique to dinosaurs, as several other contemporary archosaurs, such as rauisuchids (including ''Postosuchus''), proposaurids, and shuvosaurids were also bipedal and shared many other morphological similarities to true dinosaurs (the last of which looked [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effigia#/media/File:Effigia_BW.jpg nigh-identical to dinosaur]] [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuvosaurus#/media/File:Shuvosaurus_BW.jpg to the untrained eye]]).

to:

* Another error with the ** The ''Placerias'' is depicting them depicted with tusks. Unlike most dicynodonts, ''Placerias'' actually had horn-like protrusions of bone projecting straight from its skull rather than tusks (technically, it also had tusks, but they're very small and hidden underneath these protrusions).
* Another minor error is that ** ''Placerias'' is known from two morphotypes of equal ratio, one with longer tusks than the other, and usually believed to be the male and female forms (this was actually noted in scientific descriptions long before the production of [=WWD=], but the literature was rather obscure and would've been difficult to find, making this a borderline example), but the version here is depicted without this dimorphism.
* The most glaring example by far is how ''Postosuchus'' and ''Placerias'' are both depicted as sluggish and ungainly relics from a bygone age that are destined to be supplanted by the “superior” "superior" dinosaurs (not unlike how we used to view [[DumbDinos dinosaurs]] themselves back in the early to mid-20th century in relation to mammals), who are framed as being more versatile, fleet-footed and have the unique gift of bipedalism. Suffice to say, none of that is true, as all terrestrial Triassic tetrapods were just as agile, sophisticated, and well-adapted to their enviroment as early dinosaurs and most of them likely died out as a result of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction]], which also allowed dinosaurs to take over ([[HistoryRepeats in the same way mammals took over thanks to the K-T mass extinction]])[[note]]The narration by Creator/KennethBranagh does mention the Triassic-Jurassic extinction during the credits, mostly glossing over it by stating how the dinosaurs have continued to evolve[[/note]], and bipedalism wasn’t unique to dinosaurs, as several other contemporary archosaurs, such as rauisuchids (including ''Postosuchus''), proposaurids, and shuvosaurids were also bipedal and shared many other morphological similarities to true dinosaurs (the last of which looked [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effigia#/media/File:Effigia_BW.jpg nigh-identical to dinosaur]] [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuvosaurus#/media/File:Shuvosaurus_BW.jpg to the untrained eye]]).



* The episode also depicts the European ''Anurognathus'' in North America and interacting with otherwise North American animals. This is probably because the actual pterosaur fossils of the Morrison Formation are pretty terrible. However, the genus ''Mesadactylus'' was tentatively classified as an anurognathid in 2007, so they could have used that instead of ''Anurognathus'' nowadays.
* The WWD portrayal also places ''Anurognathus''' eyes in the wrong skull hole, the upper temporal fenestra rather than the orbit, making its face seem longer than it really was. Notice the shrinkwrapped circle in front of the eye in [[https://i.imgur.com/w3VAzGd.jpg this prop]]? That's where the eye ''should'' be. This is what makes it likely that ''Anurognathus'' was actually a nocturnal predator; its eyes [[https://qilong.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/anurognathus-ammoni-eyeball.png were enormous]] (each eye ''alone'' was bigger than its brain). Where WWD placed its eyes were actually where jaw muscles would have been attached. However, at the time, ''Anurognathus'' was only known from very scrappy and crushed skull material, and it wasn't until 2007, when a well-preserved complete skeleton was found, that this mistake was rectified.

to:

* The episode also depicts the European ''Anurognathus'' in North America and interacting with otherwise North American animals. This is probably because the actual pterosaur fossils of the Morrison Formation are pretty terrible. However, the genus ''Mesadactylus'' was tentatively classified as an anurognathid in 2007, so they could have used that instead of ''Anurognathus'' nowadays.
* The WWD portrayal also episode places ''Anurognathus''' eyes in the wrong skull hole, the upper temporal fenestra rather than the orbit, making its face seem longer than it really was. Notice the shrinkwrapped circle in front of the eye in [[https://i.imgur.com/w3VAzGd.jpg this prop]]? That's where the eye ''should'' be. This is what makes it likely that ''Anurognathus'' was actually a nocturnal predator; its eyes [[https://qilong.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/anurognathus-ammoni-eyeball.png were enormous]] (each eye ''alone'' was bigger than its brain). Where WWD placed its eyes were actually where jaw muscles would have been attached. However, at the time, ''Anurognathus'' was only known from very scrappy and crushed skull material, and it wasn't until 2007, when a well-preserved complete skeleton was found, that this mistake was rectified.



* The largest known pliosaurs were probably only around 12 metres or so at the most, and even that's pushing it. As detailed in the tie-in book ''Walking with Dinosaurs: The Evidence'', the whale-sized ''Liopleurodon'' was based on an [[http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2020/04/in-pursuit-of-giant-pliosaurids-and.html assortment of jaw and snout fragments from Oxford Clay, as well as one vertebra around 25 cm in width housed at the Peterborough Museum]] (the latter of which turned out to have come from a sauropod), which were interpreted at the time as stemming from pliosaurs reaching up to as 20 meters in length, with the main ''Liopleurodon'' of the episode being stated to be an [[BiggerIsBetter unusually large specimen]] of a species that ''on average'' reaches 18-20 meters in length. Further complicating things, some taxonomic shifting down the line transferred the largest alleged ''Liopleurodon'' remains (attributed to animals reaching 8-11 meters), such as the massive "Cumnor mandible", to the related ''Pliosaurus'', leaving ''Liopleurodon'' in the 5.5-7 meter range. Though it was still the biggest killer of its day before being replaced by (or possibly evolving into) the larger ''Pliosaurus''.

to:

* The largest known pliosaurs were probably only around 12 metres or so at the most, and even that's pushing it. As detailed in the tie-in book ''Walking with Dinosaurs: The Evidence'', the whale-sized ''Liopleurodon'' was based on an [[http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2020/04/in-pursuit-of-giant-pliosaurids-and.html assortment of jaw and snout fragments from Oxford Clay, as well as one vertebra around 25 cm in width housed at the Peterborough Museum]] (the latter of which turned out to have come from a sauropod), which were interpreted at the time as stemming from pliosaurs reaching up to as 20 meters in length, with the main ''Liopleurodon'' of the episode being stated to be an [[BiggerIsBetter unusually large specimen]] of a species that ''on average'' reaches 18-20 meters in length. Further complicating things, some taxonomic shifting down the line transferred the largest alleged ''Liopleurodon'' remains (attributed to animals reaching 8-11 meters), such as the massive "Cumnor mandible", to the related ''Pliosaurus'', leaving ''Liopleurodon'' in the 5.5-7 meter range. Though it was still the biggest killer of its day before being replaced by (or possibly evolving into) the larger ''Pliosaurus''. Additionally, it should have a fluke on its tail, as should the ''Cryptoclidus''.



* Additionally, it should have a fluke on its tail, as should the ''Cryptoclidus''.



** Addtionally, the North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''.
* The narrator also alludes to ''Iguanodon'' being a highly successful genus that was both widely distributed and lasted for tens of millions of years, but this was due to ''Iguanodon''’s former status as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]], when any mid to large-sized ornithopod fossils from the Early to Mid Cretaceous (even if they were very fragmentary) were lumped into it. Subsequent studies, however, found that the only fossils attributable to ''Iguanodon'' come from Western Europe (Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, and Iberia) during the Barremian and early Aptian (130-122 mya), and even then, many iguanodont fossils from the Early Cretaceous of Europe have been reassigned to different genera like ''Hypselospinus'', ''Barilium'', and the aforementioned ''Mantellisaurus''.

to:

** Addtionally, the * The North American ''Polacanthus'' is now seen as a separate taxon, ''Hoplitosaurus''.
* The narrator also alludes to ''Iguanodon'' being a highly successful genus that was both widely distributed and lasted for tens of millions of years, but this was due to ''Iguanodon''’s former status as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]], when any mid to large-sized ornithopod fossils from the Early to Mid Cretaceous (even if they were very fragmentary) were lumped into it. Subsequent studies, however, found that the only fossils attributable to ''Iguanodon'' come from Western Europe (Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, and Iberia) during the Barremian and early Aptian (130-122 mya), and even then, many iguanodont fossils from the Early Cretaceous of Europe have been reassigned to different genera like ''Hypselospinus'', ''Barilium'', and the aforementioned ''Mantellisaurus''.



