Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Myth / KingArthur

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
White-derived?


* LawfulStupid: Arthur. So determined to bring about this new Rule of Law idea that he lets himself be used by evil people in the guise of upholding the law.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A later English author, Layamon, also named his helmet as Goswhit (Goose-White) and his chainmail shirt as Wygar (Battle-Hard, from Old English ''wigheard'').

to:

** A later English author, Layamon, also named his helmet as Goswhit (Goose-White) and his chainmail mail shirt as Wygar (Battle-Hard, from Old English ''wigheard'').

Added: 347

Changed: 338

Removed: 325

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misplaced, moving to the correct tab


* HistoricalBadassUpgrade: Any historical King Arthur who did exist hardly had access to a magical sword in the stone, an immortality inducing scabbard and fought off any villains like Morgan le Fay.
* HistoricalHeroUpgrade:
** Historians have debated for generations whether Arthur was truly historical at all, but if we accept that the "original Arthur" was a Romano-British leader who temporarily stopped the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain, he has been greatly transformed and magnified into the [[TheGoodKing Arthur]] [[TheChosenOne of legend]].

to:

* HistoricalBadassUpgrade: Any HistoricalBadassUpgrade:
**Any
historical King Arthur who did exist hardly had access to a magical sword in the stone, an immortality inducing scabbard and fought off any villains like Morgan le Fay.
* HistoricalHeroUpgrade:
** Historians have debated for generations whether Arthur was truly historical at all, but if we accept that the "original Arthur" was a Romano-British leader who temporarily stopped the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain, he has been greatly transformed and magnified into the [[TheGoodKing Arthur]] [[TheChosenOne of legend]].
Fay.


Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalHeroUpgrade: Historians have debated for generations whether Arthur was truly historical at all, but if we accept that the "original Arthur" was a Romano-British leader who temporarily stopped the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain, he has been greatly transformed and magnified into the [[TheGoodKing Arthur]] [[TheChosenOne of legend]].

Changed: 222

Removed: 228

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Most stories of Arthur today are based on Geoffrey of Monmouth's ''[[Literature/HistoriaRegumBritanniae History of the Kings of Britain]]'', written after the Norman Conquest of England, and where Arthur comes in near the end as the BreakoutCharacter. Geoffrey was probably the single most influential recounter of the legend. He was one of the first to call Arthur a ''king'' -- in practice TheHighKing ruling over other kings -- as Arthur was more often called just a ''soldier'' or ''war-leader'' in earlier material. Also, he first wrote down (perhaps made up) Arthur's OriginStory -- he was conceived via a BedTrick thanks to the other Breakout Character, the wizard Myth/{{Merlin}}. Geoffrey was the first to write of Merlin, Arthur's queen Guinevere, and Arthur's sword {{Excalibur}} in their commonly recognizable forms, though their prototypical counterparts appeared in Welsh and Cornish material which was mostly recorded after Geoffrey wrote, giving historians headaches as to which really influenced which. He also wrote that after Arthur's final battle with his nephew Modred (later Mordred), he was taken away to the mystic isle of {{Avalon}} to be healed of his wounds, and implicitly wait until he is needed again.

to:

Most stories of Arthur today are based on Geoffrey of Monmouth's ''[[Literature/HistoriaRegumBritanniae History of the Kings of Britain]]'', written after the Norman Conquest of England, and where Arthur comes in near the end as the BreakoutCharacter. Geoffrey was probably the single most influential recounter of the legend. He was one of the first to call Arthur a ''king'' -- in practice TheHighKing ruling over other kings -- as Arthur was more often called just a ''soldier'' or ''war-leader'' in earlier material. Also, he first wrote down (perhaps made up) Arthur's OriginStory origin story -- he was conceived via a BedTrick thanks to the other Breakout Character, the wizard Myth/{{Merlin}}. Geoffrey was the first to write of Merlin, Arthur's queen Guinevere, and Arthur's sword {{Excalibur}} in their commonly recognizable forms, though their prototypical counterparts appeared in Welsh and Cornish material which was mostly recorded after Geoffrey wrote, giving historians headaches as to which really influenced which. He also wrote that after Arthur's final battle with his nephew Modred (later Mordred), he was taken away to the mystic isle of {{Avalon}} to be healed of his wounds, and implicitly wait until he is needed again.



