Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheNorthernCaves

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[invoked]]WriteWhatYouKnow: What Aaron calls "the Space Episode" is clearly based on William Chen's suicide. It involves a character obliquely called W stepping out of a ship's airlock, against the protestations of Sally. In space, W has a strange string of conversations with supernatural-seeming beings about "immolation", "unbraiding", and an "angel". He decides to take part of that, and is destroyed, ending with the line, "W gone". The story is presented to us sandwiched between the Salby journal entry that says, "I have not seen many pleasing things in World but I remember the look of joy on WCs dying face and that is one of the few good one," and Ken's story about what happened to William.

to:

* [[invoked]]WriteWhatYouKnow: What Aaron calls "the Space Episode" is clearly based on William Chen's suicide. It involves a character obliquely called W stepping out of a ship's airlock, against the protestations of Sally. In space, W has a strange string of conversations with supernatural-seeming beings about "immolation", "unbraiding", and an "angel". He decides to take part of that, and is destroyed, ending with the line, "W gone". The story is presented to us sandwiched between the Salby journal entry that says, "I have not seen many pleasing things in World but I remember the look of joy on WCs [=WCs=] dying face and that is one of the few good one," and Ken's story about what happened to William.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[invoked]]WriteWhatYouKnow: What Aaron calls "the Space Episode" is clearly based on William Chen's suicide. It involves a character obliquely called W stepping out of a ship's airlock, against the protestations of Sally. In space, W has a strange string of conversations with supernatural-seeming beings about "immolation", "unbraiding", and an "angel". He decides to take part of that, and is destroyed, ending with the line, "W gone".

to:

* [[invoked]]WriteWhatYouKnow: What Aaron calls "the Space Episode" is clearly based on William Chen's suicide. It involves a character obliquely called W stepping out of a ship's airlock, against the protestations of Sally. In space, W has a strange string of conversations with supernatural-seeming beings about "immolation", "unbraiding", and an "angel". He decides to take part of that, and is destroyed, ending with the line, "W gone". The story is presented to us sandwiched between the Salby journal entry that says, "I have not seen many pleasing things in World but I remember the look of joy on WCs dying face and that is one of the few good one," and Ken's story about what happened to William.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[invoked]]WriteWhatYouKnow: What Aaron calls "the Space Episode" is clearly based on William Chen's suicide. It involves a character obliquely called W stepping out of a ship's airlock, against the protestations of Sally. In space, W has a strange string of conversations with supernatural-seeming beings about "immolation", "unbraiding", and an "angel". He decides to take part of that, and is destroyed, ending with the line, "W gone".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TakeThat: In what Aaron terms "the Space Episode":
-->'''Sally:''' ''[to W]'' Those god awful chess books have turned your head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: What Aaron dubs the "Tales" section are segments with decernable stories in them -- weird confusing jumbled stories, but stories after some fashion. They involve the names of Chesscourt characters but they don't act like their Chesscourt counterparts. They're not just OutOfCharacter, but OutOfGenre as well, and really seem to have no relation to Chesscourt.

to:

* InNameOnly: What Aaron dubs the "Tales" section are segments with decernable stories in them -- weird confusing jumbled stories, but stories after some fashion. They involve the names of Chesscourt characters but they don't act like their Chesscourt counterparts. They're not just OutOfCharacter, but OutOfGenre {{Out of Genre|Experience}} as well, and really seem to have no relation to Chesscourt.

Added: 524

Changed: 588

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MindScrew: It begins like a Chesscourt novel then dissolves into nonsense. Most infamously there's 3 pages of just the letter A. In that sea on nonsense, occasionally sections that appear to have a story emerge, but they're weird. They're {{out of genre|Experience}} compared to Chesscourt. While they sometimes contain Chesscourt names or words, any likenesses between the two are InNameOnly.

to:

* InNameOnly: What Aaron dubs the "Tales" section are segments with decernable stories in them -- weird confusing jumbled stories, but stories after some fashion. They involve the names of Chesscourt characters but they don't act like their Chesscourt counterparts. They're not just OutOfCharacter, but OutOfGenre as well, and really seem to have no relation to Chesscourt.
-->'''[=Errant KnightsMove=]:'''' It stars Tom and Sally in a setting completely unrelated to Chesscourt. They seem to be husband and wife, rather than siblings, and have an extended (~80 page) conversation about something called "the Lorrum" (!), which they blame for ruining their marriage.
* MindScrew: It begins like a Chesscourt novel then dissolves into nonsense. Most infamously there's 3 pages of just the letter A. In that sea on of nonsense, occasionally sections that appear to have a story emerge, but they're weird. They're {{out of genre|Experience}} compared to Chesscourt. While they sometimes contain Chesscourt names or words, any likenesses between the two are InNameOnly.weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoHuggingNoKissing: Chesscourt is staunchly devoid of any romance. This is part of the tremendous ''weightiness'' of the series. Fandom [[invoked]]{{shipping}}, then, it's a sort of defiance against the themes of canon.