** Additionally, pterosaurs were probably ''not'' "on the decline" at the end of the Cretaceous. Indeed, azhdarchids like ''Quetzalcoatlus'' were among the most successful animals at the time. In March of 2018, the notion that only azhdarchids were left at the time was completely decimated, as several genera of pteranodontid and nyctosaurid pterosaurs were discovered in Morocco strata that were dated to 67 million years. Additionally, not all Maastrichtian pterosaurs (even azhdarchids) were giants.

to:

** Additionally, pterosaurs Pterosaurs were probably ''not'' not "on the decline" at the end of the Cretaceous. Indeed, azhdarchids like ''Quetzalcoatlus'' were among the most successful animals at the time. In March of 2018, the notion that only azhdarchids were left at the time was completely decimated, as several genera of pteranodontid and nyctosaurid pterosaurs were discovered in Morocco strata that were dated to 67 million years. Additionally, not all Maastrichtian pterosaurs (even azhdarchids) were giants.



* The episode also states that ''Quetzalcoatlus'' had a wingspan of thirteen metres; this was actually conservative at the time, but nowadays, with better knowledge of azhdarchid anatomy, a maximum wingspan of about eleven metres is considered more likely.

to:

* The episode also states that ''Quetzalcoatlus'' had a wingspan of thirteen metres; this was actually conservative at the time, but nowadays, with better knowledge of azhdarchid anatomy, a maximum wingspan of about eleven metres is considered more likely.



* The episode also depicts ''Anatotitan/Edmontosaurus'' as being considerably smaller than ''Tyrannosaurus'', but newer fossils indicate it was actually much larger, with specimens such as MOR 1142 and MOR 1609 suggesting lengths of over fifteen metres and possibly up to fifteen tonnes for some adults, far out-weighing the biggest ''T. rex''.

to:

* The episode also depicts ''Anatotitan/Edmontosaurus'' as being considerably smaller than ''Tyrannosaurus'', but newer fossils indicate it was actually much larger, with specimens such as MOR 1142 and MOR 1609 suggesting lengths of over fifteen metres and possibly up to fifteen tonnes for some adults, far out-weighing the biggest ''T. rex''.



** And on that note, mesonychids most likely weren't the true ancestors of whales. Later studies have found whales to still be ungulates, but closer to the ancestors of hippopotamuses than more basal groups like the mesonychids (it helps that both hippos and whales are aquatic). Ironically, these two corrections have coalesced into ''Andrewsarchus'' being [[RightForTheWrongReasons still a land-dwelling relative of whales]], but in a different branch of the ungulate family tree than previously assumed.

to:

** And on that note, mesonychids * Mesonychids most likely weren't the true ancestors of whales. Later studies have found whales to still be ungulates, but closer to the ancestors of hippopotamuses than more basal groups like the mesonychids (it helps that both hippos and whales are aquatic). Ironically, these two corrections have coalesced into ''Andrewsarchus'' being [[RightForTheWrongReasons still a land-dwelling relative of whales]], but in a different branch of the ungulate family tree than previously assumed.



* While paleontologists never expected ''Paraceratherium'' to behave like a carbon copy of African rhinos, this depiction became even less plausible after Prothero reviewed the group's biology extensively a decade later. One of the conclusions was that a mammal the size of ''Paraceratherium'' would be in permanent risk of overheating, so it would be mostly nocturnal or crepuscular, and spend the day in the shade, bathing, mud-bathing, or near water. Since indricotheres fed on tree leaves only, they would avoid depleting their food source by moving constantly from one forested area to another, which would not tire them due to their size, and might do yearly migrations like giraffes and elephants (but not modern rhinos). This would be specially true in desertic areas like the one shown in the episode. Ranging areas would be enormous and densities very low; to guarantee that mating happened at replaceable rates, the females may live in herds or family groups.
** Isotope data from central China is also consistent with indricotheres feeding mostly on riverine forests, even when the territory around was desert-like.

to:

* While paleontologists never expected ''Paraceratherium'' to behave like a carbon copy of African rhinos, this depiction became even less plausible after Prothero reviewed the group's biology extensively a decade later. One of the conclusions was that a mammal the size of ''Paraceratherium'' would be in permanent risk of overheating, so it would be mostly nocturnal or crepuscular, and spend the day in the shade, bathing, mud-bathing, or near water. Since indricotheres fed on tree leaves only, they would avoid depleting their food source by moving constantly from one forested area to another, which would not tire them due to their size, and might do yearly migrations like giraffes and elephants (but not modern rhinos). This would be specially true in desertic areas like the one shown in the episode. Ranging areas would be enormous and densities very low; to guarantee that mating happened at replaceable rates, the females may live in herds or family groups.
**
groups. Isotope data from central China is also consistent with indricotheres feeding mostly on riverine forests, even when the territory around was desert-like.



** As mentioned before, ''Andrewsarchus'' is also classed as a member of Cetancodontamorpha, and is considered to possibly be a close relative of entelodonts, thus making it rather [[HilariousInHindsight humorous in hindsight]] how different the show’s models for these two ungulates are, as conventional wisdom nowadays is that ''Andrewsarchus'' paid a stronger resemblance to entelodonts (to what extent is unclear).

to:

** As mentioned before, * ''Andrewsarchus'' is also classed as a member of Cetancodontamorpha, and is considered to possibly be a close relative of entelodonts, thus making it rather [[HilariousInHindsight humorous in hindsight]] how different the show’s models for these two ungulates are, as conventional wisdom nowadays is that ''Andrewsarchus'' paid a stronger resemblance to entelodonts (to what extent is unclear).



* Paleoartistic reconstruction have also increasingly moved from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either.

to:

* Paleoartistic reconstruction have also increasingly moved from showing ''Macrauchenia'' with a long, almost comical trunk to a more boring moose-like snout, though there is still no conclusive evidence for either.



*** Additionally, the group includes "insectivores", "creodonts", and "lepticids", groups with have since been found to be wastebasket taxa, the latter two being probably paraphyletic. Lepticids are also shown as placental mammals, but some studies find them as non-placental eutherians.

to:

*** Additionally, the ** The group includes "insectivores", "creodonts", and "lepticids", groups with have since been found to be wastebasket taxa, the latter two being probably paraphyletic. Lepticids are also shown as placental mammals, but some studies find them as non-placental eutherians.

Added: 1125

Changed: 375

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The series give a ''very'' generous upper size limit of +40 metres for ''Diplodocus'', even though the largest ''Diplodocus'' fossils of the time were only up to 26 metres in length. The companion book provides the justification; the episode used the measurements for ''Seismosaurus'', because of a hypothesis of the time that suggested the latter was actually a synonym of the former. This idea was actually ahead of its time, and most palaeontologists now consider ''Seismosaurus'' to be a species of ''Diplodocus'', but on the other hand, the old measurements for its size (some of which went as high as ''fifty'' metres) were greatly inflated; modern measurements give it a maximum of 32 metres in length.



* ''Brachiosaurus'' is no longer considered the largest land animal; the exact species of sauropod that was is not clear, one such candidate being ''Argentinosaurus'', but it wasn't ''Brachiosaurus''. The weight measurement given in the episode is also a bit higher than the maximum weight estimates considered plausible nowadays (over 70 tonnes versus less than 60 tonnes). This is likely due to weight calculation methods done on ''Giraffatitan'' (then considered a species a ''Brachiosaurus'') which are now considered to be flawed.

to:

* ''Brachiosaurus'' is no longer considered the largest land animal; the exact species of sauropod that was is not clear, one such candidate being ''Argentinosaurus'', but it wasn't ''Brachiosaurus''. The weight measurement given in the episode is also a bit higher than the maximum weight estimates considered plausible nowadays (over 70 tonnes versus less than 60 tonnes). This is likely due to weight calculation methods done on ''Giraffatitan'' (then considered a species a ''Brachiosaurus'') ''Brachiosaurus'', as noted in the companion book, which includes Africa as part of '''Brachiosaurus''' range) which are now considered to be flawed.