* AsskickingLeadsToLeadership: One of his earliest appearances treats him as a war-leader who beat the Saxons in twelve battles, fighting together with the British kings. This implies he himself was not thought to have been a king at this point. A variant text of the same document is more explicit, saying that he was chosen twelve times as commander though many others were of more noble birth.
* AuthorityGrantsAsskicking: He owns a magical unbreakable sword that he could only pull if he was the true rightful King (other times given to him by the Lady of the Lake), and he repeatedly backs up his prowess in the legends.

to:

* AsskickingLeadsToLeadership: One of his earliest appearances treats him as a war-leader who beat the Saxons in twelve battles, fighting together with the British kings. This implies he himself was not thought to have been a king at this point. A variant text of the same document is more explicit, saying that he was chosen twelve times as commander though many others were of more noble birth.
* AuthorityGrantsAsskicking:
birth. He also owns a magical unbreakable sword that he could only pull if he was the true rightful King (other times given to him by the Lady of the Lake), and he repeatedly backs up his prowess in the legends.



*** In a roundabout way, ''Artorius'' itself may possibly be Celtic in origin, deriving from the hypothetical names ''Artorix(s)'' or ''Artorigos'', 'Bear-King', or ''Artorigios'', '[[{{Patronymic}} Son]] of Artorix' i.e. 'Son of the Bear-King' if we want to split hairs. In other words, ''Arthur'' may be a Celtic version of a Roman name, or a Celtic version of a Roman version of a much older Celtic name, all ultimately connected to Celtic words for bears and possibly kings.

to:

*** In a roundabout way, ''Artorius'' itself may possibly be Celtic in origin, deriving from the hypothetical names ''Artorix(s)'' or ''Artorigos'', 'Bear-King', or ''Artorigios'', '[[{{Patronymic}} '[[{{UsefulNotes/Patronymic}} Son]] of Artorix' i.e. 'Son of the Bear-King' if we want to split hairs. In other words, ''Arthur'' may be a Celtic version of a Roman name, or a Celtic version of a Roman version of a much older Celtic name, all ultimately connected to Celtic words for bears and possibly kings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LargeAndInCharge: The reported 1191 Glastonbury Abbey grave discovery was described as holding the bones of an unusually large man. This would certainly give him a leg up as a warrior. If it was indeed the grave of the historical Arthur, this detail would make sense for a Romano-British leader who lead a successful resistance against the Anglo-Saxon invasion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationalBackstoryChange: Several adaptions tend to [[AdaptedOut remove]] Arthur's traditional HappilyAdopted backstory, such as ''Film/KingArthur2004'' and ''Series/Merlin2008''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationalHeroism: It's very common for Arthur to receive this in adaptions, or at the very least being an AdaptationalNiceGuy. This is because the exact definition of what makes someone a hero and TheGoodKing has changed greatly since the Legend first began and when ''Le Morte d'Arthur'' was written. Back then, Arthur was a hero for his glorious achievements in battle and defeating all kinds of enemies. But from a modern standpoint he comes across as a bloodthirsty warrior looking for glory who only treats a few people with respect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A later English author, Layamon, also named his helmet as Goswhit (Goose-White).

to:

** A later English author, Layamon, also named his helmet as Goswhit (Goose-White).(Goose-White) and his chainmail shirt as Wygar (Battle-Hard, from Old English ''wigheard'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** A theory popular for decades links ''Arthur'' to the Celtic word for [[BearsAreBadNews 'bear']], ''arto'' (later, Welsh ''arth''). Since the bear was seen as a mighty and dangerous animal, the hero bearing a bear-name would naturally have to be a huge {{badass}}. For a similar example see the Germanic figure of Literature/{{Beowulf}}, whose name is thought to mean 'bee-wolf', thus 'bear' as well.