to:

* NoHuggingNoKissing: Chesscourt is staunchly devoid of any romance. This is part of the tremendous ''weightiness'' of the series. Fandom [[invoked]]{{shipping}}, then, it's is a sort of defiance against the themes of canon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are directly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's likely a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This kind of thinking is a prominent aspect of Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation on moral concerns".

to:

* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are directly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, ChessMotifs, it's likely a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This kind of thinking is a prominent aspect of Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation on moral concerns".



* FunnyAnimal: The Lorrums are essentially rabbits with the capacity for human-like intellect and society. Salby explicitly mentions in his notes that he included "funny talking animals" as part of his ploy to appeal to children.
* GrowingWithTheAudience: Zigzagging. The first book is unambiguously ChildrensLiterature. The later books are not, but it's not exactly clear if they're for adults, either. Chesscourt does ''change'' as it goes along, but it doesn't really "grow up".

to:

* FunnyAnimal: The Lorrums are essentially rabbits with the capacity for human-like intellect and complex society. Salby explicitly mentions in his notes that he included "funny talking animals" as part of his ploy to appeal to children.
* GrowingWithTheAudience: Zigzagging. The first book is unambiguously ChildrensLiterature. The later books are not, but it's not exactly clear if they're for adults, either. Chesscourt does ''change'' as it goes along, but it doesn't really "grow up".



* MachineWorship: The Lorrums are rabbit-like creatures described as having a "quasi-religious fetishism or idolatry for machines and technological progress," which Ombudsman suggests stands in for "the whole of human enterprise"; Jenny's interpretation in her fic is that it stems from a fear of "disharmony". It acts as a microcosm of the greater themes of Chesscourt -- a mechanical, black-and-white simplicity -- which ties back into the philosophy of Mundum.

to:

* MachineWorship: The Lorrums are rabbit-like creatures described as having a "quasi-religious fetishism or idolatry for machines and technological progress," which progress." Ombudsman suggests it stands in for "the whole of human enterprise"; Jenny's interpretation in her fic is that it stems from a fear of "disharmony". It acts as a microcosm of the greater themes of Chesscourt -- a mechanical, black-and-white simplicity -- which ties back into the philosophy of Mundum.



* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear. This is the crux of Salby's own philosophy of Mundum, a worldview where right and wrong are unambiguously predetermined.

to:

* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut.BlackAndWhiteMorality. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear. This is the crux of Salby's own philosophy of Mundum, a worldview where right and wrong are unambiguously predetermined.



* [[invoked]]ProtectionFromEditors: As LaterInstallmentWeirdness set in, Salby's editor began to object. Salby elected to self-published the final 2 books (''The Sea of Glass'' and ''Chesscourt Regained'') without an editor. In Paul's signature, he calls himself "the only person in existence whose favorite CC book is Sea of Glass," implying these self-published books have a questionable reputation even within the fandom who loves the series. As for Paul himself, he describes being initially very impressed by Salby's unwillingness to {{sell out}}, but qualifies this with a reminder that he was a college student at the time, implying he's become more critical since then.

to:

* [[invoked]]ProtectionFromEditors: As LaterInstallmentWeirdness set in, Salby's editor began to object. Salby elected to self-published the final 2 books (''The Sea of Glass'' and ''Chesscourt Regained'') without an editor. In Paul's signature, he calls himself "the only person in existence whose favorite CC book is Sea of Glass," implying these self-published books have a questionable reputation even within the fandom who loves the series. As for Paul himself, he describes being initially very impressed by Salby's unwillingness to {{sell out}}, but qualifies this with a reminder that he was a college student at the time, implying he's become more critical since then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Gayngst}}: It's clear that Aaron is emotionally a mess, and he uses his quest of conquering TNC as a coping mechanism. It's {{Implied|Trope}} his homosexuality contributes to his emotional baggage. Blink and you'll miss it, but when Aaron and Paul are in the upstairs bathroom together and Aaron is having an emotional breakdown, he's talking about TNC, death, and fatalism -- but in the mix there's also single random comment which makes it sounds like he came from a homophobic, religious family.
-->'''Aaron:''' I am never gonna defeat Tee Enn See and that means the end of the line curtains down goodbye for [=Errant KnightsMove=] good run buddy but no more, goodbye, no more.  If it wins then ''they'' win and that's game over, period.\\
'''Paul:''' Then who wins, Aaron?\\
'''Aaron:''' Two plus two beginning of death.\\
'''Paul:''' I'm not sure I'm reading you, Aaron.\\
'''Aaron:''' The folks said I'd burn in hell, is what they said.\\
'''Paul:''' By "the folks" do you mean your parents?