* Debatable with the brief shot of a tamandua, likely meant to represent ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeMammals Eurotamandua]]'' from the Eocene of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messel_pit Messel]], which was initially identified as an anteater. Studies from 2010 indicate that it probably wasn't an anteater [[http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2010/03/the_anteater_that_isnt.php and quite likely it wasn't a xenarthran at all]]. However, the alternative is that it was a primitive, arboreal pangolin with no armor. This makes sense (since anteaters originated in South America while pangolins appeared in Eurasia, and other pangolins are known in Europe at this time) but also means that ''Eurotamandua'', in the flesh, would look very much like a tamandua even if it wasn't a real tamandua. The use of a tamandua as a stand-in should be perfectly excusable. The use of a coati as a stand-in for the giant platypus ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeMammals Steropodon]]'' in WWD, on the other hand... not so much.
* Whether the robust beak of ''Gastornis'' was to crush large nuts or small animals has been a matter of debate since its discovery. WWB went with the animals and presented ''Gastornis'' as the top predator in the Eocene European jungle. However, the latest study on calcium isotopes found that ''Gastornis''' data was more similar to herbivorous mammals and reptiles (such as dinosaurs). There goes the show's iconic line about the Eocene being a time when birds ate horses.[[note]]Near the end of their time in the early Pleistocene, the superficially similar terror birds, which ''were'' carnivores, did however eat horses, as possibly did the giant bathornithids of North America.[[/note]] In addition, the idea of ''Gastornis'' being carnivores was already suspect, since the beak lacked a hook and its feet lacked claws. More likely creodonts (the order containing ''Hyaenodon''), mesonychids, and terrestrial crocodilians such as ''Boverisuchus'' would have been the apex predators.

to:

* Debatable with the The brief shot of a tamandua, likely meant to represent ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeMammals Eurotamandua]]'' from the Eocene of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messel_pit Messel]], which was initially identified as an anteater.anteater, and is identified as such in the accompanying "Triumph of the Beasts" making-of. Studies from 2010 indicate that it probably wasn't an anteater [[http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2010/03/the_anteater_that_isnt.php and quite likely it wasn't a xenarthran at all]]. However, the alternative is that it was a primitive, arboreal pangolin with no armor. This makes sense (since anteaters originated in South America while pangolins appeared in Eurasia, and other pangolins are known in Europe at this time) but also means that ''Eurotamandua'', in the flesh, would look very much like a tamandua even if it wasn't a real tamandua. The use of a tamandua as a stand-in should be perfectly excusable.excusable (although its reclassification as a stem-pangolin ends up refuting the statement in the making-of stating anteaters didn't change much since the Early Eocene). The use of a coati as a stand-in for the giant platypus ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeMammals Steropodon]]'' in WWD, on the other hand... not so much.
* Whether the robust beak of ''Gastornis'' was to crush large nuts or small animals has been a matter of debate since its discovery. WWB went with the animals and presented ''Gastornis'' as the top predator in the Eocene European jungle. However, the latest study on calcium isotopes found that ''Gastornis''' data was more similar to herbivorous mammals and reptiles (such as dinosaurs). There goes the show's iconic line about the Eocene being a time when birds ate horses.[[note]]Near the end of their time in the early Pleistocene, the superficially similar terror birds, which ''were'' carnivores, did however eat horses, as possibly did the earlier giant bathornithids of North America.[[/note]] In addition, the idea of ''Gastornis'' being carnivores was already suspect, since the beak lacked a hook and its feet lacked claws. More likely creodonts (the order containing ''Hyaenodon''), mesonychids, and terrestrial crocodilians such as ''Boverisuchus'' would have been the apex predators.



* The ''Plateosaurus'' entry states that prosauropods did not evolve into sauropods, but later studies have found the the traditional idea was correct that prosauropods really were the director ancestors of sauropods and the group is paraphyletic.

to:

* The ''Plateosaurus'' entry states that prosauropods did not evolve into sauropods, but later studies have found the the traditional idea was correct that prosauropods really were the director direct ancestors of sauropods and the group is paraphyletic.



* The ''Protoceratops'' entry states that the origin of "ceratopsids" (probably meaning the broader group, ceratopsians) are mysterious, and they may have evolved from heterodontosaurids. Fossils of Jurassic ceratopsians are now known, making their early evolution much more well-known. Interestingly, their sister group, the pachycephalosaurs, which is still mysterious, have been suggested to have evolved from heterodontosaurids since then.

to:

* The ''Protoceratops'' entry states that the origin of "ceratopsids" (probably meaning the broader group, ceratopsians) are mysterious, and they may have evolved from heterodontosaurids. Fossils of Jurassic ceratopsians are now known, making their early evolution much more well-known. Interestingly, their sister group, the pachycephalosaurs, which is still mysterious, have mysterious origins, have been suggested to have evolved from heterodontosaurids since then.


Added DiffLines:

* A few entries, such as the ''Diplodocus'' and ''Stegosaurus'', discuss the idea that certain dinosaurs had a ganglia in their hip to make up for their tiny brains and help with motor functions, but this hypothesis is discredited nowadays, because modern birds have a similar cavity in their hips as that of extinct dinosaurs, which was used to justify the idea of the ganglia, but it just contains fatty tissue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The ''Giganotosaurus'' entry expresses uncertainty about whether carcharodontosaurids are allosaurs or not. Right around this time, following the description of the closely related ''Tyrannotitan'' and ''Mapusaurus'' (both being fellow giganotosaurines), it became generally accepted among workers that carcharodontosaurs are derived allosauroids, something future discoveries only continued to support.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Elaborating on the point


* The episode depicts numerous Mid Jurassic species near the end of the Late Jurassic in one of the series' most egregious examples of AnachronismStew. However, this may primarily stem from the fact that numerous Late Jurassic pliosaur species were lumped into ''Liopleurodon'' at the time, but have either been reclassified as ''Pliosaurus'' species or are now considered too fragmentary to be diagnostic to ''Liopleurodon'' (the genus' validity was also been called into question in 2022, since the holotype is a single indistinct tooth). It's possible the producers extrapolated ''Liopleurodon'''s range from the Mid Jurassic to the Late Jurassic to the other animals it coexisted with.

to:

* The episode depicts numerous Mid Jurassic species near the end of the Late Jurassic in one of the series' most egregious examples of AnachronismStew. However, this may primarily stem This likely stems from the fact that numerous ''Liopleurodon'', ''Cryptoclidus'', and especially ''Ophthalmosaurus'' were used as wastebasket taxa in the past, with various pliosaurid, cryptoclidid and ichthyosaur fossils from the Late Jurassic pliosaur species were lumped into ''Liopleurodon'' at being attributed to them respectively, and in the time, case of ''Ophthalmosaurus'', even some Early Cretaceous ichthyosaurs material, but those younger specimens have either all since been placed in different genera, reclassified as ''Pliosaurus'' species new genera or are now considered have been deemed too fragmentary to be diagnostic to ''Liopleurodon'' (the genus' validity was also been called into question in 2022, since diagnostic, leaving the former three restricted to the Callovian-early Kimmeridgian (166-155 mya). There was, however, no excuse for ''Eustreptospondylus'', who is only known from its Oxfordian-aged holotype is a single indistinct tooth). It's possible the producers extrapolated ''Liopleurodon'''s range from the Mid Jurassic to the Late Jurassic to the other animals it coexisted with.(circa 160 mya).

Added: 1239

Changed: 547

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The WWD portrayal also places ''Anurognathus''' eyes in the wrong skull hole, the upper temporal fenestra rather than the orbit, making its face seem longer than it really was. Notice the shrinkwrapped circle in front of the eye in [[https://i.imgur.com/w3VAzGd.jpg this prop]]? That's where the eye ''should'' be. This is what makes it likely that ''Anurognathus'' was actually a nocturnal predator; its eyes [[https://qilong.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/anurognathus-ammoni-eyeball.png were enormous]] (each eye ''alone'' was bigger than its brain). Where WWD placed its eyes were actually where jaw muscles would have been attached.

to:

* The WWD portrayal also places ''Anurognathus''' eyes in the wrong skull hole, the upper temporal fenestra rather than the orbit, making its face seem longer than it really was. Notice the shrinkwrapped circle in front of the eye in [[https://i.imgur.com/w3VAzGd.jpg this prop]]? That's where the eye ''should'' be. This is what makes it likely that ''Anurognathus'' was actually a nocturnal predator; its eyes [[https://qilong.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/anurognathus-ammoni-eyeball.png were enormous]] (each eye ''alone'' was bigger than its brain). Where WWD placed its eyes were actually where jaw muscles would have been attached. However, at the time, ''Anurognathus'' was only known from very scrappy and crushed skull material, and it wasn't until 2007, when a well-preserved complete skeleton was found, that this mistake was rectified.



* The shape of ''Diplodocus'''s head changed more dramatically as it grew, from a narrower and more triangular shape in subadults to the flatter muzzles of the adults.

to:

* The shape of ''Diplodocus'''s head changed more dramatically as it grew, from a narrower and more triangular shape in subadults to the flatter muzzles of the adults. Also, juvenile ''Diplodocus'' actually had very long legs relative to their body size compared to the adults, rather than being stumpy-legged their whole life as seen in the episode, possibly allowing them to move much faster than adults.



* The episode depicts numerous Mid Jurassic species near the end of the Late Jurassic in one of the series' most egregious examples of AnachronismStew. However, this may primarily stem from the fact that numerous Late Jurassic pliosaur species were lumped into ''Liopleurodon'' at the time, but have either been reclassified as ''Pliosaurus'' species or are now considered too fragmentary to be diagnostic to ''Liopleurodon'' (the genus' validity was also been called into question in 2022, since the holotype is a single indistinct tooth). It's possible the producers extrapolated ''Liopleurodon'''s range from the Mid Jurassic to the Late Jurassic to the other animals it coexisted with.