to:

** A theory popular for decades links ''Arthur'' to the Celtic word for [[BearsAreBadNews 'bear']], ''arto'' (later, Welsh ''arth''). Since the bear was seen as a mighty and dangerous animal, the hero bearing a bear-name would naturally have to be a huge {{badass}}.badass. For a similar example see the Germanic figure of Literature/{{Beowulf}}, whose name is thought to mean 'bee-wolf', thus 'bear' as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Asskicking Equals Authority has been renamed.


* AsskickingEqualsAuthority: One of his earliest appearances treats him as a war-leader who beat the Saxons in twelve battles, fighting together with the British kings. This implies he himself was not thought to have been a king at this point. A variant text of the same document is more explicit, saying that he was chosen twelve times as commander though many others were of more noble birth.

to:

* AsskickingEqualsAuthority: AsskickingLeadsToLeadership: One of his earliest appearances treats him as a war-leader who beat the Saxons in twelve battles, fighting together with the British kings. This implies he himself was not thought to have been a king at this point. A variant text of the same document is more explicit, saying that he was chosen twelve times as commander though many others were of more noble birth.



* DependingOnTheWriter: Arthur is pretty much the gauge by which you can read the Author's opinion on proper kingship. Thus, in the Welsh legends he does his own AsskickingEqualsAuthority and leads from the front and challenges the church on occasion, while to Mallory and the French he's your typical wellmannered and cuckolded King who leads from behind and isn't actually that great of a fighter. Modern writers have made him badass, cowardly, conflicted, compassionate, and tyrannical. And usually they do that while telling the exact same plot!

to:

* DependingOnTheWriter: Arthur is pretty much the gauge by which you can read the Author's opinion on proper kingship. Thus, in the Welsh legends he does his own AsskickingEqualsAuthority AsskickingLeadsToLeadership and leads from the front and challenges the church on occasion, while to Mallory and the French he's your typical wellmannered and cuckolded King who leads from behind and isn't actually that great of a fighter. Modern writers have made him badass, cowardly, conflicted, compassionate, and tyrannical. And usually they do that while telling the exact same plot!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CloudCuckooLander: “Rhonabwy’s Dream,” am earlier Welsh satire, has Arthur in this role. During one of his battles, Arthur decides to set up camp and play chess or gwyddbwyll against Owain. As they play, Arthur’s men attack Owain’s ravens. Owain then gets a squire to raise a battle flag and the ravens attack (and kill) some of Arthur’s men. It gets to the point that Owain’s ravens are carrying men into the air and ripping them to pieces. Arthur and Owain keep playing gwyddbwyll until Arthur decides enough is enough and crushes the pieces. It’s also worth noting that Arthur is an emperor here, fighting alongside armies from Denmark, Norway, and receiving tribute from Greece.

to:

* CloudCuckooLander: “Rhonabwy’s Dream,” am an earlier Welsh satire, has Arthur in this role. During one of his battles, Arthur decides to set up camp and play chess or gwyddbwyll against Owain. As they play, Arthur’s men attack Owain’s ravens. Owain then gets a squire to raise a battle flag and the ravens attack (and kill) some of Arthur’s men. It gets to the point that Owain’s ravens are carrying men into the air and ripping them to pieces. Arthur and Owain keep playing gwyddbwyll until Arthur decides enough is enough and crushes the pieces. It’s also worth noting that Arthur is an emperor here, fighting alongside armies from Denmark, Norway, and receiving tribute from Greece.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--'''[[Creator/ChristianBorle The Historian]]''', ''Theatre/{{Spamalot}}''

to:

-->--'''[[Creator/ChristianBorle -->-- '''[[Creator/ChristianBorle The Historian]]''', ''Theatre/{{Spamalot}}''