Added: 1104

Removed: 1047

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GrowingWithTheAudience: Zigzagging. The first book is unambiguously ChildrensLiterature. The latter books are not. Chesscourt does ''change'' as it goes along, but it doesn't really "grow up".
-->'''Paul's narration:''' Salby starts from the comfort zone of a prepubescent fantasy reader and builds from there. In that he's akin to [[Creator/JRRTolkien Tolkien]] or [[Creator/CSLewis Lewis]] or any one of their progeny. But what Salby builds into is not ''maturity'', per se. He does not "grow up" with the reader. […] The characters do not mature, except in the sense of casting off some of the cloying vocabulary that marred ''A Thornbush Tale'' (their "golly"s and "gosh"es and "darn"s). Aging is implied to occur, but [[NoHuggingNoKissing sex and romance are absent]]. Nor do the characters [[RiteOfPassage "come of age,"]] either in the sense of being initiated into the adult culture of some surrounding society or in the sense of striking out boldly on some self-determined path. Instead, the trajectory is one of increasing moral weight.


Added DiffLines:

* GrowingWithTheAudience: Zigzagging. The first book is unambiguously ChildrensLiterature. The later books are not, but it's not exactly clear if they're for adults, either. Chesscourt does ''change'' as it goes along, but it doesn't really "grow up".
-->'''Paul's narration:''' Salby starts from the comfort zone of a prepubescent fantasy reader and builds from there. In that he's akin to [[Creator/JRRTolkien Tolkien]] or [[Creator/CSLewis Lewis]] or any one of their progeny. But what Salby builds into is not ''maturity'', per se. He does not "grow up" with the reader. […] The characters do not mature, except in the sense of casting off some of the cloying vocabulary that marred ''A Thornbush Tale'' (their "golly"s and "gosh"es and "darn"s). Aging is implied to occur, but [[NoHuggingNoKissing sex and romance are absent]]. Nor do the characters [[RiteOfPassage "come of age,"]] either in the sense of being initiated into the adult culture of some surrounding society or in the sense of striking out boldly on some self-determined path. Instead, the trajectory is one of increasing moral weight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ItsAllAboutMe: Within the "mundane" interpretation of MaybeMagicMaybeMundane, their belief that the suicides of strangers are really all about them comes off as very self-involved.

to:

* ItsAllAboutMe: Within the "mundane" interpretation of MaybeMagicMaybeMundane, their the protagonists' belief that the suicides of strangers are really all about them comes off as very self-involved.



* NerdsAreVirgins: DownplayedTrope. Chesscourt fans ''do'' date. Paul was originally introduced to Chesscourt by his girlfriend-at-the-time. But it ''is'' fair to say that none of them are spending lots of time in this online forum because they have a thriving social lives.

to:

* NerdsAreVirgins: DownplayedTrope. Chesscourt fans ''do'' date. Paul was originally introduced to Chesscourt by his girlfriend-at-the-time. But it ''is'' fair to say that none of them are spending lots of time in this online forum because they have a thriving social lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are directly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's likely a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This is a prominent aspect of the Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation with moral concerns".

to:

* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are directly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's likely a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This kind of thinking is a prominent aspect of the Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation with on moral concerns".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--->'''Charles Adair:''' As ''Other Mirrors'' demands from its reader a certain drab, bureaucratic cast of mind, no child who is fully a child will enjoy it; as its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent, no adult who is fully an adult will tolerate it. Salby has written what is perhaps a definitive test of abnormal development, but he has written a dreadful novel.

to:

--->'''Charles -->'''Charles Adair:''' As ''Other Mirrors'' demands from its reader a certain drab, bureaucratic cast of mind, no child who is fully a child will enjoy it; as its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent, no adult who is fully an adult will tolerate it. Salby has written what is perhaps a definitive test of abnormal development, but he has written a dreadful novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are very clearly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's very often a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This is a prominent aspect of the Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation with moral concerns".