* The initial identification of the ankle bone as being ''Allosaurus'' led in part to the idea of Cretaceous Australia being a LostWorld for Jurassic life that had otherwise gone extinct elsewhere (including the relict temnospondyl ''Koolasuchus''), a hypothesis which the program presents. However, since the bone in question has been re-examined and is now thought to be either an abelisaur or a megaraptoran, two theropod groups that were very widespread across the southern hemisphere during the Cretaceous, the idea bears little weight nowadays.



* Whether the robust beak of ''Gastornis'' was to crush large nuts or small animals has been a matter of debate since its discovery. WWB went with the animals and presented ''Gastornis'' as the top predator in the Eocene European jungle. However, the latest study on calcium isotopes found that ''Gastornis''' data was more similar to herbivorous mammals and reptiles (such as dinosaurs). There goes the show's iconic line about the Eocene being a time when birds ate horses.[[note]]Near the end of their time in the early Pleistocene, the superficially similar terror birds, which ''were'' carnivores, did however eat horses.[[/note]] In addition, the idea of ''Gastornis'' being carnivores was already suspect, since the beak lacked a hook and its feet lacked claws. More likely creodonts (the order containing ''Hyaenodon''), mesonychids, and terrestrial crocodilians such as ''Boverisuchus'' would have been the apex predators.

to:

* Whether the robust beak of ''Gastornis'' was to crush large nuts or small animals has been a matter of debate since its discovery. WWB went with the animals and presented ''Gastornis'' as the top predator in the Eocene European jungle. However, the latest study on calcium isotopes found that ''Gastornis''' data was more similar to herbivorous mammals and reptiles (such as dinosaurs). There goes the show's iconic line about the Eocene being a time when birds ate horses.[[note]]Near the end of their time in the early Pleistocene, the superficially similar terror birds, which ''were'' carnivores, did however eat horses.horses, as possibly did the giant bathornithids of North America.[[/note]] In addition, the idea of ''Gastornis'' being carnivores was already suspect, since the beak lacked a hook and its feet lacked claws. More likely creodonts (the order containing ''Hyaenodon''), mesonychids, and terrestrial crocodilians such as ''Boverisuchus'' would have been the apex predators.



* The reasons for ''Chalicotherium'' showing up in the Late Oligocene can be chalked up to it being used as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]] in the past. The genus is known from some very complete material but all of those stem from the Late Miocene-Mid Pliocene (10-3.5 mya), with the oldest known fossils of chalicotheriines (the knuckle-walkers) stemming from the Mid Miocene (16-14 mya), while the only chalicotheres confirmed to have lived around the end of the Oligocene being the more basal schizotheriines (non-knuckle walking chalicotheres such as ''Ancylotherium'' introduced later), like ''Borissiakia'' (the best fit for “Land of Giants"). Very fragmentary fossils from the Late Oligocene-Early Miocene of Eurasia were previously lumped into ''Chalicotherium'', but those have since been deemed schizotheriines or ''nomen dubia'', like “''Chalicotherium''” ''pilgrim'' (possibly a schizotheriine) and “''Chalicotherium''” ''wetzleri'' (now included in ''Metaschizotherium'', also a schizotheriine).

to:

* The reasons for ''Chalicotherium'' showing up in the Late Oligocene can be chalked up to it being used as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wastebasket_taxon wastebasket taxon]] in the past. The genus is known from some very complete material but all of those stem from the Late Miocene-Mid Pliocene (10-3.5 mya), with the oldest known fossils of chalicotheriines (the knuckle-walkers) stemming from the Mid Miocene (16-14 mya), while the only chalicotheres confirmed to have lived around the end of the Oligocene being the more basal schizotheriines (non-knuckle walking chalicotheres such as ''Ancylotherium'' introduced later), like ''Borissiakia'' (the best fit for “Land of Giants"). Very fragmentary fossils from the Late Oligocene-Early Miocene of Eurasia were previously lumped into ''Chalicotherium'', but those have since been deemed schizotheriines (the subgroup of chalicotheriids which did not knuckle-walk) or ''nomen dubia'', like “''Chalicotherium''” ''pilgrim'' (possibly a schizotheriine) and “''Chalicotherium''” ''wetzleri'' (now included in ''Metaschizotherium'', also a schizotheriine).

Added: 348

Changed: 946

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The series uses the NoisyNature approach that was universal to dinosaur restorations at the time (although it's commendable here because the series went to the extra effort to give each animal species their own unique calls), such as giving sauropods whale-like bellows and ''Tyrannosaurus'' a MightyRoar, but later studies from [[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912960903033327 2009]] and [[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Coos%2C-booms%2C-and-hoots%3A-The-evolution-of-vocal-in-Riede-Eliason/31e0da3514edeb7fe3c1dfb01c43d4545816c794 2016]] have suggested it's likely non-avian dinosaur vocalization would've been limited in comparison to modern birds and mammals due to crocodilians, as the closest relatives of dinosaurs, having a more primitive larynx compared to mammals, and the dinosaurs not having the syrinx that modern birds have for vocalization. Some of the predators, ''Postosuchus'' in particular, vocalize a lot while pouncing on their prey (though others, like ''Allosaurus'' and ''Utahraptor'', are more realistically silent).

to:

* The series uses the NoisyNature approach that was universal to dinosaur restorations at the time (although it's commendable here because the series went to the extra effort to give each animal species their own unique calls), such as giving sauropods whale-like bellows and ''Tyrannosaurus'' a MightyRoar, but later studies from [[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912960903033327 2009]] and [[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Coos%2C-booms%2C-and-hoots%3A-The-evolution-of-vocal-in-Riede-Eliason/31e0da3514edeb7fe3c1dfb01c43d4545816c794 2016]] have suggested it's likely non-avian dinosaur vocalization would've been limited in comparison to modern birds and mammals due to crocodilians, as the closest relatives of dinosaurs, having a more primitive larynx compared to mammals, and the dinosaurs not having the syrinx that modern birds have for vocalization. Some of the predators, ''Postosuchus'' in particular, vocalize a lot while pouncing on their prey (though others, like ''Allosaurus'' and ''Utahraptor'', are more realistically silent). Although [[https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-04513-x a 2022 study]] on a fossilized ankylosaur syrinx may refute this idea.
* [[https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo7877 There is increasing evidence]] to suggest that most, if not all dinosaurs had their teeth covered in lizard-like scaly lips, but the show uses the then much more common, conservative, and [[RuleOfCool cooler-looking]] interpretation that they all had their teeth exposed, with only half lips.



* The evidence for female ''UsefulNotes/TyrannosaurusRex'' being larger than males is inconclusive at best, although considering that this pattern of dimorphism is seen in most large carnivorous birds as well as the most primitive birds today, it isn't improbable, there's just no direct evidence of it.

to:

* The episode depicts female ''Tyrannosaurus'' as being larger and more vicious than males, based on then supposed evidence of "gracile" and "robust" morphs of ''T. rex'' fossils and a supposed egg canal gap in the tail vertebrae known in the "robust" morphs, as known in modern crocodilians, so the "robust" morph was considered the female (the 'making of' program has them identifying the very large and extremely robust "Sue" ''Tyrannosaurus'' specimen as female). However, shortly after the series was broadcast evidence for female ''UsefulNotes/TyrannosaurusRex'' female's being larger than males is inconclusive at best, although was severely weakened by the fact the supposed egg canal anatomy found in crocodilians was in error, so it could not be used to accurately determine dinosaur sexes, and the extremely robust "Sue" specimen had a fully intact tail vertebrae anyway, contradicting the idea regardless. Although considering that this pattern of dimorphism is seen in most large carnivorous birds as well as the most primitive birds today, it isn't improbable, there's just no direct evidence of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The pliosaur which makes a very brief cameo is identified in supplementary material as ''Plesiopleurodon''. This specific genus was probably chosen because, at the time, it was considered a very close relative of ''Liopleurodon'' and looked very similar to it (hence the very similar names), so they could just use a very lazy PaletteSwap of their ''Liopleurodon'' to portray it (despite the massive AnachronismStew, due to the fact it lived during the Cenomanian, while the episode is set during the Barremian). However, it has since been reclassified as a polycotylid and therefore wasn't closely related to ''Liopleurodon''.[[note]]At the time of the show's production, all short-necked plesiosaurs were considered pliosaurs, but it has since been found that the short-necked condition evolved more than once amongst plesiosaurs.[[/note]]

to:

* The pliosaur which makes a very brief cameo is identified in supplementary material as ''Plesiopleurodon''. This specific genus was probably chosen because, at the time, it was considered a very close relative of ''Liopleurodon'' and looked very similar to it (hence the very similar names), so they could just use a very lazy PaletteSwap of their ''Liopleurodon'' to portray it (despite the massive AnachronismStew, due to the fact it lived during the Cenomanian, while the episode is set during the Barremian).mid Barremian, some 30 million years apart). However, it has since been reclassified as a polycotylid and therefore wasn't closely related to ''Liopleurodon''.[[note]]At the time of the show's production, all short-necked plesiosaurs were considered pliosaurs, but it has since been found that the short-necked condition evolved more than once amongst plesiosaurs.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The pliosaur which makes a very brief cameo is identified in supplementary material as ''Plesiopleurodon''. This specific genus was probably chosen because, at the time, it was considered a very close relative of ''Liopleurodon'' and looked very similar to it (hence the very similar names), so they could just use a very lazy PaletteSwap of their ''Liopleurodon'' to portray it (despite the massive AnachronismStew, due to the fact it lived during the Late Cretaceous, while the episode is set during the Early Cretaceous). However, it has since been reclassified as a polycotylid and therefore wasn't closely related to ''Liopleurodon''.[[note]]At the time of the show's production, all short-necked plesiosaurs were considered pliosaurs, but it has since been found that the short-necked condition evolved more than once amongst plesiosaurs.[[/note]]

to:

* The pliosaur which makes a very brief cameo is identified in supplementary material as ''Plesiopleurodon''. This specific genus was probably chosen because, at the time, it was considered a very close relative of ''Liopleurodon'' and looked very similar to it (hence the very similar names), so they could just use a very lazy PaletteSwap of their ''Liopleurodon'' to portray it (despite the massive AnachronismStew, due to the fact it lived during the Late Cretaceous, Cenomanian, while the episode is set during the Early Cretaceous).Barremian). However, it has since been reclassified as a polycotylid and therefore wasn't closely related to ''Liopleurodon''.[[note]]At the time of the show's production, all short-necked plesiosaurs were considered pliosaurs, but it has since been found that the short-necked condition evolved more than once amongst plesiosaurs.[[/note]]



* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown are identified by supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', the first azhdarchid ever described. But ''Azhdracho'' hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous.

to:

* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown are identified by supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', the first azhdarchid ever described. But ''Azhdracho'' ''Azhdarcho'' hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Overly myopic and reductive conclusion.


* ''Ornithocheirus'' is depicted in the episode making vast cross-continental migrations from South America to Europe due to the fact it was once thought to have lived on both continents; however, since the South American ''Ornithocheirus'' species has since been reclassified as ''Tropeognathus'', this is now considered dubious.

to:

* ''Ornithocheirus'' is depicted in the episode making vast cross-continental migrations from South America to Europe due to the fact it was once thought to have lived on both continents; however, since the South American ''Ornithocheirus'' species has since been reclassified as ''Tropeognathus'', this there is now considered dubious.no longer direct evidence for it. That said, it's still possible (if speculative) that some pterosaurs migrated between continents, much like many extant birds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The end of the episode gives off the impression that sauropods globally declined at the end of the Jurassic, which was a common view at the time (possibly why none appear in subsequent episodes). However, about the time the show came out, there were many new fossil remains of Cretaceous sauropods being discovered in the southern hemisphere, particularly South America, showing that they only seemed to have declined in the northern continents (and even then persisted until the end of the Late Cretaceous there in species like ''Alamosaurus'' and ''Magyarosaurus''), but continued to flourish in the south in great numbers and diversity.

to:

* The end of the episode gives off the impression that sauropods globally declined at the end of the Jurassic, which was a common view at the time (possibly why none appear in subsequent episodes). However, about the time the show came out, there were many new fossil remains of Cretaceous sauropods being discovered in the southern hemisphere, particularly South America, showing that they only seemed to have declined in the northern continents (and even then persisted until the end of the Late Cretaceous there in species like ''Alamosaurus'' and ''Magyarosaurus''), but continued to flourish in the south in great numbers and diversity. In fact, sauropods of the Cretaceous tended to reach much larger sizes more often than those of the Jurassic.

Added: 2875

Changed: 237

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The end of the episode gives off the impression that sauropods globally declined at the end of the Jurassic, which was a common view at the time (possibly why none appear in subsequent episodes). However, about the time the show came out, there were many new fossil remains of Cretaceous sauropods being discovered in the southern hemisphere, particularly South America, showing that they only seemed to have declined in the northern continents (and even then persisted until the end of the Late Cretaceous there in species like ''Alamosaurus'' and ''Magyarosaurus''), but continued to flourish in the south in great numbers and diversity.



* ''Ornithocheirus'' is depicted in the episode making vast cross-continental migrations from South America to Europe due to the fact it was once thought to have lived on both continents; however, since the South American ''Ornithocheirus'' species has since been reclassified as ''Tropeognathus'', this is now considered dubious.



* The pliosaur which makes a very brief cameo is identified in supplementary material as ''Plesiopleurodon''. This specific genus was probably chosen because, at the time, it was considered a very close relative of ''Liopleurodon'' and looked very similar to it (hence the very similar names), so they could just use a very lazy PaletteSwap of their ''Liopleurodon'' to portray it (despite the massive AnachronismStew, due to the fact it lived during the Late Cretaceous, while the episode is set during the Early Cretaceous). However, it has since been reclassified as a polycotylid and therefore wasn't closely related to ''Liopleurodon''.[[note]]At the time of the show's production, all short-necked plesiosaurs were considered pliosaurs, but it has since been found that the short-necked condition evolved more than once amongst plesiosaurs.[[/note]]



* The ''Anomalocaris'' doesn't have the segmented body and cephalic plate on its head it's now believed to have had; rather bizarrely, the show's portrayal seems to have a single, solid, unsegmented plate covering its entire body. The species of ''Anomalocaris'' which the show based its portrayal on (previously known as ''Anomalocaris saron'') is now known to have been a chimera of two different dinocaridid species and subsequently named ''Houcaris'' (the great appendages) and ''Innovatiocaris'' (for the rest of the body), and the former was part of a group of ''filter-feeding'' anomalocarids.

to:

* The ''Anomalocaris'' doesn't have the segmented body and cephalic plate on its head it's now believed to have had; rather bizarrely, the show's portrayal seems to have a single, solid, unsegmented plate covering its entire body. The species of ''Anomalocaris'' which the show based its portrayal on (previously known as ''Anomalocaris saron'') is now known to have been a chimera of two different dinocaridid species and subsequently named ''Houcaris'' (the great appendages) and ''Innovatiocaris'' (for the rest of the body), and the former was part of a group of ''filter-feeding'' anomalocarids. The immense size of the ''Anomalocaris'' in the episode is based on a fossil of a giant velvet worm-like predator from the formation in the episode known as ''Omnidens'', which was once thought to have belonged to an anomalocaridid.



* Big Al was reclassified in a new species known as ''Allosaurus jimmadseni'' in 2020, which is currently only known from the earlier Kimmeridgian stage of the Late Jurassic rather than the following Tithonian stage (in which only ''A. fragilis'' is known to have existed).



* ''Velociraptor'' is portrayed as killing its prey by slashing with its toe claws and hunting in packs, which was a very common depiction of the genus back then, but both attributes are now considered dubious. The former because there's no cutting edge on the claw which it could use to slash with, and, like modern birds-of-prey, they were more likely used to cling to the top of its prey, the latter because evidence of coordinated pack-hunting is lacking; while some dromaeosaurs may have hunted in packs, it's pretty unlikely for ''Velociraptor'' due to the resource-poor desert environment in which it lived (there was never any evidence of ''Velociraptor'' pack behaviour, it was only ever extrapolated from other dromaeosaur species that lived in wetter environments).



* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown are identified by supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', the first azhdarchid ever described. But Azhdracho hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous.

to:

* The pterosaurs that are occasionally shown are identified by supplementary material as ''Azhdarcho'', the first azhdarchid ever described. But Azhdracho ''Azhdracho'' hails from the Turonian-aged Bissekty Formation (92-90 mya), and actually coexisted with much smaller forerunners of the giant dinosaurs found at Nemegt, such as ''Levnesovia'' and ''Timurlengia'' (a basal, small-bodied hadrosaur and tyrannosaur respectively). Its inclusion in the episode can, once more, be chalked up to wastebasket taxonomy, as workers once assigned many small-sized azhdarchid fossils from the Upper Cretaceous to the genus before we learned about the true diversity of the group. [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320219078_Gigantic_pterosaurian_remains_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_of_Mongolia In 2017, the discovery of cervical vertebrae revealed the presence of a very large azhdarchid at Nemegt]], similar to ''Hatzegopteryx'', though smaller ones were likely present as well, since both large and small taxa are known to have coexisted in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Nigel initially sees a young ''Argentinosaurus'', he says that it's unmistakable what species it is. This statement is probably because ''Argentinosaurus'' was, at the time, the only sauropod species conclusively identified from the Huincul Formation. Four other sauropod species have since been described, making the statement that it can't be mistaken for anything else shakier. He says the same thing for ''Giganotosaurus'', but two large carcharodontosaurids have been identified from the Huincul Formation.

to:

* When Nigel initially sees a young ''Argentinosaurus'', he says that it's unmistakable what species it is. This statement is probably because ''Argentinosaurus'' was, at the time, the only sauropod species conclusively identified from the Huincul Formation. Four other sauropod species have since been described, making the statement that it can't be mistaken for anything else shakier. He says the same thing for ''Giganotosaurus'', but two large carcharodontosaurids have been identified from the Huincul Formation.Formation; as noted above, ''Giganotosaurus'' itself is ironically not one of them.