Added: 214

Changed: 79

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A lot of this applies to Lancelot and Guinevere too, though their appearances are also not really specified in the source texts either. It nevertheless helps with the visual storytelling. If Arthur is the blonde "golden boy" then Lancelot tends to be brunette for contrast, and to invoke the TallDarkAndHandsome type. The inverse is also seen, with Lancelot being the blonde "golden boy" and Arthur being the more conventional brunette to be upstaged by him, and the "golden boy" image is subverted through Lancelot's cheating with the queen. Sometimes Guinevere is blonde as the "golden girl" so that this image is subverted with her infidelity. But she may be dark brunette to invoke the AloofDarkHairedGirl type as translated to a regal bearing, while her husband and/or lover may have lighter hair for contrast. Sometimes Guinevere is a redhead or a lighter brown etc. so that they all have contrasting hair.

to:

** A lot of this applies to Lancelot and Guinevere too, though their appearances are also not really specified in the source texts either. It nevertheless helps with the visual storytelling. If Arthur is the blonde "golden boy" then Lancelot tends to be brunette for contrast, and to invoke the TallDarkAndHandsome type. The inverse is also seen, with Lancelot being the blonde "golden boy" and Arthur being the more conventional brunette to be upstaged by him, and the "golden boy" image is subverted through Lancelot's cheating with the queen. Sometimes Guinevere is blonde as the "golden girl" so that this image is subverted with her infidelity. But infidelity, while her husband and/or lover may have darker hair for contrast. Alternately, she may be dark brunette to invoke the AloofDarkHairedGirl type as translated to a regal bearing, while her husband and/or lover may have lighter hair for contrast. Sometimes Guinevere is a redhead or a lighter brown etc. so that they all have contrasting hair.hair.
** Some depictions will make Arthur blonde and his sister Morgan darker-haired because she's a dark sorceress. But others will have their hair be similar, whether blonde or darker etc. to play up their family ties.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In Mary Stewart's ''Literature/TheMerlinTrilogy'', he is black-haired and dark-eyed, akin to Merlin since they are [[RelatedInTheAdaptation cousins of a sort]]. Mordred is also a brunette with dark eyes, which sets him apart from his fair-haired half-brothers and is a clue to his father's identity.
** A lot of this applies to Lancelot and Guinevere too, but their appearance is also not really specified in the source texts either.

to:

** In Mary Stewart's ''Literature/TheMerlinTrilogy'', he is black-haired dark-haired and dark-eyed, akin to Merlin since they are [[RelatedInTheAdaptation cousins of a sort]]. Mordred is also a dark brunette with dark eyes, which sets him apart from his fair-haired half-brothers and is a clue to his father's identity.
** A lot of this applies to Lancelot and Guinevere too, but though their appearance is appearances are also not really specified in the source texts either.either. It nevertheless helps with the visual storytelling. If Arthur is the blonde "golden boy" then Lancelot tends to be brunette for contrast, and to invoke the TallDarkAndHandsome type. The inverse is also seen, with Lancelot being the blonde "golden boy" and Arthur being the more conventional brunette to be upstaged by him, and the "golden boy" image is subverted through Lancelot's cheating with the queen. Sometimes Guinevere is blonde as the "golden girl" so that this image is subverted with her infidelity. But she may be dark brunette to invoke the AloofDarkHairedGirl type as translated to a regal bearing, while her husband and/or lover may have lighter hair for contrast. Sometimes Guinevere is a redhead or a lighter brown etc. so that they all have contrasting hair.