to:

* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are very clearly directly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's very often likely a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This is a prominent aspect of the Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation with moral concerns".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
would you believe murdur is what my autocorrect changes mundum to. have i really used that word at all

Added DiffLines:

* BlackAndWhiteMorality: In Chesscourt, the sides of good and evil are very clearly defined. The "correct" actions the protagonists must take are very clearly laid out for them, and the difficulty is more often in carrying out said actions than in having to make difficult or morally ambiguous decisions. Considering the prominent chess motifs, it's very often a case of ''literal'' black-and-white morality. This is a prominent aspect of the Salby's personal philosophy, to the extent that he is professionally diagnosed with "an obsessive fixation with moral concerns".

Changed: 380

Removed: 274

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on, in addition to LaterInstallmentWeirdness, the books also get longer and longer. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages. It caps off with ''The Northern Caves'', which is ''3,642 pages'' -- it's unclear if it was ever intended to be published, but the upon seeing the manuscript, the Spelunkers "gawk at the thick stack of typed pages."

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on, in addition to LaterInstallmentWeirdness, the books also get longer and longer. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages. It caps off with ''The Northern Caves'', which is ''3,642 pages'' -- it's unclear if it was ever intended to be published, published in its present state, but the upon seeing the manuscript, the Spelunkers "gawk at the thick stack of typed pages."



* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear. This is the crux of Salby's own philosophy of Murdur, the idea that things need to be objectively correct.

to:

* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear. This is the crux of Salby's own philosophy of Murdur, the idea that things need to be objectively correct.Mundum, a worldview where right and wrong are unambiguously predetermined.



* [[invoked]]UncertainAudience:
** Chesscourt could be charitably framed as GrowingWithTheAudience, except it's done so weirdly that the latter books aren't well suited to ''any'' age range. It's too complicated for a child to be able to follow, yet not conceptually mature enough to appeal to most adults.

to:

* [[invoked]]UncertainAudience:
**
[[invoked]]UncertainAudience: Chesscourt could be charitably framed as GrowingWithTheAudience, except it's done so weirdly that the latter books aren't well suited to ''any'' age range. It's too complicated for a child to be able to follow, yet not conceptually mature enough to appeal to most adults.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Charles Adair:''' As ''Other Mirrors'' demands from its reader a certain drab, bureaucratic cast of mind, no child who is fully a child will enjoy it; as its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent, no adult who is fully an adult will tolerate it. Salby has written what is perhaps a definitive test of abnormal development, but he has written a dreadful novel.

to:

-->'''Charles --->'''Charles Adair:''' As ''Other Mirrors'' demands from its reader a certain drab, bureaucratic cast of mind, no child who is fully a child will enjoy it; as its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent, no adult who is fully an adult will tolerate it. Salby has written what is perhaps a definitive test of abnormal development, but he has written a dreadful novel.



-->''It is correct for me now to instruct you on certain points concerning the proper arrangement of material. It is correct for me to generate sentences which, as abstracta, are embodied in ASCII encoded in capacitor charges and then conveyed via electric current to other capacitor charges which encode the selfsame ASCII embodying the selfsame abstracta. It is permitted, if not necessarily correct, for me to sequentially arrange my musculature so as to produce depressions in an approximately flat plastic surface, and without arranging my musculature in this fashion it would not be feasible to set in place the required capacitances and currents, so it is thus correct that I perform this series of muscular arrangements.''

to:

-->''It --->''It is correct for me now to instruct you on certain points concerning the proper arrangement of material. It is correct for me to generate sentences which, as abstracta, are embodied in ASCII encoded in capacitor charges and then conveyed via electric current to other capacitor charges which encode the selfsame ASCII embodying the selfsame abstracta. It is permitted, if not necessarily correct, for me to sequentially arrange my musculature so as to produce depressions in an approximately flat plastic surface, and without arranging my musculature in this fashion it would not be feasible to set in place the required capacitances and currents, so it is thus correct that I perform this series of muscular arrangements.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that while the first book, ''A Thornbush Tale'', was a great children's book, the later series was no good. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.

to:

* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that while the series lost its footing after the first book, ''A Thornbush Tale'', was a great children's book, the later series was no good.installment. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.