Added: 1742

Changed: 94

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Funnily enough, later studies found the largest ''Tyrannosaurus'' were probably heavier than the largest ''Giganotosaurus'' by one or two tonnes, and a contemporary sauropod that lived alongside ''Tyrannosaurus'', ''Alamosaurus'', reached similar sizes to ''Argentinosaurus'', from fragmentary remains discovered in the early 2010s.



* ''Argentinosaurus'' is portrayed as weighing slightly over ninety tonnes, which was actually conservative for the time, since some put at around one-hundred tonnes. Subsequent weight estimates suggest slightly lower mass ranges of between 75-85 tonnes, although it's still up for debate.



* When Nigel initially sees a young ''Argentinosaurus'', he says that it's unmistakable what species it is. This statement is probably because ''Argentinosaurus'' was, at the time, the only sauropod species conclusively identified from the Huincul Formation. Four other sauropod species have since been described, making the statement that it can't be mistaken for anything else shakier. He says the same thing for ''Giganotosaurus'', but two large carcharodontosaurids have been identified from the Huincul Formation.
* ''Giganotosaurus'' is portrayed as briefly being able to chase a speeding car and suggested in supplementary material as being able to reach speeds of over thirty miles per hour. Later bio-mechanical studies on the running speeds of large theropods found it would have been impossible for them to run at high speeds, or possibly even run at all (that is, having a stride where both feet are off the ground at the same time for most of the stride) because they were so heavy their footfalls would have broken their legs, even if they had enough muscle mass to propel their massive bodies so quickly.



* The South American ''Iguanodon'' is now named ''Macrogryphosaurus'', which, similar to ''Giganotosaurus'', did not live at the same time as ''Argentinosaurus''.

to:

* The South American ''Iguanodon'' is now named ''Macrogryphosaurus'', which, similar to ''Giganotosaurus'', did not live at the same time as ''Argentinosaurus''.''Argentinosaurus'', although unidentified iguanodont fossils are known from the Candeleros and Huincul Formation.

Added: 8165

Changed: 3451

Removed: 688

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Although unnamed in the episode, supplementary material identifies the shark as ''Hybodus''. Subsequent studies indicate ''Hybodus'' is a wastebasket taxon of various hybodont species; the species in the episode would nowadays probably be identified as ''Asteracanthus''.



* A 2023 study concluded from ''Euparkeria'''s anatomy that it was not bipedal and was strictly quadrupedal, unable to rear up even for short periods because it was far too top-heavy. Archosaur bipedalism must have evolved some time later after the Early Triassic.



* ''Cymbospondylus'' is portrayed in the episode as being about 10 metres in length, which was reasonable at the time of the episode, but in 2021 a much larger species of ''Cymbospondylus'' was discovered known as ''C. youngorum'', which may have been over 17 metres in length.



* ''Arsinoitherium'', a relative of elephants that convergently resembled a rhinoceros, was probably more terrestrial than shown. It was discovered later that it also lived in inland rainforests in Ethiopia and actually survived there for longer than in Egypt; ''Arsinoitherium'' lived in mangroves, but it wasn't a mangrove ''exclusive'' as implied by the show.



* A number of mosasaur fossils have been found with shark like tail impressions (one long fin, one short fin). These fossils, and various other arguments, suggest that most or all mosasaurs would have looked more fishlike than the ones shown on the show. This, combined with the fact that it was warm-blooded, would have made it an even faster, more active hunter and give it access to polar regions.
* The largest mosasaurs probably didn't get as large in reality as they were portrayed because of this, as they would have had a more compact body shape. Lengths of between forty and fifty feet are considered more likely for the largest mosasaurs such as ''Mosasaurus'' or ''Tylosaurus''.



* ''Leedsichthys'' would have had a more smooth head than its bone-plated portrayal in the show. Also, careful examination of its size range puts it at around 16 meters and 40 tons as opposed to 30 meters and 150 tons.

to:

* ''Leedsichthys'' would have had a more smooth head than its bone-plated portrayal in the show. Also, careful examination of its size range puts it at around 16 meters and 40 tons as opposed to 30 meters and 150 tons. This would make megalodon the largest known fish of all time, although ''Leedsichthys'' is still the largest known ray-finned fish ever.



* ''Arsinoitherium'', a relative of elephants that convergently resembled a rhinoceros, was probably more terrestrial than shown. It was discovered later that it also lived in inland rainforests in Ethiopia and actually survived there for longer than in Egypt; ''Arsinoitherium'' lived in mangroves, but it wasn't a mangrove ''exclusive'' as implied by the show.
* In 2012, a stockier and better-armed relative of ''Cymbospondylus'', ''Thalattoarchon'' (Or "Ruler of the Seas"), specialized in killing big sharks and other marine reptiles, dethroned it as the ultimate Triassic badass.
** Surpassed and then some in 2021, with the description of ''Cymbospondylus youngorum'' (the largest species of its genus), which is estimated to have reached a [[https://www.reddit.com/r/Naturewasmetal/comments/rn8fjn/cymbospondylus_the_earliest_truly_giant/ gargantuan 14-17 meters and had a skull 1.9 meters long!]]

to:

* ''Arsinoitherium'', a relative of elephants that convergently resembled a rhinoceros, was probably more terrestrial than shown. It was discovered later that it also lived in inland rainforests in Ethiopia and actually survived there for longer than in Egypt; ''Arsinoitherium'' lived in mangroves, but it wasn't a mangrove ''exclusive'' as implied by the show.
* In 2012, a stockier and better-armed relative of ''Cymbospondylus'', ''Thalattoarchon'' (Or "Ruler of the Seas"), specialized in killing big sharks and other marine reptiles, dethroned it
''Liopleurodon'' is identified as the ultimate largest carnivorous reptile to have ever lived. Aside from the aforementioned revisions about pliosaur size, just one year after the series premiered a gigantic Triassic badass.
** Surpassed and then some in 2021, with the description of ''Cymbospondylus youngorum'' (the largest
ichthyosaur was described known as ''Shonisaurus sikanniensis'' (although it's sometimes considered a species of its genus), which ''Shastasaurus'') which, at 21 metres in length, was far larger than any pliosaur or mosasaur. Fragmentary fossils of related animals suggest even larger sizes, possibly up to 26 metres in length, about the same size as the ''Liopleurodon'' is estimated to as depicted in the series. Although, since it was toothless and dolphin-like in shape, it wouldn't have reached been quite as fearsome-looking as a [[https://www.reddit.com/r/Naturewasmetal/comments/rn8fjn/cymbospondylus_the_earliest_truly_giant/ gargantuan 14-17 meters pliosaur or mosasaur.
* A number of mosasaur fossils have been found with shark like tail impressions (one long fin, one short fin). These fossils,
and various other arguments, suggest that most or all mosasaurs would have looked more fishlike than the ones shown on the show. This, combined with the fact that it was warm-blooded, would have made it an even faster, more active hunter and give it access to polar regions.
* The largest mosasaurs probably didn't get as large in reality as they were portrayed because of this, as they would have
had a skull 1.9 meters long!]]
more compact body shape. Lengths of between forty and fifty feet are considered more likely for the largest mosasaurs such as ''Mosasaurus'' or ''Tylosaurus''.



* ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Othnielia]]'' and ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Leaellynasaura]]'' do not appear to be ornithopods, but more primitive ornithischians.

to:

* The ''Pterygotus'' entry states that sea scorpions' closest living relatives are horseshoe crabs, which was the traditionally held view, but a 2013 study found they were actually sister taxon to arachnids.
* The ''Plateosaurus'' entry states that prosauropods did not evolve into sauropods, but later studies have found the the traditional idea was correct that prosauropods really were the director ancestors of sauropods and the group is paraphyletic.
* The ''Placerias'' entry suggests that competition with herbivorous dinosaurs may have led to the decline of dicynodonts through competition. However, a large dicynodont was described in 2018, dubbed ''Pentasaurus'', that coexisted with numerous species of large prosauropods, seemingly refuting this idea.
* Ammonites are stated to last been known from just before the K-Pg boundary, but a small number of ammonite fossils have since been identified dating from the early Danian, just after the Mesozoic Era, making it likely a few survived the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous, but were a "dead clade walking" and perished very soon after.
* ''Ophthalmosaurus'' is stated to have been found in South America as well as Europe. This is probably because the South American ophthalmosaurid ''Mollesaurus'' was, at the time, sunk into ''Ophthalmosaurus''.
* ''Metriorhynchus''' range is stated to include South America; fragmentary fossils from the continent were identified as belonging to the genus in 2000, but numerous subsequent studies have failed to find them as being conclusively ''Metriorhynchus''.
* ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Othnielia]]'' and ''[[UsefulNotes/PrehistoricLifeHadrosaurPredecessors Leaellynasaura]]'' do not appear to be ornithopods, but more primitive ornithischians. Both are also identified as "hypsilophodontids", a group now considered to be a wastebasket taxon of various small ornithischians.
* ''Tapejara'' (now known as ''Tupandactylus'') is described as being a carnivorous fish eaters. ''Tapejara'' is now speculated to have been a hornbill or toucan-like fruit-eater or omnivore, while ''Tupandactylus'' is thought to have been a ground-dwelling raptorial predator.
* ''Velociraptor'' is stated to killed its prey by slashing at it with its retractable foot claws. Subsequent studies have indicated it probably couldn't slash and was more likely used for clinging to and pinning prey like modern hawks or falcons do.



