Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AllPsychologyIsFreudian

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As long as we're mentioning ''{{Persona}}'' as an aversion, let's discuss the other ''Persona'' (a film by [[TheSeventhSeal Ingmar Bergman]].) In terms of Freudianism, the film makes little to no sense. However, when compared to a glossary of common terms in Jungian psychology, it practically goes down the list one by one, including an ultra-rare example of countertransference (basically, [[WhatAboutBob the patient drives the examiner crazy]].)

to:

* As long as we're mentioning ''{{Persona}}'' as an aversion, let's discuss In terms of Freudianism, the other [[TheSeventhSeal Ingmar Bergman]] film ''Persona'' (a film by [[TheSeventhSeal Ingmar Bergman]].) In terms of Freudianism, the film makes little to no sense. However, when compared to a glossary of common terms in Jungian psychology, it practically goes down the list one by one, including an ultra-rare example of countertransference (basically, [[WhatAboutBob the patient drives the examiner crazy]].)

Changed: 1057

Removed: 544

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It should be noted that, while the use of potentially hazardous electric shocks as part of an experiment is simply not done, electro-shock therapy still remains a valid form of therapy. It's neither the most common nor preferred form of psychotherapy in this day and age, but a valid one nonetheless. Even if only used in rather extreme cases. Much of the confusion surrounding unethical ''electrical'' experiments can be attributed to this. It should also be noted that real electro-shock therapy is nearly painless and not the convulsion-inducing barbarism shown on TV.
*** Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It works beautifully, but does have short-term memory loss as a potential side-effect, which is usually temporary but occasionally permanent; most patients with depression that is severe enough to need ECT consider this an acceptable trade off.
** Don't forget Sheridan and King, who demonstrated that around 80% of people will electrocute a puppy to death, while able to actually see the effects on the puppy, if they are instructed to by a perceived authority figure...
*** What's the date on that study?
**** It was after the Milgram experiment, but the methodology is really the more important one; it's one thing to ask [[strike:me]]somebody if they'd do it (yes) and another to actually get them to it ([[ComedicSociopathy hold these alligator clips for a few sec, please? thanks]])...

to:

** It should be noted that, while the use of potentially hazardous electric shocks as part of an experiment is simply not done, electro-shock therapy still remains a valid form of therapy. It's neither the most common nor preferred form of psychotherapy in this day and age, but a valid one nonetheless. Even if only used in rather extreme cases. Much of the confusion surrounding unethical ''electrical'' experiments can be attributed to this. It should also be noted that real electro-shock therapy is nearly painless and not the convulsion-inducing barbarism shown on TV.
***
TV. Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It works beautifully, but does have short-term memory loss as a potential side-effect, which is usually temporary but occasionally permanent; most patients with depression that is severe enough to need ECT consider this an acceptable trade off.
** Don't forget Sheridan and King, who demonstrated that around 80% of people will electrocute a puppy to death, while able to actually see the effects on the puppy, if they are instructed to by a perceived authority figure...
*** What's the date on that study?
**** It was after the Milgram experiment, but the methodology is really the more important one; it's one thing to ask [[strike:me]]somebody if they'd do it (yes) and another to actually get them to it ([[ComedicSociopathy hold these alligator clips for a few sec, please? thanks]])...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Whats the date on that study?

to:

*** Whats What's the date on that study?
**** It was after the Milgram experiment, but the methodology is really the more important one; it's one thing to ask [[strike:me]]somebody if they'd do it (yes) and another to actually get them to it ([[ComedicSociopathy hold these alligator clips for a few sec, please? thanks]])...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."[[hottip:*:The psychiatrists who went for the MD/PhD route are, presumably, just enjoying the show.]] Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.

to:

There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."[[hottip:*:The psychiatrists who went for the MD/PhD [=MD/PhD=] route are, presumably, just enjoying the show.]] Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."[[hottip:The psychiatrists who went for the MD/PhD route are, presumably, just enjoying the show.]] Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.

to:

There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."[[hottip:The "[[hottip:*:The psychiatrists who went for the MD/PhD route are, presumably, just enjoying the show.]] Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks." Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.

to:

There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks." "[[hottip:The psychiatrists who went for the MD/PhD route are, presumably, just enjoying the show.]] Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.

Added: 73

Changed: 797

Removed: 73

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No rudeness, just correcting grammar.


* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, which holds that the best way to help the client is to build a trusting relationship with them)
* Evolutionary (based on the belief that behaviors, like physical traits, are naturally selected and thus each behavior has or had some kind of pro-reproductive purpose)

to:

* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, which holds that the best way to help the client patient is to build a trusting relationship with them)
* Evolutionary (based on the belief that behaviors, like physical traits, are naturally selected and thus each behavior has or has had some kind of pro-reproductive purpose)



Other obsolete theories that show up include:

to:

Other obsolete theories practices/theories that show up include:



** Sadly, this was TruthInTelevision when the science was in its infancy.



** Sadly, this was TruthInTelevision when the science was in its infancy.



*** Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It works beautifully, but does have problems with short-term memory as a potential side-effect, which are usually temporary but occasionally permanent; most patients with depression that is severe enough to need ECT consider this an acceptable trade off.

to:

*** Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It works beautifully, but does have problems with short-term memory loss as a potential side-effect, which are is usually temporary but occasionally permanent; most patients with depression that is severe enough to need ECT consider this an acceptable trade off.




The cause of this trope is obvious. While it may be ''correct'' to say that a psychopath has no empathy because his frontal lobe has dodgy wiring, it makes a much better ''story'' to say it is due to him being beaten as a child. A schizophrenic being treated by drugs is dull; treatment by finally confronting the neighbour who raped her is triumphant.

to:

\n*** Whats the date on that study?

The cause of this trope is obvious. While it may be ''correct'' to say that a psychopath has no empathy because his frontal lobe has dodgy wiring, it makes a much better ''story'' to say it is due to him being beaten as a child. A schizophrenic being treated by with anti-psychotic drugs is dull; treatment by finally confronting the neighbour who raped her is triumphant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind. He encounters the Eros and Thanatos drives, which take the forms of Master Billy Quizboy and Pete White, and the id, ego, and superego, who all look like Dr. Venture.

to:

* Done more or less mostly straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind. He encounters the Eros and Thanatos drives, which take the forms of Master Billy Quizboy and Pete White, and the id, ego, and superego, who all look like Dr. Venture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind. He encounters the Eros and Thanatos drives, which take the forms of Master Billy Quizboy and Pete White, and the id, ego, and superego, who all look like the doctor.

to:

* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind. He encounters the Eros and Thanatos drives, which take the forms of Master Billy Quizboy and Pete White, and the id, ego, and superego, who all look like the doctor.
Dr. Venture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind and encounters AnthropomorphicPersonifications of the id, the ego, and the superego, along with the Eros and Thanatos drives.

to:

* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind and mind. He encounters AnthropomorphicPersonifications of the id, the ego, and the superego, along with the Eros and Thanatos drives.
drives, which take the forms of Master Billy Quizboy and Pete White, and the id, ego, and superego, who all look like the doctor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Done more or less straight in ''TheVentureBros'' when Doctor Orpheus goes inside Dr. Venture's mind and encounters AnthropomorphicPersonifications of the id, the ego, and the superego, along with the Eros and Thanatos drives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Charlie didn't date a woman with the same personality as his mother, he dated a woman with a motherly personality, which is the exact opposite of his mother's ice queen persona.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Charlie didn't date a woman with the same personality as his mother, he dated a woman with a motherly personality, which is the exact opposite of his mother's ice queen persona.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
To further add to the confusion of "psychology vs psychiatry" I pointed out that Jung and Freud were seen as psychiatrists by contemporary people.


There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."

to:

There is also a tendency, formerly seen in the first paragraph of this entry, to use "psychology" and "psychiatry" interchangeably. The difference between the two is [[strike:about two hundred bucks per hour]] that psychiatrists are [=MDs=] who then studied two years of psychology, who can provide therapy and prescribe medication, while psychologists train for between six and ten years and cannot prescribe medication--though most of them, if they feel it's necessary, will just write a note to the patient's GP recommending one drug or another. Psychologists also do nearly all of the research in the field of psychology. Psychiatrists tend to view psychologists as "the poor man's option," while psychologists tend to view psychiatrists as "total quacks."
" Interestingly, both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung ''were'' psychiatrists with ''medical doctorates''. Their methods of working and researching would probably count as psychology today, but back then psychology wasn't really a common academic field.