Added: 2449

Changed: 2114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[invoked]]{{Anvilicious}}: Chesscourt is not subtle. Anyone can look at it and say, "This is the product of a man obsessed with fiendishly detail-oriented, duty-driven plots, and largely disinterested in his characters and worldbuilding." It's easy to see where his interests laid, or what the themes were. But Salby's ''anvil'' -- obeying Mundum -- is off the wall enough that it can be hard to identify that it ''is'' an anvil without exterior knowledge of his philosophy. Once you know, though, it becomes very apparent why the series is the way it is.

to:

* [[invoked]]{{Anvilicious}}: In-universe. Chesscourt is not subtle. Anyone can look at it subtle, and say, "This is reviews make a point to note that it's the product of a man obsessed with fiendishly detail-oriented, duty-driven plots, and largely disinterested in his characters and worldbuilding." worldbuilding. It's easy to see where his interests laid, or what the themes were. But Salby's ''anvil'' -- obeying Mundum -- is off the wall enough that it can be hard to identify that it ''is'' an anvil without exterior knowledge of his philosophy. Once you know, though, it becomes very apparent why the series is the way it is.



* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that the later series was no good. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.

to:

* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that while the first book, ''A Thornbush Tale'', was a great children's book, the later series was no good. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.



* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on, in addition to LaterInstallmentWeirdness, the books also get longer and longer. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages.

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on, in addition to LaterInstallmentWeirdness, the books also get longer and longer. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages. It caps off with ''The Northern Caves'', which is ''3,642 pages'' -- it's unclear if it was ever intended to be published, but the upon seeing the manuscript, the Spelunkers "gawk at the thick stack of typed pages."



* FunnyAnimal: The Lorrums are essentially rabbits with the capacity for human-like intellect and society. Salby explicitly mentions in his notes that he included "funny talking animals" as part of his ploy to appeal to children.



* MagicAIsMagicA: Chesscourt is relentlessly logical, and also a fantasy series, so together that creates this.

to:

* MachineWorship: The Lorrums are rabbit-like creatures described as having a "quasi-religious fetishism or idolatry for machines and technological progress," which Ombudsman suggests stands in for "the whole of human enterprise"; Jenny's interpretation in her fic is that it stems from a fear of "disharmony". It acts as a microcosm of the greater themes of Chesscourt -- a mechanical, black-and-white simplicity -- which ties back into the philosophy of Mundum.
* MagicAIsMagicA: Chesscourt is relentlessly logical, and also a fantasy series, so together that creates this.a world where magic always has a predictable result.



* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear.

to:

* {{Manchild}}: One reoccurring criticism of the books is that, while they get more complicated, they never ''conceptually mature''. Charles Adair's review says "its sensibility never progresses beyond that of a precocious adolescent." The podcasters call the series "psychologically very unambitious, even infantile." Chesscourt is ''complicated'', yes, but it's still a world where everything has predictable consequences and morality is clear-cut. Chesscourt lacks ambiguity. The podcasters characterize this as "a yearning for the clarity of pre-adolescent childhood." A big part of growing up is coming to terms with the fact that ''the world is messy''. Things don't always make sense; duty is not always clear. This is the crux of Salby's own philosophy of Murdur, the idea that things need to be objectively correct.



* [[invoked]]UncertainAudience: Chesscourt could be charitably framed as GrowingWithTheAudience, except it's done so weirdly that the latter books aren't well suited to ''any'' age range. It's too complicated for a child to be able to follow, yet not conceptually mature enough to appeal to most adults.

to:

* [[invoked]]UncertainAudience: [[invoked]]UncertainAudience:
**
Chesscourt could be charitably framed as GrowingWithTheAudience, except it's done so weirdly that the latter books aren't well suited to ''any'' age range. It's too complicated for a child to be able to follow, yet not conceptually mature enough to appeal to most adults.



* RougeAnglesOfSatin: As the manuscript progresses, typos and grammatical errors become increasingly common -- it's noted that at one point Tom's name is misspelled as Tomm for upwards of thirty pages, and even debated that "Tomm" may be a separate character altogether.



* AlienGeometries: Experiencing "the separation" causes you to perceive your normal surroundings as this.

to:

* AlienGeometries: Experiencing "the separation" causes you to perceive your normal surroundings as this.completely foreign -- a hyperawareness of the location of surrounding objects, an awareness of whether they are objectively correct or not, and an awareness of a higher plane of reality where things are always correct.