Added: 171

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the Welsh material, his ship is named Prydwen (Fair-Face), his [[InvisibilityCloak mantle of invisibility]] is named Gwen (White), his sword (later known as Excalibur) is named Caledfwlch, which most literally translates as "Hard-Gap" or “Hard-Cleft” (i.e. "hard-cleaver", "hard-cleaving" or "cleaving what is hard") -- though ''caled'' "hard" is also used poetically to mean "battle" (because battles are hard), his spear is named Rhongomyniad (Striking-Spear), his shield is named Wynebgwrthucher (Evening-Face), and his dagger is named Carnwennan (Little-White-Haft).

to:

** In the Welsh material, his ship is named Prydwen (Fair-Face), (Fair-Face or White-Face), his [[InvisibilityCloak mantle of invisibility]] is named Gwen (White), his sword (later known as Excalibur) is named Caledfwlch, which most literally translates as "Hard-Gap" or “Hard-Cleft” (i.e. "hard-cleaver", "hard-cleaving" or "cleaving what is hard") -- though ''caled'' "hard" is also used poetically to mean "battle" (because battles are hard), his spear is named Rhongomyniad (Striking-Spear), his shield is named Wynebgwrthucher (Evening-Face), and his dagger is named Carnwennan (Little-White-Haft).(Little-White-Haft).
** Some of this carries over to Geoffrey of Monmouth, who named Arthur's sword as Caliburn (Caliburnus in the original Latin), his shield as Pridwen, and his spear as Ron.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Pendragon'' is also meaningful as it seems to be a [[TheMagnficent honorific title]]: ''pen'' is Welsh for 'head' or 'top' and ''dragon'' is archaic Welsh for, well, [[OurDragonsAreDifferent 'dragon']], borrowed from Latin ''draco'' (possibly by way of French ''dragon'', like in English, and it's ''draig'' in modern Welsh). ''Dragon'' was also used figuratively in Welsh poetry to mean 'warrior'. So ''Arthur Pendragon'' could mean ''Bear-like Warrior Chief''. (We're avoiding ''Bear-like Dragon Chief'' only because it's {{Metaphorgotten}}, sadly.)

to:

** ''Pendragon'' is also meaningful as it seems to be a [[TheMagnficent [[TheMagnificent honorific title]]: ''pen'' is Welsh for 'head' or 'top' and ''dragon'' is archaic Welsh for, well, [[OurDragonsAreDifferent 'dragon']], borrowed from Latin ''draco'' (possibly by way of French ''dragon'', like in English, and it's ''draig'' in modern Welsh). ''Dragon'' was also used figuratively in Welsh poetry to mean 'warrior'. So ''Arthur Pendragon'' could mean ''Bear-like Warrior Chief''. (We're avoiding ''Bear-like Dragon Chief'' only because it's {{Metaphorgotten}}, sadly.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HairOfGoldHeartOfGold: The medieval texts don't really describe his physical appearance, except for the relatively late ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur'' which only says once that he has grey eyes. But since he's TheHero, modern visual representations will sometimes (if not often) make him blond to signify his personal goodness.

to:

* HairOfGoldHeartOfGold: The medieval texts don't really describe his physical appearance, except for the relatively late ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur'' ''[[Literature/LeMorteDArthur Le Morte d'Arthur]]'' which only says once that he has grey eyes. But since he's TheHero, modern visual representations will sometimes (if not often) make him blond to signify his personal goodness.



** In Mary Stewart's ''Literature/TheMerlinTrilogy'', he is black-haired and dark-eyed. Mordred is also a brunette with dark eyes, which sets him apart from his fair-haired half-brothers and is a clue to his father's identity.

to:

** In Mary Stewart's ''Literature/TheMerlinTrilogy'', he is black-haired and dark-eyed.dark-eyed, akin to Merlin since they are [[RelatedInTheAdaptation cousins of a sort]]. Mordred is also a brunette with dark eyes, which sets him apart from his fair-haired half-brothers and is a clue to his father's identity.