Changed: 1311

Removed: 374

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)
*** Maslow's hierarchy is mostly used in practical psychology to treat people with obsessive disorders who neglect things like eating and sleeping to carry out their obsessions; reorganising their priorities is often extremely useful.
*** Maslow's Hierarchy is taught in an Air Force ROTC textbook on leadership, in a chapter on motivation of subordinates.
*** Not to mention pretty much every high school health textbook there is--are we ever going to be rid of this thing?
* Psychologists carrying out some extremely unethical experiments, often involving electric shocks. While some of them would be a lot of fun and quite possibly useful to carry out in real life, there is no way in hell a psychologist would be allowed to perform them. There are a LOT of checks in place to make sure there are no [[MorallyAmbiguousDoctorate abuses of power.]]

to:

* Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a top (a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter well). Though it sounds good to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)
*** Maslow's
layman, there's no evidence that it's anything close to correct.
** In practical psychology, the
hierarchy is mostly can be used in practical psychology to treat help people with obsessive disorders disorders, who neglect things like eating and sleeping need to carry out reorganize their obsessions; reorganising their priorities is often extremely useful.
***
priorities. But even then, it's just a list of needs in an arbitrary order that Maslow happened to like.
**
Maslow's Hierarchy is still taught as truth in lots of places. It shows up in everything from high school health textbooks, to an Air Force ROTC textbook on leadership, in a chapter on motivation of subordinates.
*** Not
to mention pretty much every high school health textbook there is--are we ever going nursing school. Among people who study basic psychology but are not psychologists, it has been even harder to be get rid of this thing?
than the Freud thing.
* Psychologists carrying out some extremely unethical experiments, often involving electric shocks. While some of them would be a lot of fun and quite possibly useful to carry out in real life, there is no way in hell a psychologist would be allowed to perform them. There are a LOT of checks in place to make sure there are no [[MorallyAmbiguousDoctorate abuses of power.]]



** Sadly true when it was just getting started.
** It may also be related to the ''fake'' electrocutions done during Milgram's study of obedience. Participants ''thought'' they were delivering shocks to a helpless fellow test subject, but in reality the fellow test subject was an actor in confederacy with the researchers, who had been given specific reactions to perform as the experiment went on.

to:

** Sadly true Sadly, this was TruthInTelevision when it the science was just getting started.
in its infancy.
** It may also be related to the ''fake'' electrocutions done during Milgram's study of obedience. Participants ''thought'' they were delivering shocks to a helpless fellow test subject, but in reality the fellow test subject target was an actor in confederacy with the researchers, who had been given specific reactions to perform as the experiment went on.and nobody actually got shocked.

Changed: 1

Removed: 345

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)
** Although these theories tend to obsolescence, portions of them remain in current forms of psychology. Maslow's hierarchy of needs appears a lot in psychology theories (though not so much in practice), and marketing-related careers make ample use of Maslow's hierarchy, since it has proved quite useful to those who plan advertising campaigns.

to:

* Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)
** Although these theories tend to obsolescence, portions of them remain in current forms of psychology. Maslow's hierarchy of needs appears a lot in psychology theories (though not so much in practice), and marketing-related careers make ample use of Maslow's hierarchy, since it has proved quite useful to those who plan advertising campaigns.
)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In academia, his importance in the basic 101 of psychology that people who don't go into psychology any further will only know means that Freud is taken more seriously in the literature department than in the psychology department. The psychology applied in sociology, "gender studies" and other tangentially related fields can be biased towards basic Freud, whose denial of an evolution-created biological impact on behavior fits the ''it's-society's-fault'' approach of most sociology teachers perfectly.

to:

* In academia, his importance in the basic 101 of psychology that (that people who don't go into psychology any further will only know know), means that Freud is taken more seriously in the literature department than in the psychology department. The psychology applied in sociology, "gender studies" and other tangentially related fields can be biased towards basic Freud, whose denial of an evolution-created biological impact on behavior fits the ''it's-society's-fault'' approach of most sociology teachers perfectly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The main characters in StephenKing's ''{{Cell}}'' theorize that the zombies running around killing people all had their ego and superego wiped out by a Pulse of electromagnetism coming from their cell phones, leaving only the id, which was Freud's fancy way of saying "the part of your brain that just wants to kill and screw".

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The main characters in StephenKing's ''{{Cell}}'' theorize that the zombies running around killing people all had their ego and superego wiped out by a Pulse of electromagnetism coming from their cell phones, leaving only the id, which was Freud's fancy way of saying "the part of your brain that just wants to kill and screw".

to:

* The main characters in StephenKing's ''{{Cell}}'' theorize that the zombies running around killing people all had their ego and superego wiped out by a Pulse of electromagnetism coming from their cell phones, leaving only the id, which was Freud's fancy way of saying "the part of your brain that just wants to kill and screw".