* AmbiguouslyGay: There is some implication that Leonard Salby and William Chen may have had a LoverAndBeloved thing going on. They lived together for a time. Ken says of their relationship, "Len… had a friend, later on. Or… whatever he was." Paul reports rumors that "Salby killed his lover in a fit of passion." On the flipside, Salby seemed to seen romance as antithetical to obeying Mundum, so maybe not.

to:

* AmbiguouslyGay: There is some implication that Leonard Salby and William Chen may have had a LoverAndBeloved thing going on. They lived together for a time. Ken says of their relationship, "Len… had a friend, later on. Or… whatever he was." Paul reports rumors that "Salby killed his lover in a fit of passion." On the flipside, Salby seemed to seen see romance as antithetical to obeying Mundum, so maybe not.



* ArcWords: "Don't go into the caves."
* BlueAndOrangeMorality: Its unclear why arranging things "correctly" in accordance with Mundum is "correct"; it just is.

to:

* ArcWords: "Don't go into the caves."
caves," a mantra used by the Cafe users meant to communicate the idea that it's a waste of time to try to decipher whatever ''The Northern Caves'' is supposed to be. It slowly becomes an ominous warning as the ethos behind ''The Northern Caves'' is made more apparent.
* BlueAndOrangeMorality: Its unclear why Mundum places a massive emphasis on performing actions and arranging things "correctly" in accordance with Mundum is "correct"; it the sky. It isn't clear what constitutes "correct" in the eyes of the sky; its followers just is."get it".



* {{Bookends}}: Both the first and last chapters feature an excerpt where an outsider disparages Chesscourt and its fans. They're also a DistantPrologue (an interview from 1988 + a book review from 1983) and DistantFinale (a podcast from 2015) in contrast with the main story set in 2003 and 2004.

to:

* {{Bookends}}: Both the first and last chapters feature an excerpt where an outsider disparages Chesscourt and its fans. They're also a DistantPrologue (an interview from 1988 + and a book review from 1983) and DistantFinale (a podcast from 2015) in contrast with the main story set in 2003 and 2004.



* BrokenPedestal: Learning that Leonard Salby [[spoiler:was credibly accused of murder]] is this for Aaron.

to:

* BrokenPedestal: Learning that Leonard Salby [[spoiler:was credibly accused of murder]] is this for Aaron.drives Aaron to the brink of despair.



* ChemicallyInducedInsanity: Paul starts experiencing the separation after taking two Adderalls, [[spoiler:and slips the other Spelunkers Adderall in the hopes that the same will happen to them.]]

to:

* ChemicallyInducedInsanity: Paul starts experiencing the separation "the separation" after taking two Adderalls, [[spoiler:and slips the other Spelunkers Adderall in the hopes that the same will happen to them.]]



* DeliberateValuesDissonance: [[spoiler:Aaron and Paul kissing]] is met with mild discomfort from everyone except Kelsey (a YaoiFangirl who has to explain what "yaoi" means), with Marsh eventually taking a "do what you want, but not in front of me" stance, reflecting a generally lower tolerance and understanding of gay relationships in the early 2000s.



* DumbassHasAPoint: Ombudsman is pretentious, tedious, and into PurpleProse. But…
** in chapter 19 he's very right to point out that Paul seems not-ok and that someone should do something about that.
** in chapter 26 he's right to point out that it's fucked up everyone's more focused on Paul than the people who died.

to:

* DumbassHasAPoint: Ombudsman is pretentious, tedious, and into PurpleProse. But…
**
But...
** ...
in chapter 19 19, he's very right to point out that Paul seems not-ok doesn't seem okay and that someone should do something about that.
** ** ...in chapter 26 26, he's right to point out that it's fucked up everyone's more focused on Paul than the people who died.



* FixFic: Not in the usual plot-based "fix the story" way, but in a more thematic sense. Paul describes Chesscourt fanfic as overwhelmingly -- even defiantly -- ''anti-Salbian'' in tone.

to:

* FixFic: Not In-universe, and not in the usual plot-based "fix the story" way, but in a more thematic sense. Paul describes Chesscourt fanfic as overwhelmingly -- even defiantly -- ''anti-Salbian'' in tone.



** Paul's forum signature mentions he's one of the only people whose favorite Chesscourt book is ''Sea of Glass'', a [[invoked]] {{later installment|Weirdness}} that took Salby's ComplexityAddiction so far he was forced to self-publish it. [[spoiler:Paul ends up being the only Spelunker to adopt Salby's philosophy of life.]]

to:

** Paul's forum signature mentions he's one of the only people whose favorite Chesscourt book is ''Sea of Glass'', a [[invoked]] {{later installment|Weirdness}} that took Salby's ComplexityAddiction so far he was forced to self-publish it. [[spoiler:Paul ends up being the only Spelunker to fully adopt Salby's philosophy of life.]]