* There actually isn't any evidence that terror birds like the ''Phorusrhacos'' in the program had meathook claws on their wings. That idea came from an observation that one species, ''Titanis'', had a very rigid wrist, suggesting the presence of some kind of digit. In 2005 it was pointed out that the birds' closest living relatives, seriemas, have the very same wrist, but no claws of any kind. However, seriemas ''do'' have a dromaosaur-like "[[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Seriamanail_%28high_res%29.jpg sickle claw]]" on their second toe, suggesting that terror birds may have had that instead. It should also be noted that [[http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2010/06/30/clubs-spurs-spikes-and-claws/ most birds]] do have some kind of claw or spur hidden under their wing feathers, but nothing like the flexing, slashing finger shown in the book's restoration.

to:

* The ''Protoceratops'' entry states that the origin of "ceratopsids" (probably meaning the broader group, ceratopsians) are mysterious, and they may have evolved from heterodontosaurids. Fossils of Jurassic ceratopsians are now known, making their early evolution much more well-known. Interestingly, their sister group, the pachycephalosaurs, which is still mysterious, have been suggested to have evolved from heterodontosaurids since then.
* The discovery of a four-chambered ''Thescelosaurus'' (strangely, referred to as a hadrosaur) heart is referenced for evidence of dinosaurs being endothermic. Subsequent studies showed this supposed heart was just a build-up of minerals during fossilization and had nothing to do with a heart. In any case, the argument that dinosaurs had four-chambered hearts is moot with or without it since modern birds and crocodilians both have one, so it's almost certain non-avian dinosaurs did too.
* The book repeatedly refers to dinosaurs as cold-blooded, such as in the ''Leaellynasaura'' and ''Argentinosaurus'', and thinking of the idea of dinosaur endothermy as controversial.
* The entries for ''Velociraptor'' and ''Therizinosaurus'' poo-poo the idea of feathers for them (saying there's no actual proof) in a futile attempt to defend its scaly portrayals of the species. This would be a much, ''much'' tougher position to defend by the 2010s due to how much direct evidence of feathered coelurosaurs, of even large species, there is now.
* ''Elasmosaurus'' is stated to have also inhabited Russia and Japan, but these species are now considered to be either indeterminate elasmosaurid species for the former and classified as ''Futabasaurus'' in 2006 for the latter.
* There actually isn't any evidence that terror birds like the ''Phorusrhacos'' in the program had meathook claws on their wings. That idea came from an observation that one species, ''Titanis'', had a very rigid wrist, suggesting the presence of some kind of digit. In 2005 it was pointed out that the birds' closest living relatives, seriemas, have the very same wrist, but no claws of any kind. However, seriemas ''do'' have a dromaosaur-like dromaeosaur-like "[[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Seriamanail_%28high_res%29.jpg sickle claw]]" on their second toe, suggesting that terror birds may have had that instead. It should also be noted that [[http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2010/06/30/clubs-spurs-spikes-and-claws/ most birds]] do have some kind of claw or spur hidden under their wing feathers, but nothing like the flexing, slashing finger shown in the book's restoration.


Added DiffLines:

** The book states that terror birds may have died out as recently as 15,000 years ago, referring a 1995 study which suggested this from circumstantial evidence. This was refuted in subsequent studies that indicated the large terror birds died out close to two million years ago, and there's no evidence otherwise.


Added DiffLines:

* Megalodon is identified as a ''Carcharodon'' species (the same genus that the modern great white belongs), but subsequent studies place it in the extinct genus ''Otodus''.
* The book states that the latest research rules out the possibility the Neanderthals and modern-type humans interbred, but virtually all subsequent research from 2010 on from sequencing modern human and Neanderthal DNA has indicated the exact opposite, that they interbred extensively and nearly all living humans have Neanderthal DNA.
* The last entry in the book is the then-recently discovered ''Homo floresiensis'', which was initially found to have survived very recently, said to be died out only 13,000 years ago. Closer examination of its fossils pushes back the last known ''H. floresiensis'' fossils to a considerably older age of 190,000 to 50,000 years ago.
* The Tree of Life at the end has numerous errors aside from those already stated regarding the classification of various groups:
** Basal archosaurs are noted in brackets as "thecodonts", a group now known to be a wastebasket taxon and since discarded from common use due to being unhelpful and misleading.
** Anomalocarids are stated to have died out in the Cambrian, but fossils of anomalocarid species have since been found in subsequent time periods, and they survived up until at least the Early Devonian.
** Placoderms are shown dying out at the end of the Devonian, but we now know that modern jawed fish descend from them, so they never really died out.
** Non-mammalian cynodonts are shown to have died out in the Early Jurassic, but they are now known to have survived until at least the Early Cretaceous, possibly up until the K-Pg boundary, or even into the Eocene if gondwanatherians are actually non-mammalian.
** The mammal chart is utterly nonsensical by modern standards, as it just shows various placental groups erupting willy nilly from an enigmatic common ancestor rather than accurately depicting the relationships between the groups.
*** Additionally, the group includes "insectivores", "creodonts", and "lepticids", groups with have since been found to be wastebasket taxa, the latter two being probably paraphyletic. Lepticids are also shown as placental mammals, but some studies find them as non-placental eutherians.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* On a similar note, the idea that imagination is what distinguishes modern humans from our ancestors came from the fact that no signs of art from other humans species had been found. Since then, it's been found that Neanderthals not carved artful objects and decorated them with pigments.

to:

* On a similar note, the idea that imagination is what distinguishes modern humans from our ancestors came from the fact that no signs of art from other humans species had been found. Since then, it's been found that Neanderthals not carved artful objects and decorated them with pigments.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
They have language in the show and nobody denied they had it at the time the show was made


* On a similar note, the idea that imagination is what distinguishes modern humans from our ancestors came from the fact that no signs of art from other humans species had been found. Since then, it's been found that Neanderthals not only carved artful objects, they decorated them with pigments and may have even developed language.

to:

* On a similar note, the idea that imagination is what distinguishes modern humans from our ancestors came from the fact that no signs of art from other humans species had been found. Since then, it's been found that Neanderthals not only carved artful objects, they objects and decorated them with pigments and may have even developed language.pigments.

Changed: 971

Removed: 96

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And on that note, mesonychids most likely weren't the true ancestors of whales. Later studies have found whales to still be ungulates, but closer to the ancestors of hippopotamuses than more basal groups like the mesonychids (it helps that both hippos and whales are aquatic).
** Ironically, these two corrections have coalesced into ''Andrewsarchus'' being [[RightForTheWrongReasons still a land-dwelling relative of whales]], but in a different branch of the ungulate family tree than previously assumed.
* The holotype hails from the Irdin Manha Formation, which turned out to be Mid Eocene in age (44-40 mya), not Late Eocene (39-34 mya), meaning it would not have been a contemporary of ''Embolotherium''. The apex predators of Late Eocene Asia would have been hyaenodonts and entelodonts (like the ones seen in "Land of Giants").
* ''Apidium'' is now dated to the Oligocene instead of the late Eocene as portrayed in the show.

to:

** And on that note, mesonychids most likely weren't the true ancestors of whales. Later studies have found whales to still be ungulates, but closer to the ancestors of hippopotamuses than more basal groups like the mesonychids (it helps that both hippos and whales are aquatic).
**
aquatic). Ironically, these two corrections have coalesced into ''Andrewsarchus'' being [[RightForTheWrongReasons still a land-dwelling relative of whales]], but in a different branch of the ungulate family tree than previously assumed.
* ** The holotype hails from the Irdin Manha Formation, which turned out to be Mid Eocene in age (44-40 mya), not Late Eocene (39-34 mya), meaning it would not have been a contemporary of ''Embolotherium''. The apex predators of Late Eocene Asia would have been hyaenodonts and entelodonts (like the ones seen in "Land of Giants").
* ''Apidium'' is now dated to the Oligocene instead of the late Eocene as portrayed in the show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The introductory opening of the episode states that there were two different types of humans alive at the time (Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon), but a third variety of ice age human was identified in 2010, known as Denisovans, which may have survived as late as 14,500 years ago. However, they are still very poorly understood and is not known to have existed in the region the episode is set.

to:

* The introductory opening of the episode states that there were two different types of humans alive at the time (Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon), but a third variety of ice age human was identified in 2010, known as Denisovans, which may have survived as late as 14,500 years ago. However, they are still very poorly understood and is not known to have existed in the region the episode is set.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The introductory opening of the episode states that there were two different types of humans alive at the time (Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon), but a third variety of ice age human was identified in 2010, known as Denisovans, which may have survived as late as 14,500 years ago. However, they are still very poorly understood and is not known to have existed in the region the episode is set.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The narration states that dinosaurs first appeared as small predators. Nowadays, it would be much more accurate and probable that the first dinosaurs were omnivorous and later diverged into carnivores and herbivores, but even the notion of omnivorous dinosaurs was controversial back then.