** As codified by ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur''- in Arthur's last battle, he [[ImpaledWithExtremePrejudice skewers]] Mordred with his spear, but Mordred [[PullYourselfDowntheSpear drags himself closer]] and [[TakingYouWithMe mortally wounds the king]] with his sword as he dies. Not technically a mutual kill if he's just out of commission in Avalon but close enough.

to:

** As codified by ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur''- ''[[Literature/LeMorteDArthur Le Morte d'Arthur]]'' - in Arthur's last battle, he [[ImpaledWithExtremePrejudice skewers]] Mordred with his spear, but Mordred [[PullYourselfDowntheSpear drags himself closer]] and [[TakingYouWithMe mortally wounds the king]] with his sword as he dies. Not technically a mutual kill if he's just out of commission in Avalon Avalon, but close enough.



* PreAssKickingOneLiner: Spouts off several in the "Lucius" section of ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur''.

to:

* PreAssKickingOneLiner: Spouts off several in the "Lucius" section of ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur''.''[[Literature/LeMorteDArthur Le Morte d'Arthur]]''.

Added: 715

Changed: 46

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) had several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. These people included one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, and he is pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur, though this is problematic in many ways.[[note]]For one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like how to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.

to:

*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) had several members from different family branches branches. as attested to from by written records and artifacts. These people included one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, and he is pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur, though this is problematic in many ways.[[note]]For one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like how to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar [[UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar GaiusJuliusCaesar]] as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.



%%* MutualKill: With Mordred.

to:

%%* MutualKill: With Mordred.* MutualKill:
** As codified by ''Literature/LeMorteDArthur''- in Arthur's last battle, he [[ImpaledWithExtremePrejudice skewers]] Mordred with his spear, but Mordred [[PullYourselfDowntheSpear drags himself closer]] and [[TakingYouWithMe mortally wounds the king]] with his sword as he dies. Not technically a mutual kill if he's just out of commission in Avalon but close enough.
** The roots of this is in one of the earliest historical references to Arthur centuries prior, where a chronicle called the ''Annales Cambriae'' (''Annals of Wales'') says that Arthur and Medraut fell in the Strife of Camlann. However, it does not offer any details about whether they killed each other, or if they indeed fought on opposing sides.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan or house (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) had several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. These people included one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, a and he is pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur, though this is problematic in many ways.[[note]]For one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like how to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.

to:

*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan or house (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) had several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. These people included one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, a and he is pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur, though this is problematic in many ways.[[note]]For one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like how to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) has several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. The most famous or notorious such person is one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur though this is problematic in many ways[[note]]for one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.

to:

*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan or house (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) has had several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. The most famous or notorious such person is These people included one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, a and he is pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur Arthur, though this is problematic in many ways[[note]]for ways.[[note]]For one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like how to this day we refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.



** The origin of ''Pendragon'' is clearer: ''pen'' is Welsh for 'head' or 'top' and ''dragon'' is archaic Welsh for, well, [[OurDragonsAreDifferent 'dragon']], borrowed from Latin ''draco'' (possibly by way of French ''dragon'', like in English, and it's ''draig'' in modern Welsh). ''Dragon'' was also used figuratively in Welsh poetry to mean 'warrior'. So ''Arthur Pendragon'' could mean ''Bear-like Warrior Chief''. (We're avoiding ''Bear-like Dragon Chief'' only because it's {{Metaphorgotten}}, sadly.)

to:

** The origin of ''Pendragon'' is clearer: also meaningful as it seems to be a [[TheMagnficent honorific title]]: ''pen'' is Welsh for 'head' or 'top' and ''dragon'' is archaic Welsh for, well, [[OurDragonsAreDifferent 'dragon']], borrowed from Latin ''draco'' (possibly by way of French ''dragon'', like in English, and it's ''draig'' in modern Welsh). ''Dragon'' was also used figuratively in Welsh poetry to mean 'warrior'. So ''Arthur Pendragon'' could mean ''Bear-like Warrior Chief''. (We're avoiding ''Bear-like Dragon Chief'' only because it's {{Metaphorgotten}}, sadly.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
IUEO now


* MeaningfulName: ''Arthur'' is of uncertain etymology, but often in modern retellings, it is in-universe a meaningful name and also a [[AwesomeMcCoolname cool]] one, due to two main competing theories about the origin of the name, which informed these modern writers.

to:

* MeaningfulName: ''Arthur'' is of uncertain etymology, but often in modern retellings, it is in-universe a meaningful name and also a [[AwesomeMcCoolname cool]] one, name, due to two main competing theories about the origin of the name, which informed these modern writers.