* KissingCousins: Paul ships cousins Sally and Charles.

to:

* KissingCousins: In-universe, Paul ships cousins Sally and Charles.



* SesquipedalianLoquaciousness: Paul has a tendency to slip into this (along with PurpleProse) in his notes, usually when he's nervous or uncomfortable about what he's writing. He lampshades this tendency a few times.

to:

* SesquipedalianLoquaciousness: SesquipedalianLoquaciousness:
**
Paul has a tendency to slip into this (along with PurpleProse) in his notes, usually when he's nervous or uncomfortable about what he's writing. He lampshades this tendency a few times.times.
** Being affected by "the separation" also seems to alter one's vocabulary to the point of becoming nearly mechanical: Paul's forum post made under the influence has him explain very wordily why making the action of making the post is "correct".
-->''It is correct for me now to instruct you on certain points concerning the proper arrangement of material. It is correct for me to generate sentences which, as abstracta, are embodied in ASCII encoded in capacitor charges and then conveyed via electric current to other capacitor charges which encode the selfsame ASCII embodying the selfsame abstracta. It is permitted, if not necessarily correct, for me to sequentially arrange my musculature so as to produce depressions in an approximately flat plastic surface, and without arranging my musculature in this fashion it would not be feasible to set in place the required capacitances and currents, so it is thus correct that I perform this series of muscular arrangements.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that while the first book, ''A Thornbush Tale'', was a great children's book, the later series was no good. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.

to:

* [[invoked]]CultClassic: The Chesscourt fandom really cherishes the series, but the mainstream opinion seems to be that while the first book, ''A Thornbush Tale'', was a great children's book, the later series was no good. The most discussed aspect of Chesscourt is its complexity -- praised by fans, disparaged by critics. However, both groups basically seem to agree that the books have little to offer beyond that. Critics say there's a fundamental immaturity that pervades the series. Fans admit the characters and worldbuilding leave something to be desired. Fanfic overwhelmingly changes the tone, suggesting the original ponderously weighty tone isn't exactly loved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FirstInstallmentWins: While the latter Chesscourt series isn't regarded as good by anyone but the fandom, multiple critics seem to maintain that ''A Thornbush Tale'' was a great children's book.

to:

* FirstInstallmentWins: [[invoked]]FirstInstallmentWins: While the latter Chesscourt series isn't regarded as good by anyone but the fandom, multiple critics seem to maintain that ''A Thornbush Tale'' was a great children's book.book -- perhaps even a PhraseCatcher for the word "charming."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FirstInstallmentWins: While the latter Chesscourt series isn't regarded as good by anyone but the fandom, multiple critics seem to maintain that ''A Thornbush Tale'' was a great children's book.
-->'''1988 interviewer:''' …the sort of young readers who, every year, discover the charms of ''A Thornbush Tale''?
-->'''Podcaster:''' So this fantasy series started out with a book called A Thornbush Tale [=--=] which was a really very charming children's book, kind of a classic in its own right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EpilepticTrees: Aaron is known on the Cafe as a fan theorist.

to:

* EpilepticTrees: [[invoked]]EpilepticTrees: Aaron is known on the Cafe as a fan theorist.theorist. His signature contains links to 7 different theory threads.

Added: 461

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Charles Adair:''' Salby's plotting builds hierarchically, inexorably, unforgivingly. Every new development serves as scaffolding for the next, and any idea or event, however minor, however many pages or books ago it was introduced, can serve as fodder for new narrative contortions. The result is a reading experience that recreates with eerie accuracy the atmosphere of the schoolroom. Salby demands academic devotion; everything ''will'' be on the test.



* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on the books get longer and longer, in addition to getting weirder and more complex. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages.

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: As the Chesscourt series goes on on, in addition to LaterInstallmentWeirdness, the books also get longer and longer, in addition to getting weirder and more complex.longer. The nine books lengths are: 166 pages, 255 pages, 242 pages, 271 pages, 345 pages, 435 pages, 676 pages, 775 pages, 844 pages.



* EpilepticTrees: In-universe, Aaron is known for this on the Cafe.

to:

* EpilepticTrees: In-universe, Aaron is known for this on the Cafe.Cafe as a fan theorist.