Changed: 169

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added Evolutionary Psychology



to:

* Evolutionary (based on the belief that behaviors, like physical traits, are naturally selected and thus each behavior has or had some kind of pro-reproductive purpose)

Added: 444

Changed: 548

Removed: 177

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Cognitive (the study of how people think, learn, and remember, with strong ties to biological psychology : also the natural evolution of behavioral psychology)

to:

* Cognitive (the study of how people think, learn, and remember, with strong ties to biological psychology : also the natural evolution of behavioral behavioural psychology)



* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, with a strong focus on counselling that helps the client to help himself)

to:

* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, with a strong focus on counselling which holds that helps the best way to help the client is to help himself)
build a trusting relationship with them)



Interestingly, recent surveys by various psychological associations show that the vast majority of therapists favour an eclectic approach; for example, the vast majority of therapists use humanistic techniques, and most modern behaviourists (or "neo-behaviourists") blend cognitive and biological elements into their work, rather than treating the brain as an unknowable quantity and working only from visible actions, as their forerunners did.



* The old behaviourist idea of psychology that thinks all learning, etc., is simple reward-stimuli reactions, like Pavlov's dog learning to salivate when a bell is rung--while behaviourism still exists, this is an extremely dumbed-down version that bears only the smallest resemblance to reality
* Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)

to:

* The old behaviourist idea of psychology that thinks all learning, etc., is simple reward-stimuli reactions, like Pavlov's dog learning to salivate when a bell is rung--while behaviourism still exists, this is an extremely dumbed-down version that bears one of the more popular models of psychology today, classical conditioning makes up only the smallest resemblance to reality
*
tiniest fraction of the modern fild.
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an idea that first we focus on the physical necessities like sleeping and pooping, then needs relating to safety, then love and friendship, then esteem and being respected, and finally "self-actualization" at the top, a term endlessly debated because Maslow didn't bother defining it very well. (Because of its complexity, there are widespread misconceptions of this theory even in psychology - another psychologist skipping his lunch break after pulling an all-nighter to hang out with a friend is not quite an invalidation of the theory.)



*** Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It frequently causes memory loss, however.

to:

*** Indeed, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) is now used only in severe cases of depression that are unresponsive to any other form of treatment. The patient is fully anaesthetized before the treatment now, and every precaution is taken to ensure that the treatment is safe and humane. It frequently causes works beautifully, but does have problems with short-term memory loss, however.as a potential side-effect, which are usually temporary but occasionally permanent; most patients with depression that is severe enough to need ECT consider this an acceptable trade off.



That and most viewers only know the Freudian model, and only a little of it at that. Sometimes it may actually be used as a gag, but there ''are'' more serious uses than joking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some such experiments do still take place--but they only involve low level shocks (and this in the context of studying fear conditioning).

to:

* ** Some such experiments do still take place--but they only involve low level shocks (and this in the context of studying fear conditioning).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Some such experiments do still take place--but they only involve low level shocks (and this in the context of studying fear conditioning).

Added: 4

Changed: 199

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----

to:

*Sadly, I remember well being taught psychoanalysis in English class (and how it applies to literature). As far as I can tell, I was being told to search for phallic imagery in everything I read.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** While most academics in ''psychology'' have moved on, the vast majority of academics in the ''humanities'', particularly the postmodern lit-crit crowd, still pretend that Freud closed the book on psychology. A particularly adventurous academic might name-drop Jung as well, but nothing more contemporary than that. Chip Morningstar mentions this in his [[http://www.fudco.com/chip/deconstr.html very funny essay]] "How to Deconstruct Almost Anything":
--> ''"You are also allowed to pretend that the works of Freud present a correct model of human psychology and the works of Marx present a correct model of sociology and economics (it's not clear to me whether practitioners in the field actually believe Freud and Marx or if it's just a convention of the genre)."''

Added: 23

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


If a psychologist is asking about the patient's parents and childhood, sees sexual imagery in everything the patient says, and uses lots of projective tests like the Rorschach ink blot test or word association, you're probably looking at television's idea of Freudian psychology. The next most common form of psychology in media is Humanistic psychology-- when you've got a patient lying on a couch with the psychologist asking questions like "Could you tell me more about that?" and "So how does that make you ''feel''?", you're looking at a Humanistic psychologist. Ironically, these are probably the two ''least'' common of the five major schools in real life.

to:

If a psychologist is asking about the patient's parents and childhood, sees sexual imagery in everything the patient says, and uses lots of projective tests like the Rorschach ink blot test or word association, you're probably looking at television's idea of Freudian psychology. The next most common form of psychology in media is Humanistic psychology-- when you've got a patient lying on a couch [[FreudianCouch couch]] with the psychologist asking questions like "Could you tell me more about that?" and "So how does that make you ''feel''?", you're looking at a Humanistic psychologist. Ironically, these are probably the two ''least'' common of the five major schools in real life.