Added DiffLines:

* The cynodonts are depicted with highly altricial offspring, which would have been a reasonable assumption at the time since the more "primitive" living mammals, the marsupials and monotremes, have highly altricial offspring. However, later fossils of primitive mammals, specifically multituberculates, which are between marsupials and monotremes, and the non-mammalian cynodont ''Kayentatherium'' indicates they had well-formed offspring at birth/hatching (in the case of ''Kayentatherium'', it's possible they were independent immediately after hatching and did not have parental care), suggesting the altricial offspring of monotremes and marsupials might be a derived attribute rather than the original state of cynodont offspring. The ''Kayentatherium'' fossil also suggests that complex parental care did not appear until the evolution of near-mammalian cynodonts.


Added DiffLines:

* The episode also depicts the European ''Anurognathus'' in North America and interacting with otherwise North American animals. This is probably because the actual pterosaur fossils of the Morrison Formation are pretty terrible. However, the genus ''Mesadactylus'' was tentatively classified as an anurognathid in 2007, so they could have used that instead of ''Anurognathus'' nowadays.


Added DiffLines:

* The ''Diplodocus'' is depicted as nesting individually, but only a few years later there were extensive bonebeds discovered that indicated sauropods (or titanosaurs at least) nested in large colonies like hadrosaurs or modern day seabirds.


Added DiffLines:

* It's stated the ''Diplodocus'' is the longest of all the sauropods, however subsequent fossils of a contemporary diplodocid, ''Supersaurus'', may exceed the largest ''Diplodocus'' in size, with partial remains suggesting monstrous sizes of up to one-hundred-and-fifty feet in length (if BYU 9024 is in fact assignable to ''Supersaurus'').


Added DiffLines:

** Another detail that should be changed is the orientation of the tail spikes. Traditionally, they are depicted erupting mostly vertically, but fossils with the tail spikes still in place show that it should be more horizontal. In hindsight, this is more logical since the position makes it much easier to use the spikes as side-to-side swiping weapons.

Added: 866

Changed: 297

Removed: 541

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The opening for the episode states the indricothere as being the largest land mammal of all time, but [[https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app001362014.html a study in 2015]] found that the extinct elephant species ''Palaeoloxodon namadicus'' may have gotten bigger by about five tonnes (17 tonnes for ''Paraceratherium'' vs 22 tonnes for ''Paleoloxodon''). However, the study based this on two partial bones discovered and measured in the early 19th century, not from direct examination of these fossils, so it still requires further confirmation.

to:

* The opening for the episode states the indricothere as being the largest land mammal of all time, but [[https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app001362014.html a study in 2015]] found that the extinct elephant species ''Palaeoloxodon namadicus'' may have gotten bigger by about five tonnes (17 tonnes for ''Paraceratherium'' vs 22 tonnes for ''Paleoloxodon''). However, the study based this on two partial bones discovered and measured in the early 19th century, not from direct examination of these fossils, so it still requires further confirmation. Also the study found the largest ''Paraceratherium'' could have reached 17 tonnes rather than 15 as stated in the episode.



* ''Dunkleosteus''' tooth-like extensions of its armor were later discovered to have been actual teeth that merged together. It also would likely have had lips covering them.
* [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 A study]] presented at the 2022 SVP and published in early 2023 suggests that the traditional size estimates of ''Dunkleosteus'' and other large placoderms are inaccurate and greatly embellished. It found ''Dunkleosteus'' was probably much shorter and more compact than previously thought, only about four metres long and less than two tonnes in weight (making it about the size of an average great white, but much heavier) instead of the ten-metre long, five-ton monster presented in the episode.



* The ''Metriorhynchus'' species that coexisted with ''Leedsichthys'' and ''Liopleurodon'' was reclassified in 2020 as a new genus, ''Thalattosuchus''.



* ''Dunkleosteus''' tooth-like extensions of its armor were later discovered to have been actual teeth that merged together. It also would likely have had lips covering them.
* [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 A study]] presented at the 2022 SVP and published in early 2023 suggests that the traditional size estimates of ''Dunkleosteus'' and other large placoderms are inaccurate and greatly embellished. It found ''Dunkleosteus'' was probably much shorter and more compact than previously thought, only about four metres long and less than two tonnes in weight (making it about the size of an average great white, but much heavier) instead of the ten-metre long, five-ton monster presented in the episode.

to:

* ''Dunkleosteus''' tooth-like extensions of its armor were later discovered to have been actual teeth that merged together. It also would likely have had lips covering them.
* [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 A study]] presented at the 2022 SVP and published in early 2023 suggests that the traditional size estimates of ''Dunkleosteus'' and other large placoderms are inaccurate and greatly embellished. It found ''Dunkleosteus'' was probably much shorter and more compact than previously thought, only about four metres long and less than two tonnes in weight (making it about the size of an average great white, but much heavier) instead of the ten-metre long, five-ton monster presented in the episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
redundant (doesn't anyone check for duplicates?)


* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long 8-metre body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]] half that, just under the size of a great white shark. The original size estimates are the result of using the oarfish, which is long but not muscular, as a baseline for the animal's reconstructions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long 8-metre body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]] half that, just under the size of a Great White Sark.

to:

* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long 8-metre body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]] half that, just under the size of a Great White Sark.great white shark. The original size estimates are the result of using the oarfish, which is long but not muscular, as a baseline for the animal's reconstructions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Musth likely has nothing to do with mating, but with helping elephants fight in times of scarcity (in fact, musth-striken males will kill females rather than try mating with them).

to:

* Musth likely has nothing to do with mating, but with helping elephants fight in times of scarcity (in fact, musth-striken scarcity. Musth-striken males will kill females rather than try mating with them).them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]], just under the size of a Great White Sark.

to:

* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long 8-metre body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]], body]] half that, just under the size of a Great White Sark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Dunkleosteus'' is shown with a long body, but as of 2023 it is known to have [[https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/318 a shorter more compact body]], just under the size of a Great White Sark.

Added: 452

Changed: 13

Removed: 452

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Anomalocaris'' doesn't have the segmented body and cephalic plate on its head it's now believed to have had; rather bizarrely, the show's portrayal seems to have a single, solid, unsegmented plate covering its entire body. The species of ''Anomalocaris'' which the show based its portrayal on (previously known as ''Anomalocaris saron'') is now known to have been a chimera of two different dinocaridid species and now named ''Houcaris'' (the great appendages) and ''Innovatiocaris'' (for the rest of the body), and the former was part of a group of ''filter-feeding'' anomalocarids.

to:

* The ''Anomalocaris'' doesn't have the segmented body and cephalic plate on its head it's now believed to have had; rather bizarrely, the show's portrayal seems to have a single, solid, unsegmented plate covering its entire body. The species of ''Anomalocaris'' which the show based its portrayal on (previously known as ''Anomalocaris saron'') is now known to have been a chimera of two different dinocaridid species and now subsequently named ''Houcaris'' (the great appendages) and ''Innovatiocaris'' (for the rest of the body), and the former was part of a group of ''filter-feeding'' anomalocarids.



* The series depicts its gorgonopsid as being hairless and the narration states that fur has not evolved yet, but fossils [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/let.12156 described in 2015]] found in the Late Permian of Russia (the exact time and location the specific episode is set) found direct evidence of hair. Whether the hair came from a gorgonopsid is unknown, but it's clear some sort of therapsid at the same time already did have fur.


Added DiffLines:

* The series depicts its gorgonopsid as being hairless and the narration states that fur has not evolved yet, but fossils [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/let.12156 described in 2015]] found in the Late Permian of Russia (the exact time and location the specific episode is set) found direct evidence of hair. Whether the hair came from a gorgonopsid is unknown, but it's clear some sort of therapsid at the same time already did have fur.

Top