Added: 85

Changed: 841

Removed: 382

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: The demographics who end up liking the books are[=:=]

to:

:: The This adult/kid thing resulted in two main demographics who end up liking the books are[=:=]books[=:=]



** Fans like Paul who came to like the books in adulthood, seemingly because they're already a little like Salby themselves.
** The podcasters mention that in their experience, Chesscourt is mostly read as MiddleGradeLiterature by nerdy middle-schoolers.
:: Salby actually ''did'' have a TargetAudience[=:=] people who shared -- or were at least amenable to -- the philosophy of Mundum. He wrote the books with that audience in mind, intentionally trying to drive away anyone else. However, that demographic is ''unimaginably'' minuscule -- perhaps just William Chen and no one else -- so the books were inevitably mostly read by others.

to:

** Fans like Paul who came to like the books in adulthood, seemingly because they're already a little like Salby themselves.
** The podcasters mention that in their experience, Chesscourt is mostly read as MiddleGradeLiterature by nerdy middle-schoolers.
middle-schoolers. It seems like most of these fans lost interest as they got older, and only a small number went on to be the Cafe sort.
:: Salby actually ''did'' have a TargetAudience[=:=] people who shared -- or were at least amenable to -- the philosophy of Mundum. He The mild version of this would be fans like Paul who came to like the books in adulthood liked them seemingly because they were already a little like Salby. The extreme version would be Willam Chan. Salby wrote the books with that this audience in mind, intentionally trying to drive away anyone else. However, that demographic is ''unimaginably'' minuscule -- perhaps just William Chen and no one else -- so the books were inevitably mostly read by others.else.


Added DiffLines:

* PosthumousCharacter: Salby died in 1995, and the story takes place in 2003 to 2004.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WordSaladHorror: The excerpts from ''Northern Caves'' dip into barely comprehensible sentences where the exact meaning is left up to the reader to decipher; the forum posts note that they can't really decipher if it's sexual or violent because it's difficult to parse at all.

to:

* WordSaladHorror: The excerpts from ''Northern Caves'' dip into barely comprehensible sentences where the exact meaning is left up to the reader to decipher; the forum posts note that they can't really decipher decide if it's sexual or violent because it's difficult to parse at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->Councillor 14 "LOCAL CHIASTS ADVISE UNRAVEL AND REBRAID W TO PRIMAL STATE"\\
W "i will be remade before the birth of my angel"\\
Councillor 2 "REBRAID W PRECEDE ANGEL"

to:

-->Councillor -->''Councillor 14 "LOCAL CHIASTS ADVISE UNRAVEL AND REBRAID W TO PRIMAL STATE"\\
W
STATE"''\\
''W
"i will be remade before the birth of my angel"\\
Councillor
angel"''\\
''Councillor
2 "REBRAID W PRECEDE ANGEL"ANGEL"''

Added: 445

Changed: 41

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WordSaladHorror: The excerpts from ''Northern Caves'' dip into barely comprehensible sentences where the exact meaning is left up to the reader to decipher; the forum posts note that they can't really decipher if it's sexual or violent because it's difficult to parse at all.
-->Councillor 14 "LOCAL CHIASTS ADVISE UNRAVEL AND REBRAID W TO PRIMAL STATE"\\
W "i will be remade before the birth of my angel"\\
Councillor 2 "REBRAID W PRECEDE ANGEL"



** The Cafe admin torgo shares a name with a character from ''Film/ManosTheHandsOfFate''. His forum signature is a quote from the [[Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000 MST3K]] of the movie:

to:

** The Cafe admin torgo shares a name with a character from ''Film/ManosTheHandsOfFate''. His location is "Satellite of Love", and his forum signature is a quote from the [[Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000 MST3K]] of the movie:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->[[spoiler:'''Errant KnightsMove:''' I feel no compulsion to join him in his "Salbian" endeavors, and given what I appear to be capable of, I think I should dissociate myself from him entirely for the near future.]]

to:

-->[[spoiler:'''Errant KnightsMove:''' -->[[spoiler:'''[=Errant KnightsMove=]:''' I feel no compulsion to join him in his "Salbian" endeavors, and given what I appear to be capable of, I think I should dissociate myself from him entirely for the near future.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DidNotGetTheGirl: [[spoiler:Aaron and Paul kiss at Spelunk 04!]] but the last word on their relationship is from the story's final forum post is:
-->[[spoiler:'''Errant KnightsMove:''' I feel no compulsion to join him in his "Salbian" endeavors, and given what I appear to be capable of, I think I should dissociate myself from him entirely for the near future.]]

Top