That and most viewers only know the Freudian model, and only a little of it at that. Sometimes it may actually be used as a gag, but there ''are'' more serious uses than joking.

to:

That and most viewers only know the Freudian model, and only a little of it at that. Sometimes it may actually be used as a gag, but there ''are'' more serious uses than joking. joking.

Also see FreudianCouch.

Changed: 419

Removed: 486

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
My trope-fu isn't strong enough to specify exactly how, but it definitely is playing with the trope. Or a trope, anyway. It might be this one.


* Kyon in ''SuzumiyaHaruhi'' references to Freud's psychology at times. After the events of episode 6 (chronological), when it still seemed like AllJustADream (which ended with a kiss) he cries "What the hell?! Freud would have a field day with this!" That being said, the story (the novels) does have a ''[[ViewersAreGeniuses giant]]'' [[ViewersAreGeniuses reference pool to advanced physics, history, ancient mythology and other stuff]] you don't know, so it doesn't really make sense why this trope is active.
** It makes perfect sense. Psychoanalysis is the only area of psychiatry that typically finds the content of dreams to be important. If you asked someone who follows the behavioral or biological methods what your dreams means they'd probably laugh at you.
*** Not necessarily; while interpreting symbolism in dreams is sneered at by most non-psychoanalysts, the emotional content can often be extremely helpful in working through things the client might not be acknowledging consciously.

to:

* Played with in ''SuzumiyaHaruhi'': Kyon in ''SuzumiyaHaruhi'' references to Freud's psychology at times. After the events of episode 6 (chronological), when it still seemed like AllJustADream (which wakes up from a dream that ended with a kiss) he cries kiss and cries, "What the hell?! Freud would have a field day with this!" That being said, the story (the novels) does have a ''[[ViewersAreGeniuses giant]]'' [[ViewersAreGeniuses reference pool to advanced physics, history, ancient mythology and other stuff]] you don't know, so it doesn't really make sense why this trope is active.
** It makes perfect sense. Psychoanalysis is the only area of psychiatry that typically finds the content of dreams to be important. If you asked someone who follows the behavioral or biological methods what your dreams means they'd probably laugh at you.
*** Not necessarily; while interpreting symbolism in dreams is sneered at by most non-psychoanalysts, the emotional content can often be extremely helpful in working through things the client might not be acknowledging consciously.
this!"

Added: 388

Changed: 151

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In academia, his importance in the basic 101 of psychology that people who don't go into psychology any further will only know means that Freud is taken more seriously in the literature department than in the psychology department. The psychology applied in sociology, gender studies and other tangentially related fields can be biased towards basic Freud.

to:

* In academia, his importance in the basic 101 of psychology that people who don't go into psychology any further will only know means that Freud is taken more seriously in the literature department than in the psychology department. The psychology applied in sociology, gender studies "gender studies" and other tangentially related fields can be biased towards basic Freud.Freud, whose denial of an evolution-created biological impact on behavior fits the ''it's-society's-fault'' approach of most sociology teachers perfectly.
* The criticism toward Freud will, paradoxically, create a die-hard core of believers in those few universities where Freud is still taken seriously. While almost every psychology education in Sweden will focus on giving a patient practical advice on how to cope with negative tendencies, the two colleges where Freudianism is still being taught foster an atmosphere of being under siege.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, with a strong focus on counselling that helps the client to help themself)

to:

* Humanistic (a field that grew out of a combination of behavioural and psychoanalytic psychology, with a strong focus on counselling that helps the client to help themself)
himself)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Used in ''BillAndTedsExcellentAdventure''. [[JustifiedTrope By Freud himself, no less.]]

to:

* Used in ''BillAndTedsExcellentAdventure''. [[JustifiedTrope By Freud himself, no less.]]]] It helps that it's actually Ted's ''stepmother'' that's giving him the complex - his father's second wife who happens to be only a few years older than him.




to:

* {{Inception}} doesn't even give Freud the dignity of a dismissal; the "projections" encountered within dreams are nothing but unexpressed fragments of the dreamer's personality.

Top