Added: 440

Changed: 77

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulName: ''Arthur'' is of uncertain etymology, but often in modern retellings, it is in-universe a meaningful name if not also a [[AwesomeMcCoolname cool]] one, due to two main competing theories about the origin of the name, which informed these modern writers.
** A theory popular for decades links ''Arthur'' to the Celtic word for [[BearsAreBadNews 'bear']], ''arto'' (later, Welsh ''arth''). Since the bear was seen as a mighty and dangerous animal, the hero bearing a bear-name would naturally have to be a huge {{badass}}. For a similar example see the Germanic figure of Literature/{{Beowulf}}, whose name is thought to mean "bee-wolf", thus "bear" as well.

to:

* MeaningfulName: ''Arthur'' is of uncertain etymology, but often in modern retellings, it is in-universe a meaningful name if not and also a [[AwesomeMcCoolname cool]] one, due to two main competing theories about the origin of the name, which informed these modern writers.
** A theory popular for decades links ''Arthur'' to the Celtic word for [[BearsAreBadNews 'bear']], ''arto'' (later, Welsh ''arth''). Since the bear was seen as a mighty and dangerous animal, the hero bearing a bear-name would naturally have to be a huge {{badass}}. For a similar example see the Germanic figure of Literature/{{Beowulf}}, whose name is thought to mean "bee-wolf", 'bee-wolf', thus "bear" 'bear' as well.



*** Some modern retellings outright make "Bear" Arthur's nickname; some do it in English (leaving the readers to work out the TranslationConvention themselves) while some do it as GeniusBonus, like ''Literature/SwordAtSunset'' where Arthur is called "Artos" for most of the book until we learn his real name is Latin, see below.
*** An early {{Demythification}}-style novel from 1944 even had it in the title: ''Arthur the Bear of Britain''.



*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), not a personal name and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) has several members attested to from written records and artifacts. The most famous or notorious such person is one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur though this is problematic in many ways[[note]]for one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like to this day we recognize UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.

to:

*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), not a personal name and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) has several members from different family branches attested to from written records and artifacts. The most famous or notorious such person is one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur though this is problematic in many ways[[note]]for one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like to this day we recognize refer to UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
putting back in under different trope

Added DiffLines:

* MeaningfulName: ''Arthur'' is of uncertain etymology, but often in modern retellings, it is in-universe a meaningful name if not also a [[AwesomeMcCoolname cool]] one, due to two main competing theories about the origin of the name, which informed these modern writers.
** A theory popular for decades links ''Arthur'' to the Celtic word for [[BearsAreBadNews 'bear']], ''arto'' (later, Welsh ''arth''). Since the bear was seen as a mighty and dangerous animal, the hero bearing a bear-name would naturally have to be a huge {{badass}}. For a similar example see the Germanic figure of Literature/{{Beowulf}}, whose name is thought to mean "bee-wolf", thus "bear" as well.
*** The ''ur'' part of ''Arthur'' was often theorized in the past to be from a Celtic word for 'man', ''uiros'' or ''wiros'' (later, Welsh ''gwr''), but nowadays this is considered untenable because then the name would have developed into "Artgur" or "Arthwr", so Arthur can't mean ''Bear-Man'' or ''Man of the Bear'' as many have suggested.
*** Others have tried to link ''Arthur'' to the Greek ''Arktouros'' and Latin ''Arcturus'', meaning ''Bear Guardian'', which is the name of a star. The bear in this case refers to the constellation Ursa Major, as Arcturus is part of a different constellation, Boötes, and is better understood as 'guardian ''of'' the bear'. The similarity is most often explained as the languages being related instead of direct derivation.
** Alternatively, ''Arthur'' is often thought to derive not from a Celtic origin but from the Latin name ''Artorius'', whose meaning is uncertain too. When modern retellings mention the Latin name, they're noting or indeed emphasizing the post-Imperial Roman origins of the legend and their versions of Arthur himself being a product of that culture, like being Roman "by blood" as in the movie ''Film/KingArthur'', or just a Roman citizen by default.
*** According to classical Roman naming conventions, ''Artorius'' was a wider family or clan name (''nomen''), not a personal name and was paired with one's personal name (''praenomen'') and direct family name (''cognomen''). The Artorius clan (or rather ''gens Artoria'' in Latin) has several members attested to from written records and artifacts. The most famous or notorious such person is one Lucius Artorius Castus, who became an high-ranking officer and local government official in the 2nd century AD, pegged by some scholars and thus the works inspired by them as ''the'' inspiration for the legendary Arthur though this is problematic in many ways[[note]]for one thing, in modern terms his name would be something like "Lucius Castus of Clan Artorius", and so he'd be better known in his day as Castus, just like to this day we recognize UsefulNotes/GaiusJuliusCaesar as "Caesar" for short; another thing is that he lived far too early for Arthur's conventional origin story fighting the Saxons.[[/note]] Since Roman naming conventions grew looser as the centuries passed, it's possible that in time Artorius was used in the late Empire as a personal name, though there's no record of it from archaeology or written records.
*** In a roundabout way, ''Artorius'' itself may possibly be Celtic in origin, deriving from the hypothetical names ''Artorix(s)'' or ''Artorigos'', 'Bear-King', or ''Artorigios'', '[[{{Patronymic}} Son]] of Artorix' i.e. 'Son of the Bear-King' if we want to split hairs. In other words, ''Arthur'' may be a Celtic version of a Roman name, or a Celtic version of a Roman version of a much older Celtic name, all ultimately connected to Celtic words for bears and possibly kings.
*** ''Artorius'' could simply be Latin for "of/descending from Artor", but then what "Artor" means in Latin remains up in the air. Other attempts to derive ''Artorius'' from names in non-Latin ancient Italian languages like Messapic ''Artorres'' or ''Artas'' most often loop back to assuming the root names mean "bear" in some form like ''Arthur'' may, due to the common Indo-European roots of the ancient Celtic and Italian languages. The outlier is Etruscan '' Arnthur'', which may be related to their word for "younger son", but that's boring.
** The origin of ''Pendragon'' is clearer: ''pen'' is Welsh for 'head' or 'top' and ''dragon'' is archaic Welsh for, well, [[OurDragonsAreDifferent 'dragon']], borrowed from Latin ''draco'' (possibly by way of French ''dragon'', like in English, and it's ''draig'' in modern Welsh). ''Dragon'' was also used figuratively in Welsh poetry to mean 'warrior'. So ''Arthur Pendragon'' could mean ''Bear-like Warrior Chief''. (We're avoiding ''Bear-like Dragon Chief'' only because it's {{Metaphorgotten}}, sadly.)
** His father Uther also counts as having a meaningful name. Uther or ''Uthyr'' in Welsh is from the word ''uthr'' which means 'terrible' (in the older sense of "awesome", "fear-inducing", "intimidating") so ''Uther Pendragon'' really means ''Dreaded Warrior Chief'', which Uther certainly was to his rival Vortigern.
*** Amusingly, one Latin text says Arthur was known as "mab uter", which the author interpreted as "horrible son" (filius horribilis) instead of "son of Uther", and took it to mean that Arthur was a juvenile delinquent. The same author interpreted Arthur to mean "horrible bear" (ursus horribilis), probably thinking of "arth + uthr", but also suggested "iron hammer which breaks lions' teeth", which has confounded scholars about where the hell he got ''that'' from.

Top